A Russian court has ordered the seizure of funds in JPMorgan Chase (JPM.N), opens new tab bank accounts in Russia, court filings showed on Wednesday, in a lawsuit filed by state-owned bank VTB (VTBR.MM), opens new tab as it seeks to regain funds blocked abroad.
JP Morgan Chase last week sued VTB in New York to halt its efforts to recover $439.5 million from an account that was blocked after Russia despatched its army to Ukraine in 2022 and VTB was hit with sanctions.
So Russia is trying to get stolen funds back, and the media frames this as "Russia victimizing poor JP Morgan".
Not really, the trafficker/pimp has greater culpability than the John or victim/prostitute in literally every jurisdiction on earth. But again you manage to deftly avoid the point with a swift and substanceless “no u”.
Not if you try to argue that "Jews want to have sex with 2-year-old kids", which appeared to be your argument. Your argument for that cannot be running a blackmail ring recruiting non-Jews for that.
I see you still haven’t looked into the origins of feminism, transgenderism, sexual depravity, and myriad other forms of the degeneration of western culture.
It's childish to think that acceptance of any of that can be accomplished by a minority that is 1% of the population.
The talmud supercedes the Torah in rabbinic judaism. No one consults the Torah for direction, they consult their rabbi who consults their talmud. That’s the point of rabbinic judaism.
Yeah, I don't think that you can back that up. I'd be very surprised if you can.
Have you ever deeply asked yourself how a gay jew could have such a different opinion than you of his own “nation”?
Not at all, as I have a different opinion from my own 'nation'. It's good to view people as individuals. That said, I have noticed that he will say things that are so extreme that if said by a non-Jew would be labeled as anti-Semitic, and even by a Jew if they were not trying to ignore him to death.
I’d be interested in your thoughts because the authors posted there tend not to pull anywhere near as many punches as you’re likely used to in your regular edgy centrist discourse.
On Israel? I listen to a lot of people who are anything but 'centrist', Glenn Greenwald not being the only one. I follow folks on Twitter, like Aaron Mate, who label Biden as 'Genocide Joe' for his support of Israel. I just don't find it persuasive.
Dude they literally identified the ship as American then tried to sink it, and succeeded in murdering dozens of AMERICAN NAVY MEN. How could you possibly justify any feeling on that subject other than (rabid) “hate”. I’d love to hear this. And do try to put yourself in the shoes of an American for this one and not some aloof eurofag who decries the American empire or whatever the fuck your first instinct is to get out of this one.
I don't know about the case, other than the fact that some people obsessively bring it up. My point wasn't even that Israel was justified, or that I don't care about an American ship. It's that any mention of the USS Liberty tends to be accompanied by rabid Jew-hatred.
Let's say Israel did identify the ship as American and shot at it anyway, even though I don't see what it could have to gain from it. How exactly does that justify someone hating his Jewish neighbor who had nothing to do with it? I don't hate you for the actions of the American government, nor do you hate me for the actions of the vassal puppets called European governments.
Budget deficit? AFUERTA!
Honestly, I thought he was crazy - and his recent alleged conversion to Judaism doesn't exactly take that suspicion away - but he's been more successful than even his wildest proponent expected. Now let's see if this holds.
Those Indian bastards poisoned themselves in order so they could blame it on eeeevil white disease-carriers. So crafty.
"WE'RE WHITE. WE DON'T HAVE A CULTURE."
Unconscionable that Border Control thinks that immigrants are horses.#TrumpIsAFascist #Twitler #CheetoVoldemort
Articles ending with "report says" generally filled with lies, experts say
Except you (used to?) call me a sToRmFaG for presenting the same historical arguments.
I called you a Stormfag for very different reasons, perhaps things that you just said because you thought it would rile me up.
I think you’re being a little too broad when you just assume that everyone who feels this way is an unthinking racist. They may since have descended into unthinking racism on the subject, but I would wager many if not most got to that point through applied logic initially, saw that the subject was not ((allowed)) to be discussed logically, and decided “well if they don’t why should I” - or something along those lines
This sounds logical, but I wouldn't be sure on the percentages. It doesn't help that nearly everyone who, say, talks about the USS Liberty tends to a rabid Jew-hater. At the same time, I've seen people wonder about the Holocaust: they lie about everything else, so why would that be true. Besides, they try to silence everyone who argues otherwise, and that's how a guilty mind acts.
If all I know about a given topic was that "the regime is trying to censor side X", I'd say that side X was probably in the right.
So you’re victim blaming? Yikes. Do better sweaty.
Leaving satire aside, almost everything has a reason or a cause. It doesn't mean that it is sufficient justification for the reaction.
Wrong. They don’t follow “the OT”, they follow the talmud. That’s the definition of rabbinic judaism.
Do you mean that they don't follow the Old Testament at all? That is certainly wrong. You might argue that the Talmud has equal standing with the OT, because I recall it being called the 'oral law' as opposed to the 'written law' of the OT - but the other claim would be preposterous.
Yeah no shit, who else could expose evil from within but for someone within already.
Right, but that doesn't work if you were to argue - which it seems you don't - that Jews are inherently evil by virtue of their ethnicity, rather than their religion being no good.
Are you ((again)) trying to insinuate that I’m looking at this solely through a racial lens? You’d be a fool to.
That's good, but it is a legitimate assumption because it holds for 99% of people here who don't like the Jews.
You should look up Ron Unz of the Unz Report, Henry Makow, Norman Finkelstein, Glenn Greenwald, among others for some modern day jews with integrity. Sounds like you could do with some exposure to thoughts outside your comfort zone.
I watch Greenwald's show almost every day. I agree he has integrity. I just disagree with him on Israel.
If you found one who was running his operation on behalf of a White intelligence agency for the purpose of collecting blackmail on influential non-whites*
That would implicate non-whites more than whites.
Literally thousands of years of accusations of satanic ritual child abuse.
By Jews? Less than a thousand, actually. I believe 1144 was the first one. And of course, none of them are in any way credible. The only way you could rightly accuse Jews of child abuse is what they do to their own children.
Remember that foreman in the Georgia Trump showtrial?
Jury duty is the one place that your vote actually counts
[cries in European]
A few times a year? That's nothing to worry about. And even with all this diversity bullcrap, it's way safer than driving - which is not to justify how they are making it unsafe.
EDIT: Not triggered by the downvotes, but I'm very curious what people disagree with. Can someone explain?
Lmfao, dude, don’t be so disingenuous:
Dude, talking about Internet Stormfags. Don't pretend that they know anything of history.
But you never seem to want to discuss any potential causes for their situation beyond “goyim bad”.
And where did I say that? There are plenty of causes. Middlemen minorities are hated everywhere, as Sowell has demonstrated.
Wrong, it is the holy book of Rabbinic judaism. Like hadiths if every muslim agreed on them. Nothing like “early church fathers”
The Old Testament is the holy book of Rabbinic Judaism. Not sure why you're comparing it to the hadiths. The church fathers provided guidance on how to interpret the Bible, just like the Talmudists did for the Old Testament.
(tangentially, many of whom had based opinions on that matter, but that’s neither here nor there).
Actually, zero of them would have said that Jews are bad on account of their race or lineage. They just said that their religion is wrong, which is perfectly legitimate. They were far too close to the time when nearly all Christians were ethnic Jews to condemn an entire people based on their race. Hell, that disputation you cited, as well as Tortosa, was conducted by a converted Jew.
Well it seems they were trying
Muslims were trying to eff off back to their own countries? Could have fooled me.
Shit dude did you miss that whole Epstein raping kids for the mossad thing?
This in defense of the idea that "the Jews want to rape 2-year-old kids"? All I have to do is present one white pedo and you'll say this proves that whites want to rape 2-year-old kids? Be serious.
I bet you would have supported the austere religious scholar Bin Laden in his holy religious crusade against communism, had you existed as anything more than a sample of jizzum at the time. You seem far too easily swayed by the ramblings of ((intellectuals)).
"Intellectuals" generally back Islam...
The guy is a Trump appointee, BTW.
It is self-interest. Relocating would kill the company.
The ones that were asking people to snitch on their neighbors?
Kids on their parents even. They're getting there.
Ah, I wonder what it was that justified such draconian punishments. "Gas the kikes"? "Hang niggers, they are subhuman apes."? "Kill all politicians."?
Exeter University student disciplined after flat mate overheard him saying ‘veganism was wrong’
Oh. WELL THAT DOESN'T ABSOLVE HM!
Good that you did, because I can't open the link.
It would have been a major escalation in their war on free speech and political liberty if they started banning the third-largest political party in European countries.
(In parliamentary systems, being third is actually pretty good.)
there’s no winning with some of you people, and even if every quote is cited and an unambiguous translation of writing included in the talmud,
This is the very first time that an even mildly dubious text from the Talmud has been sourced by someone. Normally, it's just copy-paste for people who look for a club with which to beat people they don't like.
And if I understand it correctly, and I'm not a Jew let alone one spending 18 hours a day at the Yeshiva as some here believe, the Talmud is nothing more than a collection of the words of famous Jewish 'theologians'. As if you were to gather all the famous medieval Christian theologians who commented on Lombard's book. Now, some of them no doubt said something batty. It doesn't follow from that at all that this is 'the Jewish view'.
and on the other hand, if even one of two dozen quotes comes from, say, a kabbalistic text (thus not the talmud, a good example being the Toledat Yeshu), the image will be accused of conflation and dismissed out of hand by the usual suspects.
Well yeah, if you claim the Talmud says something and it's a Kabbalistic text, they're right to dismiss that.
If I purported to quote Augustine and produce as evidence something from Quesnel's devotional or some text of mysticism, you'd call me a retard, and rightly so.
tell me, why do you take such severe issue with one “purity religion” and not the other?
One has 1.5 billion followers, is exterminating all religious minorities as well as freethinkers in its midst, is threatening to overtake all of Europe, and the other is a pitiful sect taking no or barely any converts whose adherents go from one catastrophe to the other.
If Muslims kept to themselves, had only 15 million people, took no converts, and better yet, were effing off to a country they created, I'd love them.
When the jews work out just how old their rape victims can be to still be of mariable quality, you squeak out “buh buh im no expert, but I’m sure it’s justified!”,
Just posing an alternative interpretation to "the Jews just want to rape 2-year-olds", which seems pretty strange to me.
you raise a bitch fit and act like we should send goyim, I mean “our sons and daughters” to fight them in some kind of clash of civilizations. Am I reading you wrong?
I'd do it if it did any good. But it doesn't, as the past two decades have taught us.
Right now, it's the 'Chosen People' fighting Islam and the Muslims. So "the goyim" are sending the Jews to do their dirty work for them. You should love them.
I am the literal antithesis to the world and system in place now
You're a schizo.
Of course I consider myself a great man.
This casts some serious doubt on your judgment.
If women don't think so, then perhaps they need to be raped by immigrants until they change their mind.
I suspect that you're a leftist trying to demonize rightists/white nationalists by appearing as crazy as you possibly can. You may have had some plausible deniability in the past, but you're really pushing it with this one.
So explain that verse to me, why are they worried about the virginity of 3 year olds?
I might as well explain electro-weak theory to you. If you want it explained, you could consult someone who knows what he's talking about, who has made his life studying the Talmud.
Why are they worried? Purity religions are worried about a lot of weird things. Here, it might be retaining the girl as marriagable though.
Yeah I’ve learned how to preemptively avoid many of the pilpulous pitfalls parlayed against the truth
How would you know it's "the truth" if you copy-pasted it from a site that has an ax to grind, which does not provide a source?
I didn't even consider that reading. If he was her ex when he died, then that comment is not just not a mic drop, but actively deceptive because it would not be relevant to the criticism.
He also complains about women being degenerates while going on "business trips" to Thailand.
And that while posing as a white nationalist.
Did you hear that ladies? If you let this charming fellow have his way with you he there's an above 0% chance he would stop you from getting raped by other men. Do you feel lucky?
Not just let Prince Charming here have his way with you, but possess you. Normally, I wouldn't see too much in a statement like that, but given that he's actually said that women should be property and "sex slaves", I think he meant: I'll defend my own property, but who cares if someone else's car gets smashed up?
I guess maybe the women who lined up to go to join ISIS might want him.
And why not? It's not as if it can get any more ridiculous.
I know you're a troll and believe none of the opinions you purport to hold, but yeah, the people who oppose this d o support seizing assets when it's not theirs: