It - Ah - I - look - I, uh, ah, uh ah is it, isit - bwuh - hwh -
That's the sound your brain makes when you know the answer is 'no' but your incoherent braindead ideology of the fucking mass-delusion cult you've become swept up in is short-circuiting your rational mind.
Jesus christ, this bumbling, fumbling, blithering idiot is #2 in the labour party. Theoretically she is a potential future Prime Minister!
I don't even know how to start answering these questions
why are we having to discuss parts of women's anatomy?
You're one of the highest politicians in the land and we have people being harassed by police and winding up on a background check list of 'non-crime hate incidents' for questioning this stuff that you 'don't know how to answer'! People have been arrested and taken to court over this crap that your party leader espouses, but you 'don't know how to answer'.
How is this acceptable to anyone!?
Holy fucking shit, the host should have fucking REAMED her for this.
Dear god, if there was any sense left in the leaders of this country, this conversation right here should be enough to fucking nuke the nonsense trans-rights bullshit back to where it was in the fucking 90's: You are allowed to be a tranny, and everyone else is allowed to laugh at you for it, and if they go further than laughing, the regular laws of criminal conduct apply.
I disagree. It is transphobic, and transphobia is a good thing. It's perfectly normal. We all have instincts that have been developed over hundreds of thousands of years, and this is one of them - we all instinctively know to avoid diseased people, including those with mental diseases, because they're dangerous. It's a good thing to do and there's no shame in it. The people who would see civilization burned to the ground are trying to weaponize our instincts against us, they call them "bigotry" and they pretend it's the worst thing ever, but we don't have to play by their rules.
I disagree. It is transphobic, and transphobia is a good thing.
An accurate percetion of reality should not be described wih the suffix '-phobic'
There is zero irrationality in the statement 'women have cervixes, men do not'. Thus, desdecribing it as 'phobic', even if you're doing so because you want to be the Chad "Yes" meme, is shortsighted.
Do not concede the point that you are 'phobic'. Reject their terminology entirely, for the language they use is toolset deliberately engineered to make it harder for you to argue against them.
Reject, rebuke, disregard and destroy all their ideologic theory at its foundational base: In language.
I see where you're coming from but I don't agree. "Muh -phobia" is a thought-terminating cliche, when someone accuses you of being a -phobe, it puts you on the defensive - except when you embrace it. People make fun of "I'm not racist because I have a black friend"; I'm more racist than your average /pol/tard and I have several black friends and they know.
I disagree. It is transphobic, and transphobia is a good thing
It is not a thing. Ergo, it cannot be either 'good' or 'bad'. No one is 'transgender', as raving about how you are a woman does not change your objective status, and so it follows that no one is 'transphobic'.
There is, however, natural revulsion towards hairy men who cut off their balls and then dress like a 9-year-old girl.
What's a person supposed to do, when they are confronted with a person, roleplaying as the opposite sex, living in the uncanny valley, such that everyone that sees them has the same reaction - That chick's a dude! The visceral reaction that a person has upon seeing that is not hateful discrimination, it's the same as seeing a leper - "oh, that's a weird look, keep your distance."
It can't be hate if it's a biological reflex.
That's the sound your brain makes when you know the answer is 'no' but your incoherent braindead ideology of the fucking mass-delusion cult you've become swept up in is short-circuiting your rational mind.
Jesus christ, this bumbling, fumbling, blithering idiot is #2 in the labour party. Theoretically she is a potential future Prime Minister!
You're one of the highest politicians in the land and we have people being harassed by police and winding up on a background check list of 'non-crime hate incidents' for questioning this stuff that you 'don't know how to answer'! People have been arrested and taken to court over this crap that your party leader espouses, but you 'don't know how to answer'.
How is this acceptable to anyone!?
Holy fucking shit, the host should have fucking REAMED her for this.
Dear god, if there was any sense left in the leaders of this country, this conversation right here should be enough to fucking nuke the nonsense trans-rights bullshit back to where it was in the fucking 90's: You are allowed to be a tranny, and everyone else is allowed to laugh at you for it, and if they go further than laughing, the regular laws of criminal conduct apply.
I disagree. It is transphobic, and transphobia is a good thing. It's perfectly normal. We all have instincts that have been developed over hundreds of thousands of years, and this is one of them - we all instinctively know to avoid diseased people, including those with mental diseases, because they're dangerous. It's a good thing to do and there's no shame in it. The people who would see civilization burned to the ground are trying to weaponize our instincts against us, they call them "bigotry" and they pretend it's the worst thing ever, but we don't have to play by their rules.
An accurate percetion of reality should not be described wih the suffix '-phobic'
There is zero irrationality in the statement 'women have cervixes, men do not'. Thus, desdecribing it as 'phobic', even if you're doing so because you want to be the Chad "Yes" meme, is shortsighted.
Do not concede the point that you are 'phobic'. Reject their terminology entirely, for the language they use is toolset deliberately engineered to make it harder for you to argue against them.
Reject, rebuke, disregard and destroy all their ideologic theory at its foundational base: In language.
I see where you're coming from but I don't agree. "Muh -phobia" is a thought-terminating cliche, when someone accuses you of being a -phobe, it puts you on the defensive - except when you embrace it. People make fun of "I'm not racist because I have a black friend"; I'm more racist than your average /pol/tard and I have several black friends and they know.
Go “play” legolas in your backyard some more. Fucking goober.
Does another suffix exist that describes hatred of something but replaces "irrational fear" with "understandable and precise"?
It is not a thing. Ergo, it cannot be either 'good' or 'bad'. No one is 'transgender', as raving about how you are a woman does not change your objective status, and so it follows that no one is 'transphobic'.
There is, however, natural revulsion towards hairy men who cut off their balls and then dress like a 9-year-old girl.
What's a person supposed to do, when they are confronted with a person, roleplaying as the opposite sex, living in the uncanny valley, such that everyone that sees them has the same reaction - That chick's a dude! The visceral reaction that a person has upon seeing that is not hateful discrimination, it's the same as seeing a leper - "oh, that's a weird look, keep your distance."
It can't be hate if it's a biological reflex.
Seeing as how the #1 isn't even likely to be PM at this point his deputies are of even less concern :p
I italicized 'theoretically' for a reason!