Just another example of progs passing down their mythology. Sexy armor has been out of the western mainstream longer than this badly proportioned faggot has been alive. He's never played a game with it, and definitely not in D&D. Those images are almost certainly, at best, from some Korean MTX-ridden whale farm, but more likely just resume padding he pulled from Artstation.
Aion only gets remembered because its basically the only time one of those brokethrough to the mainstream for a bit, so its dead horse will be beaten forever.
I think Lineage 1-2 did it first, and taught everyone to avoid Korean MMOs forever more. I dunno, maybe Lineage didn't have the reach I remembered wholst Aion actually hit it big.
I'll just forever remember it as the insulting consolation prize NCSoft gave out after killing Richard Garriot's last big boondoggle a few weeks post partum.
Aion was the first I remember hearing people talk about considerably. Probably helped by that being prime "WoW Killer" time for every MMO that came out.
The manlet needs to go to a Renaissance faire sometime. Do the women dress like the men? Fuck no… most of the women have dresses that show off boobs or less clothing than that! Women like dressing up that show off their curve. It also means if they play MMOs, they will also play the sexy hooker elf or a character they can resonate with on a physical level. Men will either play as the hooker elf too or as a man that resonates with on a mental level.
Another fucking asshole with this wishy washy "practicality" and "realism" argument in bloody FICTION when it suits them. Whether its realistic or not doesn't matter, both can exist with or without the other. It is creative liberty of the author and if you don't like it go consume something else and stop forcing rule changes on existing work.
I won't say I entirely disagree with him. I do prefer male and female armor to generally look alike. Alter it to fit the different body proportions, sure, but you don't need one to show considerably more skin than the other. If I want to see a female death knight, I want to see her looking like a death knight who strides into battle looking scary and spreading death and destruction everywhere she goes. Not like a porn star in some Lord of the Rings-themed porno.
That being said, he defeats his entire argument when he goes on about functionality. Not only are none of these suits of armor functional, but he turns around and gives a male armor his mark of approval simply because it's just as skimpy as its female counterpart. Which means this isn't really about functionality at all or wanting to see less sexual material. He's just another feminist manlet shaming male sexuality while promoting female sexuality. All done for the express purpose of getting pussy from feminists who will never give him the time of day.
Someone should probably also should tell this manlet that a lot of the artists who draw suits of armor like this are women.
I won't say I entirely disagree with him. I do prefer male and female armor to generally look alike. Alter it to fit the different body proportions, sure, but you don't need one to show considerably more skin than the other. If I want to see a female death knight, I want to see her looking like a death knight who strides into battle looking scary and spreading death and destruction everywhere she goes. Not like a porn star in some Lord of the Rings-themed porno.
I partially agree, but fags like this shouldn't have any input on the discussion.
"The male armour would probably work pretty well"
My fuckin' dude. Someone needs to drag you into your first ever ass kicking if you think that mardi gras costume is in any way practical.
Just another example of progs passing down their mythology. Sexy armor has been out of the western mainstream longer than this badly proportioned faggot has been alive. He's never played a game with it, and definitely not in D&D. Those images are almost certainly, at best, from some Korean MTX-ridden whale farm, but more likely just resume padding he pulled from Artstation.
That first one is from Aion, it was indeed a Korean MMO that has been functionally dead for even longer than his testicles.
Aion only gets remembered because its basically the only time one of those brokethrough to the mainstream for a bit, so its dead horse will be beaten forever.
I think Lineage 1-2 did it first, and taught everyone to avoid Korean MMOs forever more. I dunno, maybe Lineage didn't have the reach I remembered wholst Aion actually hit it big.
I'll just forever remember it as the insulting consolation prize NCSoft gave out after killing Richard Garriot's last big boondoggle a few weeks post partum.
Aion was the first I remember hearing people talk about considerably. Probably helped by that being prime "WoW Killer" time for every MMO that came out.
when is he trooning out
The manlet needs to go to a Renaissance faire sometime. Do the women dress like the men? Fuck no… most of the women have dresses that show off boobs or less clothing than that! Women like dressing up that show off their curve. It also means if they play MMOs, they will also play the sexy hooker elf or a character they can resonate with on a physical level. Men will either play as the hooker elf too or as a man that resonates with on a mental level.
You will never find stats for this, but I guarantee you that female druid is by far the least played character in Diablo 4.
Individual that doesn't know what the fuck "fantasy" is.
"guy"
a soyed-out male is still a male
If you want a CORRECT NON BIASED take on female armour, go look up Shadiversity as he has VERY good breakdowns for them
This was just rushing in with an agenda from the start.
Why link this faggot's youtube channel though?
So people can downvote.
I think any engagement is good engagement for faggots like that but thats fair enough bro
I'm guessing that this is yet another white knight male feminist desperately trying to be 'one of the good ones' to get a lick of pussy, somehow.
Not going to watch the videos, so someone else can tell me if I'm on the mark or no.
Wrong. It's the other kind of male feminist, the one that identifies with women a little too much
this thing is a proto-tranny.
lol what a faggot
what he leaves out is at the male armor would weigh more than a truck, have no visibility, and still have glaring faults.
Another fucking asshole with this wishy washy "practicality" and "realism" argument in bloody FICTION when it suits them. Whether its realistic or not doesn't matter, both can exist with or without the other. It is creative liberty of the author and if you don't like it go consume something else and stop forcing rule changes on existing work.
I won't say I entirely disagree with him. I do prefer male and female armor to generally look alike. Alter it to fit the different body proportions, sure, but you don't need one to show considerably more skin than the other. If I want to see a female death knight, I want to see her looking like a death knight who strides into battle looking scary and spreading death and destruction everywhere she goes. Not like a porn star in some Lord of the Rings-themed porno.
That being said, he defeats his entire argument when he goes on about functionality. Not only are none of these suits of armor functional, but he turns around and gives a male armor his mark of approval simply because it's just as skimpy as its female counterpart. Which means this isn't really about functionality at all or wanting to see less sexual material. He's just another feminist manlet shaming male sexuality while promoting female sexuality. All done for the express purpose of getting pussy from feminists who will never give him the time of day.
Someone should probably also should tell this manlet that a lot of the artists who draw suits of armor like this are women.
Who are you to say what a female death knight looks like? Men and women frequently have different traditional dress, even within professions.
I partially agree, but fags like this shouldn't have any input on the discussion.
so youtube is not promoting this soy just to me. mmmm