I used to say all the time to my old gf how ridiculous it is to list objective, possessive and subjective pronouns. Putting aside the normal transgender/genderfluid bs, the implication of listing all 3 is that someone would go by one gender when they are doing something, another when they own something, and a third if something happens to them. Is there really a case where that's not completely sexist or otherwise ridiculous?

I can't think of a more hilarious stereotype of a Jewish person than paying someone at least $200 dollars to complain about them making a single joke made an irrelevantly long time ago.

Lol she's wearing peace sign earrings while LITERALLY victim blaming a rape victim.

"No, Boss, you don't understand, I'm based" - someone about to get fired.

You can taste the projection. They dumb down our language to just buzzwords but most of it is because they’re leftist buzzwords that right wingers recognize as meaningless or poor values.

Fucking idiot. They just described hyperinflation like it’s a good thing. What we need is either a normal inflation cycle OR to print money at the same rate it’s destroyed so that no one loses value over time just for having money.

So it's spyware. Destroy this app.

I like that in the abstract it implies both that one of the most racially integrated nations on earth insulates race separatism while also implying that making people experience more social stress is a logical solution

Remember that this used to be so easy. We defined womanhood around a defined biological structure that included the cervix, and now they had to steamroll that so that people who want to act feminine (usually in a way that is offensive to what a woman is or should be) can do so without the constant realization of how ridiculous they look.

They like factoids so they can feel smart with having to actually think about it. The knowledge they gain from constantly chipping away at a problem until inspiration fuels the solution is often lost to them.

The problem isn’t about kowtowing to others about your political beliefs, but the fact that it shouldn’t be the first thing people know about each other from a distance (because it just leads to only bad-faith conversations) and they’re so generic that people will not argue with your ideology but the vague idea they think your ideology is. For example, I see someone with a Bernie sticker. Are they socialist? A Marxist? Maybe just a liberal? Maybe not even a liberal, just someone who likes outsider politicians? If the point is self-expression, then it tells me Jack-all except that you think your political expression is important enough to advertise, but not enough to give it the due diligence of expressing it in a way so that others have an actually good grasp of what it is.

I don’t disagree that this kid has a right to advertise his ideals and that he shouldn’t get shit from it, but honestly it’s such a bad idea. 90% of the interactions you will get because of it will be negative because people react more often and more aggressively towards stances they don’t align with. It’s like wearing a novelty t shirt about a niche hobby you have. It’ll attract negative attention and let others know exactly how to pester you.

Appeal to authority is usually pretty weak, more so if the authority in question is completely fictional.

I find the idea of political computer stickers to be ridiculous, you’re just asking for trouble, regardless of how popular or milquetoast the stance is.

They don’t make songs and movies about the protagonist who rolls over and lets the enemies win uncontestedly.

It’s funny because idle cars release a TON of greenhouse gases.

It’s not necessarily a myth that those living sinful lives will suddenly regret it when on their deathbed, it’s just not as universal and one would hope.

Why does this game sound fake? It’s like when you see someone play a CoD knockoff in a TV show and it’s called something like “Gut Explosion 4”, but with leftist buzzwords slapped on it.

I’ve never heard the phrase “cringe-superspreader” but that phrase is one.

Without a single study published Ivermectin went from well-known clinically safe drug to an animal-only medication to unsafe for commercial ownership. On an unrelated note, gun ownership and racism are epidemics and if you disagree you’re a baby killer (and not the good kind).

Only if he keeps weapons after Uncle Sam says no. Otherwise he’ll die in an attempted home invasion by either someone they never find or a career criminal with a very generous plea deal.

The military retreated from the enemy but damn did they do a good job of running with their tail between their legs!

Get a PCR test, then change positive to negative if necessary.

They say more lethal, but not to whom. Given the influx of tranny/women soldiers I wouldn’t be surprised if it was our own/civilians.

It went from “If you have a skewed mental view, change it to fit the rest” to “if you have a skewed mental viewpoint, accept it as who you are and don’t question it” to “if you have a skewed mental viewpoint, change reality and police everyone around you to make yourself think you’re right”.