I like how the gender discourse flip-flops between "it happens in nature so it's ok" and "animals are too primitive to understand gender so it's a human only thing"
Only half? Male bedbugs will attempt to fuck every other bedbug they meet because female bedbugs have evolved to look more like the males as a means to avoid males. Rather than deter the males they simply fuck everything. Also the females have no analogous structure for a vagina so males simply penetrate the bodies of other bedbugs wherever possible through a mechanism called 'traumatic insemination'.
Generally yes but, as I said in my comment, Israel is actually an interesting case. They conquered land, then went on to steal more land. So they are actually on stolen land, just not quite how most of the leftists would argue it. They've pulled some really slimy stuff. If you're going to claim "global community" benefits, you should also play by the rules. Israel has expanded well past their recognized and agreed upon borders.
They were also sort of just... Handed the land they got in 1948. Sure, they partly "conquered" it (mainly through literal terrorism), but then the British were like, "Yeah, you know what, this is too difficult. Here you go."
Slightly different to most tales of conquest, IMHO. Literally a vassal state getting the empire to come in and use superior force to crush their opponents, lol.
And then there's the post-1967 situation, like you mention. They just can't seem to help themselves...
I was being generous because some people get bent out of shape on the issue but, yes, you're correct; even their initial "conquest" was sketchy as fuck. Kind of a reverse-Rhodesia, actually, where Israel had the backing of the Empire.
Gotta love the irony of such a young country telling us how they've been around 2,000 years, too. Oh, also? Palestine? Not a real country, chud. Israel? Infinite years old. How dare you.
the "history book" bit is dumb though since Jewish response to criticism of them ethnically cleansing Palestine was to say "ummm there was no Palestine!" A position so ahistorical and preposterous many fellow jews have repeatedly demolished it.
Not to mention the bizarre evangelical Christian support of Israel, despite Christians holding the holy land more recently (pre Balfour), the new testament replacing the old covenant with the jews, as well as ignoring 2000 years of church dogma that jews are Christ killers who need to repent and accept Jesus to be saved.
Damn, leftists are retarded. Never ceases to amaze me.
Biology doesn't prove gender is a spectrum. Marx wasn't an economist, he was a whiny loser, who was also wrong about everything. Ironically, the Communist Manifesto works just as well to counter Marxists as an economics book does, perhaps better due to irony. Statistics prove the "racists" correct. And, even when there's some agreement with leftists (I don't like what Israel is doing), they are so retarded they still manage to get me to argue against them. Many, many countries are "on stolen land." It's just how it goes. That's not Israel's crime. Well, it actually is part of it, but not how they're thinking. The issue isn't that they took the territory, it's that they then went and took more than what was "globally recognized" or whatever. Anyway, they're wrong on all of this, even the stuff I partially agree with them on. Because they're stupid.
Marx was a 'political economist' by profession, who also mired himself in the German philosophy of his time. Sociologists also claim him as one of their own, even though he never identified as one. Sociology was still a nascent field at the time, accepted only as a branch of philosophy and yet to have been accepted as a science. For example, sociology was still regarded as part of philosophy at what is now the University of Tokyo in 1920. Furthermore, the USSR (as well as Albania and China) banned sociology for decades as a bourgeois science.
If the crime stats are skewed, it's only because "unknown race" is included due to unsolved crimes. That means that they are skewed in the opposite direction of what this idiot is implying.
They conflated the language intentionally, gender was always a scientific classification for sex and was never separated from biology until a few women and pedophiles trying making entirely sociological. The two root words of gender are genos and genre.
He repeatedly tried to show gender was societal conditioning, which led to the reimer “experiment” and following suicides of the twins that had their lives destroyed.
See this conflation is also not entirely accurate. Gendered language or how we describe it using the word gender is entirely to describe how other languages utilize language to express male or female. Gender in English is unique because we base our terms just as much from Greek as we do Latin. This is why gender has two root words, genos (Greek) and genre (French)
Advanced biology shows we are a sexually dimorphic species and that the money acolytes trying to cherry pick specific brain patterns in “trans” were not only wrong, but that the opposite was in fact correct. Under their argument an actual intersex person would be a different or subspecies. Same as dwarfs, albinos, Down syndrome, etc.
I don’t trust any recent biology book. Considering the backlash that comes from not going along with the current narrative is anyone surprised they’ve gone off the deep end
Debra soh who by every definition is a leftist acknowledges this and cites multiple examples of how this occurred in in “academic spaces” in her book “the end of gender”. She’s also one of the few mainstream sexologists / journalists that acknowledges how birth control has decimated women’s natural mating instincts.
Her book is definitely worth a read. She’s had hard ties to the LGBTQ community but didn’t fall for the programming in the modern narrative, which by her own account was do to working with people who were gay.
oh, ok, now we appeal to nature. you troons and feminists really want to go down that route? who do you think will be telling you what to do if we listen strictly to nature? it won't be some jew feminist landwhale, whore.
contested land. Israel is on contested land. the land has been contested for at least the past 2000 years, and it will be contested for the next 2000. is nothing but a pile of sand filled with death and massacre, and it is not worth anyone's time.
Science does not "prove," it supports a theory/ model to some n'th degree. It operates on the basis of epistemological limitation — that a scientific model of reality can get infinitely close to 99.99999...% accurate (via supporting evidence), but never 100% "prove" anything.
People who use the phrase "science proves" do not know their asses from their holes. A model of reality is NOT conclusive. Yet, it seems people are just trying to project their religious absolutism onto something contemporary, a culture now manifest as Scientism (tm).
What I think has happened is the institutional capture of scientific goodwill. I.e. theories produced by science were coopted by engineering to make genuine technology and break throughs. Now, these institutions grow their ideology by parroting that "all science" resulted in "progress," and thus that denying THEIR science is amount to denying the establishment of computers.
What is rarely mentioned is that the goodwill of science is based on theories that survived the selection process of the industrial pipeline. Most scientific research does not and gets found out to be bullshit. Something like 95% is fraudulent or gets buried under mountains of antagonizing evidence. This is the realm that contemporary, institutionalized science finds itself in, where it rarely survives replication/ scrutiny, let alone engineering application.
Even now, something as basic as electron orbitals are still being debated by Chemists. We have atomic orbital theory, postulating that individual orbitals hybridize to form bonds. We also have molecular orbital theory, which states that all the orbitals hybridize into an ort cloud specific to that molecule.
These are conflicting theories that have equal support in the lab from measurements, yet clearly "both" cannot exist at the same time. They are conflicting, yet both "real" science.
Science can only support, it cannot prove. People who say otherwise are just latching onto "science" as their religion, and institutions are using this fervor to push their ideology. Institutions get away with this because of a perceived history of technological dominance and empirical truth. This history, though, falls apart upon closer examination. Most science failed, and most "established" science today is in existential quarrel with some core foundational principle.
“Gender” has nothing to fucking do with biology because it’s a, as THEY SAY, a SOCIAL MOTHER FUCKING CONSTRUCT. SEX has to do with biology and this knucklehead doesn’t say FUCK about SEX. That’s like saying “advanced algebra PROVES borderline personality disorder!” It’s pure refuckingtardery.
Edit: why the downvotes? You faggots don’t think sex is biologically concrete?!?
I hate to be that guy but it is important to understand your enemy. "real" communism is the end state, a utopia where reality no longer applies and all things are equal for all time in all places.
You have to remember marxism is actually a religion and "real communism" is their version of heaven on earth (which is always hell) so technically "real" communism has never been tried in the same way the second coming of Jesus has never been tried.
The subtext to "real communism has never been tried" is so funny. These coddled white leftist fucktards are basically saying they would do it better because they're smarter than or superior to all the ethnics who've already tried and failed.
I like how the gender discourse flip-flops between "it happens in nature so it's ok" and "animals are too primitive to understand gender so it's a human only thing"
Now do animals and homosexuals
They already are, that's why there's so many diseases.
Damn you
Animals also rape enough that certain species have evolved specialized vaginas to deal with it.
If we are going with "biology justifies it" then I'm about to impregnate half my town whether they like it or not.
Only half? Male bedbugs will attempt to fuck every other bedbug they meet because female bedbugs have evolved to look more like the males as a means to avoid males. Rather than deter the males they simply fuck everything. Also the females have no analogous structure for a vagina so males simply penetrate the bodies of other bedbugs wherever possible through a mechanism called 'traumatic insemination'.
Despite what troons tell you, men cannot get pregnant.
So yes, I can only impregnate half my town/
I don't care if it's a jew or an American Indian, or one of those gobbledygook in Australia. It's never stolen land. It's conquered.
even then, what do they think is going to happen? the government will just go "aw jeez rick i guess you're right" and dissolve itself?
Generally yes but, as I said in my comment, Israel is actually an interesting case. They conquered land, then went on to steal more land. So they are actually on stolen land, just not quite how most of the leftists would argue it. They've pulled some really slimy stuff. If you're going to claim "global community" benefits, you should also play by the rules. Israel has expanded well past their recognized and agreed upon borders.
They were also sort of just... Handed the land they got in 1948. Sure, they partly "conquered" it (mainly through literal terrorism), but then the British were like, "Yeah, you know what, this is too difficult. Here you go."
Slightly different to most tales of conquest, IMHO. Literally a vassal state getting the empire to come in and use superior force to crush their opponents, lol.
And then there's the post-1967 situation, like you mention. They just can't seem to help themselves...
I was being generous because some people get bent out of shape on the issue but, yes, you're correct; even their initial "conquest" was sketchy as fuck. Kind of a reverse-Rhodesia, actually, where Israel had the backing of the Empire.
Gotta love the irony of such a young country telling us how they've been around 2,000 years, too. Oh, also? Palestine? Not a real country, chud. Israel? Infinite years old. How dare you.
the "history book" bit is dumb though since Jewish response to criticism of them ethnically cleansing Palestine was to say "ummm there was no Palestine!" A position so ahistorical and preposterous many fellow jews have repeatedly demolished it.
Not to mention the bizarre evangelical Christian support of Israel, despite Christians holding the holy land more recently (pre Balfour), the new testament replacing the old covenant with the jews, as well as ignoring 2000 years of church dogma that jews are Christ killers who need to repent and accept Jesus to be saved.
For what it's worth, while it may have been stolen land before, now it's conquered.
Also BLM was a scam, lol. No refunds!
Damn, leftists are retarded. Never ceases to amaze me.
Biology doesn't prove gender is a spectrum. Marx wasn't an economist, he was a whiny loser, who was also wrong about everything. Ironically, the Communist Manifesto works just as well to counter Marxists as an economics book does, perhaps better due to irony. Statistics prove the "racists" correct. And, even when there's some agreement with leftists (I don't like what Israel is doing), they are so retarded they still manage to get me to argue against them. Many, many countries are "on stolen land." It's just how it goes. That's not Israel's crime. Well, it actually is part of it, but not how they're thinking. The issue isn't that they took the territory, it's that they then went and took more than what was "globally recognized" or whatever. Anyway, they're wrong on all of this, even the stuff I partially agree with them on. Because they're stupid.
Marx was a 'political economist' by profession, who also mired himself in the German philosophy of his time. Sociologists also claim him as one of their own, even though he never identified as one. Sociology was still a nascent field at the time, accepted only as a branch of philosophy and yet to have been accepted as a science. For example, sociology was still regarded as part of philosophy at what is now the University of Tokyo in 1920. Furthermore, the USSR (as well as Albania and China) banned sociology for decades as a bourgeois science.
If the crime stats are skewed, it's only because "unknown race" is included due to unsolved crimes. That means that they are skewed in the opposite direction of what this idiot is implying.
Also, we keep having all these very dark whites, and nonhispanic white Joses and Jesuses and the like.
"Biology" "gender" LOL
They conflated the language intentionally, gender was always a scientific classification for sex and was never separated from biology until a few women and pedophiles trying making entirely sociological. The two root words of gender are genos and genre.
Really? I thought John Money coined gender as a technical term.
He repeatedly tried to show gender was societal conditioning, which led to the reimer “experiment” and following suicides of the twins that had their lives destroyed.
Hmm yes, it seems that he twisted the grammatical term "gender," which distinguishes male and female categories in Romance languages and others, into his pedophilic fantasy.
See this conflation is also not entirely accurate. Gendered language or how we describe it using the word gender is entirely to describe how other languages utilize language to express male or female. Gender in English is unique because we base our terms just as much from Greek as we do Latin. This is why gender has two root words, genos (Greek) and genre (French)
Advanced biology shows we are a sexually dimorphic species and that the money acolytes trying to cherry pick specific brain patterns in “trans” were not only wrong, but that the opposite was in fact correct. Under their argument an actual intersex person would be a different or subspecies. Same as dwarfs, albinos, Down syndrome, etc.
It’s not the crime stats that are skewed. 51 thousand likes with only 304 replies…
I don’t trust any recent biology book. Considering the backlash that comes from not going along with the current narrative is anyone surprised they’ve gone off the deep end
Debra soh who by every definition is a leftist acknowledges this and cites multiple examples of how this occurred in in “academic spaces” in her book “the end of gender”. She’s also one of the few mainstream sexologists / journalists that acknowledges how birth control has decimated women’s natural mating instincts.
I think I’ve heard of her. Good to hear there are some sane ones left
Her book is definitely worth a read. She’s had hard ties to the LGBTQ community but didn’t fall for the programming in the modern narrative, which by her own account was do to working with people who were gay.
oh, ok, now we appeal to nature. you troons and feminists really want to go down that route? who do you think will be telling you what to do if we listen strictly to nature? it won't be some jew feminist landwhale, whore.
Nature is their crotch wound trying to heal itself shut.
Totally organic 64k likes.
Musk, deal with the leftist bot problem.
It's difficult since a significant number of the bots on twitter are people.
Public education is turning kids into retarded gender-confused communists.
contested land. Israel is on contested land. the land has been contested for at least the past 2000 years, and it will be contested for the next 2000. is nothing but a pile of sand filled with death and massacre, and it is not worth anyone's time.
Studied Biology in Uni,
Science does not "prove," it supports a theory/ model to some n'th degree. It operates on the basis of epistemological limitation — that a scientific model of reality can get infinitely close to 99.99999...% accurate (via supporting evidence), but never 100% "prove" anything.
People who use the phrase "science proves" do not know their asses from their holes. A model of reality is NOT conclusive. Yet, it seems people are just trying to project their religious absolutism onto something contemporary, a culture now manifest as Scientism (tm).
What I think has happened is the institutional capture of scientific goodwill. I.e. theories produced by science were coopted by engineering to make genuine technology and break throughs. Now, these institutions grow their ideology by parroting that "all science" resulted in "progress," and thus that denying THEIR science is amount to denying the establishment of computers.
What is rarely mentioned is that the goodwill of science is based on theories that survived the selection process of the industrial pipeline. Most scientific research does not and gets found out to be bullshit. Something like 95% is fraudulent or gets buried under mountains of antagonizing evidence. This is the realm that contemporary, institutionalized science finds itself in, where it rarely survives replication/ scrutiny, let alone engineering application.
Even now, something as basic as electron orbitals are still being debated by Chemists. We have atomic orbital theory, postulating that individual orbitals hybridize to form bonds. We also have molecular orbital theory, which states that all the orbitals hybridize into an ort cloud specific to that molecule.
These are conflicting theories that have equal support in the lab from measurements, yet clearly "both" cannot exist at the same time. They are conflicting, yet both "real" science.
============================================================= TL,DR
Science can only support, it cannot prove. People who say otherwise are just latching onto "science" as their religion, and institutions are using this fervor to push their ideology. Institutions get away with this because of a perceived history of technological dominance and empirical truth. This history, though, falls apart upon closer examination. Most science failed, and most "established" science today is in existential quarrel with some core foundational principle.
“Gender” has nothing to fucking do with biology because it’s a, as THEY SAY, a SOCIAL MOTHER FUCKING CONSTRUCT. SEX has to do with biology and this knucklehead doesn’t say FUCK about SEX. That’s like saying “advanced algebra PROVES borderline personality disorder!” It’s pure refuckingtardery.
Edit: why the downvotes? You faggots don’t think sex is biologically concrete?!?
I hate to be that guy but it is important to understand your enemy. "real" communism is the end state, a utopia where reality no longer applies and all things are equal for all time in all places.
You have to remember marxism is actually a religion and "real communism" is their version of heaven on earth (which is always hell) so technically "real" communism has never been tried in the same way the second coming of Jesus has never been tried.
The subtext to "real communism has never been tried" is so funny. These coddled white leftist fucktards are basically saying they would do it better because they're smarter than or superior to all the ethnics who've already tried and failed.