I won't say I entirely disagree with him. I do prefer male and female armor to generally look alike. Alter it to fit the different body proportions, sure, but you don't need one to show considerably more skin than the other. If I want to see a female death knight, I want to see her looking like a death knight who strides into battle looking scary and spreading death and destruction everywhere she goes. Not like a porn star in some Lord of the Rings-themed porno.

That being said, he defeats his entire argument when he goes on about functionality. Not only are none of these suits of armor functional, but he turns around and gives a male armor his mark of approval simply because it's just as skimpy as its female counterpart. Which means this isn't really about functionality at all or wanting to see less sexual material. He's just another feminist manlet shaming male sexuality while promoting female sexuality. All done for the express purpose of getting pussy from feminists who will never give him the time of day.

Someone should probably also should tell this manlet that a lot of the artists who draw suits of armor like this are women.