It results from turning people from assets into liabilities. Used to be, the more population you had, the stronger your country was. It still is kinda, but the US for instance is mostly adding liabilities. From a statistical perspective, the country will be worse in the future for being made up of the imported people rather than progeny of the foundational ones.
Just for example 200 million Central Americans and 300 million Pilgrim-Americans is worse than 400 million Pilgrims.
The way that things are setup doesn't help people be positive. If you just look at tax money, the rich pay for everything, but you can't eat tax money, so.
It's to try and make it seem like it's a social choice, rather than a government induced obligation. If they make it seem like offing yourselfAsSiStEd dYiNg is just a totally cool choice that people make, it's no longer the taboo it ultimately should be. And then the government can pretend like it's not killing the people it's supposed to protect, it's "helping them".
Putting aside the racial angle, which is significant, why are there any advertisements for assisted suicide? This is beyond ghoulish.
It's the end result of socialized medicine. Make you pay into it all your life then kindly escort you to the death pods when it's time to cash out.
It results from turning people from assets into liabilities. Used to be, the more population you had, the stronger your country was. It still is kinda, but the US for instance is mostly adding liabilities. From a statistical perspective, the country will be worse in the future for being made up of the imported people rather than progeny of the foundational ones.
Just for example 200 million Central Americans and 300 million Pilgrim-Americans is worse than 400 million Pilgrims.
Once you get past a certain standard of living, certain populations are always net negatives.
The way that things are setup doesn't help people be positive. If you just look at tax money, the rich pay for everything, but you can't eat tax money, so.
It's to try and make it seem like it's a social choice, rather than a government induced obligation. If they make it seem like
offing yourselfAsSiStEd dYiNg is just a totally cool choice that people make, it's no longer the taboo it ultimately should be. And then the government can pretend like it's not killing the people it's supposed to protect, it's "helping them".lotus eaters discussed that, something about a lot of the political class in london, takes the tube to that station.
its an attempt to influence them before the vote on the legislation.
It looked like several Arabs, a Mexican (or whatever they have in Westminster), and a white lady. Which is about right for UK cities.
When you cost more than you provide to the state, your death becomes financially convenient.