Generational warfare is warfare. This isn’t a pussy pass, it’s one of the things imp was half right on. Women are the foil that Fabian socialists have been using to try and destroy American society since they pushed for the 19th.
That's the beauty of it. While the Fabian Society had actual members, you can argue nearly every elected official in the West is a Fabian. That's the point of using it as misdirection.
Most people (schizos excepted) who say things like this don’t mean that some random person was actually receiving orders from whatever group they blame, but that said group has manipulated societal incentive structures to produce this kind of outcome more often. Your performative incredulity is misplaced because it doesn’t address the point; it’s as though you saw someone talking about “Soros DAs” releasing criminals and went “wow, of course George Soros personally ordered Jamal to mug that guy and Shaniqua to release him afterward!”
No one was suggesting that, and you look dumb and/or hostile for implying they were.
Most people (schizos excepted) who say things like this
It's Ahaus, bro. He's at least borderline.
it’s as though you saw someone talking about “Soros DAs”
It's nothing like that. If he pointed out that Soros donated to that DA, I wouldn't have said anything. He pointed out nothing. This is attributing random events to some grand conspiracy with nothing connecting the dots hence why there is only some vague inferences and nothing concrete.
I read his comment as saying that the light sentencing was the deliberate enabling of said “useful idiots,” and more broadly that women’s movements supported /encouraged by “Fabian Socialists” have encouraged marital strife and intersexual hostility. Not that he literally meant someone had told her that she should poison her husband.
Honestly, the most unusual part of his comment is who he ascribes it to. If you rewrite it as “feminist influence” rather than “Fabian Socialist,” (or “Jews,” or “Communists,” or “China”) you could use it as a pretty standard talking point for various sections of the right.
Criminals don't cause soft on crime policies. Those get passed by legislatures, implemented by executive offices and/or law enforcement, or are products of judicial activism.
What are you on? Someone utilizing the inherent nature of another to their benefit is a constant. Letting women be Maenads isn’t just so women’s fee fees are being appeased.
Totally. I do agree with some of the broad strokes of his positions but people like him always take it too far and make it a core part of every single thing they ever say.
Great response. In my experience, women claim they were abused in 90% of breakups, whether it was physical and emotional abuse. What the women never tell you is what they did to deserve it. Kind of like jews who complain about being thrown out of 109 countries. But they never tell you why...
"Your honor, I knew exactly what I was doing, and that it was wrong, and that it was just for the money that would result in the death of a man. That's it. That's my plea deal."
'Oh okay. 3 years probation, no jail time.'
Fuck everything, by the way. If it wasn't obvious yet.
She was a Flipino if memory serves, just goes to show you--even to the "passport bros" any woman who signs up with a dude for money is ultimately there for money (this is actually even worse with third world women, because their low IQ short-sights their long term gain by marrying a solider of ZOG and just waiting patient till he dies in the next war)
still, its retarded stupid they didn't put this bitch in jail for multiple attempted poisoning, if this was a man doing it he'd be getting 20 years easy.
Generational warfare is warfare. This isn’t a pussy pass, it’s one of the things imp was half right on. Women are the foil that Fabian socialists have been using to try and destroy American society since they pushed for the 19th.
It's also the pussy pass.
Okay street shitter
What do you mean?
He's a pedophile that spams this place with advocacy for child marriages.
Ah…
More to the point, he's a pajeet street shitter who probably rapes goats after bathing in the shit filled river he lives next to.
That's what he calls non-pedophiles.
New euphemism just dropped lol
It's actually a misdirection I've seen out of Gizortnik many times.
It was his favorite bogeyman and excuse to bloviate endlessly whenever someone started connecting too many dots.
He never even really explained what it was. Probably a byproduct of him being unable to be concise to save his fucking life.
That's the beauty of it. While the Fabian Society had actual members, you can argue nearly every elected official in the West is a Fabian. That's the point of using it as misdirection.
It's people who won WW2 and have been trying to Make Weimar Great Again ever since.
Ah, she tried to kill him to serve the Fabian socialists. Silly me. It was so obvious!
Most people (schizos excepted) who say things like this don’t mean that some random person was actually receiving orders from whatever group they blame, but that said group has manipulated societal incentive structures to produce this kind of outcome more often. Your performative incredulity is misplaced because it doesn’t address the point; it’s as though you saw someone talking about “Soros DAs” releasing criminals and went “wow, of course George Soros personally ordered Jamal to mug that guy and Shaniqua to release him afterward!”
No one was suggesting that, and you look dumb and/or hostile for implying they were.
It's the criminal justice spin off from Reagan's quote of "If you want more of something, subsidize it. If you want less of something, tax it".
It's Ahaus, bro. He's at least borderline.
It's nothing like that. If he pointed out that Soros donated to that DA, I wouldn't have said anything. He pointed out nothing. This is attributing random events to some grand conspiracy with nothing connecting the dots hence why there is only some vague inferences and nothing concrete.
I read his comment as saying that the light sentencing was the deliberate enabling of said “useful idiots,” and more broadly that women’s movements supported /encouraged by “Fabian Socialists” have encouraged marital strife and intersexual hostility. Not that he literally meant someone had told her that she should poison her husband.
Honestly, the most unusual part of his comment is who he ascribes it to. If you rewrite it as “feminist influence” rather than “Fabian Socialist,” (or “Jews,” or “Communists,” or “China”) you could use it as a pretty standard talking point for various sections of the right.
The key difference is the legacy of Fabian socialism in America is the 19th amendment.
That narrative would have made more sense as well. It was so vague that it came across like ranting about flat earth or some shit to me.
Useful idiots are useful idiots. You think the ferals ransacking cities are doing it for more than a free pair of Nikes?
Sometimes a life insurance scam is just a life insurance scam.
And three years probation for clear attempted murder couldn’t possibly have anything to do with the current catch and release climate right?!
Sure. I don't see how they would make her in service to some grand master plan. The light sentence is just a product of their anarcho-tyranny.
Guys! I don’t know how using useful idiots en masse could lead to societal collapse which is Fabian socialisms goal for over a century now!
Criminals don't cause soft on crime policies. Those get passed by legislatures, implemented by executive offices and/or law enforcement, or are products of judicial activism.
"this isn't women being women when men do not control them. It's socio-economic pressures, guys!"
you know you, and everyone like you, is a liberal leftist at heart, right? bluepilled SIMPs and fags.
What are you on? Someone utilizing the inherent nature of another to their benefit is a constant. Letting women be Maenads isn’t just so women’s fee fees are being appeased.
America was just fine, until you parasites invaded.
Your rent's due already? Shit must suck to be a WEF slave and still have to pay rent.
Something something Imp was right again
They banned him because he spoke the truth.
They banned him because he was an annoying sperg.
Totally. I do agree with some of the broad strokes of his positions but people like him always take it too far and make it a core part of every single thing they ever say.
At least the coffee machine was getting cleaned...
#freeimp
Did she claim she was abused so this was self defense?
Great response. In my experience, women claim they were abused in 90% of breakups, whether it was physical and emotional abuse. What the women never tell you is what they did to deserve it. Kind of like jews who complain about being thrown out of 109 countries. But they never tell you why...
"Your honor, I knew exactly what I was doing, and that it was wrong, and that it was just for the money that would result in the death of a man. That's it. That's my plea deal."
'Oh okay. 3 years probation, no jail time.'
Fuck everything, by the way. If it wasn't obvious yet.
She was a Flipino if memory serves, just goes to show you--even to the "passport bros" any woman who signs up with a dude for money is ultimately there for money (this is actually even worse with third world women, because their low IQ short-sights their long term gain by marrying a solider of ZOG and just waiting patient till he dies in the next war)
still, its retarded stupid they didn't put this bitch in jail for multiple attempted poisoning, if this was a man doing it he'd be getting 20 years easy.
There is a group of people that doesn't abide by law when it comes to matters of their Ummah.
Strangely these lawbreakers are given a wide berth and much leeway.
I wish I were smart enough to draw conclusions on being the change you want to see.