Even though discrediting an argument by who is making it is a logical fallacy, it is incredibly foolish to take an argument at face value from a known liar and subversive. Source matters. It is monumentally naive to continue to trust known liars, to compromise with known evil people who advocate small, somewhat reasonable initial positions, who then use the new gained ground to push their evil and lies further, ad infinitum.
Furthermore, if someone continually makes the mistake of enabling and approving of the initial first steps of known liars and evil people, who capitulate to their initial "reasoning", then there's something fundamentally flawed with that person, in belief, practice, and/or virtue, who is incapable of spotting lies and evil at first subtle glance, and stopping/resisting it before it gains its first foot hold.
Even though discrediting an argument by who is making it is a logical fallacy, it is incredibly foolish to take an argument at face value from a known liar and subversive. Source matters. It is monumentally naive to continue to trust known liars, to compromise with known evil people who advocate small, somewhat reasonable initial positions, who then use the new gained ground to push their evil and lies further, ad infinitum.
Furthermore, if someone continually makes the mistake of enabling and approving of the initial first steps of known liars and evil people, who capitulate to their initial "reasoning", then there's something fundamentally flawed with that person, in belief, practice, and/or virtue, who is incapable of spotting lies and evil at first subtle glance, and stopping/resisting it before it gains its first foot hold.