TL;DR after years of groypers celebrating pedophilia, Nick Fuentes suddenly decided he needed optics, so it is now the Night of the Long Knives for groypers who "joke" about little girls.
The post that launched a thousand comments, with commentary by HowlingMutant.
This is Piers Morgan's daughter, Elise Morgan. @piersmorgan can I get her number? [emojis]
She only has a few good years left before shes expired, better be quick! @piersmorgan
As with all groyper/Fuentes stories, this gets complex. The opening shot was of course the Piers Morgan interview, in which Piers named Nick's dad (Bill Fuentes) and asked him to explain an anecdote about his dad calling Red Lobster a black restaurant. Nick took extreme offense to Piers bringing up his dad, then said on his show that Piers' family was "fair game" and "greenlit," adding "fuck you and fuck your kids."
On the internet, "greenlit" basically means "go after these people, it's open season." It comes from black gangbanger slang for getting "greenlit" to kill someone.
In the wake of Nick's pronouncement, people dug up mountains of hilarious evidence that Piers is a cuck (already posted here), but the whole family was declared greenlit, so naturally a groyper account named "Voluntary Conscription Groyper" @fuentesclips went after Piers' daughter, resulting in the above post. (Elise Morgan was born in 2010 so she's about 15 now, but obviously she's much younger in that photo, probably around 8-11.)
The post was immediately seized on by the likes of James Lindsay and other faggot libs, and Nick, although making no public comment, may have put out the word to disavow. Subsequently, large groyper booster accounts like Gentile News Network did indeed disavow. Several times. Then the OP was suspended by X.
The funniest thing about this is that before yesterday, this was standard, even celebrated, groyper behavior. For example:
- OP was a large groyper account followed by Nick Fuentes and regularly posted things like a picture of infamous teenage rape and murder victim Junko Furata with the caption "14 year olds are hotter" with almost 300 likes
- Complained "haven't raped in a while" (see above)
- Groyper defending the above posts by stating "Catholic Church age of marriage is 14 retard"
- "Ok but why does loli Candace look kind of cute tho"
- "Haha isn't it funny if you burn a mom alive and kidnap her daughter"
- Groyper tributes to the suspended account with 160 likes and 54 likes
- Another example of groypers making rape porn out of the wifejak meme. There are many of these
- To sum it up, groypers with snowflake emojis are part of a pedophile gang that popularized the term "cunny" to refer to, well... the physiology of an underage girl
- Long thread about how Nick covered for a Indian/Pakistani/something pedophile named Ali Alexander. This could be a post in itself. Background on Ali.
So, if you didn't know yet, Nick fostered a teeming community of pedophiles in addition to everything else he's done, making him the weirdest fed asset of all history. But now it's time for him to enter the mainstream, so the long knives are out.
As far as getting offended at his dad being named by Piers: I don't get it. One, it's an anecdote he told on his show, so it's public knowledge. Two, putting out his dad's name isn't really doxing him. Three, he claims his parents are working themselves to the bone to pay for terminal cancer treatments, but Nick is a millionaire at this point. He can't help his parents out?
"No. Now get in the oven."
Wait, oven not woodchipper?
You kids with your fancy woodchippers and helicopter rides...I say, if ovens were good enough for grandpa Heinz, they're good enough for me!
Woodchipper, feet first.
Oven, not preheated.
Oven is slower and more painful
Can you make an oven large enough to fit a woodchipper inside of it?
Or, hear me out, what if we mount the wood chipper on a roller coaster, and then have it end up in the oven?
When does the masturbation machine come into play?
Or, hear me out, what if we mount a masturbation machine on the wood chipper on a roller coaster, and then have it end up in the oven?
Maybe that's what happened to Milo Yiannopoulos. He's looking rough these days.
Half cooked into the woodchipper
haha
Mr. Woodchipper's on vacation. Man's got a family, ya know...
Woodchipper is for pedos, oven is for Jews
Jews also are disproportionately pedos, and controlled opposition like Nick and his Groypers
I ASSumed this was over some exchange I missed during the 2 hour video between the two? Why else would he do that?
It's linked in the second paragraph of OP
Something I didn't even pick up on before is Piers is (of course) selectively editing the quote to make it sound like his dad didn't want to go to restaurants run by blacks, but later when he's defending his attack to make sure he's got it right reads "black fare".
So the anecdote was really saying his dad didn't want to go to KFC, even run by white employees, which jibes with Nick later saying his dad was just a food snob.
What? Whether it's true or not, the implication is Nick's dad didn't want to go to red lobster because its customers are mostly black not the employees
That's your opinion on what was implied by what was said and it's refuted by the person who said it.
In any case all of this comes from Nick - he's the only source for everything here. He's either telling the truth and it's a wrong implication or you're taking the word of a liar.
Sometimes liars tell the truth, but that's not really the strongest foundation is it.
Ah, I skipped past that part. Two hours, the thing was TWO HOURS!!!
What a gay nanny thread. The entire point of the piers/nick interview is that this feminine kvetching and pearl clutching is over and everyone is sick and tired of it. All of a sudden though, like leftists, we should care that some random dipshit groypers are taking jokes too far? Next you'll cry out about how he has a responsibility due to his platform or some other faggot leftist shit. This thread reads like a Hope Not Hate hitpiece and as such I reject your woman framing completely.
Yeah queer we do infact care about people promoting pedophilia and child rape
No you see its super based and just kvetching when Nick and his people are all pro-child rape and treat it as no big deal.
But that Epstein list about child rape? That's super fucking serious and Nick is still super based for demanding it because clearly he cares so much about the issue.
Lmao they can't seem to use basic logic and morals. We really do know Christians by their fruits.
Also it's hilarious that they always downvote me for being anti pedophilia
You'll have to decide if child rape jokes are OK with you or not.
I thought we were gamers
They aren't. Good think it isn't Nick saying them, huh? The biggest mark against Nick is the Ali Alexander stuff anyway, but you chose to instead focus on random anons who are tangentially related, which is what faggot leftists do. If this thread was an Ali Alexander/Nick Knew thread, that would be completely different, but it is in fact a kvetching shareblue fanfic.
Everyone knows Nick attracts unhinged (literal) faggots. I personally don't give a shit for the same reason I don't give a shit about Andrew Tate "radicalizing young boys!!!" There's so much you can actually pin Nick on that people rarely do, and you glossed over the biggest AF scandal in favor of schoolmarming.
I think the gap between us is the experience with the RW twitter sphere. First of all, RW twitter is where all serious political business goes down up to the level of the president and vice president. This has been proven countless times over the last few years. It's also influential on everyone in the RW, including thinkers, artists, influencers, etc.
Everyone on the internet gets influenced by Twitter, and Nick constantly leverages his popularity.
Having established that, groypers are one of the most powerful forces in the RW. They aren't self-organizing. They function as a cohesive unit taking orders from Nick and his lieutenants, they don't think for themselves, and they back each other up no matter what. They don't discuss or reason anything. The only thing that matters is "does Nick agree with this" and everyone else gets ratioed. This is extremely irritating.
Now imagine a significant part of this mob is into pedophilia and constantly shoves that in your face. It's as if 50 posters here were clones of AbleistSL and constantly talk about raping lolicons while everyone who disagrees gets downvoted. And this took over several threads daily. And this forum was somehow politically influential.
Nick takes the blame for this and it speaks to the character of his "movement." The Ali stuff is a lot more important in the grand scheme of things, but this is the part that's shoved in my face every day, and I'm sick of it.
I don't have twitter at all, so your take on what happens there I'll largely just grant. Like Cato, I'm more of the opinion that what happens on twitter largely doesn't matter. It is undeniable that Nick is getting popular in the grander view of public discourse, and this is really all I focus on. This is also where I stop caring about the groyper army, because at the end of the day, it's Nick himself going on Piers and Tucker. I don't give a shit about groyper faggotry because from my perspective, dissident right politics is wagging its fat dick in the face of the establishment to a degree that's utterly undeniable, and "our side" is making great strides towards shifting the culture and establishing the support necessary to actually foster real change. Some degenerate fucks on Twitter doesn't make me lose sight of that goal. Once we deal with the commies, most of them will largely settle down and stop being spicyboys. If they don't, they'll get the rope too.
Nick is probably a total fucking asshole and Machiavellian dipshit in real life and likely has zero actual empathy for his groypers who he will most certainly betray if it gives him more power to do so. It's basically why he teamed up with Ali in the first place. In spite of this, I do not care, because the more zoomers look at Nick and smile, the more zoomers will find people like Thomas Sewell and start working towards real change.
Whether we like it or not, Nick is really the only truly successful dissident voice with anything close to mass appeal. I'll take him as the tip of the spear. For now.
I suppose this could be the case. I've argued something similar about alt-lite voices like Tim Pool or something. In this view, the more Nick is popularized, the more white racial consciousness will rise, regardless of what his handlers are trying to do.
On the other hand, my point is that whatever you want to call his movement, it's a burgeoning cult of personality that is corrosive to basic pursuit of the truth, and that's potentially very destructive.
I don't seem to see the same velocity of the dissident right, but maybe that's just my perspective.
Said tip of the spear is spending most of his energies trying to stop people from tying the murder of Charlie Kirk to Israel, so this should be a good test as to what effects his influence will have.
I largely agree with everything you just wrote here. I guess we can only really sit back and wait to see how Nick handles all this extra attention now. I hope he actually is on team whitey and not team fed.
You are the literal definition of "terminally online". Nothing real ever happens on Twitter. It is always completely fake and gay.
The Haitian dogs+cats trend that became Trump's biggest debate line got started on Twitter. Trump has repeatedly reversed policy because of Twitter. Vivek got fired from DOGE because of Twitter. Vivek's campaign, in fact, is now tanking in an R+8 state because of things he said on Twitter. That's just off the top of my head.
Typical hallmark of the boomer, you refuse to open your eyes and see how the world has changed. Every single politically influential person on the RW is on that website.
Actually now that I think of it, you might as well have said that Gamergate doesn't matter because it was all on the internet. Truly a ridiculous position.
Your tweets haven't deported my neighbors. They are still here. There are still 50 squatamalans across 6 bedrooms in 3 houses within 100 feet of where I live. Tweets are worth nothing. The are just circuses to keep the right chasing after current thing, expending energy on ghosts.
Tweets are, in large part, why Kamala Harris isn't sending you to a Covid Camp. If anything significant at all will happen on the right, tweets will be involved.
You mean literally what happens here with Nazis?
At least we got this. Amazing stuff.
Piers is the most pathetic type of loser imaginable and/or has a massive humiliation kink.
But, yeah, Fuentes has collected a group containing some very disturbing individuals, some of whom are taking things way too far, or are just massive creeps to start with.
Nick intentionally turned himself into a toxic commodity, which I understand given his circumstances, but that means he's surrounded himself with other even more toxic people too.
His rabid and often retarded fanbase is one of my two major gripes with Fuentes. For those curious, the other is that he's ego-driven and disingenuous, bouncing around in opinion based on what will get him good results...he's just not trustworthy, because he's so wrapped up in being Nick Fuentes™. And trustworthiness/loyalty is one of the things I value most, especially in the "influencer" sphere.
Can't speak to that specifically, but I will say that kind of thing is exactly what I'm talking about. Nick will turn on a dime, and act like past things never happened. Very sneaky and dishonest behavior.
I will defend Nick here, though. That was pretty disgusting by Piers, and it's clear what the intent was. It was at the very least a soft-dox, and a signal boost of the said dox. Piers was trying to rattle Nick. Nick also claims his dad had never been specifically named publicly and, while that wouldn't be hard to do, Piers doing the work and putting that out there is making it even easier. Also, the stuff that gets clipped from Nick's content is the spicier stuff, by and large. Most people probably hadn't seen the stuff about his dad, I'd guess. Piers was being quite scummy.
I think my list of examples is enough to substantiate that. One of the most annoying things about the right wing on twitter is running into groypers acting like Lord of the Flies on almost every post, all liking and retweeting each others' posts.
Piers was definitely trying to rattle Nick. I guess I can see how it was a scumbag move to name the dad. But this is a kind of live by the sword, die by the sword moment. Nick has gone after people's kids plenty of times, and he clearly has no compunctions about going after Piers' kids.
You mean like CuckPro does here?
Nothing about Nick's cult is against Nazi beliefs.
The sooner people realize they are all pedos because that's what Nazism is about, the better.
You are a boomer with the usual retarded boomer ideas.
This is the most retarded statement I've read today.
Nevermind, this is the most retarded thing I've read today. The term "cunny" has existed since before the internet, and it's just a synonym for "cunt", without the Australianism that is normally associated with "cunt"
Which is it? Is he disavowing them or is he fostering them? You can't have it both ways.
And remember, KiA2 is fostering a community of pedophiles, because Ableist and his ilk are still not banned, and that one shitskin pedoposter posts here.
if /v/ pedos are anything to go by, "cunny" indeed refers to "underaged cunt". It is 100% pedo speak.
Then that is just you outing yourself.
classic groyper logic
I'm not the one thinking of CP when I see the word "cunny"
I'm american, the word is not part of my regular language. I've only ever seen it when pedos try to escape their quarantine.
Me thinks the Elder protesteth too much.
I think you got outed a long time ago, stormfaggot.
You people have been chomos since the mommy's boy set the age of consent at 14.
Meet in the middle: It obviously means that, but it wasn't "popularized by Nick Fuentes' audience" which is in the core original poster claim, and had existed as a term before Nick rose to fame. They were using a term whose meaning they knew before they said it, it wasn't some meme creation of theirs that went off their plantation where it could have had internal meaning.
It's like saying "kike is a disparaging term for jews popularized by Hasanabi's audience". It's obviously a term, the first part is clearly correct, but the second part is attributing far too much importance, power, and fame to some random dude's audience.
What's ironic is that its a dirty sounding word that was originally just an abbreviation of lolicon double speak. Because its short for "cute and funny" which is what the /v/tards and others used to reply when people asked for why they liked X loli girl.
And now it ended up with a word that is way worse both to see and even think, but actually sounds more disgusting than what it was meant to cover for initially.
Lol. You are one of the biggest boomer weirdos who post here.
That's a really pathetic excuse. Kiwifarms has documented the use of the word several times. Unsurprisingly, groypers have nothing to do with Australian slang.
He fostered, then disavowed. Is the passage of time confusing to you?
Those situations are not comparable.
Those situations are identical. Highlighting outliers who were being offensive and blaming the whole group for it was the exact same strategy that the media used to shut down gamergate as a whole, let alone individual forums like this one.
Gamergate doesn't really have a leader/spokesman for the movement the way groypers do, however, and Nick could be seen as fostering the pedos in the past when he argued for abolishing the age of consent and defended Roy Moore.
Guilt by association doesn't require a leader. You are arguing a distinction without a difference.
Who are you saying is being wrongfully judged guilty by association? I don't remember anyone here saying that all fans of Nick are pedos. And if you were referring to Nick, then he is not just guilty by association, he is literally guilty of defending and fostering pedos.
Don't play dumb. This isn't about smearing groypers or even Nick. It's about smearing anyone who opposes Israel.
Lmao what? Look at OP's post history dude. Believe it or not, but just because someone criticizes Nick doesn't make them a zionist.
Nick is a leader of a movement and directs people from Telegram and Discord. The banned account was one of the larger groyper accounts at 22k followers, followed by Nick. These people are his soldiers, and he absolutely knew what was going on. They dominate groyper posts on Twitter.
Obviously Nick also associated, on camera, with brown pedophile Ali Alexander, then repeatedly (many, many times) covered for him.
Meanwhile, this is a free speech forum where anyone can post and only like 10 people have ever been banned (for making spicy comments about minorities). The comparison is a nonstarter.
You are going to become this community's enemy if you keep going.
Embracing Nazism leads to pedophilia.
And it's funny how you won't ban kidfuckers but I got perma'd twice for speaking nothing but truth.
I didn't click on your KF link and don't know much about the origins of the term "cunny".
But Josh Moon has a hate for Fuentes in particular and I wouldn't trust users in Nick's KF thread to have any unbiased takes on Nick or the Groypers either as embellishing rumors about the lolcows you hate is half the fun of a-logging.
Well, the beautiful thing about Kiwi Farms is that they post evidence for everything, and the post that I linked has pretty undeniable evidence.
Moon does have it out for Nick, but I can separate his rhetoric from his facts. This is the same place that caught Nick with a tab of tranny porn.
You see the term on chans a lot, basically current year version of pedobear jokes.
What's the deal with Ableist?
Look at the list of communities he moderates.
https://scored.co/u/AbleistSL
I remember when you weren't completely retarded.
How dare the groypers make such despicable jokes. The rape gangs won't take too kindly to joking about their property like that. If groypers keep irritating them, someone could get hurt.
"but whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea."
The rape gangs that nobody has ever seen, and the only evidence is from perennial grifters with a gofundme in bio?
The truth of Rotherham was something people were not ready for. Teenage girls were trading sex for drugs then crying rape when the supply of drugs was cut off. That's your scandal. 13-14 year olds aren't fucking angels. No shit.
I went to school there, and not to a craphole, somewhere with a good rating. Most of the 13-14-15 year olds were trading sex for cigarettes, alcohol and drugs. That's what young British women are.
Was your dad the one offering that?
You can't anger me, I don't consider you human.
We are well aware that your kind thinks goyim are just cattle. I would say the feeling is mutual, except calling you livestock would be a compliment. You're actually insects.
Ironic, given the entire existence of your retarded movement relies on draining successful people like me to fund it.
So they were selling underage girls drugs in order to have sex with them? Cool woodchipper it is.
Nick explained it in the interview. It's hearsay. His dad isn't there to defend himself and only his dad can say what he meant. They don't bring the local gossip in to court to say "Nancy said this and meant that" they bring Nancy in.
It's actually worse than doxing. The only reason for Piers to focus on the dad is to involve him, a private non-famous citizen, against his will against his son. Dad didn't choose to take on the 'not full-on doxing' risk and threats to himself, Piers did it to him and now he is a target of leftoids.
Could be all kinds of reasons. Maybe they'll end up bankrupt and any money Nick sends won't actually help them but will go to Pfizer and UHC. Maybe they don't like Nick and won't accept his dirty money. Maybe his parents are jerks and Nick doesn't want to help them, but he's magnanimous and won't disparage them in public. Maybe he is helping them out.
Who knows and who cares?
Piers simply quoted a story that Nick himself told on his show. Which is public, with over 100,000 live viewers.
I have to say it's pretty funny that posts like this somehow bring out the weirdest people here to countersignal.
Piers: 'Isn't your dad inherently racist because he didn't want to go to KFC?'
Shadow: 'I just don't understand why this isn't appropriate'
lol
If it is a story that Nick put out to the public, then that does make it fair game to comment on. And let's not forget Nick has never hesitated to attack the families of public figures himself.
Relevant to this:
Nick arguing for abolishing the age of consent, from his episode titled "Judge Roy Moore Did Nothing Wrong" (Roy Moore was found guilty of sexual misconduct with a 14 year old girl when he was 32).
Nick saying he wants a 16-year old bride when he turns 30
Nazi collaborator Simone de Beauvoir would be proud.
They can't resist their Nazi roots...
Do you really think anyone here is a fan of Simone de Beauvoir
Seems like a lot of people are given how many posts are whining about Jews.
No I don't think it's ideological, Nick is just an amoral grifter. I actually support White Nationalism, but I also think the groyper movement is hypocritical and retarded.
How can anyone sane support white nationalism?
It's just racial Stalinism. It's every bad economic and social idea wrapped into one stupid ideology.
Do you object to Israel creating an ethno-state for jews?
What has that got to do with anything? Would you rather the goat fuckers had that land?
Seriously, every argument from white nationalists is the same, if it's bad, it's because of Israeli influence, if they want it, it's because Israel exists.
You don't have an argument in favor of your ideology that isn't just an appeal to anti-Semitism. I have an easy one against you, Vermont is the whitest state in America and votes for a damn commie every election.
It's racist for Whites to practice tribalism, and it's also racist to object to the tribalism of non-whites, got it.
Nobody said the word racist.
Like I said, you have no arguments. Your ideology is retarded and relies on people falling in line with your stupid non-sequiturs.
It's just a memetic plague, nothing more. The political equivalent of 67.
As it would mean no more wars fought by us on their behalf in middle east shitholes, absofuckinglutely.
I'm not reading all that but I'm not getting up in arms for things anonymous Twitter accounts say, especially those claiming to be groypers
There's been pedo shit in that circle for a while. https://xcancel.com/chrisbrunet/status/1955087822748078402
It's interesting that mainstream critics of Fuentes don't bring that up and instead focus on "muh anti-Semitism." He also shills for war in Venezuela, which makes no sense for someone who believes Jews run the US to do.
Its one of the many reasons why so many people suspect him of being a fed. He just skirts by in many areas where men who've done a fraction have been black bagged and they seem to be actively only attacking him in ways that will appeal to a vast chunk of the population currently.
Rolling Stone has an article about him up right now titled "The War Over Nick Fuentes Is Over. He Won." It's a subtle puff piece. Just look at the opening lines.
https://archive.ph/SS94C
There's no way they haven't realized that kind of language just makes people like him more. They don't say anything about the weird pedo shit despite stories about that being out for a while.
Yeah, his sudden mainstream thrusting is incredibly odd and the fact that they are spending so much effort trying to condemn and "destroy" him immediately after, while literally ignoring all of the open secrets about him that could easily do so, looks beyond suspicious.
And it should be even for those who support him, because its obvious he isn't just that fucking good that he is now breaking into the big leagues and being a real player. He is very obviously being set up for people to rally around for some purpose, one that cannot be good.
I suspect his shilling for wars that he can plausibly deny have anything to do with Israel is part of it. They need fighting age men . I think his influence on such men is overstated, and it won't really work.
It's amazing that as a GG based board people cant sniff out shills after we spent years dealing with them during GG
TBH, it feels like most of the problem types here are .win types who just came to this board because of its lax moderation and extreme Right leanings. They were never part of GG (likely because too young) and only care about video games in regards to the culture war.
That's a fair point. I recognize fewer and fewer of the old names from reddit. End of an era or whatnot
Nazism is linked to pedophilia, you dumbass. It's all related.
Fuentes started a war on Nazis when he first started getting known around 2019 or so. They called it the "Optics War."
We literally had a top post here yesterday of Fuentes praising Hitler. Nobody's buying into this.
Saying Hitler is cool or has aura isn't ideological.
It absolutely is.
Those are just statements about his personality, not ideological. Like I said, Fuentes did the optics war thing. He wouldn't have done so if he were an actual Nazi.
It's a safe way to pivot into praising what he did.
I cannot believe I have to explain "hiding your power level" to a fucking stormfaggot.
Greenlit also comes from the entertainment industry. It means something is fully funded and could go ahead with production.
What the actual fuck is wrong with these people?
Nazism? I told everyone they needed MAID.
The reason I'm posting this is because people need to know exactly who Nick is and what he does. Just another chapter in his weird, weird story. His clips make me laugh though.
Didn't he cover for a mudslime chomo (pardon the repeat words) called Ali Alexander?
Yes. It happened a few years ago. I need to edit that into the post.
More about Ali. His background is quite extensive.
Unless you can show me a similarly effective Kid with the reach and popularity of Fuentes I don't care. Winning then Woodchippers.
I'm not so sure Nick is on your side.
To be honest, I'm pretty in the dark about the size of the groyper following, does this constitute a significant percentage of them?
The snowflake pedophile gang is a big contingent. I'd say they were at least a quarter of big groyper accounts at one time, maybe higher. When the wifejak meme got big and Nick started complaining about it, you couldn't log onto twitter without seeing some groyper post about raping the daughter and/or the wife in the meme.
I was talking about Snowflake Gang last year. Keep up.
Of course Elon wants this chomo to succeed. They're both kidfuckers.
If you genuinely care about kids and it's not just propaganda to attack single men, it's time to throw Fuentes into a woodchipper.
Genuinely? The only thing you genuinely care about is Israel lol. If the kids are female you'll even defend raping them in this actual thread.
Keep that friendly fire going, dumbass.
I'm literally digging up stuff to help expose the retarded cuck and you're backstabbing me, such a shock.
This community is such a joke at this point. We have forced age verify to play violent games and not a peep from any of you, too scared to piss off your Christcuck masters.
I will lol. Please leave
Christcuck, lol.
Quiet tranny fucker
Yes although as recently revealed by Twitter alot of them are foreign muslims
Groypers are retarded lemmings. They like Muslims and communists so this isn't shocking. See also when Fuentes tried to throw midterms even worse with "your body my choice"
Is it okay to rape Piers Morgan's daughter?
As long as non-Whites are allowed to be in the UK then the answer is yes as far as I am concerned. The answer only becomes no when all non-Whites are deported from NA and Europe.
You don't need ''muh optics'' to say pedos belong into the woodchipper.
It just seems ineffective. Regardless of whether you feel it can be excused as a joke or not, there just isn't anything to be gained by going after the kid. Both Piers and his wife seem like horrible people, are public figures, and nice easy targets. Breaking them directly shouldn't be difficult, and could potentially be hilarious. Going after the kid is just lobbing Piers a softball where he can stand up to defend his daughter, safely regain a bunch of his masculinity, and net some sympathetic PR. Playing him against his wife is a much better tactic and it makes him look pathetic.
I really wish that loli was not dragged in to the stupid groyper drama as it ain't evidence of pedophilia under normal conditions.
It's almost like Nazis are pedophiles and I was right. Again.
I have a post somewhere with a collated list of Fuentes pedo incidents.
Congrats, u/The_Shadow_of_Intent. Doesn't Imp's praise fill you with gladness?
When you all burn, I'll be the last one standing.
Stormfaggotry will blow away like ashes in the wind of German cities after the heroism of Bomber Command.
Then you'll all quietly delete everything, try to fit back into society.
Your obsession with seeing Nazis everywhere is proof of your ethnicity.
I'm sorry, who other than Nazis would defend Fuentes?
Anyone who does't want to be murdered by jews or browns.
I'll take "things only a Nazi would ever say" for $300