MLKs Daughter
(twitter.com)
Comments (49)
sorted by:
Posts like this make me reflect on the concept of minorities using words as magic spells without ever learning what they actually mean. It is clearly the case that most civil rights activists have been using words as spells, it's just really obvious now when they trot out the usual spurious moral-sounding pap after a black kid murdered someone at a track meet. Beatrice King doesn't understand what honesty, accountability, or justice mean.
Neither did her father. He just spouted platitudes handed to him by the KGB.
You mean the guy who plagiarized his doctoral thesis would also read speeches written for him by communists? Unbelievable
INCONCEIVABLE!
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
They couldn't read it anyway. I'd garner 50% have no arithmetic measure at all and less than 25% with literature skills. Nothing lost just words on paper to them they couldn't comprehend.
There's a trend among Kick and other Cricket phone level live streaming platforms of right side bell curve blacks asking random blacks to read a sentence with polysyllabic terms and not only failing to pronounce the words but also being completely aloof about the summarized content of the message.
Low IQ cargo cult behavior + postmodernist relativism and subjectivity = perfect golems.
This is exactly why Wokism makes up words with not objective definition; savages can mouth them which confuses rational Whites long enough to get into stabbing range.
The guy who stabbed an unarmed teenager in the chest
The victims' and their families'
Okay. Let's talk about all the repeat offenders being let out on the street repeatedly with no punishment and no regard for public safety because they were Black.
This.
I agree with basically everything written here, but I don't think we're talking about the same group.
This is because our cultures are not compatible; not after 400 years of cohabitation, not after forced integration, not after mixing blood.
They need to understand that they don't belong here and, importantly, they need to understand that they have zero chance of forcing Whites out of the countries we built.
Take back SA. Take back Rhodesia. Take back America.
Let's be honest. We already knew the content of her character.
Yes we did.
His lawyers picked the jurors. Maybe if his parents didn't spend his grifted money from him, and used it to defend their murderous son, perhaps the outcome would have been different
And the potential black jurors were dismissed, not because they were black but because they said they wouldn’t convict a young black man.
I actually appreciate their honesty because they could have lied
There's a good chance that anyone who would admit to that would believe that it was a good thing, and that it would improve their chances of being on the jury.
I doubt it had anything to do with a sense of honesty or truth.
Lol, they seriously think all Whites are Woke Liberals.
Not really. No impulse control + sub 80 IQ = incapable of second order thinking.
Reminds me of the video where the migrant is (truthfully) listing all the reasons he shouldn't rape a White girl and they're all some variant of "someone could do something bad to me in return"
They could have tried to help their son in anyway in stead of screaming "racist" is my point
I don't think they could. "Africa Time" is real; when they got the money to hire a lawyer, and didn't need a lawyer right that second, they didn't even have the choice to save it for later because they can't understand the concept.
Obligatory.
That venn diagram is a circle.
I doubt any amount of money spent on lawyers or expert witnesses could have changed the outcome. It's simply not a winnable case based on the facts and the law. The only way to change the outcome would be to coach the hoodrat niggers in the jury pool to act impartial during questioning.
A more honest and competent lawyer might have convinced the murderer to plead guilty in exchange for 25 or 30 years instead of 35.
The feral murder machine should have been executed anyway.
I'd bet anything he, with the support of his disgusting parents, loudly and ignorantly refused to entertain even the possibility of taking a plea deal multiple times.
There's been (for women, who courts GREATLY favor, but still) clear-cut cases of obvious first-degree murder where they get off with two years, plus chance of early parole. A good lawyer wouldn't theorize that the victim attacked his client's knife using the victim's chest.
Then again, a GREAT lawyer may purposefully fumble the case ridiculously, to get the public riled up, and force a political pardoning situation for a clearly guilty person.
This is Diaparate Impact Theory in action. She's inferring that our justice system is de facto racist because it "disproportionately" punishes blacks.
This is a lie.
Blacks are proportionally incarcerated based on the violence and crime they commit. And no, their violence and crime are not "a response" to any kind of "oppression"; blacks are now systemically advantaged in almost every way. Their anti-social behavior isn't justified in any way.
Whites are disproportionately victimized by blacks. That's the real disparity of outcome in our society. But blacks don't care about that. Because Disparate Impact Theory is just another word spell used by anti-white actors to get what they want. It's not a logical argument or a fixed principle. It's not an honest investigation. It's a kafka trap with a fixed outcome: whites lose.
"Disparate Impact" is the opposite of Meritocratic. Reality doesn't care that you really want Blacks to be as civilized as Whites.
There are many, many, reasons that Blacks, as a statistical group, perform worse than others.
First, they skew younger than most other groups which means higher rates of violence, lower incomes, and less political influence without taking anything else into account. There are, again, many reasons for this: more deaths due to violence, obesity, anti-racist doctors not checking for Black-specific ailments, etc.
Second, dey cultcha. Blacks frequently attack other Blacks (everything from online comments to burning down businesses) who are successful out of resentment, racism (school is "White"), or just trying to steal from the only people they know who have stuff. If you want to see what "toxic masculinity" actually looks like, there's no better example; savagery buys status, muh dicking random women and then leaving the kids is seen as heroic, going into debt to buy luxury status symbols they can't afford etc. Absolutely none of these niggers are calling this shit out but this sheboon has the gall to criticise our culture; the culture that gave her the language she's speaking, the schooling that gave her credibility, the internet that allows her to have an audience, and the justice system that protected Anthony from a public lynching.
And then there's the genetic component that even Whites are uncomfortable speaking about. Sub-saharan nations average IQs that we consider mentally retarded; that is, they cannot function in the White, high-IQ society that we built. 400 years of living beside us (including forcing Whites to allow them into their own communities) hasn't fixed this. Neither has over-spending on their education, mixing with White blood, or actually giving them preferential treatment and "supports" to make things as easy as possible.
Finally, they hate us. They will never integrate with their betters so long as they resent the people from whom they should be humbly asking for guidance. Even if everything else were true, they could at least find a way to coexist with Whites (maybe as sewer workers or chicken wrangles) if they actually had some concept of humility, but they don't. And given their IQ, they never will.
So yeah, there are "good Blacks"; 99th percentile outliers who could integrate at an individual level. But what do they do, instead? They stir up the niggers with fancy words (which they do not understand) to fuck up the society that they want to partake in. They, individually, cannot get past race, so we need to treat them as a race and not individuals.
Aka "wet streets cause rain"
Here's a mirror. Have a look.
They don't do so well with that either
Kek "That's her?! Get that niggress!"
Communist Jew backed nigger agitator spawns communist Jew back niggress agitator. Who would have guessed it?
A guy with a mustache?
Blacks hate being judged by the content of their character after all.
niggers are inherently terrorists
Jurors need to be judged by the color of their skin, not the content of their character
That's what she's saying here, right? That a Black jury would have let him off, regardless of guilt, And That's A Good Thing.
The fact is, White culture could "end racism" but the other races would just bring it back so why bother?
Turns out one is an indicator of the other
They're the same picture.
James Earl Ray is a hero. He did nothing wrong.
She's LITERALLY DEMANDING it BE shaped by race! 🤬
I read that one of MLK's grandkids recently went from lib-left to full blown conservative. She's a politician and switched parties too.
It's not murder if you stab someone in the chest i guess... like the other nigger did with the Ukrainian woman in the bus.
The implied statement with every aggrieved black person bemoaning the sentence is the acknowledgement that a black person would not find him guilty because he is black and the victim is white. That is it. I bet every other facet, class, residency, culture, the jury was equal to Karmelo. But it doesn't matter the only thing they see is black skin. That's what kills me with the well meaning color blind white people.
If they were truly "color blind", they'd see [entity of unknown skin color] pledging to judge people of [skin color] solely based on [skin color], and want all those people jailed, extirpated, deported, or generally removed from society.
Her daddy was a subversive communist funded by ((you know who)) and raped underage White girls who were drunk at the time. Never let her forget this.
He dindu nothin!
She does know that Karmelo Anthony was trying to judge the content of Austin Metcalf's character by puncturing his exterior, doesn't she?
12 jurors, 13% of the population are black - there's a chance that a jury with no black people can happen. In the initial pool there were potential jurors who were black but got removed by being educators or having reservations about the case.
It would seem that Bernice is thinking that a convicted criminal wouldn't have been convicted if there was a black person on the jury. That's all kinds of wrong.
Nothing wrong with thinking that a blatant criminal wouldn't have been convicted if a black person were on the jury. Plenty here ALSO think that they'd 100% in-group preference.
What's wrong is thinking that such a result is anything but a travesty and an abomination of society and justice.