Unmarried White women, to be more precise. Married ones tend to mirror their husband's beliefs and majority voted for Trump. The rest are effectively wed to the state and mirror the beliefs pushed by mockingbird media and government funded indoctrination centers.
Agreed, though I should point out that even married white women tend to be center-rent.
Truly, we need a right-wing affirmative narrative for women. A rightist society must show more than submission and safety for married women; but improved and increased social status at the center of a social ordering of their local community and family. A true matriarch position where it is actually appropriate.
Right now, due to demographics, rightist narratives are skewed to heavily towards men, and men's disagreeableness to pathological women.
How are women going to be given more status than they already have under the current paradigm? They're already immune to the consequences of any wrongdoing and told everything is someone else's fault and that they're all 11/10 queens who deserve everything.
The reality that we all know but don't care to say in public is that women need to be torn down and put in their place. We've removed their direct dependence upon the men in their lives and society has gone to absolute shit as a result. We can talk about giving them status again once women exist purely at the mercy of the men who love them.
Anyone who is gifted everything inevitably destroys themselves because of the pathological nature of a lack of necessity. Hunter Biden is a great example. He is basically an ultra-entitled creature, incapable of being held to account, and is merely a financial vehicle for other more powerful people. This is why Pedo Pete took 45% of his income.
Not holding women accountable does not actually give them any real status. This is because that status is an abstract status that exists exclusively in social media. They are not high status among their friends and community. They are typically TOLD they are high status by virtue of a collective, and normally have nothing to show for it. Then the people that do have high "status" just have internet updoots, as if that had any meaning to it. The respect of a woman's peers and community is what they actually crave which is why they actually have nothing.
This is why women don't need to be torn down at all. They have the highest suicide rate we've ever seen, and 45% of all white women under the age of 30 have a diagnosed mental health disorder. Women are already destroyed by the system that feminism has given them. What we have are feminist simulacrums of women that are so insecure and so unfulfilled that a swathe of them are in to rape fetishes, and the other swathe are so radicalized they want to be suicidal empathy bombers for foreigners they can pretend are the children they never had. All because the elites conditioned women to have cluster B personality disorders while denying them any access to healthy masculinity and families.
You are very right about that. Women will need to feel valuable and respected in a system if we are to get them to adopt it. Right now women are lauded for all the wrong things. Either for being a slut and being promiscuous. Or for being a bad bitch / independent woman who don't need no man. Men on the right need to enshrine classic femininity, the wife. Basically, make a cultural (female) hierarchy like this:
Grandmother
Mother
Dutiful wife
Feminine and chaste
Young girl
Where there is essentially upward mobility for "promotion" and each requires action but also certain inaction. Yes, there are certain things that must be done (have kids) but also things that mustn't be done (sleep around, be a derelict mother, get tattoos, get rainbow hair, get non-ear piercings).
Bro tubers that being on sluts just to shit on them don't help. They divide the sexes.
Yes, fundamentally it's a very old Leftist deflection. Claim you represent a group. Then claim that criticism of you, is criticism of that group. Any one from within the group that criticises you is a traitor to that group, and you are allowed to engage with unlimited violence against such a person. As your policies fail and the group is emisserated, tell them that the emisseration is because a) you didn't get enough power, and b) the group's enemy group.
So long as you keep one group fighting another, you keep up the deflection in recognizing that the problem is entirely your fault.
This is what Tim Walz is doing with ICE and Immigrants. This is the false dichotomy that he is using as a deflection to keep him from facing RICO charges for the amount of Medicare fraud he must have personally approved.
The Left wants to promote inceldom and anti-female chauvinism among the right, because it keeps women Leftist, as they demand that you have to pick a side. They key to undermining the Leftist is to guarantee a place for the group members they are manipulating.
Yes
The right can sweep up voters and support in general by basically saying hey we don't want to fight you. We want your lives improved as well and we genuinely think our plans will accomplish that. As much as the left pisses me off, kill em with kindness seems to work better. And that's for garnering external support. Internal cohesion is paramount.
Female radicalization doesn't mean much without the muscle of men behind it, something they enjoyed with the Boomers and Millennials but stalled with Zoomers/Alphas. I've noticed the younger generations are casually calling women foids now, not to mention "repeal the 19th."
That's why white women have been so eager to import non-white men. The percentage of white men who are willing to destroy themselves for pussy has probably plateaued, and there aren't enough simps to completely surrender society to women. So they've opted to bring in foreign men who are all too happy to help finish the job.
That's not really the problem. The radicalization of women means that men can't marry sane women, women who reproduce will castrate their children, and some will be suicide bombers for Leftism.
All that and unmarried white women will still continue to dominate the middle managerial class, which will be enacting the most draconian regulations and laws.
It's not about women being a political block to threaten power, it's that they're effectively being persuaded to commit civilizational suicide.
A guy in the quoted thread drops a psych paper that basically says women can be brainwashed using repeated A/V cues (think Daily Show family of products) in ways men cannot.
Jews only worry about leftward swings when it is bad for Jews. Direct example here. The crazy left has adopted a pro Palestine stance and for that reason have abandoned support of Israel and by extension Jews. So the Jew realizes they need to push those people more rightward. And not even to actual right, but just right enough (including moderate left) such that they become at least agnostic on the Israel issue, but ideally pro Israel again. So what we'll see in the coming months is the Jew trying to pit one special group against another more useful idiot special group in the form of pitting Islam against faggots (LGBT). And the line will be "Israel is pro LGBT and Islam throws gays off rooftops. Support Israel!"
He tries so, so hard to "balance" his take by heaping at least some of the blame on men, of course. And when men slowly begin to recognize what's happening and lurch towards the right, in an effort to correct the female problem, dude says men are just being "captured" by another machine.
Yeah that's why you can't take most of these pussies online seriously. The only blame men have is not shutting down women and I'm not in that group. I'm very open about my opinions on women and politics.
Who was that interviewer who had maybe 20-30 zoomer college girls on the mic? Asking them if the Constitution should be rewritten (all unanimously answered yes, and when asked to include what, every single one gave "abortion" as the first answer)
Smith Mundt Modernization Act. It was aimed at women, because they're the easiest to control. Just laugh at women and girls when they spout their nonsense. Don't even engage. Just laugh.
Remember that Donald Trump won 2016 primarily with older whites, as well as a wider variety of non-whites than previous Republicans.
Those older whites have basically aged out into their 70's & 80's; and now he's dealing with actual Boomer seniors who fucking despise him. The Left actually called this part of the 2020 election correctly. He's in a tough spot where he basically needs a huge tent to win, including non-whites, and he needs a lot more Zoomer support, despite the fact that most Zoomers (even males) are Leftwing.
The message was from women who have seen men move radically right relative to themselves. They just never had perspective because they process everything in relative terms.
Now break it down by race, imposed over the decline of the white percentage of the population.
Jarvis, break it down by race. Impose the decline of the white percentage of the population.
I'm afraid you're going to find white women to be very leftist and trending more leftward.
Unmarried White women, to be more precise. Married ones tend to mirror their husband's beliefs and majority voted for Trump. The rest are effectively wed to the state and mirror the beliefs pushed by mockingbird media and government funded indoctrination centers.
And the number of those are on the rise "thanks" to peer pressure from other miserable childless cat ladies and of course the (((media)))
Agreed, though I should point out that even married white women tend to be center-rent.
Truly, we need a right-wing affirmative narrative for women. A rightist society must show more than submission and safety for married women; but improved and increased social status at the center of a social ordering of their local community and family. A true matriarch position where it is actually appropriate.
Right now, due to demographics, rightist narratives are skewed to heavily towards men, and men's disagreeableness to pathological women.
How are women going to be given more status than they already have under the current paradigm? They're already immune to the consequences of any wrongdoing and told everything is someone else's fault and that they're all 11/10 queens who deserve everything.
The reality that we all know but don't care to say in public is that women need to be torn down and put in their place. We've removed their direct dependence upon the men in their lives and society has gone to absolute shit as a result. We can talk about giving them status again once women exist purely at the mercy of the men who love them.
Enabling is not the same as Success.
Anyone who is gifted everything inevitably destroys themselves because of the pathological nature of a lack of necessity. Hunter Biden is a great example. He is basically an ultra-entitled creature, incapable of being held to account, and is merely a financial vehicle for other more powerful people. This is why Pedo Pete took 45% of his income.
Not holding women accountable does not actually give them any real status. This is because that status is an abstract status that exists exclusively in social media. They are not high status among their friends and community. They are typically TOLD they are high status by virtue of a collective, and normally have nothing to show for it. Then the people that do have high "status" just have internet updoots, as if that had any meaning to it. The respect of a woman's peers and community is what they actually crave which is why they actually have nothing.
This is why women don't need to be torn down at all. They have the highest suicide rate we've ever seen, and 45% of all white women under the age of 30 have a diagnosed mental health disorder. Women are already destroyed by the system that feminism has given them. What we have are feminist simulacrums of women that are so insecure and so unfulfilled that a swathe of them are in to rape fetishes, and the other swathe are so radicalized they want to be suicidal empathy bombers for foreigners they can pretend are the children they never had. All because the elites conditioned women to have cluster B personality disorders while denying them any access to healthy masculinity and families.
You're playing word games again to fellate your own intellectual and linguistic ego.
Women are going to see any change in the current order as a downgrade, because it will be. The change will need to be imposed on them.
Being specific isn't ego. It's not going to be seen as a downgrade because enabling isn't success.
True.
You are very right about that. Women will need to feel valuable and respected in a system if we are to get them to adopt it. Right now women are lauded for all the wrong things. Either for being a slut and being promiscuous. Or for being a bad bitch / independent woman who don't need no man. Men on the right need to enshrine classic femininity, the wife. Basically, make a cultural (female) hierarchy like this: Grandmother Mother Dutiful wife Feminine and chaste Young girl
Where there is essentially upward mobility for "promotion" and each requires action but also certain inaction. Yes, there are certain things that must be done (have kids) but also things that mustn't be done (sleep around, be a derelict mother, get tattoos, get rainbow hair, get non-ear piercings).
Bro tubers that being on sluts just to shit on them don't help. They divide the sexes.
Yes, fundamentally it's a very old Leftist deflection. Claim you represent a group. Then claim that criticism of you, is criticism of that group. Any one from within the group that criticises you is a traitor to that group, and you are allowed to engage with unlimited violence against such a person. As your policies fail and the group is emisserated, tell them that the emisseration is because a) you didn't get enough power, and b) the group's enemy group.
So long as you keep one group fighting another, you keep up the deflection in recognizing that the problem is entirely your fault.
This is what Tim Walz is doing with ICE and Immigrants. This is the false dichotomy that he is using as a deflection to keep him from facing RICO charges for the amount of Medicare fraud he must have personally approved.
The Left wants to promote inceldom and anti-female chauvinism among the right, because it keeps women Leftist, as they demand that you have to pick a side. They key to undermining the Leftist is to guarantee a place for the group members they are manipulating.
Yes The right can sweep up voters and support in general by basically saying hey we don't want to fight you. We want your lives improved as well and we genuinely think our plans will accomplish that. As much as the left pisses me off, kill em with kindness seems to work better. And that's for garnering external support. Internal cohesion is paramount.
Because women always side with the invading force, thats why they should never be free
That's an open lie, and the position of an idiot.
Women get raped and are not killed because they are a resource, contrasting with disloyal men who are of no benefit to a conqueror.
You kill men and it's a conquest. You kill women and it's an extermination campaign.
Yes, that's why they side with the invaders
By your logic, prisoners are pro-police.
All those who aren't wrongfully imprisoned are, because otherwise tthey'd be tortured to death if not for police protection.
That is the most incomprehensibly stupid thing you could have said. Good job.
Female radicalization doesn't mean much without the muscle of men behind it, something they enjoyed with the Boomers and Millennials but stalled with Zoomers/Alphas. I've noticed the younger generations are casually calling women foids now, not to mention "repeal the 19th."
That's why white women have been so eager to import non-white men. The percentage of white men who are willing to destroy themselves for pussy has probably plateaued, and there aren't enough simps to completely surrender society to women. So they've opted to bring in foreign men who are all too happy to help finish the job.
That's not really the problem. The radicalization of women means that men can't marry sane women, women who reproduce will castrate their children, and some will be suicide bombers for Leftism.
All that and unmarried white women will still continue to dominate the middle managerial class, which will be enacting the most draconian regulations and laws.
It's not about women being a political block to threaten power, it's that they're effectively being persuaded to commit civilizational suicide.
Wait, does this mean that Zarathustra figured out a way to tell men and women apart? Quick, they need to inform the judges and politicians!
Women are 2/3 of university student bodies, is it any wonder they are winding up hard core progressives by the time they graduate?
Why does this surprise anyone?
If you haven't realized by now that universities are the home base for progressives, I've got nothing for you...
A guy in the quoted thread drops a psych paper that basically says women can be brainwashed using repeated A/V cues (think Daily Show family of products) in ways men cannot.
https://xcancel.com/GoodPyre/status/2012107217978183935#m
CHS is a Jew and Democrat. I'm sure she's on your team and just trying to help.
Jews only worry about leftward swings when it is bad for Jews. Direct example here. The crazy left has adopted a pro Palestine stance and for that reason have abandoned support of Israel and by extension Jews. So the Jew realizes they need to push those people more rightward. And not even to actual right, but just right enough (including moderate left) such that they become at least agnostic on the Israel issue, but ideally pro Israel again. So what we'll see in the coming months is the Jew trying to pit one special group against another more useful idiot special group in the form of pitting Islam against faggots (LGBT). And the line will be "Israel is pro LGBT and Islam throws gays off rooftops. Support Israel!"
This guy concludes women were brainwashed by social media into conformity:
https://x.com/iterintellectus/status/2012220254504530043
He tries so, so hard to "balance" his take by heaping at least some of the blame on men, of course. And when men slowly begin to recognize what's happening and lurch towards the right, in an effort to correct the female problem, dude says men are just being "captured" by another machine.
Yeah that's why you can't take most of these pussies online seriously. The only blame men have is not shutting down women and I'm not in that group. I'm very open about my opinions on women and politics.
OvertonWindowInAction
Who was that interviewer who had maybe 20-30 zoomer college girls on the mic? Asking them if the Constitution should be rewritten (all unanimously answered yes, and when asked to include what, every single one gave "abortion" as the first answer)
Smith Mundt Modernization Act. It was aimed at women, because they're the easiest to control. Just laugh at women and girls when they spout their nonsense. Don't even engage. Just laugh.
Young men reached peak leftism in 2016?
Remember that Donald Trump won 2016 primarily with older whites, as well as a wider variety of non-whites than previous Republicans.
Those older whites have basically aged out into their 70's & 80's; and now he's dealing with actual Boomer seniors who fucking despise him. The Left actually called this part of the 2020 election correctly. He's in a tough spot where he basically needs a huge tent to win, including non-whites, and he needs a lot more Zoomer support, despite the fact that most Zoomers (even males) are Leftwing.
Woah.
Roughly a 33% reversal towards sanity for young women since the Fentanyl Floyd riots and jewish clot shot poisonings of 2020?
Well, yeah?
The message was from women who have seen men move radically right relative to themselves. They just never had perspective because they process everything in relative terms.
It's interesting because in 2012, 2008, and 2016 men shifted leftward, strongly.
Women shifted rightward in 2004, 2007, 2018, and 2024? Why men are shifting leftward?
Granted it looks like this chart ends in 2024.
Feminists have always been a jewish thing. Just ask them...
It was always a radical idea. One of the writers for The Guardian wants to put men in camps and believes marriage is evil and should be abolished..
Feminists engaged in arson and bombing campaigns as well!.
I'm pretty sure this yenta is overreacting
Women haven't changed much and will not change because like fish they swim with the current
Have you been charting the path of the waters lately and which way they run. Women have been swimming with the leftist invasion of the institutions.
Gonna hit a hard spot and then Dam.
Always appreciate the dad joke