He's a kept man
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (63)
sorted by:
What's sad is the first two should be basic expectations for any relationship and not some major revelation of controlling. And the fourth is probably just a normal thing for dating any "celeb".
But its that third one that sticks out to show that it isn't about normal expectations of fidelity and relationships, its entirely about control.
eh, not taking photos with female fans is kinda controlling.
Female fans are much more likely than male fans to be pushy in terms of trying to sexually assault the guy than male fans could ever be. If you go to any Con in the world you can see whatever male talent (who are massively below this guy in the rungs) getting groped by random girls or them demanding kisses or the like during these pictures.
In fact basically the entire KickVic thing is based on them doing that, and people blaming him for it.
Swift may be a controlled agent of TPTB, but she isn't completely retarded. She knows those girls will be grabbing his ass when the photo goes off.
Yeah who is that streamer that publicly said he never wanted to work with a female co-streamer? Ninja? Because it's just way too much of a liability.
Like it or not, Taylor Swift is a billionaire and an insanely popular music star. That means a lot of people could potentially stalk her/her boyfriend, either as a mad fan or someone who just wants to stir shit up. Even if you're rich, you don't want to deal with some sexual scandal and/or a lawsuit.
Heck even ol' Mike Pence openly said he wouldn't be alone with a woman without his wife present. He took a lot of shit for it, but we all knew why.
I remember that blowing up within a month of Trump taking office. Then 8 months later PoundMeToo proved him right.
IIRC this is also a thing in the open source community when it comes to conventions. Don't be alone with women unless you want to have some allegations thrown your Way.
I think the football player can defend himself against unwanted advances.
And get MeToo'd for rejecting them?! Or do you mean physically defend himself, beat up a broad in broad daylight for feeling him up? How do you wish him to ruin his life?
This nigga thinks women can handle rejection and will handle it with reason, and certainly won't accuse a man of doing things because he didn't play along with her.
I envy being so naive and young.
Cause you're not already rejecting them by not taking a photo....
Yes, which gives you a safe distance and an easy, acceptable excuse that doesn't embarrass her.
Compared to being right next to her, with an easy claim that you "touched" her by that distance, and rejecting mid photo because you didn't like her groping you makes her look and feel bad. Which means she now needs to make you the bad guy.
Its women 101 man.
you're assuming the type of lunatic that will grope you aren't the type to get embarrassed by being rejected for a photo
The dude isn't going to get physical with a female fan over a momentary grope or grab.
I was thinking more he could move away not beat them up and they can't stop him
Sure but then it's already happened. If I had a hot celebrity girlfriend I wouldn't want her getting groped and touched by dudes who are drooling over her. Overall these conditions are psychopathic but it's hard for me to find much fault in that one so long as she isn't ridiculously strict about it.
I mean there's nothing stopping them from going up and doing that without taking a photograph
Kind of controlling? The man's on a leash. He's a famous football player. What should he do? Say no to every woman that wants to take a pic with him?
Yeah, it's no surprise that she's a ball busting bitch but not going to strip clubs is a totally reasonable expectation. Of course she should be offering sexual gratification in its place and be kicked the curb if she doesn't.
A woman demanding that a man must use certain technology as a condition of their relationship? Sounds suspiciously similar to how Gilgamesh lured Enkidu to him.
Modern relationships in a nutshell. In this photo the guy even has a giga Chad style face. Woman's world, woman's rules.
Edit: Also, betting this is BS to sell to women. How you too can conquer your alpha male/ giga Chad/ hot guy and bend him to your rule.
...and then once he bends the knee, the slattern gets the "feelz" for another unkempt Chad/Tyrone to start the process all over again.
Poor man still wearing his pijamas apparently.
I'm pretty sure there are no clothes that don't look retarded if you have to spend 500k a month. After a certain point, the more expensive an item of clothing is the more stupid it looks.
Virtue signaling clothing. The emperor has no clothes was a cautionary tale no great civilization ever survives.
What are the odds this is real?
Low, its almost certainly just trying to get contrarian clicks and hate engagement from the two sides of the Swift debate.
Because you can only post the same handful of pictures of her and basic "they dating" for so long, before you need to invent ways to milk her existence.
Yea. Depends how much you trust a "source" at dailymail or lifestyle magazine. The main one of contention about FaceTime is even said in the article as not really a rule or something she even said, but "secretly" she doesn't trust his friends.
"Friends claim that Taylor has asked Travis to FaceTime her, not just text, when they’re apart,” shares the source, noting that “she didn’t overtly say it, but she secretly wants to see where he is and who he’s with."
Which is a bad sign of controlling paranoia, but could also be a result of him trying some shit in the past as well.
I won't give her the benefit of the doubt, but there are millions of girls doing the same shit right now and all their guy is getting is mediocre head instead of millions of dollars.
Look at the last point. Do you honestly think TSwift is giving he boyfriend half a million dollars a month for a clothing allowance?
I'm shocked at the number of people saying this is reasonable... no, it's not. Not at all. You don't set these sorts of "rules" with people unless you have huge trust issues and are very insecure. It's entirely the wrong way to go about things. If she can't trust her man to do the right thing without asserting these "rules", she shouldn't even be dating him. It's not her place to impose any sort of "rules" on him.
Also, the facetime one is funny to me because I've known some really hot girls that basically imposed this rule on their BFs and I also knew both the BFs and the hot girls were cheating on each other. Like, you don't think guys can come up with excuses when they need to? Sorry honey, I was doing some football practice with the boys and didn't notice your message. You know I usually workout at this time, sorry... Like, you're only fooling yourself with these rules and only low quality simps accept these sorts of rules. The kinds of guys that do anything for pussy. These are also the kinds of guys that like to have 3 different vaginas on the go at once because they're obsessed with vagina if they tolerate rules like these just to get access to vagina. You can't turn an unfaithful slut into an upstanding person with these sorts of micky mouse rules. So if that's what he is and you're worried maybe stick to your gut feeling and pick a better man instead of indulging your bad boy triad feelies because you won't change him and it's going to end exactly as you expect.
I think the strip club one is fine if she's living up her end of the deal (ha!), but I generally agree with this statement. As I said in response to the "happy wife, happy life" saying, I refuse to arrange my life around appeasing an overgrown child who wouldn't know adversity if it bit her on her over pampered ass.
You really think this guy has his life together? You actually answered your question in your question... Why on Earth did a guy like that pick... Well, that's because he's a guy "like that". He's actually not a professional who has his shit together. He's on TS's level which is why they've ended up together.
I hardly know these people so I could be wrong on many counts but he strikes me as a simp in disguise. The kind of man who bases his value from the attention women give him instead of having his own value for himself come from within. That's why he'd put up with a girl like TS because she offers a lot of positive reinforcement for his self-esteem because of her looks and fame. That type of guy is precisely the kind of guy that would cheat though; however, TS is likely going to have a better chance to tame this sort of guy compared to any other girl. TS knows what kind of guy he is, likely because he's exactly the kind of guy she has historically dated. TS isn't a quality person either. Sooo they're probably good for each other.
All I know about him is he promotes pfizer so that's already a negative impression
TS is clearly talented and successful. Means nothing in terms of quality of the person.
Knowing what I know about TS, I have a hard time respecting any man that would date her but I can say that about a lot of guys dating a lot of women.
Still, I hope both of them find happiness in one another.
Considering how many male celebrity cocks have probably been through her since she first got mainstream attention 15+ years ago, and possibly the men prior given her early songwriting, her ability to pair bond is close to crippled at this point. The strip club ban and improved warobe rules make sense (as long as she's putting out, and also a guy should look presentable in public), but it's obvious she can't keep a man permanently going forward. That wall has already splatted her, and it's just her obscene wealth and popularity that's keeping the guys coming. She'll probably be like DiCaprio and continue trading for younger bods as she ages.
Nope, nope, nope. Young guys don't want older women. There's no equality here. Old fucks like DiCaprio can date younger women, but an older chick will have a very hard time finding a younger guy.
If you have to tell your guy not to go to a strip club, well, you can't make a zebra lose its stripes. Why you wasting your time?
Yes, exactly. It's like telling a slut she's supposed to be monogamous then act surprised when she cheats on you.
More like their handler's rules of this arranged relationship. I'd be surprised if they even talked to each other off camera.
https://archive.md/5ALUj
These honestly seem pretty reasonable.
It doesnt say they're texting already before she asks for facetime video. Just that he's expected to do it immediately if she asks and not just text her
That's clearly what it means. If you're not talking/texting with someone already, you have no way to ask them to facetime.
And we know it's not some crazy requirement like him needing to stay within 5 seconds of his phone so he can always facetime, because that would have been part of the article instead.
it could be her first text in the convo is 'facetime me'
In Europe - women have killed their husbands in cold blood AND BEEN LET OFF for less.
Men shouldn't go to strip clubs because they have more important things to do and think about than hoes, not because some slot feels bad when he does and orders him not to.
There is appropriate and inappropriate behavior for men in a relationship but the woman doesn't get to dictate what that is. It doesnt matter that her hole is attached to an 8 figure bank account.
Where's Imp when we need him?
imagine ever being such a cuck simp that your woman sets rules for you in a relationship. or being a man a seeing it as "reasonable" that a woman sets rules for you. You are the man. You are the prize. You set the rules, you set the direction. She can follow or not, her choice.
If true the poor dude has been turned into a yippy little purse dog. Hopefully he has kids with a few other women otherwise his line is ended.
trophy husband. if that's what he wants to be, all power to him. I personally find his lifestyle unfulfilling.
Seems reasonable unless he’s pooping.
He gets an allowance? WTF is this shit?