Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

83
Google allegedly changes definition of bloodbath to remove non-violent definitions (twitter.com)
posted 2 years ago by evilplushie 2 years ago by evilplushie +83 / -0
37 comments share
37 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (37)
sorted by:
▲ 45 ▼
– Kienan 45 points 2 years ago +45 / -0

I love Google's absolutely fucking inept censorship.

My favorite example is that you can still to this very day buy a "Confederate fla" on Google Shopping, but not a "Confederate Flag." The latter returns zero results.

Your search - confederate flag - did not match any shopping results.

Suggestions: Make sure all words are spelled correctly.

HAHAHAHAHA.

Anyway, why do I bring this up? If you click the Google link to "Usage examples" you get this:

"the election turned out to be a bloodbath for their party"

"the bad publicity would be a media bloodbath"

There were other nonmetaphorical examples, of course, but those two are clearly not actual bloody bloodbaths.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– Skywise 13 points 2 years ago +13 / -0

I miss southern girls in confederate flag bikinis.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– bamboozler1 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

That's still a thing, right?? Even if it's harder to find on the internet, surely that culture still exists, no?

I doubt girls like that give a shit what TPTB think, and it's not like they're doing anything actually illegal, anyway!

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– AnotherSchwarzesMark 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

That sounds really bad to do, where? No really, where so I can avoid it :)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– bamboozler1 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Sadly I haven't been to the South myself yet, so I can't really help there, lol. Though I feel like even parts of Queensland over here would have had their share of "rebel flag bikinis", even fairly recently...

But I'll let you know if I ever see/hear of one in person again, ha.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– Vivs3rdSock 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0

Do an image search on Google for: How many women does it take to change a lightbulb?

No quotations marks, just the words and punctuation at the end, and see what the first image result is.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Kienan 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

Hahaha, is it the "feminists can't change anything" shirt?

Also, it's weird, most of the results aren't for women changing lightbulbs. I checked with men, and most of the results are about men changing lightbulbs. Someone with their finger on the scale again, I suppose.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Vivs3rdSock 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

is it the "feminists can't change anything" shirt?

It wasn't when I last checked when making that post, it was the "How many men" version that comes after it from Pinterest, although some results may differ I guess.

Now it's the feminist t-shirt and the men version in second.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– fvckface 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

I don't even get the t-shirt unless I open google search in a private tab

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– FlyingCow 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

the flag example works even from russian IP, that is hilarious

it even does "did you mean: confederate flag" if you don't type g in, and that leads to "did not match any shopping results" page

poor search ai is forced into a loop

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– bamboozler1 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

I don't have too much of a horse in this race, given that I'm not American, but I do find it weird that we've gone from even hippies liking Skynyrd and the Allman Brothers band, and the Dukes of Hazzard being culturally ubiquitous, to, in less than two decades (since the Hazzard remake) that flag being so supposedly "racist" that it is pretty much a "cultural no-no" almost everywhere, not just in polite society, and even Mississippi had to tear down their state flag...

Not to mention the whole tearing down statues shit that only really made its way into the West (and has now even reached my home city, depressingly) after Trump won, and the left declared open war on society as it stood...

At the same time, I would argue that "racial harmony" has gone completely backwards, people hate each other more than ever, and "violence" only seems to be increasing, along with the obvious political polarization...

Same thing happened in England with the British and English flags. Same in Australia (since 2005 in particular) with the Australian flag and the Eureka cross/flag. And arguably same in NZ with their flag... And the statues shit has carried through to all these places, plus Canada, plus even Central Europe of all places...

Really makes you wonder...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– mharmless 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

They are still doing this to Kyle Rittenhouse too. No results, but insert a space there somewhere and see plenty of merch.

He gets the same treatment as Adolf Hitler. But of course, Stalin works just fine on Google's platform.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Kienan 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Sometimes people get treated worse than Hitler. They'll (in this case Amazon) ban books (I think Jordan Peterson, various "Covid denialism," among others?) while still selling Mein Kampf. You think the government response to Covid was atrocious? You're literally worse than Hitler!

Huh, apparently they did briefly ban Mein Kampf for a second, then brought it back.

Amazon has reportedly banned the sale of most editions of Adolf Hitler’s “Mein Kampf” after decades of lobbying from Jewish groups...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 25 ▼
– nuggetpatrol 25 points 2 years ago +25 / -0

Trump really should just sit there and read a dictionary out loud so these people will never be able to use a word again because Trump also used said word, and that'd be very bad.

They're literally doing the Hitler breathed air and drank water routine with words and it's not even the most retarded thing I've seen lately.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 19 ▼
– Kienan 19 points 2 years ago +19 / -0

Trump really should just sit there and read a dictionary out loud

Dude, I'd pay to see that. Trump going off on tangents while reading the dictionary would be one of the most on-brand things he could do. And could you imagine when he get's to "Insurrection," or "Impeachment," or so many others?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 17 points 2 years ago +17 / -0

Trump gets to "Abomination"

Media: "THAT'S TRANSPHOBIC!"

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Kienan 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

The "Defamation" tangent would cost him another couple hundred million dollars.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Knife-TotingRat 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Wait until he gets to the Rs ...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– Vivs3rdSock 13 points 2 years ago +13 / -0

Mostly bloodless baths.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– TisDaRhythmOfDaNight 10 points 2 years ago +10 / -0

so how does this gel with the theory that Jews are going to let Trump win because he's useful to Israel?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Careless_Ejaculator 14 points 2 years ago +14 / -0

Obviously he's the shabbiest goy, but the circus we're seeing is just to get the population fighting amongst themselves. Divide and conquer.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– GamingTheSystem-01 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

https://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/956/598/d36.jpg

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– Skywise 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

Trump should campaign on this. “I’m so powerful I can change the definitions of words. No, it’s true! Watch me!”

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Devidose 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

Didn't he make people support Nickleback after he criticised them in some way? This is despite the fact everyone shits on Nickleback, so much like Dr Cox in Scrubs needing to start an argument with Kelso that time Cox stopped fighting with his wife, TDS is so bad for these idiots they must go against long running memes like there being no actual fans of Nickleback.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– bamboozler1 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Clearly Nickelback has, and always has had, some fans, otherwise the Rockstar video clip wouldn't exist, lol...

But I still see your point.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– bloodguard 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

If he manages to thread the needle again on day one Trump should start anti-trust break up lawsuits against Alphabet Inc (Google, Youtube, DoubleClick) and Facebook (Instagram, Threads, and WhatsApp).

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– ElmoHassel 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

Who gives a rat's ass about how google defines anything?

Politically neutral lexicography ended sometime in the late 1960's-early '70s, which is why my only lexicon other than the OED or an etymological dictionary is the Random House American College Dictionary, copyright 1969.

Comparing definitions in the same dictionary from different decades or editions is a good exercise, a good way to see how politics infiltrates lexicography.

Citing dictionaries in arguments over definitions is a lame appeal to authority.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 3 ▼
– FrozeInFear 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

The screenshots shown suggest they switched to a different dictionary source (dictionary.com to "Oxford Languages").
For my part, I don't know how I feel about dictionaries including metaphorical meanings among their definitions. I imagine printed dictionaries would swell up if they did.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– Kienan 20 points 2 years ago +20 / -0

The screenshots shown suggest they switched to a different dictionary source (dictionary.com to "Oxford Languages").

Yup, and I checked, it has been that single definition for years. But Google switching what they're using in this case, at this time, is still absolutely shit-teir behavior. You have to go down pretty dang far to even find it, too. You pass Merriam-Webster, Dictionary, Cambridge, Vocabulary, Collins, Britannica, and more. All of these include either non-literal definitions or at least examples. You have to bypass all that to get to what Google is currently using. That's intentional, and it's malicious.

No matter how you feel about metaphorical definitions, Google is pulling a fast one here, for vicious and political means.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– nuggetpatrol 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0

I was going to mention that too. In order to get the definition they did, they had to skip at least eight other far more reputable sources for the word.

To put this in easier terms, they're a half a step from using urban dictionary as an actual dictionary source when they have to dig this deep.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Skywise 4 points 2 years ago +4 / -0

That’s pretty much their SOP. Once the election is over or this narrative drops from the spotlight they’ll switch back to whichever source supports the current narrative.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– Bouldabassed 3 points 2 years ago +3 / -0

Feelings on that aside, if they just switched it now, they're clearly doing it on purpose for shit reasons.

Personally though, I prefer all common usages of a word be listed.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– bamboozler1 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Printed dictionaries of any merit have always included metaphorical meanings for words like this, though. That's why they have value.

That's... Almost the whole point of why I have the coffee table-sized, 15-year-old one that I do, for precisely that reason...

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– TomSeeSaw 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

As long as it sold more ads.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– ApparentlyImAHeretic 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

it looks like it was dictionary.com, since that's what those results are pulling from.

also, did the original poster happen to post an archive?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Kienan 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

also, did the original poster happen to post an archive?

I couldn't find one, sadly.

Also, doing some testing, it looks like Google is using Oxford for everything now. Not sure when that happened, or why. The format in the image (where it puts the link to the dictionary used) is/was a valid one, but that doesn't prove anything one way or the other. Archiving should be standard practice. Also, I wish Twitter/"X" wasn't so bent on inconveniencing people who aren't signed in. I haven't used Twitter in years, I don't remember my password, and I think I'd have to do some weird phone verification if I tried to reset it anyway. I don't want to sign in to Twitter, but that means I can't read shit.

I know I'm tangenting, but it's really weird how locked down Twitter is now. I get smaller sites having to do that to save bandwidth, but it feels super clunky and cheap when a big name site does it. Inconvenient for people trying to use Twitter to promote themselves, too, as a lot of people do. You want people without accounts to be able to see your stuff easily. So this shit hurts both people with and without accounts.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - bh6wd (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy