It - Ah - I - look - I, uh, ah, uh ah is it, isit - bwuh - hwh -
That's the sound your brain makes when you know the answer is 'no' but your incoherent braindead ideology of the fucking mass-delusion cult you've become swept up in is short-circuiting your rational mind.
Jesus christ, this bumbling, fumbling, blithering idiot is #2 in the labour party. Theoretically she is a potential future Prime Minister!
I don't even know how to start answering these questions
why are we having to discuss parts of women's anatomy?
You're one of the highest politicians in the land and we have people being harassed by police and winding up on a background check list of 'non-crime hate incidents' for questioning this stuff that you 'don't know how to answer'! People have been arrested and taken to court over this crap that your party leader espouses, but you 'don't know how to answer'.
How is this acceptable to anyone!?
Holy fucking shit, the host should have fucking REAMED her for this.
Dear god, if there was any sense left in the leaders of this country, this conversation right here should be enough to fucking nuke the nonsense trans-rights bullshit back to where it was in the fucking 90's: You are allowed to be a tranny, and everyone else is allowed to laugh at you for it, and if they go further than laughing, the regular laws of criminal conduct apply.
I disagree. It is transphobic, and transphobia is a good thing. It's perfectly normal. We all have instincts that have been developed over hundreds of thousands of years, and this is one of them - we all instinctively know to avoid diseased people, including those with mental diseases, because they're dangerous. It's a good thing to do and there's no shame in it. The people who would see civilization burned to the ground are trying to weaponize our instincts against us, they call them "bigotry" and they pretend it's the worst thing ever, but we don't have to play by their rules.
I disagree. It is transphobic, and transphobia is a good thing.
An accurate percetion of reality should not be described wih the suffix '-phobic'
There is zero irrationality in the statement 'women have cervixes, men do not'. Thus, desdecribing it as 'phobic', even if you're doing so because you want to be the Chad "Yes" meme, is shortsighted.
Do not concede the point that you are 'phobic'. Reject their terminology entirely, for the language they use is toolset deliberately engineered to make it harder for you to argue against them.
Reject, rebuke, disregard and destroy all their ideologic theory at its foundational base: In language.
I see where you're coming from but I don't agree. "Muh -phobia" is a thought-terminating cliche, when someone accuses you of being a -phobe, it puts you on the defensive - except when you embrace it. People make fun of "I'm not racist because I have a black friend"; I'm more racist than your average /pol/tard and I have several black friends and they know.
I disagree. It is transphobic, and transphobia is a good thing
It is not a thing. Ergo, it cannot be either 'good' or 'bad'. No one is 'transgender', as raving about how you are a woman does not change your objective status, and so it follows that no one is 'transphobic'.
There is, however, natural revulsion towards hairy men who cut off their balls and then dress like a 9-year-old girl.
What's a person supposed to do, when they are confronted with a person, roleplaying as the opposite sex, living in the uncanny valley, such that everyone that sees them has the same reaction - That chick's a dude! The visceral reaction that a person has upon seeing that is not hateful discrimination, it's the same as seeing a leper - "oh, that's a weird look, keep your distance."
It can't be hate if it's a biological reflex.
I love the fake outrage and the complete non-answer because she knows that it truly is a kafka trap that can be used against them of their own creating.
Guess they should have thought of this shit before they went and began using communist subversion tactics for power, huh?
Here, allow me help this gasping retard woman: "No. It is not transphobic to recognize that women exist, just as they always have. If this upsets trannies, well too damn bad. Just because you toss on a shit ton of makeup and a dress doesn't mean you're an actual woman. It just means you're a mentally ill brainwashed man practicing an extreme form of cosplay. Transphobia isn't a thing because no one is actually afraid of trans people — they simply don't like them due to their behavior, which is a tumor on society as a whole. The proper term that dumb retard dipshits are looking for would not be "transphobic," but rather, "transmisic." I hope this helps clear up confusion."
More specifically, it's a sociopath behavior. They're not projecting on purpose. They're doing it because they legitimately lack theory of mind. They actually believe everyone feels the same way they do because they can't comprehend otherwise, like a dog who's very sure you want to take their disgusting, dirty bone away from them. They want it, therefore everyone must want it.
Women are often erroneously considered the more empathetic sex, but they're far more likely to have an almost complete lack of empathy, at least initially. That has a tendency to change once they have children. That's why people who write this kind of thing are almost always cool wine aunts. They never had kids and never fell in love, and as such they never developed empathy.
I remember Reeves from when I was in Labour Students at University. I knew her sister, Ellie too.
I do not have a high opinion of them. I wrote an article about Ellie, entitled, "Ellie Reeves MP and the Corpses of Children" a few years back. It made some quite serious allegations and she tried to get me a police warning to suppress it. She failed. She is a lawyer, and she chose not to try to sue over it. She allowed the limitation period for defamation to lapse.
Having been in both parties, the Conservatives are way better.
Except for silent members who just pay and donate and do not attend meetings, being in Labour is basically wasting your life in a bitter war between two or three large mobs of emotionally driven individuals whipped up by grifters. At a lower level, that breaks down into smaller factions viciously feuding over trivia or pure spite. It is literally structured like an MMO, with vast numbers of inconsequential but important sounding positions for activists to fight over. Kind of like PvP. Grinding (leafleting, for example) enhances your ability to obtain bling.
It's like radical leftists don't think - they just follow a deterministic NPC programming language of rhetoric that can be short-circuited by using the right words like Captain Kirk using simple logic bombs against M-5.
Human: "Hey <microaggression>, do you <trigger phrase> this <made up word> to <statement of truth>?"
Remember that this used to be so easy. We defined womanhood around a defined biological structure that included the cervix, and now they had to steamroll that so that people who want to act feminine (usually in a way that is offensive to what a woman is or should be) can do so without the constant realization of how ridiculous they look.
so that people who want to act feminine (usually in a way that is offensive to what a woman is or should be) can do so without the constant realization of how ridiculous they look
So men can dress in womanface without getting shamed for it. We've come so far.
That's the sound your brain makes when you know the answer is 'no' but your incoherent braindead ideology of the fucking mass-delusion cult you've become swept up in is short-circuiting your rational mind.
Jesus christ, this bumbling, fumbling, blithering idiot is #2 in the labour party. Theoretically she is a potential future Prime Minister!
You're one of the highest politicians in the land and we have people being harassed by police and winding up on a background check list of 'non-crime hate incidents' for questioning this stuff that you 'don't know how to answer'! People have been arrested and taken to court over this crap that your party leader espouses, but you 'don't know how to answer'.
How is this acceptable to anyone!?
Holy fucking shit, the host should have fucking REAMED her for this.
Dear god, if there was any sense left in the leaders of this country, this conversation right here should be enough to fucking nuke the nonsense trans-rights bullshit back to where it was in the fucking 90's: You are allowed to be a tranny, and everyone else is allowed to laugh at you for it, and if they go further than laughing, the regular laws of criminal conduct apply.
I disagree. It is transphobic, and transphobia is a good thing. It's perfectly normal. We all have instincts that have been developed over hundreds of thousands of years, and this is one of them - we all instinctively know to avoid diseased people, including those with mental diseases, because they're dangerous. It's a good thing to do and there's no shame in it. The people who would see civilization burned to the ground are trying to weaponize our instincts against us, they call them "bigotry" and they pretend it's the worst thing ever, but we don't have to play by their rules.
An accurate percetion of reality should not be described wih the suffix '-phobic'
There is zero irrationality in the statement 'women have cervixes, men do not'. Thus, desdecribing it as 'phobic', even if you're doing so because you want to be the Chad "Yes" meme, is shortsighted.
Do not concede the point that you are 'phobic'. Reject their terminology entirely, for the language they use is toolset deliberately engineered to make it harder for you to argue against them.
Reject, rebuke, disregard and destroy all their ideologic theory at its foundational base: In language.
I see where you're coming from but I don't agree. "Muh -phobia" is a thought-terminating cliche, when someone accuses you of being a -phobe, it puts you on the defensive - except when you embrace it. People make fun of "I'm not racist because I have a black friend"; I'm more racist than your average /pol/tard and I have several black friends and they know.
Go “play” legolas in your backyard some more. Fucking goober.
Niggers tongue my anus
Does another suffix exist that describes hatred of something but replaces "irrational fear" with "understandable and precise"?
It is not a thing. Ergo, it cannot be either 'good' or 'bad'. No one is 'transgender', as raving about how you are a woman does not change your objective status, and so it follows that no one is 'transphobic'.
There is, however, natural revulsion towards hairy men who cut off their balls and then dress like a 9-year-old girl.
What's a person supposed to do, when they are confronted with a person, roleplaying as the opposite sex, living in the uncanny valley, such that everyone that sees them has the same reaction - That chick's a dude! The visceral reaction that a person has upon seeing that is not hateful discrimination, it's the same as seeing a leper - "oh, that's a weird look, keep your distance."
It can't be hate if it's a biological reflex.
Seeing as how the #1 isn't even likely to be PM at this point his deputies are of even less concern :p
I italicized 'theoretically' for a reason!
I love the fake outrage and the complete non-answer because she knows that it truly is a kafka trap that can be used against them of their own creating.
Guess they should have thought of this shit before they went and began using communist subversion tactics for power, huh?
Here, allow me help this gasping retard woman: "No. It is not transphobic to recognize that women exist, just as they always have. If this upsets trannies, well too damn bad. Just because you toss on a shit ton of makeup and a dress doesn't mean you're an actual woman. It just means you're a mentally ill brainwashed man practicing an extreme form of cosplay. Transphobia isn't a thing because no one is actually afraid of trans people — they simply don't like them due to their behavior, which is a tumor on society as a whole. The proper term that dumb retard dipshits are looking for would not be "transphobic," but rather, "transmisic." I hope this helps clear up confusion."
This comment is extremely funny to me:
Martha:
Pale Female:
So is Trans women>Black>other POC>women>trans male in the victimhood hierarchy?
Men: Hey, look what I figured out!
Women: But what about Me!
More specifically, it's a sociopath behavior. They're not projecting on purpose. They're doing it because they legitimately lack theory of mind. They actually believe everyone feels the same way they do because they can't comprehend otherwise, like a dog who's very sure you want to take their disgusting, dirty bone away from them. They want it, therefore everyone must want it.
Women are often erroneously considered the more empathetic sex, but they're far more likely to have an almost complete lack of empathy, at least initially. That has a tendency to change once they have children. That's why people who write this kind of thing are almost always cool wine aunts. They never had kids and never fell in love, and as such they never developed empathy.
What a pathetic display. The west is in serious trouble.
Gee, I wonder who started promoting this nonsense.
I remember Reeves from when I was in Labour Students at University. I knew her sister, Ellie too.
I do not have a high opinion of them. I wrote an article about Ellie, entitled, "Ellie Reeves MP and the Corpses of Children" a few years back. It made some quite serious allegations and she tried to get me a police warning to suppress it. She failed. She is a lawyer, and she chose not to try to sue over it. She allowed the limitation period for defamation to lapse.
The article is still up here.
Still so glad I left and joined the Conservatives.
Long time no see.
I'd argue that the Conservatives are little better, but everyone needs to pick one organization and work against the wokies there.
Oh hi u/AntonioOfVenice. Good to hear from you.
Having been in both parties, the Conservatives are way better.
Except for silent members who just pay and donate and do not attend meetings, being in Labour is basically wasting your life in a bitter war between two or three large mobs of emotionally driven individuals whipped up by grifters. At a lower level, that breaks down into smaller factions viciously feuding over trivia or pure spite. It is literally structured like an MMO, with vast numbers of inconsequential but important sounding positions for activists to fight over. Kind of like PvP. Grinding (leafleting, for example) enhances your ability to obtain bling.
It's like radical leftists don't think - they just follow a deterministic NPC programming language of rhetoric that can be short-circuited by using the right words like Captain Kirk using simple logic bombs against M-5.
Human: "Hey <microaggression>, do you <trigger phrase> this <made up word> to <statement of truth>?"
Leftist: "Uh..." *explodes*
Remember that this used to be so easy. We defined womanhood around a defined biological structure that included the cervix, and now they had to steamroll that so that people who want to act feminine (usually in a way that is offensive to what a woman is or should be) can do so without the constant realization of how ridiculous they look.
So men can dress in womanface without getting shamed for it. We've come so far.