First: no, he's an idiot. Prisoners are not pro-police simply because they are held against their will, and obedience to coercion is not loyalty, or a desire to be held captive.
Second: How on Earth would you expect me understand a comic that is clearly at a story-telling peak about intricately woven power-plays with zero backstory? A son dies at the end from separating himself from his father, because his son's actions are a threat to his father's interests, and his son insists upon being outside of his father's protection. I suppose if this comic is supposed to be a corollary, a woman wouldn't be dumb enough to intentionally distance herself from the only protection she has, even if it is monstrous?
By your logic, prisoners are pro-police.
All those who aren't wrongfully imprisoned are, because otherwise tthey'd be tortured to death if not for police protection.
That is the most incomprehensibly stupid thing you could have said. Good job.
Hea drawing a point about institutions and the most retarded among us not recognizing how bad the alternative is to what they're complaining about.
https://www.giantitp.com/comics/oots0913.html
First: no, he's an idiot. Prisoners are not pro-police simply because they are held against their will, and obedience to coercion is not loyalty, or a desire to be held captive.
Second: How on Earth would you expect me understand a comic that is clearly at a story-telling peak about intricately woven power-plays with zero backstory? A son dies at the end from separating himself from his father, because his son's actions are a threat to his father's interests, and his son insists upon being outside of his father's protection. I suppose if this comic is supposed to be a corollary, a woman wouldn't be dumb enough to intentionally distance herself from the only protection she has, even if it is monstrous?