"If you call a man a cuck or a coward and he get's angry, that's his fragility speaking. The true measure of strength is to be a cowardly cuck." - The complete idiots guide to Soyfaggotry, Chapter 2.
I think the first one of this kind in American contexts was The People's History of the United States. Meanwhile there was also the 1609 Project attempt but it kinda failed.
In Australia (in addition to the above, of course) it's a remarkably similar book called "Dark Emu", which purports that Aboriginals had a well-developed, "highly evolved" civ, prior to white settlement, and... Turned out to be a complete lie. Made up. With no legitimate sources.
But by the time that became publicly known, it was already a "key text" of all these dumbshit institutions, and of "the learned classes", so of course they doubled down... snort
Lots of money to be had with this books. Companies spend a ridiculous amount of money to train their employees in white fragility. And you can bet your arse that someone is getting payed off in the process.
At some point I want to read that White Fragility book. Just to see how incredibly stupid the contents must be. I refuse to pay for it and won't even check it out from a library that might keep statistics about someone being interested in it. Will have to look up pirated books sometime.
Chapter 11 White Women's Tears is fun. It uses a lot of words to say that showing empathy for the coloreds is recentering whiteness, so good anti-racist praxis is for white people to show no emotion while stepping on minorities.
Here is the original paper. The book is just padding to make the grift less obvious.
I like that in the abstract it implies both that one of the most racially integrated nations on earth insulates race separatism while also implying that making people experience more social stress is a logical solution
James Lindsey of The New Discourse already does videos/podcasts that break that shit down.
Poor guy has to read through hundreds of thousands of pages of Marxists, Critical Theorists, etc. and to describe how FUCKED their thinking is.
But yeah, an actual academic that heavily criticizes this shit. Originally part of the "New Athiest" (not Atheism+) crowd, but fell out of favor with them when he pointed out atheism was starting to adapt the religious-like cult of socjus.
“white fragility” is such an idiotic term
Didn't it began as "male fragility" first? Something like "fragile male ego"?
Oh yea! That’s right.
"If you call a man a cuck or a coward and he get's angry, that's his fragility speaking. The true measure of strength is to be a cowardly cuck." - The complete idiots guide to Soyfaggotry, Chapter 2.
You'll have to decolonize the federal banking system of der Juden if you want to actually do anything about this.
But the Germans colonized the atmosphere with them and look where we are.
Well see, look what happens when you start a job but don't finish!
These 2 books are the new Bibles.
I think the first one of this kind in American contexts was The People's History of the United States. Meanwhile there was also the 1609 Project attempt but it kinda failed.
These people have degrees in "other people's opinions". None of their knowledge is falsifiable or valid.
These people think Wakanda exists. They're old pros at assuming blatant fiction is reality.
In Australia (in addition to the above, of course) it's a remarkably similar book called "Dark Emu", which purports that Aboriginals had a well-developed, "highly evolved" civ, prior to white settlement, and... Turned out to be a complete lie. Made up. With no legitimate sources.
But by the time that became publicly known, it was already a "key text" of all these dumbshit institutions, and of "the learned classes", so of course they doubled down... snort
Lots of money to be had with this books. Companies spend a ridiculous amount of money to train their employees in white fragility. And you can bet your arse that someone is getting payed off in the process.
AUDIT
THE
FED
THEN END THE FED
At some point I want to read that White Fragility book. Just to see how incredibly stupid the contents must be. I refuse to pay for it and won't even check it out from a library that might keep statistics about someone being interested in it. Will have to look up pirated books sometime.
Chapter 11 White Women's Tears is fun. It uses a lot of words to say that showing empathy for the coloreds is recentering whiteness, so good anti-racist praxis is for white people to show no emotion while stepping on minorities.
Here is the original paper. The book is just padding to make the grift less obvious.
I like that in the abstract it implies both that one of the most racially integrated nations on earth insulates race separatism while also implying that making people experience more social stress is a logical solution
James Lindsey of The New Discourse already does videos/podcasts that break that shit down.
Poor guy has to read through hundreds of thousands of pages of Marxists, Critical Theorists, etc. and to describe how FUCKED their thinking is.
But yeah, an actual academic that heavily criticizes this shit. Originally part of the "New Athiest" (not Atheism+) crowd, but fell out of favor with them when he pointed out atheism was starting to adapt the religious-like cult of socjus.
https://twitter.com/realchrisrufo/status/1443271787949670401
Being charitable, here, but in context I assume that meant, "decolonize the atmosphere of the room/the working environment"...
As in, the "atmosphere" that we are working in. The "vibe", if you will.
Which is still complete horseshit, but... Let's not be facetious, here. It's not that hard to work out.
No, it's about "climate justice" with more randomly constructed buzzwords.