It gets better. She was previously in the SS, in charge of guarding Biden during the Obama admin. And was then appointed as director under President Biden. And given an award by President Biden.
If you were wondering how this even happened, it sounds like 1) they didn’t secure the nearest roof and 2) snipers scoped the target before he opened fire. So SS let it happen.
Fair questions. Plus a closer watching shows the rapid and significant repositioning of the counter sniper's weapon, maybe he didn't have shooter in his sights initially. Still, why the fuck was there an unmonitored rooftop 150 yds away?
Taking out a rifle and aiming it at Trump must have taken enough time to know, IMO.
It looks to me like he had him under sights and hesitated. Or waited. He's either too weak for his position or he's the worst case scenario for the SS.
Her current “goal” was increasing the secret service to be 30% female. DEI almost allowed the first presidential assassination since the secret service began protecting presidents.
When the motorcade was backing up and it was all women I immediately knew standards were slipping, then details come out and it turns out they nearly got a president killed over the most basic of oversights.
If I was trying to be sold on life protection, why would I ever choose a woman to take charge? You know, someone who is easily overpowered by 90% of men just based on genetics alone?
The man, 42-year-old Omar J. Gonzalez, ran unobstructed for 70 yards across the front lawn of the White House before entering through the North Portico. On the way, he brushed by a Secret Service officer with a drawn gun, sources tell CBS News’ Bill Plante.
Gonzalez then proceeded to run through the entrance hall to the cross hall of the White House, past the staircase that leads up to the first family’s residence. He was confronted by a female Secret Service agent, who he overpowered and made it all the way to the East Room, Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, told CBS News, citing whistleblowers.
Ahahaha, you just don't stop. Female (appointed by male, awarded by male, previously relationship with male), may have been involved, so it was the Females that did the thing.
At least wait till all the information is out before you start declaring victory. If you're right, you're right. But you look foolish jumping the gun, either way.
Me slightly, only because when Trump gets in so long as his God armour holds, he'll have the legitimacy to go full order 66 on the establishment after the attempted hit.
I don't mind restraining myself for now if I can see the establishment loose their toys in a few months..
I'm sorry, but missing a rooftop with clear sight line and ignoring concern from the public about it screams malice.
She almost certainly wasn't onsite herself. Plenty of highly trained men were. If SS agents were in on it, it almost certainly goes higher than the SS itself. She may have been in on it, but she wasn't the lead. Come on.
Look, we've had this discussion multiple times. I don't dislike you, I think you have some very valid points, but you always, always, always take it to absurd lengths and torpedo your own cause.
If this was a deep state hit, were women involved? Statistically, likely? Were women pulling the strings? Potentially, but nowhere near as likely, and definitely not a certainty. Your unwavering confidence that it's always women just doesn't work.
I never said the men were innocent. I haven't even watched the video. His security detail could have been the Israeli army for all I know. I've just been reading what reportedly happened, and the common theme is Secret Service leadership did not act when they should have. Didn't secure the perimeter, didn't send extra security when the campaign asked, didn't listen to public warnings.
The last two attempted assassinations of President Trump were both radfems, it wasn't a big stretch to call #3. First one was a Canadian who got busted trying to cross the border with a bag full of guns, and sent poison to the WH. Second was the heavily connected feminist woman who planned to kill him in the Bronx but everyone saw her schizo posting on the day. Honestly, my money was on her trying again, because Secret Service never detained her (this makes a lot more sense in hindsight.)
It's a cheap joke at my detractors. I'm sure they're getting their spin ready, they already had a few attempts at it, that didn't sound at all like their feminist masters...
First pictures of the perpetrator are out, I fed them into an AI gender prediction tool, it had 60% confidence in male.
Please don't ban Imp again, or at least not for months like his last ban. By starting with the conclusion every single time and working backwards, he makes it clear how ridiculous identity politics can get. If anything, he helps all the rest of us think through situations individually and not in terms of stereotypes...if only because, in the back of our minds, we have a little voice saying "That reflex assumption you just made sounds a bit like Imp".
Yeah, sure, a bit. I get that argument. However, I can't make the dude the exception to the rules forever, especially when he knows he can change the comment to rescind the ban, and openly refuses.
It gets better. She was previously in the SS, in charge of guarding Biden during the Obama admin. And was then appointed as director under President Biden. And given an award by President Biden.
In any other field, it would be a conflict of interest.
Honestly it's possible this was some sort of payoff. Super weird.
Next you'll tell me they slept together.
Her and his handler Jill, of course. Not Joe, she's about 50 years too old.
Welcome back!
If you were wondering how this even happened, it sounds like 1) they didn’t secure the nearest roof and 2) snipers scoped the target before he opened fire. So SS let it happen.
Here is the SS counter sniper hesitating
Devils advocate:
Fair questions. Plus a closer watching shows the rapid and significant repositioning of the counter sniper's weapon, maybe he didn't have shooter in his sights initially. Still, why the fuck was there an unmonitored rooftop 150 yds away?
I doubt he was able to reposition and fire accurately within 1-2 seconds.
nah, it's easily doable. Especially on a tripod like that. source: I shoot a lot.
Taking out a rifle and aiming it at Trump must have taken enough time to know, IMO.
It looks to me like he had him under sights and hesitated. Or waited. He's either too weak for his position or he's the worst case scenario for the SS.
Her current “goal” was increasing the secret service to be 30% female. DEI almost allowed the first presidential assassination since the secret service began protecting presidents.
When the motorcade was backing up and it was all women I immediately knew standards were slipping, then details come out and it turns out they nearly got a president killed over the most basic of oversights.
Malice, not incompetence. Mark my words.
How about both? Because when you are sufficiently incompetent, there is no difference.
If I was trying to be sold on life protection, why would I ever choose a woman to take charge? You know, someone who is easily overpowered by 90% of men just based on genetics alone?
Relevant incident from 10 years ago:
https://www.unz.com/isteve/female-secret-service-agents-arent-actually-hollywood-style-buttkicking-babes/
Thank God the high-fructose corn syrup was unharmed.
So she wants more women to be shot and killed [in the line of duty]? Sounds misogynistic to me. 🤡
This bitch was guarding cheetos.
He literally would have been safer if she were a 250lbs ham planet.
https://x.com/BritMartinez/status/1812272885513465886
Ahahaha, you just don't stop. Female (appointed by male, awarded by male, previously relationship with male), may have been involved, so it was the Females that did the thing.
At least wait till all the information is out before you start declaring victory. If you're right, you're right. But you look foolish jumping the gun, either way.
At the very least he's not claiming how this woman is a slut for not giving birth in her teens. Man those pajeets were annoying
Can't argue with that. He's still being annoying and incorrect, though.
I saw those posts a couple of times. I thought it was some bizarre parody of me at first.
Now, I think it's either Fed or leftist journalist.
Which reminds me, don't say anything violent because you know the leftist scum are going to be on right wing pages trying to both sides this.
Who cares?
Me slightly, only because when Trump gets in so long as his God armour holds, he'll have the legitimacy to go full order 66 on the establishment after the attempted hit.
I don't mind restraining myself for now if I can see the establishment loose their toys in a few months..
Yeah pajeet, we see you.
If he did that then he would never be able to declare victory.
Because the information will never come out?
I mean, I've been waiting months to be vindicated on Audrey Hale.
Closest we've come is an autopsy that doesn't show any of the typical signs of testosterone exposure.
Jumping the gun?
I'm sorry, but missing a rooftop with clear sight line and ignoring concern from the public about it screams malice.
Quota hire might be the popular line, but I've always said the feminist hires are malicious rather than incompetent.
Edit:
Laura Loomer is saying the shooter used a fucking ladder.
I'm sorry but if you miss something that obvious, you're not security, you're making a Monty Python sketch.
She almost certainly wasn't onsite herself. Plenty of highly trained men were. If SS agents were in on it, it almost certainly goes higher than the SS itself. She may have been in on it, but she wasn't the lead. Come on.
Look, we've had this discussion multiple times. I don't dislike you, I think you have some very valid points, but you always, always, always take it to absurd lengths and torpedo your own cause.
If this was a deep state hit, were women involved? Statistically, likely? Were women pulling the strings? Potentially, but nowhere near as likely, and definitely not a certainty. Your unwavering confidence that it's always women just doesn't work.
I never said she was.
I never said the men were innocent. I haven't even watched the video. His security detail could have been the Israeli army for all I know. I've just been reading what reportedly happened, and the common theme is Secret Service leadership did not act when they should have. Didn't secure the perimeter, didn't send extra security when the campaign asked, didn't listen to public warnings.
The last two attempted assassinations of President Trump were both radfems, it wasn't a big stretch to call #3. First one was a Canadian who got busted trying to cross the border with a bag full of guns, and sent poison to the WH. Second was the heavily connected feminist woman who planned to kill him in the Bronx but everyone saw her schizo posting on the day. Honestly, my money was on her trying again, because Secret Service never detained her (this makes a lot more sense in hindsight.)
Never thought I'd hear that from you.
It's a cheap joke at my detractors. I'm sure they're getting their spin ready, they already had a few attempts at it,
that didn't sound at all like their feminist masters...First pictures of the perpetrator are out, I fed them into an AI gender prediction tool, it had 60% confidence in male.
You don't have detractors. You have delusions of grandeur and a bunch of random people who get tired of your stupid shit.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
I have no idea what "female backed" is supposed to mean, but this doesn't appear to be a R16 violation.
Please don't ban Imp again, or at least not for months like his last ban. By starting with the conclusion every single time and working backwards, he makes it clear how ridiculous identity politics can get. If anything, he helps all the rest of us think through situations individually and not in terms of stereotypes...if only because, in the back of our minds, we have a little voice saying "That reflex assumption you just made sounds a bit like Imp".
Yeah, sure, a bit. I get that argument. However, I can't make the dude the exception to the rules forever, especially when he knows he can change the comment to rescind the ban, and openly refuses.