New mayor of NYC as of New Year's Day... I see he's gonna be just as retarded as the last one
(media.communities.win)
Comments (42)
sorted by:
Can someone name just one Dem politician who doesn't push LGBT propaganda, COVID hysteria+authoritarian mandates and critical race theory?
You cannot find one.
JFK?
Yeah, and they offed him for not falling in line.
Manchin supports vaccine mandates for healthcare workers and the military. He is against the OSHA mandate.
Manchin is easily the best Dem though.
Best dem only because he's from West Virginia, which is one of the reddest states in the country.
He's only a Dem because he's so old he comes from a different Democratic party. Working white (and black) middle class people used to be the Democrat base, as hard as that is to imagine. Now, I would argue the elites always held them in contempt, but they at least sought their votes.
Elites generally hold everyone in contempt that don't share their worldview and/or have an equal or larger sized portfolio.
Well, tolerable.
No he supports woke, and votes for 97% of bidens far left wishlist. Plus he did the shampeachment against trump. Fuck manchin, wv needs to replace his commie ass with a republican
they need to replace him with an america first patriot
I want to say houston's mayor but i just ignore that weaselly little shit and he's a corrupt dirt ball anyways. At least he's leaving this year.
Teddy Roosevelt, Andrew Jackson, Martin Van Buren? I'm out of names. Anyone before 1900 is likely.
I used to say all the time to my old gf how ridiculous it is to list objective, possessive and subjective pronouns. Putting aside the normal transgender/genderfluid bs, the implication of listing all 3 is that someone would go by one gender when they are doing something, another when they own something, and a third if something happens to them. Is there really a case where that's not completely sexist or otherwise ridiculous?
Progressive pronouns have nothing to do with grammar. It is purely an ideological flex. They are forcing you to accept their irrational ideas as a humiliation/demoralization ritual. Their goal is to break you in order to facilitate total adoption of the leftist worldview.
The best thing you can do is abandon pronouns altogether. Refer to such people only by their proper names, in every context. This will produce awkward sentences, but they will be grammatically correct - and you won't be kneeling at the altar of radical gender ideologues.
The best thing you can do is use the correct pronouns. If someone tries to score points by "correcting" you on the internet then you ignore him. If someone does it in real life then you respond with an appropriate level of hostility and contempt as the situation allows.
I seem to recall a professor who tried that got in trouble.
I forget what the term is for this code talk. I say "shibboleth" a lot, but a shibboleth is one word, or, metaphorically one thing. Leftism has a whole vocabulary that enables them to identify each other. It has to change constantly because conservatives adopt their language slowly.
Right, it's stupid. But how would you simplify it? By just saying "Gender: male", right? Or "Male pronouns"? But that's exactly what they're trying to avoid. To them, saying "Male" doesn't actually answer the question because they think it's sexist to say that men are referred to with male pronouns, so they're left without a way to do it concisely, because the English language simply wasn't designed to handle how stupid that is. So as soon as they'd try to make up a new word to describe people who use "he/his/him", some tranny somewhere would say they identify as that but use different pronouns, and they'd be back to where they started, because being a liberal means you must never, ever, ever say a tranny is wrong. It's preferable to deny observable reality than risk making a tranny somewhere uncomfortable.
It stems from an old attempt to replace the pronouns altogether with completely new ones. At least it didn't go that far, but the convention of writing out all three forms has been kept.
The obvious troll would be to just go "he/her". After all, when I act, I feel powerful and masculine, but when I am acted upon, I feel vulnerable and feminine. Checkmate, atheists.
It sounds ridiculous but a lot of them go by the she/them because you also have to know how they feel on the enby scale at any moment before addressing them.
He's black, so, they got Black DiBlasio.
Y'all voted a stank skin idiot into office. New Yorkers are some dumb motherfuckers. Never again will I let a fucking Yankee try to tell me they know something. Especially when it is evident they are stupid as fuck.
Ugh. I actually had hope since he was a former cop and spoke against blm.
He said he would expand the "no jab no life or food" policy
Oh. Well I guess he looked good compared to Deblasio but who doesn’t. I guess I should’ve figured he was a nut
I have to agree, anything looks better in comparison to de Blasio.
He confirmed before this, he's not changing course
He's a fucking nigger so what do you expect. 99% of them are the same.
He/him? I don't know, it looks like a bitch to me.
People get sick of and move out of NYC constantly. For every one there's someone that think "ooh 'culture'" and moves in.
I saw the photo and thought Low IQ. Then Read the bio and was not disappointed.
Did anyone really expect anything less from NYC? It's the San Fran of the east coast now.
Pandering to the loudmouth micrority on twitter.
Capitalizing pronouns eh? That’s double gay