His handlers must be flabbergasted that his minority female diversity hire is accidentally helping the nation, instead of destroying it like she's supposed to.
I'm torn on it...I'm in a fiercely competitive industry, where even our janitors sign confidential information, non compete, patent, copyright, invention, and trade secret agreements...
But, a good friend of mine could have benefitted greatly by the law passing when starting her new business.
Glad it has the injunction, as ultimately it is less work for me.
Janitors have an astonishing amount of access to places. And they hear things, because people talk around them as if they were uneducated chimps with no language comprehension.
This just makes me suspicious. The government doing something right instead of royally fucking it up must mean there's some nefarious motive behind it that we just haven't seen yet.
Acts of good will are not in the government's wheelhouse.
There is always the chance that they simply aren't in lockstep and don't all work for the exact same overlords, and fucking one over for petty reasons just happens to benefit us.
I think that's behind the majority of these decisions, major powers fighting behind the scenes and whatever it does "for us" is just collateral.
I haven't read the whole ruling, but I'm going to assume 230 pages of administrative law is hiding a lot of BS in there.
It looks like vague, poorly defined, all-encompassing terms so anybody can be in violation just because the FTC decides to go after them. "Any misrepresentation" in any commercial - isn't that all commercials?
When you are playing a lottery game, the organizers use a complex secure network to quickly identify where the winning ticket was purchased. Are you trying to use a fraudulent lotto ticket? Fuggedaboutit!
Meanwhile, in U.S. election we will wait days (perhaps weeks) for the officials to calculate the winner.
California also did 1 good regulation. Making game publishers and platforms change their wording to let people know they are licensing the game, not buying the game.
Underrated question. "One click to cancel... and 1000 more regulations that big companies will easily be able to comply with and small startups couldn't hope to."
This seems like an unambiguously good rule change from the FTC. Maybe the government got one right for a change.
They also recently banned non-compete agreements.
The main reason the FTC is moving so fast is because Biden put in a 35 year old woman whose main focus as a lawyer was antitrust law to lead the FTC
His handlers must be flabbergasted that his minority female diversity hire is accidentally helping the nation, instead of destroying it like she's supposed to.
Ya win some, ya lose some, oy vey.
I'm torn on it...I'm in a fiercely competitive industry, where even our janitors sign confidential information, non compete, patent, copyright, invention, and trade secret agreements...
But, a good friend of mine could have benefitted greatly by the law passing when starting her new business.
Glad it has the injunction, as ultimately it is less work for me.
Janitors have an astonishing amount of access to places. And they hear things, because people talk around them as if they were uneducated chimps with no language comprehension.
Ah, I didn’t even know that
This just makes me suspicious. The government doing something right instead of royally fucking it up must mean there's some nefarious motive behind it that we just haven't seen yet.
Acts of good will are not in the government's wheelhouse.
Rest assured any time the government does anything, it's to entrench their own power. If the thing they do is something right, that's coincidental.
Political PR with the populace still has to happen, they'll throw a bone out every now and then if it doesn't cost them much.
Besides, who would volunteer all that sweet lobbying money if they didn't make an example out of someone every now and then?
There is always the chance that they simply aren't in lockstep and don't all work for the exact same overlords, and fucking one over for petty reasons just happens to benefit us.
I think that's behind the majority of these decisions, major powers fighting behind the scenes and whatever it does "for us" is just collateral.
Do remember, a broken clock is right twice a day.
For every good thing they do, there's probably 6 million more they fuck up.
Really? I wouldn't know.
I haven't read the whole ruling, but I'm going to assume 230 pages of administrative law is hiding a lot of BS in there.
It looks like vague, poorly defined, all-encompassing terms so anybody can be in violation just because the FTC decides to go after them. "Any misrepresentation" in any commercial - isn't that all commercials?
Good, it was probably the only thing I want the US to copy from the EU is their consumer rights. Having this is a good step in that direction.
If the US copied other countries' strong voter integrity practices (like finger ink dabs after voting), Trump would win at least 40 states.
It's pathetic that basic shit like that is stronger voter integrity than some state's policies.
That's intentional so they can commit fraud.
We can't even get a law that says you have to show your fucking ID, because it's racist or something.
When you are playing a lottery game, the organizers use a complex secure network to quickly identify where the winning ticket was purchased. Are you trying to use a fraudulent lotto ticket? Fuggedaboutit!
Meanwhile, in U.S. election we will wait days (perhaps weeks) for the officials to calculate the winner.
this better apply to internet service providers as well.
The life hack is to just tell them you're moving and your new place already has their service installed.
My method has always been to assume the identity of a Pokemon called "I am canceling my service" while talking with the ISP.
What are they going to do to the violators? Gum them to death? FTC got no teeth.
a) do they have the authority to do this
b) do they have the balls to enforce it
Lina Khan is the only decent Biden regime appointee.
Bit of a Khan job really.
California also did 1 good regulation. Making game publishers and platforms change their wording to let people know they are licensing the game, not buying the game.
Underrated question. "One click to cancel... and 1000 more regulations that big companies will easily be able to comply with and small startups couldn't hope to."
Most of these already are present. They are just in a smaller font off to the side.
Comcast out there laughing and flipping the FTC off.
You're still going to have to repeatedly call Jugdish in the retention department and still not be able to cancel.