Damn only delayed it, though I hope the mother that ran was in a religious community not a deeply self absorbed mother.
The reason I'm more suspicious of this than adoption is with adoption you're raising a kid from a broken home usually and so they already have preset notions installed. This, it feels like they want to groom them from birth to accept 'their culture' and being honest, if you're gay or trans you've effectively taken yourself out the gene pool, live with it or become bi and settle for being pegged /s
Rule of law is a made up concept we simply enforce for the greater good. Fact of the matter is when you remove that, it doesn't change the fact it is a child birthed from her. Therefore.... It's her child too.
One is a concept derived from a pact made from words, the other blood. The latter is more tangible. Not saying it is right or wrong, it is simply the matter of fact and how she could rationalize her actions. You need to play devil's advocate from time to time if you want to get inside the head of someone that isn't just your own.
Damn only delayed it, though I hope the mother that ran was in a religious community not a deeply self absorbed mother.
The reason I'm more suspicious of this than adoption is with adoption you're raising a kid from a broken home usually and so they already have preset notions installed. This, it feels like they want to groom them from birth to accept 'their culture' and being honest, if you're gay or trans you've effectively taken yourself out the gene pool, live with it or become bi and settle for being pegged /s
A woman in a 'religious community' would never have been a surrogate.
how far would people go to spin a narrative of muh based trad person? far enough to celebrate this surrogate mother who is also a thief, apparently.
Name one religious community that thinks stealing children is moral besides Islam (who will then rape the children anyway).
Mothers who steal other people's children are always self-absorbed.
Biologically speaking, it's her child too.
Not when she explicitly acknowledges to abandon her parental rights.
She shouldn't be able to abort the child without the consent of the father, and she shouldn't be able to steal the child either.
Which is why I specified "biologically."
Rule of law is a made up concept we simply enforce for the greater good. Fact of the matter is when you remove that, it doesn't change the fact it is a child birthed from her. Therefore.... It's her child too.
One is a concept derived from a pact made from words, the other blood. The latter is more tangible. Not saying it is right or wrong, it is simply the matter of fact and how she could rationalize her actions. You need to play devil's advocate from time to time if you want to get inside the head of someone that isn't just your own.