Unmarried White women, to be more precise. Married ones tend to mirror their husband's beliefs and majority voted for Trump. The rest are effectively wed to the state and mirror the beliefs pushed by mockingbird media and government funded indoctrination centers.
Agreed, though I should point out that even married white women tend to be center-rent.
Truly, we need a right-wing affirmative narrative for women. A rightist society must show more than submission and safety for married women; but improved and increased social status at the center of a social ordering of their local community and family. A true matriarch position where it is actually appropriate.
Right now, due to demographics, rightist narratives are skewed to heavily towards men, and men's disagreeableness to pathological women.
How are women going to be given more status than they already have under the current paradigm? They're already immune to the consequences of any wrongdoing and told everything is someone else's fault and that they're all 11/10 queens who deserve everything.
The reality that we all know but don't care to say in public is that women need to be torn down and put in their place. We've removed their direct dependence upon the men in their lives and society has gone to absolute shit as a result. We can talk about giving them status again once women exist purely at the mercy of the men who love them.
Anyone who is gifted everything inevitably destroys themselves because of the pathological nature of a lack of necessity. Hunter Biden is a great example. He is basically an ultra-entitled creature, incapable of being held to account, and is merely a financial vehicle for other more powerful people. This is why Pedo Pete took 45% of his income.
Not holding women accountable does not actually give them any real status. This is because that status is an abstract status that exists exclusively in social media. They are not high status among their friends and community. They are typically TOLD they are high status by virtue of a collective, and normally have nothing to show for it. Then the people that do have high "status" just have internet updoots, as if that had any meaning to it. The respect of a woman's peers and community is what they actually crave which is why they actually have nothing.
This is why women don't need to be torn down at all. They have the highest suicide rate we've ever seen, and 45% of all white women under the age of 30 have a diagnosed mental health disorder. Women are already destroyed by the system that feminism has given them. What we have are feminist simulacrums of women that are so insecure and so unfulfilled that a swathe of them are in to rape fetishes, and the other swathe are so radicalized they want to be suicidal empathy bombers for foreigners they can pretend are the children they never had. All because the elites conditioned women to have cluster B personality disorders while denying them any access to healthy masculinity and families.
You are very right about that. Women will need to feel valuable and respected in a system if we are to get them to adopt it. Right now women are lauded for all the wrong things. Either for being a slut and being promiscuous. Or for being a bad bitch / independent woman who don't need no man. Men on the right need to enshrine classic femininity, the wife. Basically, make a cultural (female) hierarchy like this:
Grandmother
Mother
Dutiful wife
Feminine and chaste
Young girl
Where there is essentially upward mobility for "promotion" and each requires action but also certain inaction. Yes, there are certain things that must be done (have kids) but also things that mustn't be done (sleep around, be a derelict mother, get tattoos, get rainbow hair, get non-ear piercings).
Bro tubers that being on sluts just to shit on them don't help. They divide the sexes.
Yes, fundamentally it's a very old Leftist deflection. Claim you represent a group. Then claim that criticism of you, is criticism of that group. Any one from within the group that criticises you is a traitor to that group, and you are allowed to engage with unlimited violence against such a person. As your policies fail and the group is emisserated, tell them that the emisseration is because a) you didn't get enough power, and b) the group's enemy group.
So long as you keep one group fighting another, you keep up the deflection in recognizing that the problem is entirely your fault.
This is what Tim Walz is doing with ICE and Immigrants. This is the false dichotomy that he is using as a deflection to keep him from facing RICO charges for the amount of Medicare fraud he must have personally approved.
The Left wants to promote inceldom and anti-female chauvinism among the right, because it keeps women Leftist, as they demand that you have to pick a side. They key to undermining the Leftist is to guarantee a place for the group members they are manipulating.
I'm afraid you're going to find white women to be very leftist and trending more leftward.
Unmarried White women, to be more precise. Married ones tend to mirror their husband's beliefs and majority voted for Trump. The rest are effectively wed to the state and mirror the beliefs pushed by mockingbird media and government funded indoctrination centers.
And the number of those are on the rise "thanks" to peer pressure from other miserable childless cat ladies and of course the (((media)))
Agreed, though I should point out that even married white women tend to be center-rent.
Truly, we need a right-wing affirmative narrative for women. A rightist society must show more than submission and safety for married women; but improved and increased social status at the center of a social ordering of their local community and family. A true matriarch position where it is actually appropriate.
Right now, due to demographics, rightist narratives are skewed to heavily towards men, and men's disagreeableness to pathological women.
How are women going to be given more status than they already have under the current paradigm? They're already immune to the consequences of any wrongdoing and told everything is someone else's fault and that they're all 11/10 queens who deserve everything.
The reality that we all know but don't care to say in public is that women need to be torn down and put in their place. We've removed their direct dependence upon the men in their lives and society has gone to absolute shit as a result. We can talk about giving them status again once women exist purely at the mercy of the men who love them.
Enabling is not the same as Success.
Anyone who is gifted everything inevitably destroys themselves because of the pathological nature of a lack of necessity. Hunter Biden is a great example. He is basically an ultra-entitled creature, incapable of being held to account, and is merely a financial vehicle for other more powerful people. This is why Pedo Pete took 45% of his income.
Not holding women accountable does not actually give them any real status. This is because that status is an abstract status that exists exclusively in social media. They are not high status among their friends and community. They are typically TOLD they are high status by virtue of a collective, and normally have nothing to show for it. Then the people that do have high "status" just have internet updoots, as if that had any meaning to it. The respect of a woman's peers and community is what they actually crave which is why they actually have nothing.
This is why women don't need to be torn down at all. They have the highest suicide rate we've ever seen, and 45% of all white women under the age of 30 have a diagnosed mental health disorder. Women are already destroyed by the system that feminism has given them. What we have are feminist simulacrums of women that are so insecure and so unfulfilled that a swathe of them are in to rape fetishes, and the other swathe are so radicalized they want to be suicidal empathy bombers for foreigners they can pretend are the children they never had. All because the elites conditioned women to have cluster B personality disorders while denying them any access to healthy masculinity and families.
True.
You are very right about that. Women will need to feel valuable and respected in a system if we are to get them to adopt it. Right now women are lauded for all the wrong things. Either for being a slut and being promiscuous. Or for being a bad bitch / independent woman who don't need no man. Men on the right need to enshrine classic femininity, the wife. Basically, make a cultural (female) hierarchy like this: Grandmother Mother Dutiful wife Feminine and chaste Young girl
Where there is essentially upward mobility for "promotion" and each requires action but also certain inaction. Yes, there are certain things that must be done (have kids) but also things that mustn't be done (sleep around, be a derelict mother, get tattoos, get rainbow hair, get non-ear piercings).
Bro tubers that being on sluts just to shit on them don't help. They divide the sexes.
Yes, fundamentally it's a very old Leftist deflection. Claim you represent a group. Then claim that criticism of you, is criticism of that group. Any one from within the group that criticises you is a traitor to that group, and you are allowed to engage with unlimited violence against such a person. As your policies fail and the group is emisserated, tell them that the emisseration is because a) you didn't get enough power, and b) the group's enemy group.
So long as you keep one group fighting another, you keep up the deflection in recognizing that the problem is entirely your fault.
This is what Tim Walz is doing with ICE and Immigrants. This is the false dichotomy that he is using as a deflection to keep him from facing RICO charges for the amount of Medicare fraud he must have personally approved.
The Left wants to promote inceldom and anti-female chauvinism among the right, because it keeps women Leftist, as they demand that you have to pick a side. They key to undermining the Leftist is to guarantee a place for the group members they are manipulating.
Because women always side with the invading force, thats why they should never be free
That's an open lie, and the position of an idiot.
Women get raped and are not killed because they are a resource, contrasting with disloyal men who are of no benefit to a conqueror.
You kill men and it's a conquest. You kill women and it's an extermination campaign.
Yes, that's why they side with the invaders
By your logic, prisoners are pro-police.