In Australia it's the low life scum of every race - and you actually end up seeing more trailer trash white types doing it here. We can still post it - for now....
Protecting the "privacy" of people plainly poaching packages per presumed principles (innocent until proven guilty).
As though victims didn't have a reason to post the theft videos in the first place.
Only if you're still naïve enough to believe that "protect and serve" was referring to the peasants. They'll gladly enforce the rule of communists like Castro's bastard son.
Just like it was an invasion of privacy to identify some of the Leftist terrorists that engaged in a Red Terror campaign against Catholics back in 2020?
96 total church attacks as far as can be identified. Several burned to the ground. Basically no one held responsible. All the result of a moral panic based on zero evidence of atrocities that did not happen. DAE Remember Civil Rights groups celebrating firebombing campaigns against Catholics? I fucking do.
"You cannot post the images yourself because you have to remember, in Canada, we have a presumption of innocence and posting that picture could be a violation of private life," SQ communications officer Lt. Benoit Richard warned.
So the Canadian police regularly violate the law then.
With police being increasingly useless and in some cases harmful I won't be surprised of citizens start giving persistent miscreants the 3-S treatment.
So the Canuckian Police may get what they asked for. But not what they want.
They have a right to privacy. On your property. While committing a crime. Against you. But we'll prosecute you if you publicly complain about any of it, because that's against the law.
'You cannot post the images yourself because you have to remember, in Canada, we have a presumption of innocence,'
Unless, of course, you want to protest against Castro Jr's covid policies in which case it's perfectly acceptable to have your name slandered, your face plastered all over news media while the media calls you abject evil, and your bank accounts frozen.
What the fuck does the "presumption of innocence" to do with anything? It's literally on video and as long as you don't name anyone (cause it could be their twin brother on video) you don't even shame someone?
I mean I could maybe get their argument of privacy. But wouldn't that require the other person suing me or can a third party start this? Cause "Yeah, I'm on your property and I'm stealing your shit and you recorded me" doesn't sound that bad to me. Sounds like a confession.
Too many negros observed in their natural habitat?
In Australia it's the low life scum of every race - and you actually end up seeing more trailer trash white types doing it here. We can still post it - for now....
They just don't like the fact they can't control the Narrative (hiding the race of the thief, etc)
It's less than even that. They don't want people to believe that crime is happening.
The Left are still arguing that crime is down. Everywhere. That's how they won the NY Governor's race.
Leftists ignore crime they can't solve because it illegitimates their rule.
*crime they WON’T solve
Protecting the "privacy" of people plainly poaching packages per presumed principles (innocent until proven guilty).
As though victims didn't have a reason to post the theft videos in the first place.
Kind of hard to be presumed innocent when you flaunt your guilt.
The ponderously plodding pontification polluting this post is painful.
This is beautiful.
THIS is the end result of removing your right to record people in public.
It is always sold as : “we want to protect the children from upskirting”
(from the same European police who look the other way when kids are gang raped to avoid being raciss)
My dad told me about this yesterday. Those are some worthless police
Only if you're still naïve enough to believe that "protect and serve" was referring to the peasants. They'll gladly enforce the rule of communists like Castro's bastard son.
Just like it was an invasion of privacy to identify some of the Leftist terrorists that engaged in a Red Terror campaign against Catholics back in 2020?
96 total church attacks as far as can be identified. Several burned to the ground. Basically no one held responsible. All the result of a moral panic based on zero evidence of atrocities that did not happen. DAE Remember Civil Rights groups celebrating firebombing campaigns against Catholics? I fucking do.
So the Canadian police regularly violate the law then.
They're in public, so how the fuck could it be a violation of private life?
The criminal could be part of the Screen Actors' Guild and thus be making an unlicensed and unapproved film appearance?
Amazing.
With police being increasingly useless and in some cases harmful I won't be surprised of citizens start giving persistent miscreants the 3-S treatment.
So the Canuckian Police may get what they asked for. But not what they want.
Please use archive links for sites like wikepedia. They don't deserve the hits.
https://archive.ph/rx6Dh
I definitely agree with this assessment. The government can only abandon its duties for so long, before the citizens will start filling in for them.
They have a right to privacy. On your property. While committing a crime. Against you. But we'll prosecute you if you publicly complain about any of it, because that's against the law.
That's okay. You won't find anyone releasing footage of the canadian police actually doing a good job.
"OOPS I GOT HACKED AND THEY WERE LEAKED!"
Yes, I made this same joke 3 months ago, I'll keep making it as long as it's suitable.
Unless, of course, you want to protest against Castro Jr's covid policies in which case it's perfectly acceptable to have your name slandered, your face plastered all over news media while the media calls you abject evil, and your bank accounts frozen.
What the fuck does the "presumption of innocence" to do with anything? It's literally on video and as long as you don't name anyone (cause it could be their twin brother on video) you don't even shame someone?
I mean I could maybe get their argument of privacy. But wouldn't that require the other person suing me or can a third party start this? Cause "Yeah, I'm on your property and I'm stealing your shit and you recorded me" doesn't sound that bad to me. Sounds like a confession.
Looks like the police have been doing some noticing themselves when it comes to the footage.
They probably will allow glitterbombing though because it sounds gay
Not allowed to notice that it's foreigners stealing all your shit?
you're on my land and i didn't invite you? you have no rights.
The duty of victims to safeguard the rights of their attackers is insane.
Current year cops. To protect (criminals) and serve (governments). Now pick up that can.