I disagree. It is transphobic, and transphobia is a good thing. It's perfectly normal. We all have instincts that have been developed over hundreds of thousands of years, and this is one of them - we all instinctively know to avoid diseased people, including those with mental diseases, because they're dangerous. It's a good thing to do and there's no shame in it. The people who would see civilization burned to the ground are trying to weaponize our instincts against us, they call them "bigotry" and they pretend it's the worst thing ever, but we don't have to play by their rules.
I disagree. It is transphobic, and transphobia is a good thing.
An accurate percetion of reality should not be described wih the suffix '-phobic'
There is zero irrationality in the statement 'women have cervixes, men do not'. Thus, desdecribing it as 'phobic', even if you're doing so because you want to be the Chad "Yes" meme, is shortsighted.
Do not concede the point that you are 'phobic'. Reject their terminology entirely, for the language they use is toolset deliberately engineered to make it harder for you to argue against them.
Reject, rebuke, disregard and destroy all their ideologic theory at its foundational base: In language.
I see where you're coming from but I don't agree. "Muh -phobia" is a thought-terminating cliche, when someone accuses you of being a -phobe, it puts you on the defensive - except when you embrace it. People make fun of "I'm not racist because I have a black friend"; I'm more racist than your average /pol/tard and I have several black friends and they know.
I disagree. It is transphobic, and transphobia is a good thing
It is not a thing. Ergo, it cannot be either 'good' or 'bad'. No one is 'transgender', as raving about how you are a woman does not change your objective status, and so it follows that no one is 'transphobic'.
There is, however, natural revulsion towards hairy men who cut off their balls and then dress like a 9-year-old girl.
What's a person supposed to do, when they are confronted with a person, roleplaying as the opposite sex, living in the uncanny valley, such that everyone that sees them has the same reaction - That chick's a dude! The visceral reaction that a person has upon seeing that is not hateful discrimination, it's the same as seeing a leper - "oh, that's a weird look, keep your distance."
It can't be hate if it's a biological reflex.
I disagree. It is transphobic, and transphobia is a good thing. It's perfectly normal. We all have instincts that have been developed over hundreds of thousands of years, and this is one of them - we all instinctively know to avoid diseased people, including those with mental diseases, because they're dangerous. It's a good thing to do and there's no shame in it. The people who would see civilization burned to the ground are trying to weaponize our instincts against us, they call them "bigotry" and they pretend it's the worst thing ever, but we don't have to play by their rules.
An accurate percetion of reality should not be described wih the suffix '-phobic'
There is zero irrationality in the statement 'women have cervixes, men do not'. Thus, desdecribing it as 'phobic', even if you're doing so because you want to be the Chad "Yes" meme, is shortsighted.
Do not concede the point that you are 'phobic'. Reject their terminology entirely, for the language they use is toolset deliberately engineered to make it harder for you to argue against them.
Reject, rebuke, disregard and destroy all their ideologic theory at its foundational base: In language.
I see where you're coming from but I don't agree. "Muh -phobia" is a thought-terminating cliche, when someone accuses you of being a -phobe, it puts you on the defensive - except when you embrace it. People make fun of "I'm not racist because I have a black friend"; I'm more racist than your average /pol/tard and I have several black friends and they know.
Go “play” legolas in your backyard some more. Fucking goober.
Niggers tongue my anus
Does another suffix exist that describes hatred of something but replaces "irrational fear" with "understandable and precise"?
It is not a thing. Ergo, it cannot be either 'good' or 'bad'. No one is 'transgender', as raving about how you are a woman does not change your objective status, and so it follows that no one is 'transphobic'.
There is, however, natural revulsion towards hairy men who cut off their balls and then dress like a 9-year-old girl.
What's a person supposed to do, when they are confronted with a person, roleplaying as the opposite sex, living in the uncanny valley, such that everyone that sees them has the same reaction - That chick's a dude! The visceral reaction that a person has upon seeing that is not hateful discrimination, it's the same as seeing a leper - "oh, that's a weird look, keep your distance."
It can't be hate if it's a biological reflex.