A whole bunch of jeets and liberal men pay for it.
You'll see the jeets flooding the Instagram accounts and comment sections of these e-thots, and they make up a sizable portion of the black pill/looksmaxxing/losermaxxing communities. The official stats say mostly married men are paying for it, but I don't know if that's by volume or spending.
One of those pathetic OnlyFans subscribers appeared on an episode of that YouTube show where the bloke goes over the finances and tries to instruct them on how to get out of debt or cut back on spending.
The OF subscriber was the exact kind of guy you would expect to subscribe to OnlyFans: a loser liberal beta male. He was dating a whale of a wench and was using HER credit card to pay for e-thots. Even more funny than that, he didn't like having sex with his whale of a girlfriend. Ouch.
The OF subscriber was the exact kind of guy you would expect to subscribe to OnlyFans: a loser liberal beta male.
Over the years I've seen a few streamer meltdowns on Twitch. One that happened a few years back was a British variety gaming streamer called Spamfish. Over the course of a mental breakdown brought on by loneliness and depression, he gradually torched his stream in multiple tearful bouts of crying and complaining and oversharing. At the stage when he was struggling to afford his rent and soon to be evicted from his place, he revealed that he had spent 5 figures online on onlythots. He confessed this in between random gibberish political rants about eg. Rishi Sunak's transphobia(?!), further revealing that his mind had been colonised by progressive cancer. It seemed obvious that he'd adopted more and more feminist talking points in the belief that it would make him seem like a good feminist ally, so that female twitch streamers in adjacent communities might touch his e-peen.
People are saying they find the OF spending hard to believe and that they never hear about it, but I'm willing to believe there are tens of thousands of stories like spamfish. Only his unhinged level of oversharing shed light on where his money went. With most guys you'd never hear about it. The simps problem cannot be overstated.
Lol, ive been fighting with my spouse, partly because of some comments made by her friend a few months back. They were drinking here and her friend came at me while I was alone in my room telling me I was just depressed and needed to take anti anxiety medication lol, like these twats. Her best friend told me a month ago that I just needed to like, drink more water. Damn I cant believe I never thought of that.
Anyway, really bothered me because I thought this girl was talking for my wife. She is half the age as we are and covered in tattoos. She is also very cute, which is prolly the only reason I cared what she thought rofl.
Come to find out after talking with my spouse last weekend that her marriage isnt doing very good. Her man apparently spends a chunk of his paycheck on onlyfans and meanwhile she is hot enough she could be banking money if she wanted. Its honestly kinda crazy.
Its not about the sex.
Now that I have an official diagnosis, you think any of these assholes have, or are going to apologize. Fuck no.
The dating market is hell and average men have no hope of even getting a fat used up slut these days.
The OF subscriber was the exact kind of guy you would expect to subscribe to OnlyFans: a loser liberal beta male. He was dating a whale of a wench and was using HER credit card to pay for e-thots. Even more funny than that, he didn't like having sex with his whale of a girlfriend. Ouch
I'm actually jealous of him. I can't even get an ugly bitch willing to use me for money, but he got one that let him spend hers.
Yeah, debate over the merits of gooning vs more enlightened pursuits not wiithdtanding, who the fuck actually pays for this? The internet is home to practically limitless free equivalents, and it's trivially easy even to find the specifically sold content for free most of the time too.
I refuse to believe there's that many dumb simps willing to pay 10 bucks a month for some videos they could get for free and a DM from a jeet with a whore's pfp.
jews print money and then use it to pay White women to whore themselves
It's not even about profit. It's just about demoralizing White people, whoring out our women, destroying our culture and civilization.
That's why I get angry when faggots such as u/thisisnotanexit is more worried about censoring people for saying kike than he is worried about half the internet being an economy built around whoring out and demoralizing and demeaning and humiliating White women. And it's the kikes doing it. But u/thisisnotanexit is more mad about jews being called kikes rather than what jews are doing that makes people WANT to call them kikes in the first place.
The money isn't even real. So basically jews just print something and people sell their souls for fake money that some jew printed in his money printing factory. It's purely evil and kikes deserve much worse than being called mean names. I consider u/thisisnotanexit complicit in their crimes for trying to protect them.
It's not the nudity or sexual content men are paying for. They want to believe they are in relationships with these women, that they are getting unique or personalized content. It's exclusivity the guys think they are buying.
Remember that adult video store that you used to pass by that remained in business despite never having any cars but the single employee? Businesses like this are prime for money laundering because everyone tries to conceal their identity when using them legitimately, so it makes it hard to look for money changing hands just to change hands.
The online ones are no different, saw an article about some embezzler tipping his sister-in-law millions of dollars over years on her cam girl page, only caught because it being his sister-in-law made it blatant, and it all clicked for me that the entire adult industry is rife with money laundering.
The porno industry always had a reputation of being run by the organized crime, it isn't just because they branched out from prostitution. They need a place to feed their drug profits through.
Does the no tax on tips apply to onlyfans? That would make it even more attractive to money laundering, even from legal but off-book profits.
Many tax professionals and IRS guidance indicate that tips from OnlyFans especially those tied to adult or pornographic content do not qualify for the special “no tax on tips” deduction.
It's the same in most countries live streamers tried to claim "donations" as tax exempt but the money given was clearly given as appreciation of a product, in this case the stream.
They tried to do this in countries where we already have laws to tax tips and don't have a tipping culture at all.
Good point, I think that is technically under the de facto umbrella of money laundering though, but probably exempt from the de jure umbrella (like the "wealth management" Epstein did as his more-legit face business)
OpenAI only making that much per month and they buy nearly half the world's semiconductor production capacity with the money Federal Reserve banks pilfer from citizens.
Yeah, I think this is bullshit Jewish stealth marketing. The only times I've heard anyone mention Onlyfans IRL is in the normie context of "did you see those girls on that podcast that work for that website" or "did you see that girl that made 20 million dollars" regardless of whether I'm talking to a boomer or zoomer. For that matter, I don't even see OF girls mentioned on the internet.
Even when it comes to legitimate users, there's no reason to assume that the revenue is equally distributed across the userbase. The whale phenomenon has been well known for over a decade now. Most of the money likely flows from a tiny core of subscribers.
Then you factor in the money laundering and propaganda aspect. In the past I would've thought that the idea of a multibillion dollar industry being propped up was too farfetched, but it seems like rich Jews don't recognize any limits.
low T middle class man who has never tried to hire escorts because they're not available enough or because he's scared to tangle with that world, but has the means to spend thousands of dollars. It's not like that's financially responsible for him, but that doesn't matter. Buys into the parasocial experience of OF even though the sex chats are run by Indian guys. Same type of person who whales out for mobile games.
millionaire or above who is a complete weirdo. Might use escorts but also uses onlyfans because it's a difference experience. E.g. you can pay celebrities like Bhad Barbie to send you commissioned videos or photoshoots.
It's completely unnecessary too given how much free HD porn exists online
But these losers fall for this small amount of fle engagement with a women. Reading your chats on screen, responding to your texts (it's not even them)
They pay for a fake simulated relationship, even though they know she is doing the same with tons of other men
The only OF whore I knew, had a gay dude be the one that responds to all the dorks that would message her. They'd even pay to send her dick picks and get feedback about them. And the fag would get to check out all the d pics.
They pay for a fake simulated relationship, even though they know she is doing the same with tons of other men
And? If your options are a fake simulated relationship with a whore or having nothing at all and being alienated by a society filled with reference to these experiences you're expected to have had by your age I don't see how it's surprising that men pay for simulated engagement with someone they imagine to be a woman.
The only other alternative would be hiring a prostitute for hundreds of dollars per hour, risking prison, and all that just to get a blow job from some middling hag.
The only other alternative would be hiring a prostitute for hundreds of dollars per hour, risking prison, and all that just to get a blow job from some middling hag.
A lot of these women simply don't want to work a contributing day job to society. Most have boyfriends already (or could in a second if they wanted one).
It's pure exploitation of lonely men that adds 0 value to society. It inflates the egos of whores and helps to make normal relationships more difficult. It also allows women to date loser men instead of compelling women to seek out productive men.
There's nothing good about onlyfans but it's ultimately a symptom of the larger underlying problems in society and not the root cause itself.
Way to exculpate the people enabling this. I'm more concerned about societal consequences than about poor weirdo suckers being parted from their money.
It also allows women to date loser men instead of compelling women to seek out productive men.
How?
There's nothing good about onlyfans but it's ultimately a symptom of the larger underlying problems in society and not the root cause itself.
Men aren't enabling it. Women are. Women purposely cause a supply shortage of sex for men who aren't the top 0.1% of men. If women had sex more often with men then then there would be no demand for this. Women create the demand for onlyfans by restricting access to sex.
Because women make enough money to sustain themselves through OF and virtual sex work such that women don't need to seek out engineers or lawyers for their lifestyle. They instead can opt to seek out men that don't make tons of money but have bigger dicks or are better looking from their pov.
Men subscribe to OnlyFans... women to blame. Sounds like when immigrants groped women in Cologne and feminists blamed German men.
Women purposely cause a supply shortage of sex for men who aren't the top 0.1% of men.
How do they do that?
Because women make enough money to sustain themselves through OF and virtual sex work such that women don't need to seek out engineers or lawyers for their lifestyle.
You know that's just a handful of people, right? It's like saying that men don't need to become productive like engineers or lawyers because they can just toss a football around.
They instead can opt to seek out men that don't make tons of money but have bigger dicks or are better looking from their pov.
It's whatever reason other than the guy is a productive member to society.
Why are you trying to blame men for their nature. Men want to enjoy women. They are compelled to by their nature. You think men want to buy OF? They don't. They have no other options. Give men other options and they'll stop buying OF. Women are the ones who control men's options.
It's whatever reason other than the guy is a productive member to society.
I think it's good if women have some standards and won't just date any fat slob. But you thinking that women go around looking for "bigger dicks" is laughable.
Wait, you're the German immigrant to Canada who said that America and Canada are "German" and that Trump should conquer Canada. Never mind.
Fat slobs aren't likely productive members of society. You're exaggerating "having some standards". The men they're with tend to not be quality from what you'd probably gauge quality to be.
I was just at a sex show all weekend where chatterbate was the largest sponser and pornstars whose names you'd recognize were there. I'm friends with multiple women who do OF and some escorts. I know the women in the sex industry inside and out. I've dated a couple before. And at least for these women into this line of work, yeah, dick size gets brought up as a characteristic they care about. But it depends what phase they're in. Most deep down aren't any different than the men they charge money to. They want hot men out of their league and are bitter they can't get this or the men who they can get have no money but the men with money aren't hot. Same issues, usually.
There's two ways to look at it.
There's nothing wrong with what the women are doing and this is just everyone finding something that works for them. Women need money and have sex so they sell sex for money but without any of the benefits of a loving relationship. Men need sex and have money so they buy sex for money without any of the benefits of a loving relationship.
There's a problem with this.
Here's the thing though, it's the men who want loving relationships with the women but the women don't want it with the men. The men pay and the women receive. Who is truly the victim and the exploiter here? Men lose their resources and earn fake care in return. If you think it's a problem that the women are doing these things, anyhow... If there's no problem, then there's no problem but if there's a problem I think you should start with the women not the men. The women are the ones selling the lie and acting. They fool the men into thinking there's something more than there is. The men often get false hope and lie to themselves about the woman's actual care for them. It's a scam... No different than the Nigerian prince who tells you if you keep sending money, he'll repay you eventually. Keep sending the OF girl money and she'll fall in love with you eventually (but she won't).
Fat slobs aren't likely productive members of society. You're exaggerating "having some standards". The men they're with tend to not be quality from what you'd probably gauge quality to be.
Doctors and engineers (real ones) tend not to be the best-looking people, and engineers often aren't the healthiest ones. So what are you selecting for.
I was just at a sex show all weekend
You must be trolling again.
I know the women in the sex industry inside and out.
Here too. Inside?
And at least for these women into this line of work, yeah, dick size gets brought up as a characteristic they care about.
The paradox is that women who talk about dick size with strangers generally aren't quality women.
Who is truly the victim and the exploiter here? Men lose their resources and earn fake care in return.
As the old Soviet adage went: we pretend to work and they pretend to pay us. I'm sure they know that a woman they're paying doesn't actually care about them.
I play a mobile game in a top alliance and the amount of money that people spend on this is insane. I wholly believe that people spend more on only fans.
I’ve never seen anything like this when there’s a completely free archive of as much naked ladies as you’d ever need but still be compelled to throw money at these women to take maybe half their clothes off.
If people subscribe to these weirdos on Twitch to see them in skimpy clothing, is it really that hard to believe that they'd pay to see them fully nude? Not saying it's right, only that it's believable. Although I don't believe it myself.
I'm still convinced that there is some artificial stats in this to make it seem this big to entice more girls into doing it.
There is a loneliness issue, but this feels like a psyop.
A whole bunch of jeets and liberal men pay for it.
You'll see the jeets flooding the Instagram accounts and comment sections of these e-thots, and they make up a sizable portion of the black pill/looksmaxxing/losermaxxing communities. The official stats say mostly married men are paying for it, but I don't know if that's by volume or spending.
One of those pathetic OnlyFans subscribers appeared on an episode of that YouTube show where the bloke goes over the finances and tries to instruct them on how to get out of debt or cut back on spending.
The OF subscriber was the exact kind of guy you would expect to subscribe to OnlyFans: a loser liberal beta male. He was dating a whale of a wench and was using HER credit card to pay for e-thots. Even more funny than that, he didn't like having sex with his whale of a girlfriend. Ouch.
Oh I remember this.The show is called Financial Audit, but I think it was worse he was just donating to a twitch streamer,.not even Only Fans
There was also a guy in Florida who murdered his family after they wouldn't give him more $ to spend on OnlyFans girls.
He stole a bunch of his family's money too and spend like $40K on OF.
Over the years I've seen a few streamer meltdowns on Twitch. One that happened a few years back was a British variety gaming streamer called Spamfish. Over the course of a mental breakdown brought on by loneliness and depression, he gradually torched his stream in multiple tearful bouts of crying and complaining and oversharing. At the stage when he was struggling to afford his rent and soon to be evicted from his place, he revealed that he had spent 5 figures online on onlythots. He confessed this in between random gibberish political rants about eg. Rishi Sunak's transphobia(?!), further revealing that his mind had been colonised by progressive cancer. It seemed obvious that he'd adopted more and more feminist talking points in the belief that it would make him seem like a good feminist ally, so that female twitch streamers in adjacent communities might touch his e-peen.
People are saying they find the OF spending hard to believe and that they never hear about it, but I'm willing to believe there are tens of thousands of stories like spamfish. Only his unhinged level of oversharing shed light on where his money went. With most guys you'd never hear about it. The simps problem cannot be overstated.
Lol, ive been fighting with my spouse, partly because of some comments made by her friend a few months back. They were drinking here and her friend came at me while I was alone in my room telling me I was just depressed and needed to take anti anxiety medication lol, like these twats. Her best friend told me a month ago that I just needed to like, drink more water. Damn I cant believe I never thought of that.
Anyway, really bothered me because I thought this girl was talking for my wife. She is half the age as we are and covered in tattoos. She is also very cute, which is prolly the only reason I cared what she thought rofl.
Come to find out after talking with my spouse last weekend that her marriage isnt doing very good. Her man apparently spends a chunk of his paycheck on onlyfans and meanwhile she is hot enough she could be banking money if she wanted. Its honestly kinda crazy.
Its not about the sex.
Now that I have an official diagnosis, you think any of these assholes have, or are going to apologize. Fuck no.
Literal Plapjak meme
The dating market is hell and average men have no hope of even getting a fat used up slut these days.
I'm actually jealous of him. I can't even get an ugly bitch willing to use me for money, but he got one that let him spend hers.
You’re not an average man
Try expanding your dating pool beyond 12-year-olds, preferably to the exclusion of your favored age range.
Try having sex with a tank of piranhas.
See my comment about money laundering
https://scored.co/c/KotakuInAction2/p/1ASFhNxEGb/americans-now-spend-more-on-only/c/4eZE8eWRf5t
NOT IN MY HALL!
Yeah, debate over the merits of gooning vs more enlightened pursuits not wiithdtanding, who the fuck actually pays for this? The internet is home to practically limitless free equivalents, and it's trivially easy even to find the specifically sold content for free most of the time too.
I refuse to believe there's that many dumb simps willing to pay 10 bucks a month for some videos they could get for free and a DM from a jeet with a whore's pfp.
jews. Onlyfans is a jewish owned website.
jews print money and then use it to pay White women to whore themselves
It's not even about profit. It's just about demoralizing White people, whoring out our women, destroying our culture and civilization.
That's why I get angry when faggots such as u/thisisnotanexit is more worried about censoring people for saying kike than he is worried about half the internet being an economy built around whoring out and demoralizing and demeaning and humiliating White women. And it's the kikes doing it. But u/thisisnotanexit is more mad about jews being called kikes rather than what jews are doing that makes people WANT to call them kikes in the first place.
The money isn't even real. So basically jews just print something and people sell their souls for fake money that some jew printed in his money printing factory. It's purely evil and kikes deserve much worse than being called mean names. I consider u/thisisnotanexit complicit in their crimes for trying to protect them.
Unless you're specifically trying to get input from another user on the post's subject, you can just bitch about them without the u/ tag.
That seems less likely to derail the topic at hand into dredging old grudges like an angry GF.
My way is more fun.
It's not the nudity or sexual content men are paying for. They want to believe they are in relationships with these women, that they are getting unique or personalized content. It's exclusivity the guys think they are buying.
All they have to do is show high average income instead mean income, most people on it make close to nothing
That includes a lot of money laundering.
Remember that adult video store that you used to pass by that remained in business despite never having any cars but the single employee? Businesses like this are prime for money laundering because everyone tries to conceal their identity when using them legitimately, so it makes it hard to look for money changing hands just to change hands.
The online ones are no different, saw an article about some embezzler tipping his sister-in-law millions of dollars over years on her cam girl page, only caught because it being his sister-in-law made it blatant, and it all clicked for me that the entire adult industry is rife with money laundering.
The porno industry always had a reputation of being run by the organized crime, it isn't just because they branched out from prostitution. They need a place to feed their drug profits through.
Does the no tax on tips apply to onlyfans? That would make it even more attractive to money laundering, even from legal but off-book profits.
Many tax professionals and IRS guidance indicate that tips from OnlyFans especially those tied to adult or pornographic content do not qualify for the special “no tax on tips” deduction.
It's the same in most countries live streamers tried to claim "donations" as tax exempt but the money given was clearly given as appreciation of a product, in this case the stream.
They tried to do this in countries where we already have laws to tax tips and don't have a tipping culture at all.
Also, the Feds are definitely send info money through, or at least the CIA.
Good point, I think that is technically under the de facto umbrella of money laundering though, but probably exempt from the de jure umbrella (like the "wealth management" Epstein did as his more-legit face business)
OpenAI only making that much per month and they buy nearly half the world's semiconductor production capacity with the money Federal Reserve banks pilfer from citizens.
Yeah, I think this is bullshit Jewish stealth marketing. The only times I've heard anyone mention Onlyfans IRL is in the normie context of "did you see those girls on that podcast that work for that website" or "did you see that girl that made 20 million dollars" regardless of whether I'm talking to a boomer or zoomer. For that matter, I don't even see OF girls mentioned on the internet.
Even when it comes to legitimate users, there's no reason to assume that the revenue is equally distributed across the userbase. The whale phenomenon has been well known for over a decade now. Most of the money likely flows from a tiny core of subscribers.
Then you factor in the money laundering and propaganda aspect. In the past I would've thought that the idea of a multibillion dollar industry being propped up was too farfetched, but it seems like rich Jews don't recognize any limits.
why would whales be a thing there? if they feel the need to throw whale level money at hot women, why not just hire a professional?
I think it breaks down into two user profiles.
Sounds like you just don't interact with enough women to see them shilling themselves.
That's a rich accusation, coming from you.
People spend money on the New York Times.
It’s sexual release for lonely child free liberal women. Basically Onlyfans
The question is, which is the worse personality indicator: Someone with a New York Times subscription, or someone with an Onlyfans subscription.
Only fans is trying to break out of porn and offer comedy and cooking. That’s worst.
I hate these whores with a passion. Please let it all be money laundering.
Money laundering, brown and black people (especially Indians), psyop. As stated by everyone below.
>now
>graph shows it's been that way for over 3 years
What a fucking retard.
Also why would anyone spend money on NYT when chatGPT will lie to you for free?
College students forced to subscribe by their libshit professors.
And with a weird spike in late 2024 now that you mention it...
And more convincingly.
Just a symptom. Not the problem.
It's such a loser thing to pay for OnlyFans
It's completely unnecessary too given how much free HD porn exists online
But these losers fall for this small amount of fle engagement with a women. Reading your chats on screen, responding to your texts (it's not even them)
They pay for a fake simulated relationship, even though they know she is doing the same with tons of other men
Loser behavior
I heard the pay farms of filipinos to answer
Worldwide. Pretty sure my cousin does this from Canada.
Do what you love and you never have to work a day in your life
The only OF whore I knew, had a gay dude be the one that responds to all the dorks that would message her. They'd even pay to send her dick picks and get feedback about them. And the fag would get to check out all the d pics.
Lol
I have heard worse stories.
Going to a massage place for a handy. Lady puts a towel over your eyes during handy. You take off the handy to find an old man giving you a handy.
And? If your options are a fake simulated relationship with a whore or having nothing at all and being alienated by a society filled with reference to these experiences you're expected to have had by your age I don't see how it's surprising that men pay for simulated engagement with someone they imagine to be a woman.
The only other alternative would be hiring a prostitute for hundreds of dollars per hour, risking prison, and all that just to get a blow job from some middling hag.
True maybe that does sound worse.
Yeah but it’s not the only other alternative
To be fair the "person" you are talking to on Onlyfans is probably some form of AI.
Or an Indian dude in a call center.
Or that. There's even a chance you may get the actual performer.
Saar, I am doing the needful on myself with the money you sent
that's the best case scenario lmao
what a strange metric to use...
Imagine paying for porn.
A lot of these women simply don't want to work a contributing day job to society. Most have boyfriends already (or could in a second if they wanted one).
It's pure exploitation of lonely men that adds 0 value to society. It inflates the egos of whores and helps to make normal relationships more difficult. It also allows women to date loser men instead of compelling women to seek out productive men.
There's nothing good about onlyfans but it's ultimately a symptom of the larger underlying problems in society and not the root cause itself.
Way to exculpate the people enabling this. I'm more concerned about societal consequences than about poor weirdo suckers being parted from their money.
How?
You're definitely right about this.
Men aren't enabling it. Women are. Women purposely cause a supply shortage of sex for men who aren't the top 0.1% of men. If women had sex more often with men then then there would be no demand for this. Women create the demand for onlyfans by restricting access to sex.
Because women make enough money to sustain themselves through OF and virtual sex work such that women don't need to seek out engineers or lawyers for their lifestyle. They instead can opt to seek out men that don't make tons of money but have bigger dicks or are better looking from their pov.
Men subscribe to OnlyFans... women to blame. Sounds like when immigrants groped women in Cologne and feminists blamed German men.
How do they do that?
You know that's just a handful of people, right? It's like saying that men don't need to become productive like engineers or lawyers because they can just toss a football around.
lol, bigger dicks? You really believe that?
It's whatever reason other than the guy is a productive member to society.
Why are you trying to blame men for their nature. Men want to enjoy women. They are compelled to by their nature. You think men want to buy OF? They don't. They have no other options. Give men other options and they'll stop buying OF. Women are the ones who control men's options.
I think it's good if women have some standards and won't just date any fat slob. But you thinking that women go around looking for "bigger dicks" is laughable.
Wait, you're the German immigrant to Canada who said that America and Canada are "German" and that Trump should conquer Canada. Never mind.
Fat slobs aren't likely productive members of society. You're exaggerating "having some standards". The men they're with tend to not be quality from what you'd probably gauge quality to be.
I was just at a sex show all weekend where chatterbate was the largest sponser and pornstars whose names you'd recognize were there. I'm friends with multiple women who do OF and some escorts. I know the women in the sex industry inside and out. I've dated a couple before. And at least for these women into this line of work, yeah, dick size gets brought up as a characteristic they care about. But it depends what phase they're in. Most deep down aren't any different than the men they charge money to. They want hot men out of their league and are bitter they can't get this or the men who they can get have no money but the men with money aren't hot. Same issues, usually.
There's two ways to look at it.
There's nothing wrong with what the women are doing and this is just everyone finding something that works for them. Women need money and have sex so they sell sex for money but without any of the benefits of a loving relationship. Men need sex and have money so they buy sex for money without any of the benefits of a loving relationship.
There's a problem with this.
Here's the thing though, it's the men who want loving relationships with the women but the women don't want it with the men. The men pay and the women receive. Who is truly the victim and the exploiter here? Men lose their resources and earn fake care in return. If you think it's a problem that the women are doing these things, anyhow... If there's no problem, then there's no problem but if there's a problem I think you should start with the women not the men. The women are the ones selling the lie and acting. They fool the men into thinking there's something more than there is. The men often get false hope and lie to themselves about the woman's actual care for them. It's a scam... No different than the Nigerian prince who tells you if you keep sending money, he'll repay you eventually. Keep sending the OF girl money and she'll fall in love with you eventually (but she won't).
Doctors and engineers (real ones) tend not to be the best-looking people, and engineers often aren't the healthiest ones. So what are you selecting for.
You must be trolling again.
Here too. Inside?
The paradox is that women who talk about dick size with strangers generally aren't quality women.
As the old Soviet adage went: we pretend to work and they pretend to pay us. I'm sure they know that a woman they're paying doesn't actually care about them.
"now"
looks like they always have
Americans, or "I'm as American as you"ans?
I play a mobile game in a top alliance and the amount of money that people spend on this is insane. I wholly believe that people spend more on only fans.
Leonid Radvinsky sends OF money to Israel. It's not going away until Jewish sovereignty goes away.
I’ve never seen anything like this when there’s a completely free archive of as much naked ladies as you’d ever need but still be compelled to throw money at these women to take maybe half their clothes off.
This doesn’t factor VPNs from other counties.
The most pathetic part is how free porn is better quality and has more variety.
If people subscribe to these weirdos on Twitch to see them in skimpy clothing, is it really that hard to believe that they'd pay to see them fully nude? Not saying it's right, only that it's believable. Although I don't believe it myself.
Gross.