"Mother's basement," and "women look at you and shudder," and the like.
Didn't he build his whole brand on helping these people? He's lost the plot in a huge way.
Honestly, at this point I think he's both a retard and a fed. Him and his daughter both. They can't shut the fuck up about "anonymity" and how gosh darn bad it is. And how everyone are Nazi Incels.
It's really, really pathetic. And pretty disgusting. Shame on him.
With how feminized a lot of guys are, it's really hard to tell nowadays. And Jordan Peterson has been acting equally ridiculous and embarrassing in real life for ages. Perhaps someone else wrote it...but perhaps he really did.
It must have been considerable amount of money he received from Dailywire that he is going to belittle the main audience he fostered for years. Seems such a typical boomer thing to do, do something cringe for monetary gain while throwing younger people with no direction under the bus.
Same here, I last heard about him, months ago getting shit flung at him for defending young men and being moved to tears thinking of the abuse they got.
If you're not a Nazi, you can just clean you're room.
If you don't like Israel bombing civilians, you're a Nazi, a detestable incel, and there's no redemption for you. Don't even bother cleaning your room. Just keep being a Nazi. Wait...I'm sensing a flaw in this tactic...
Peterson's rebuttal to the numerical argument speaks loudly. Despite his dismissive attitude to the whole issue he felt the need to respond. Of his cohort of 140+ IQ individuals, only a portion actually have to engage in in-group preferences for it to have a huge nepotistic affect. Something that Jews and JQers have in common is the belief that Jews have a very unique culture-religion: a people set apart as it were. Based on the religious and cultural mores of the Jewish people, I find it very plausible that at least 1 in 10 (and probably higher) successful high IQ Jews engage in ethnic nepotism. This minority has an outsized influence based on their intelligence and influence that could have a massive downstream effect.
Even he can’t deny the objective reality of relative domination, like we see in his first few paragraphs:
pointing to the over-representation of Jews in positions of authority, competence and influence (including revolutionary movements).
Well, Jews are genuinely over-represented in positions of authority, competence and influence. New York Jews, in particular,
So the only question becomes “what is the explanation?”
He reaches to “IQ”, and to whatever extent that may have validity to it, he neglects all other factors as negligible ( importantly, as you point out, nepotistic in group bias)
While reading his argument, things may stand out as flawed:
Simply put: if a very complex job or role requires an IQ of 145, three standard deviations above the mean and characteristic of less than one percent of the general population, then a group with a higher average IQ will be exceptionally over-represented in such enterprises.
This would only be the case if the groups in question existed in equal proportion, which they obviously don’t, whites are ~70% of the population while jews are ~2.5%. Ultimately, his arguments are all flawed in similar ways.
The last time I checked this page there were many comments, some of which tore apart his math and logic line by line. I was actually at the time somewhat impressed that he allowed them to remain up and that he even attempted a response to one of them, but looking now I can’t see them anymore, I guess the spineless coward got told to purge those if he wanted that nettanyahoo interview. Pathetic.
For what its worth, I still like Peterson in certain contexts. He does represent a popular figure who analyses the world in a manner outside of mainstream (Progressive and neocon) methods. Hell, he's to the right of American conservatives just being willing to discuss IQ as a predictive metric. I do think he's absolutely unwilling to get behind any practical solutions to the social ills he points out because the solutions to any given problem all have an unpleasant side. At the end of the day he's an old fashioned liberal who will default to "niceness" when all the chips are on the table. In short he is both often right and also the exact kind of person that created today's declining western society
if a very complex job or role requires an IQ of 145 ... then a group with a higher average IQ will be exceptionally over-represented in such enterprises.
He's not even remotely correct. The totality of IQ scores form a normal distribution / bell curve, but individual groups have different variances (width of the bell) and different means.
For example, say there's 5 genes for intelligence, but the 5th reduces IQ unless all 5 are present in which case it's a huge boon. A group that's been genetically isolated for thousands of years and doesn't have this 5th will have higher average intelligence because most of the time the 5th one interferes and lowers the average of others. But occasionally somebody in the other group will have all 5 giving them far more super geniuses per capita.
There are many genes for intelligence that operate in complex ways, so this is not even theoretical. Average means nothing as to the number of geniuses without the variances.
, I find it very plausible that at least 1 in 10 (and probably higher) successful high IQ Jews engage in ethnic nepotism.
I don't think this is a uniquely Jewish thing in the slightest. Shit its not even related to IQ even. I think the only group who doesn't do this is certain groups of whites, due to successful psyops over the last century.
What makes the Jewish one so problematic is that they are embedded in so many extremely high level and society controlling positions that their nepotism gives them absurd amounts of power over basically everything.
Like, its not any better or really different that the tech industry is controlled by Indians instead doing the same exact thing. But we can acknowledge that without devolving into "YOUR HATRED MAKES YOU BLIND AND TRAPPED" screaming.
When you so publicly took on the censorious trans activists in 2016, or the neurotic feminists in 2018, despite the fact that those groups labelled you a bigot and even Nazi, you responded to them calmly and rationally.
You didn't call these lefitsts a fraction of the names you now reserve for the online "antisemites", despite how they were actively seeking to get you fired, deplatformed, and have now actually managed to hand you a professional censure.
In fact, in several instances, where they would allow it, you actually sat down to converse with them. To debate their ideas.
But when it comes to critics of Israel, it seems like your go-to is instead ad hominem attacks. And despite your preference for "precise" language (and yes, to the lesser extent there do exist actual trolls), it seems that you like many others are falling into the trap of equating anti-Zionism with antisemitism.
Where are the rational rebuttals to those who question Israel's role in Western politics? You might say they don't warrant your time, but either this "antisemitism" is a worrying, growing trend, or it is beneath you to address. It cannot logically be both, and if it is indeed not worthy of a response, it is strange that you spend so much time online chastising them.
I was watching a video recently that, roughly paraphrased, introduced the line of 'It's almost as if the Left is begging the Right to come up with another Hitler.'
Peterson... I'm not going to say he's intelligent per se, but he probably knows more than most. And I wonder if, deep down, there's a small part of him looking around at the modern age and screaming to the rest 'THIS IS HOW YOU GET NAZIS YOUR RETARDED FUCKWITS STOP STOP STOP FOR THE LOVE OF GOD STOP'.
...only some serious wires get crossed on the way to the rest of him and it instead comes out as 'Nazis could be here. With a twitter account, you can do anything.'
So he became a jew...
Isn't his daughter running his twitter now?
Wait...is Peterson calling people incels?!
"Mother's basement," and "women look at you and shudder," and the like.
Didn't he build his whole brand on helping these people? He's lost the plot in a huge way.
Honestly, at this point I think he's both a retard and a fed. Him and his daughter both. They can't shut the fuck up about "anonymity" and how gosh darn bad it is. And how everyone are Nazi Incels.
It's really, really pathetic. And pretty disgusting. Shame on him.
"Anyone I don't like is a smelly virgin."
Definitely written by a woman.
With how feminized a lot of guys are, it's really hard to tell nowadays. And Jordan Peterson has been acting equally ridiculous and embarrassing in real life for ages. Perhaps someone else wrote it...but perhaps he really did.
This tweet was clearly written by a woman with "And rightly bloody so" added to make it sound like Peterson.
Yeah the 3 different "you're mad women won't fuck you" is the huge mark of it.
Because deep down, all women know that their only inherent value is that of a fuckable piece of meat
Which is supremely hypocritical from Mr "I'm not saying your words". No? But someone else can use my reputation to spout off on twitter?
I've defended the guy in the past but, if it's even him and not some kind of replicant, he's clearly lost it.
Good because, honestly, your scenario might even make him look more weak and pathetic.
And, as I've said in another comment...the dude's been embarrassing himself in real life for years. This is totally on brand.
It must have been considerable amount of money he received from Dailywire that he is going to belittle the main audience he fostered for years. Seems such a typical boomer thing to do, do something cringe for monetary gain while throwing younger people with no direction under the bus.
Same here, I last heard about him, months ago getting shit flung at him for defending young men and being moved to tears thinking of the abuse they got.
Now he is insulting them?
Well, uh...they have the wrong opinions?
If you're not a Nazi, you can just clean you're room.
If you don't like Israel bombing civilians, you're a Nazi, a detestable incel, and there's no redemption for you. Don't even bother cleaning your room. Just keep being a Nazi. Wait...I'm sensing a flaw in this tactic...
I think Rubin and Shapiro cloned him on tour with the same tech they used with Biden. He's unrecognizable from 2015.
Also a possibility.
https://www.jordanbpeterson.com/psychology/on-the-so-called-jewish-question/
He showed us a while back that there are some questions he’s too afraid to broach. Probably why he works for ben shapiro these days.
But at this point who gives a fuck what this coward or his money hungry daughter think?
Peterson's rebuttal to the numerical argument speaks loudly. Despite his dismissive attitude to the whole issue he felt the need to respond. Of his cohort of 140+ IQ individuals, only a portion actually have to engage in in-group preferences for it to have a huge nepotistic affect. Something that Jews and JQers have in common is the belief that Jews have a very unique culture-religion: a people set apart as it were. Based on the religious and cultural mores of the Jewish people, I find it very plausible that at least 1 in 10 (and probably higher) successful high IQ Jews engage in ethnic nepotism. This minority has an outsized influence based on their intelligence and influence that could have a massive downstream effect.
Even he can’t deny the objective reality of relative domination, like we see in his first few paragraphs:
So the only question becomes “what is the explanation?”
He reaches to “IQ”, and to whatever extent that may have validity to it, he neglects all other factors as negligible ( importantly, as you point out, nepotistic in group bias)
While reading his argument, things may stand out as flawed:
This would only be the case if the groups in question existed in equal proportion, which they obviously don’t, whites are ~70% of the population while jews are ~2.5%. Ultimately, his arguments are all flawed in similar ways.
The last time I checked this page there were many comments, some of which tore apart his math and logic line by line. I was actually at the time somewhat impressed that he allowed them to remain up and that he even attempted a response to one of them, but looking now I can’t see them anymore, I guess the spineless coward got told to purge those if he wanted that nettanyahoo interview. Pathetic.
For what its worth, I still like Peterson in certain contexts. He does represent a popular figure who analyses the world in a manner outside of mainstream (Progressive and neocon) methods. Hell, he's to the right of American conservatives just being willing to discuss IQ as a predictive metric. I do think he's absolutely unwilling to get behind any practical solutions to the social ills he points out because the solutions to any given problem all have an unpleasant side. At the end of the day he's an old fashioned liberal who will default to "niceness" when all the chips are on the table. In short he is both often right and also the exact kind of person that created today's declining western society
He's not even remotely correct. The totality of IQ scores form a normal distribution / bell curve, but individual groups have different variances (width of the bell) and different means.
For example, say there's 5 genes for intelligence, but the 5th reduces IQ unless all 5 are present in which case it's a huge boon. A group that's been genetically isolated for thousands of years and doesn't have this 5th will have higher average intelligence because most of the time the 5th one interferes and lowers the average of others. But occasionally somebody in the other group will have all 5 giving them far more super geniuses per capita.
There are many genes for intelligence that operate in complex ways, so this is not even theoretical. Average means nothing as to the number of geniuses without the variances.
tl;dr Peterson is being a dumb-dumb.
I watched the nettanyahoo interview; can confirm it was pathetic.
I don't think this is a uniquely Jewish thing in the slightest. Shit its not even related to IQ even. I think the only group who doesn't do this is certain groups of whites, due to successful psyops over the last century.
What makes the Jewish one so problematic is that they are embedded in so many extremely high level and society controlling positions that their nepotism gives them absurd amounts of power over basically everything.
Like, its not any better or really different that the tech industry is controlled by Indians instead doing the same exact thing. But we can acknowledge that without devolving into "YOUR HATRED MAKES YOU BLIND AND TRAPPED" screaming.
This.
When I first started listening to him, it changed the way I thought about myself in a positive way.
If he's going to turn around and attack me, then I no longer care about what he says.
Well his wife is jewish https://files.catbox.moe/bhbqym.webp
isn't his daughter some kind of e-thot?
The wannabe kind.
Based on her trajectory she's about two weeks away from stripping on OF for $3 a download.
The right to indivual privacy and the right to free speech is guaranteed by human rights accords.
He calls his anonymous critics 'nazis', and then escalated from there.
He and his daughter have lost it.
I thought calling a group of people "rats" is what Hitler did?
Based Lauren: https://x.com/TheLaurenChen/status/1811503282755391905
When you so publicly took on the censorious trans activists in 2016, or the neurotic feminists in 2018, despite the fact that those groups labelled you a bigot and even Nazi, you responded to them calmly and rationally.
You didn't call these lefitsts a fraction of the names you now reserve for the online "antisemites", despite how they were actively seeking to get you fired, deplatformed, and have now actually managed to hand you a professional censure.
In fact, in several instances, where they would allow it, you actually sat down to converse with them. To debate their ideas.
But when it comes to critics of Israel, it seems like your go-to is instead ad hominem attacks. And despite your preference for "precise" language (and yes, to the lesser extent there do exist actual trolls), it seems that you like many others are falling into the trap of equating anti-Zionism with antisemitism.
Where are the rational rebuttals to those who question Israel's role in Western politics? You might say they don't warrant your time, but either this "antisemitism" is a worrying, growing trend, or it is beneath you to address. It cannot logically be both, and if it is indeed not worthy of a response, it is strange that you spend so much time online chastising them.
I thought her other comment was good too.
I was watching a video recently that, roughly paraphrased, introduced the line of 'It's almost as if the Left is begging the Right to come up with another Hitler.'
Peterson... I'm not going to say he's intelligent per se, but he probably knows more than most. And I wonder if, deep down, there's a small part of him looking around at the modern age and screaming to the rest 'THIS IS HOW YOU GET NAZIS YOUR RETARDED FUCKWITS STOP STOP STOP FOR THE LOVE OF GOD STOP'.
...only some serious wires get crossed on the way to the rest of him and it instead comes out as 'Nazis could be here. With a twitter account, you can do anything.'
Or something. I dunno.
"Disgust is wasted on you"
Is a better line before you resort to cheeto-dust covered, basement dwelling, momma's skirt hiding behind sort of insults.
You big headed meanie face.
What about the new nazi rat bedevilled eggs with a wife and kids who own their own home?
Well he is The Red Skull.
A truly pathetic display. Holy shit
Don't listen to him stormfags, he's wrong about you:
You don't eat cheetos.
Hell, most of you aren't even American.