It results from turning people from assets into liabilities. Used to be, the more population you had, the stronger your country was. It still is kinda, but the US for instance is mostly adding liabilities. From a statistical perspective, the country will be worse in the future for being made up of the imported people rather than progeny of the foundational ones.
Just for example 200 million Central Americans and 300 million Pilgrim-Americans is worse than 400 million Pilgrims.
The way that things are setup doesn't help people be positive. If you just look at tax money, the rich pay for everything, but you can't eat tax money, so.
It's to try and make it seem like it's a social choice, rather than a government induced obligation. If they make it seem like offing yourselfAsSiStEd dYiNg is just a totally cool choice that people make, it's no longer the taboo it ultimately should be. And then the government can pretend like it's not killing the people it's supposed to protect, it's "helping them".
Besides the obvious reason, its also only whites that live long enough or are retarded enough to do such a thing. The benefit of being a low IQ mongrel is not being burdened with neurotic nonsense that leads to thinking about such things.
Assisted suicide, when it was pushed to be legalized, was never supposed to be suggested to people. Only something that was possible if a terminally-ill patient in great pain that couldn't be alleviated after trying everything reasonable, brought-up the subject themselves and asked for it.
Uh huh. Just like how abortion was argued on the back of "rape and incest". They get their foot in the door with a somewhat reasonable lie, and then push what they really wanted. Evil progresses through incrementalism, one small step at a time. They know good people will naturally reject what they truly want (hell on earth), so they convince us to walk the path, one step at a time.
From a moral point of view, the baby is entirely innocent. Kill the rapist, not the baby if you so desperately want to kill.
From an evolutionary perspective, you don't want to perpetuate the genes of rapists. which is a moral problem you end up burdening the future of your kind with.
All these complex moral questions are handwaved-away by at-will abortion advocates who argue a woman should never be incovinienced by a baby for a few months before dumping it to adoption.
Even though discrediting an argument by who is making it is a logical fallacy, it is incredibly foolish to take an argument at face value from a known liar and subversive. Source matters. It is monumentally naive to continue to trust known liars, to compromise with known evil people who advocate small, somewhat reasonable initial positions, who then use the new gained ground to push their evil and lies further, ad infinitum.
Furthermore, if someone continually makes the mistake of enabling and approving of the initial first steps of known liars and evil people, who capitulate to their initial "reasoning", then there's something fundamentally flawed with that person, in belief, practice, and/or virtue, who is incapable of spotting lies and evil at first subtle glance, and stopping/resisting it before it gains its first foot hold.
The UK Conservative party tore up his membership for his Lotus Eaters involvement shortly after Starmer's win in July.
I doubt Sargon would actually allow anyone that based to be a regular contributor though as he's more of a gentleman fencesitter since his Philosophy degree completion.
This mentality here is a fundamental reason nothing ever gets done from "the right" the complete lack of strategic thought beyond what's right in front of you.
Lotus Eaters are probably the most effective media channel in the UK currently for any type of heritage movement or whatever you want to call it. "We can't say that on youtube" is probably the most uttered phrase on the show.
How close do you think Carl and the rest of the organisation are to getting arrested? having armed cops burst in during a lads hour and cart them off?
What on earth would be the strategic benefit of saying something a single time that would be based and getting the organisation shut down?
I think your either a glowie or just pants on head retarded. What do you think progress towards any type of tangible goal looks like? What does an actionable plan actually look like?
There are White Nationalists groups in the UK. I know of Patriotic Alternative, which is what Sam Melia is part of. I'd say you need to go all in on pushing Reform not to suck and stealing their support base if they won't comply, but I'm not from UK.
Sargon will correctly observe the symptoms of society's ills, without properly diagnosing the illness itself. He'll find a way tangentially sorta kinda describe the root problem but miss the mark every time. So often that it can't be by mistake. His sights are dialed in perfectly, and he's deliberately hitting the ring just outside of bullseye.
Medically, white people have a more stable genetic leaning that makes them prime for organ sellling. Most other races have some sort of genetic tendency that can make organs unusable. Examples include sickle cell, lung and hearts from sand and air pollution, diabetes, and skin cancer.
if you're white, your organs are likely to go to non whites who didn't take care of themselves and won't be appreciative of given a second chance, probably hate white as well
The ideal target of government-facilitated suicide is people who have paid into NHS their whole lives without asking for much back and are about to start drawing off it. Those are older Brits and they're White because the "enrichment" has been been young economic migrants, not the elderly.
It was either this, or stop importing beggar-class migrants, in terms of weighing down the NHS. And we know the UK gov't loves importing additional beggars and the criminally-adjacent. Even when the UK people voted saying "we don't mind if there's some economic damage, just stop importing the criminal beggars", the UK governments, several different ones, all said "you can take anything from us, millions per day, billions in deals, just don't stop sending more criminal beggars to us!"
Putting aside the racial angle, which is significant, why are there any advertisements for assisted suicide? This is beyond ghoulish.
It's the end result of socialized medicine. Make you pay into it all your life then kindly escort you to the death pods when it's time to cash out.
It results from turning people from assets into liabilities. Used to be, the more population you had, the stronger your country was. It still is kinda, but the US for instance is mostly adding liabilities. From a statistical perspective, the country will be worse in the future for being made up of the imported people rather than progeny of the foundational ones.
Just for example 200 million Central Americans and 300 million Pilgrim-Americans is worse than 400 million Pilgrims.
Once you get past a certain standard of living, certain populations are always net negatives.
The way that things are setup doesn't help people be positive. If you just look at tax money, the rich pay for everything, but you can't eat tax money, so.
It's to try and make it seem like it's a social choice, rather than a government induced obligation. If they make it seem like
offing yourselfAsSiStEd dYiNg is just a totally cool choice that people make, it's no longer the taboo it ultimately should be. And then the government can pretend like it's not killing the people it's supposed to protect, it's "helping them".It looked like several Arabs, a Mexican (or whatever they have in Westminster), and a white lady. Which is about right for UK cities.
lotus eaters discussed that, something about a lot of the political class in london, takes the tube to that station.
its an attempt to influence them before the vote on the legislation.
Socialism is a death cult
Besides the obvious reason, its also only whites that live long enough or are retarded enough to do such a thing. The benefit of being a low IQ mongrel is not being burdened with neurotic nonsense that leads to thinking about such things.
That seems like a lot of adverts, they really want whiteys to die
Assisted suicide, when it was pushed to be legalized, was never supposed to be suggested to people. Only something that was possible if a terminally-ill patient in great pain that couldn't be alleviated after trying everything reasonable, brought-up the subject themselves and asked for it.
The United Kingdom bans the advertising of prescription medicines to the general public. I feel like this ad violates the spirit of that rule.
Uh huh. Just like how abortion was argued on the back of "rape and incest". They get their foot in the door with a somewhat reasonable lie, and then push what they really wanted. Evil progresses through incrementalism, one small step at a time. They know good people will naturally reject what they truly want (hell on earth), so they convince us to walk the path, one step at a time.
From a moral point of view, the baby is entirely innocent. Kill the rapist, not the baby if you so desperately want to kill.
From an evolutionary perspective, you don't want to perpetuate the genes of rapists. which is a moral problem you end up burdening the future of your kind with.
All these complex moral questions are handwaved-away by at-will abortion advocates who argue a woman should never be incovinienced by a baby for a few months before dumping it to adoption.
Even though discrediting an argument by who is making it is a logical fallacy, it is incredibly foolish to take an argument at face value from a known liar and subversive. Source matters. It is monumentally naive to continue to trust known liars, to compromise with known evil people who advocate small, somewhat reasonable initial positions, who then use the new gained ground to push their evil and lies further, ad infinitum.
Furthermore, if someone continually makes the mistake of enabling and approving of the initial first steps of known liars and evil people, who capitulate to their initial "reasoning", then there's something fundamentally flawed with that person, in belief, practice, and/or virtue, who is incapable of spotting lies and evil at first subtle glance, and stopping/resisting it before it gains its first foot hold.
Yeah from the Libertarian argument, the only thing is that suicide should not be criminalized.
Now they are executing children for depression.
Is Connor an open White Nationalist now? I don't see the point in noticing things if you aren't.
The UK Conservative party tore up his membership for his Lotus Eaters involvement shortly after Starmer's win in July.
I doubt Sargon would actually allow anyone that based to be a regular contributor though as he's more of a gentleman fencesitter since his Philosophy degree completion.
Sargoy is the biggest edger in history.
This mentality here is a fundamental reason nothing ever gets done from "the right" the complete lack of strategic thought beyond what's right in front of you.
Lotus Eaters are probably the most effective media channel in the UK currently for any type of heritage movement or whatever you want to call it. "We can't say that on youtube" is probably the most uttered phrase on the show.
How close do you think Carl and the rest of the organisation are to getting arrested? having armed cops burst in during a lads hour and cart them off?
What on earth would be the strategic benefit of saying something a single time that would be based and getting the organisation shut down?
I think your either a glowie or just pants on head retarded. What do you think progress towards any type of tangible goal looks like? What does an actionable plan actually look like?
There are White Nationalists groups in the UK. I know of Patriotic Alternative, which is what Sam Melia is part of. I'd say you need to go all in on pushing Reform not to suck and stealing their support base if they won't comply, but I'm not from UK.
Sargon will correctly observe the symptoms of society's ills, without properly diagnosing the illness itself. He'll find a way tangentially sorta kinda describe the root problem but miss the mark every time. So often that it can't be by mistake. His sights are dialed in perfectly, and he's deliberately hitting the ring just outside of bullseye.
Maybe they know none whites are too illiterate to read them? Shitlords should run with this and watch the backlash and backpedaling.
Medically, white people have a more stable genetic leaning that makes them prime for organ sellling. Most other races have some sort of genetic tendency that can make organs unusable. Examples include sickle cell, lung and hearts from sand and air pollution, diabetes, and skin cancer.
if you're white, your organs are likely to go to non whites who didn't take care of themselves and won't be appreciative of given a second chance, probably hate white as well
I'm so fucking HAPPY I'm dying, look at me DANCING!!!!
I'm not dead yet!
The ideal target of government-facilitated suicide is people who have paid into NHS their whole lives without asking for much back and are about to start drawing off it. Those are older Brits and they're White because the "enrichment" has been been young economic migrants, not the elderly.
It was either this, or stop importing beggar-class migrants, in terms of weighing down the NHS. And we know the UK gov't loves importing additional beggars and the criminally-adjacent. Even when the UK people voted saying "we don't mind if there's some economic damage, just stop importing the criminal beggars", the UK governments, several different ones, all said "you can take anything from us, millions per day, billions in deals, just don't stop sending more criminal beggars to us!"
UK government: White people kill yourselves because we see you as harder to control even though we have NO control over the Muslims.