Its funny how differently I see the whole mudblood vs pureblood debate. Its pure "we must let in the muggles or we wizards won't survive" tripe. Its a 1 for 1 of modern gimmigrants being given education, skills, and tools at our expense. All while we are painted as evil racist pureblood wizards who just hate muggles.
Is he their friend? I've never read the books or watched the movies (and I never will), but from what I can tell, he sounds more like some retard who follows the other two around like an abandoned puppy and exists to asks questions about things he should honestly know so that the supergenius girl can answer them and relay exposition to the audience.
That's what he is in the movies, because the showrunner's favorite character was Hermione. It's far more fair in the books. But if you'll never read or watch the books or movies, why do you care to ask?
It's not that my perspective is worth expressing. I just felt like being a smartass and responding to an obvious smartass question. My bad for failing to be funny.
I don't know about petty but I doubt its shitty fanbase will object to the woke treatment. They turned on the franchise's creator over the TERF/tranny wars. I never got into Harry Potter myself. It's less that I disliked it and more that it was never all that interesting to me.
JK Rowling is in full support of giving up her creation to the DEI mob. Only reason she isn't fully woke is that trannies impact her group directly (men in women's sports, etc). Otherwise she'd be all about that as well.
Harry Potter was literally one of the first proto-Woke properties. Rowling turned Dumbledore gay to please all her tumblr fans and that's one of the reasons it became so big with the SJWs in the first place. She even openly approved of black Hermione by saying "nobody ever said she wasn't black!"
She is a TERF, as a radical feminist. Almost all things Woke came from her movement in the first place. The only reason HP doesn't seem Woke now is because what was once radical in the 00s now barely registers whatsoever.
Were this any other book series I would see it failing midway just like WoT has, but because it's Harry Potter I can see the corpse of the show crawling all the way to the end of the last book and maybe even shambling even further to the retarded play that was also adapted despite being actual fanfic garbage.
Still annoyed at how they massacred Sopranos. Didnt even try to keep to the lore and spent half the movie following around a black gangster and his "totally not BLM riots" adventures
lol, yeah, it also came too late. Similar to the Deadwood movie, the audience had already moved on. To be honest, I wasn't even interested in watching 'The Sopranos' movie to begin with. Perhaps if I rewatched the entire show, I would, but I'm not going to, because it has the HBO brand and it just ruins everything it touches. Even the older stuff.
Many sons of Newark was a major disappointment. Made no sense for that black dude to be in it. If he had been in sopranos that would be different but I was expecting the rise of Tony Soprano. Boy was I wrong
They sold it as a Tony or Dickie Moltisanti story in the previews with Harold making maybe a five second spot in the ads. Total subversion and felt more like a BLM movie with a cheap Sopranos knockoff story grafted onto it.
To think years ago I would watch any hbo show for simply being an hbo show and having a reputation for quality tv. Had the same mindset with the BBC at one point as well
I was sure they'd get rid of my fellow ginger Ron. It's a compulsion with these virtue signalling goons.
They're not finished. I'm guessing one or more of his siblings will have the skin tones of an additional baby daddy from Mrs Weasley's wild years before she convinced Arthur to "step up" and marry a single mother.
What, are they intending to completely run through the books again? What a blatant cash grab. Even in the absence of woke cancer, the odds that it would be meaningfully better than the original adaptation is nil.
Malfoy calling her a mudblood is going to hit different.
Its funny how differently I see the whole mudblood vs pureblood debate. Its pure "we must let in the muggles or we wizards won't survive" tripe. Its a 1 for 1 of modern gimmigrants being given education, skills, and tools at our expense. All while we are painted as evil racist pureblood wizards who just hate muggles.
“British actress” and here again we see how words have no meaning to the left.
Righhhtttt and Mexicans are Spaniards.
And Snape is black.
I think he said, "Hermione's near."
Because having a black guy join the totally not kk makes sense in the modern day.
Whatever do you mean? Serverius Snape-Prince has always been a supporter of the Dark Arts.
It's still unrealistic, who actually believes a ginger has two friends?
Is he their friend? I've never read the books or watched the movies (and I never will), but from what I can tell, he sounds more like some retard who follows the other two around like an abandoned puppy and exists to asks questions about things he should honestly know so that the supergenius girl can answer them and relay exposition to the audience.
That's what he is in the movies, because the showrunner's favorite character was Hermione. It's far more fair in the books. But if you'll never read or watch the books or movies, why do you care to ask?
Why do you feel like your perspective is worth expressing then?
It's not that my perspective is worth expressing. I just felt like being a smartass and responding to an obvious smartass question. My bad for failing to be funny.
Breaking news, guy discovers tropes exist and characters are written as vehicles for storytelling sometimes.
Just hasn't stole their souls yet.
Haha, wasn't that on the AI video thread the other day? Still genius.
Hermione Ganges
It's leviosaar!
I'm strangely happy about it.
I never liked Harry Potter, even when it was peak popularity.
Does it make me petty that I want it to get the full woke treatment?
I don't know about petty but I doubt its shitty fanbase will object to the woke treatment. They turned on the franchise's creator over the TERF/tranny wars. I never got into Harry Potter myself. It's less that I disliked it and more that it was never all that interesting to me.
The Harry Potter franchise is for little kids.
JK Rowling is in full support of giving up her creation to the DEI mob. Only reason she isn't fully woke is that trannies impact her group directly (men in women's sports, etc). Otherwise she'd be all about that as well.
Harry Potter was literally one of the first proto-Woke properties. Rowling turned Dumbledore gay to please all her tumblr fans and that's one of the reasons it became so big with the SJWs in the first place. She even openly approved of black Hermione by saying "nobody ever said she wasn't black!"
She is a TERF, as a radical feminist. Almost all things Woke came from her movement in the first place. The only reason HP doesn't seem Woke now is because what was once radical in the 00s now barely registers whatsoever.
No surprise. I guess they decided to do a Wheel of Time style adaptation
Were this any other book series I would see it failing midway just like WoT has, but because it's Harry Potter I can see the corpse of the show crawling all the way to the end of the last book and maybe even shambling even further to the retarded play that was also adapted despite being actual fanfic garbage.
True. There are a lot of normies
It's HB(lack)O.
They live to worship Fentanyl Floyd.
Still annoyed at how they massacred Sopranos. Didnt even try to keep to the lore and spent half the movie following around a black gangster and his "totally not BLM riots" adventures
Never seen the movie. Have seen the entire series, though. It was poorly received I see and the whole BLM thing doesn't surprise me one bit.
Loved the series and couldn't wait to see the movie. Felt extremely disappointed and by the middle of it I was skipping all the black gangster scenes.
lol, yeah, it also came too late. Similar to the Deadwood movie, the audience had already moved on. To be honest, I wasn't even interested in watching 'The Sopranos' movie to begin with. Perhaps if I rewatched the entire show, I would, but I'm not going to, because it has the HBO brand and it just ruins everything it touches. Even the older stuff.
Many sons of Newark was a major disappointment. Made no sense for that black dude to be in it. If he had been in sopranos that would be different but I was expecting the rise of Tony Soprano. Boy was I wrong
They sold it as a Tony or Dickie Moltisanti story in the previews with Harold making maybe a five second spot in the ads. Total subversion and felt more like a BLM movie with a cheap Sopranos knockoff story grafted onto it.
Exactly. Could’ve used the blm plot for a plot that was connected to the show
To think years ago I would watch any hbo show for simply being an hbo show and having a reputation for quality tv. Had the same mindset with the BBC at one point as well
I see they dodged the ''dyslexic casting of a giNger'' pitfall.
lol of course the smart girl can't be left white.
Man, I thought they were just going to slap Zendaya into it as usual and we were supposed to pretend she looks like a believable 11yo or we're waysis.
I was sure they'd get rid of my fellow ginger Ron. It's a compulsion with these virtue signalling goons.
They're not finished. I'm guessing one or more of his siblings will have the skin tones of an additional baby daddy from Mrs Weasley's wild years before she convinced Arthur to "step up" and marry a single mother.
What, are they intending to completely run through the books again? What a blatant cash grab. Even in the absence of woke cancer, the odds that it would be meaningfully better than the original adaptation is nil.
What is the kid's ethnicity?
Oh look, they replaced yet another ginger with a black
Niggmione.