For surrogates it's about $100k per. I know because one of my work buddy's sisters tried making a career out of it, and failed miserably when she got an STD midway through having the first kid.
Damn only delayed it, though I hope the mother that ran was in a religious community not a deeply self absorbed mother.
The reason I'm more suspicious of this than adoption is with adoption you're raising a kid from a broken home usually and so they already have preset notions installed. This, it feels like they want to groom them from birth to accept 'their culture' and being honest, if you're gay or trans you've effectively taken yourself out the gene pool, live with it or become bi and settle for being pegged /s
Rule of law is a made up concept we simply enforce for the greater good. Fact of the matter is when you remove that, it doesn't change the fact it is a child birthed from her. Therefore.... It's her child too.
One is a concept derived from a pact made from words, the other blood. The latter is more tangible. Not saying it is right or wrong, it is simply the matter of fact and how she could rationalize her actions. You need to play devil's advocate from time to time if you want to get inside the head of someone that isn't just your own.
Right. Because children raised by single mothers have a 0% rate of being molested. Because women are such angels that as long this child is kept away from one perverted man, the child is guaranteed to be safe.
Anyway, since you apparently know nothing about the abysmal statistics associated with children of single mothers, here's a random link to inform you: https://www.fixfamilycourts.com/single-mother-home-statistics/. Plenty of others out there if you want educate yourself.
Its funny because people are acting like this isn't the same type of womanly behavior that has women run off with actual father's children for deeply selfish reasons.
Enabling women's bad behavior as long as its against bad targets only makes more suffering.
My sister was in a lesbian relationship for the past few years. She "surrogated" for her own daughter. Now that she's left the relationship and come back to our neck of the woods due to her partner being controlling and manipulative dies from lack of surprise there's an understanding that the other woman still has a connection with my niece that's not so easily severed. It's all a mess and I hate everything about it. Especially since nobody can tell her "I told you so" without getting snapped at.
Because when women need a flood of hormones to even feel the slightest hint of motherly love and protection for their children they always keep that feeling once the hormones stop coming about.
Still a sad end to the story though.
Meh, the guy paid $200k for something most people can get for free.
Yeah, I got my kid for free f̶͕̍r̶͎̓o̵̪͠ḿ̴̟ ̴͓͝a̴̰͠ ̸̘̈́p̶̯̎â̷͇r̸̝͘k̵̬̊ǐ̷̩n̶̘͘g̵̰̏ ̶͈̈́l̶͍̋ó̶̙ţ̴͘
I don't know what the going price is for white children.
For surrogates it's about $100k per. I know because one of my work buddy's sisters tried making a career out of it, and failed miserably when she got an STD midway through having the first kid.
Damn only delayed it, though I hope the mother that ran was in a religious community not a deeply self absorbed mother.
The reason I'm more suspicious of this than adoption is with adoption you're raising a kid from a broken home usually and so they already have preset notions installed. This, it feels like they want to groom them from birth to accept 'their culture' and being honest, if you're gay or trans you've effectively taken yourself out the gene pool, live with it or become bi and settle for being pegged /s
A woman in a 'religious community' would never have been a surrogate.
how far would people go to spin a narrative of muh based trad person? far enough to celebrate this surrogate mother who is also a thief, apparently.
Name one religious community that thinks stealing children is moral besides Islam (who will then rape the children anyway).
Mothers who steal other people's children are always self-absorbed.
Biologically speaking, it's her child too.
Not when she explicitly acknowledges to abandon her parental rights.
She shouldn't be able to abort the child without the consent of the father, and she shouldn't be able to steal the child either.
Which is why I specified "biologically."
Rule of law is a made up concept we simply enforce for the greater good. Fact of the matter is when you remove that, it doesn't change the fact it is a child birthed from her. Therefore.... It's her child too.
One is a concept derived from a pact made from words, the other blood. The latter is more tangible. Not saying it is right or wrong, it is simply the matter of fact and how she could rationalize her actions. You need to play devil's advocate from time to time if you want to get inside the head of someone that isn't just your own.
Lol no surrogacy laws and relying on a woman's word, especially when there's children involved?
They're faggots, probably with std rotted brains
Right. Because children raised by single mothers have a 0% rate of being molested. Because women are such angels that as long this child is kept away from one perverted man, the child is guaranteed to be safe.
What ridiculous pro-feminist propaganda.
Single mothers don't molest their kids. They murder them and get away with it because society has bought into the ridiculous lie that is SIDS.
Great comeback! 10/10!
Anyway, since you apparently know nothing about the abysmal statistics associated with children of single mothers, here's a random link to inform you: https://www.fixfamilycourts.com/single-mother-home-statistics/. Plenty of others out there if you want educate yourself.
Its funny because people are acting like this isn't the same type of womanly behavior that has women run off with actual father's children for deeply selfish reasons.
Enabling women's bad behavior as long as its against bad targets only makes more suffering.
The more arguments I hear around surrogacy and the more I think about it the more I don't like it.
You are buying a Human for your own needs. It's morally questionable.
>women (who scam people out of money) would never molest young men
ISHYGDDT
I'll never stop hating "people" who do shit like this.
modern slavery
these fuckers deserve a painful death
I mean, yes. That's what should happen to women who steal children, I agree.
Absolutely disgusting. Even more disgusting is how quickly all of this has been normalized.
My sister was in a lesbian relationship for the past few years. She "surrogated" for her own daughter. Now that she's left the relationship and come back to our neck of the woods due to her partner being controlling and manipulative dies from lack of surprise there's an understanding that the other woman still has a connection with my niece that's not so easily severed. It's all a mess and I hate everything about it. Especially since nobody can tell her "I told you so" without getting snapped at.
Idiot OP thinks that female felons who abuse children by abducting them won't hurt children.
Good job idiot.
When some of us have hated women for longer than most of you have been alive and that their bullshit is why fags have any power to begin with.
Says the genius who thinks a woman who let herself get inseminated by a faggot for money is 'based'.
This isn't based at all. This just a retarded whore of a women being overcome by her own natural instincts to care for her child.
How terrible?
Because when women need a flood of hormones to even feel the slightest hint of motherly love and protection for their children they always keep that feeling once the hormones stop coming about.
Pray it isn't a fleeting sentiment