Worse, I fear the British style for this law. Like with their communications act.
Get a law on the books but don't enforce it for years, just allow it to remain until you can use the fact it hasn't been challenged for years (because it wasn't enforced from the get go) as grounds to why it has standing to be used in massive crackdowns later.
Worse, I fear the British style for this law. Like with their communications act.
Get a law on the books but don't enforce it for years, just allow it to remain until you can use the fact it hasn't been challenged for years (because it wasn't enforced from the get go) as grounds to why it has standing to be used in massive crackdowns later.
Meanwhile the migrants raping their women and children won't be punished
It's part of their Culture!
Well that's also retarded. Precedent and standing should only apply when a law has been used.
"Well it's been sitting here for 10 years even though its never been used so it has standing" is the exact opposite of logical.