"objectification is when you point out that a new character model looks like shit"
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (47)
sorted by:
A woman's evolutionary purpose is to be attractive. This is not up for debate. Leftists hate and reject reality in all forms.
Leftists hate and reject God. It just so happens that reality reflects and glorifies its Creator.
You know what the difference between you and an atheist? They believe in 1 less god than you.
This is a profoundly retarded comment.
And yet, not as profoundly retarded as believing there's some sky wizard judging you.
If your partner is attractive, your kids have higher chance to look attractive, which gives them the best chance at life.
Says the person with the One Piece avatar which is written by a man and which has tons of female characters with giant boobs and skinny waists
They know that OP is full of fanservice, which is why they always rag on Oda for being sexist or whatever ( and then in the next second say that OP is a leftist manga that has messages against capitalism).
Yah Hasanabi thinks OP supports his idea of anarcho communism.
Whose author literally married a cosplayer of his main female character, and then coincidentally that character's boobs have been growing literally ever since over the course of the story.
Doctor Harleen Quinzel, a brilliant psychiatrist and gymnast who thought that she could temper the Joker into the lost man he was underneath it all and found herself cast as a marionette very deeply, and madly, in love with him.
Girls who don't see the deeper story here should get back to their Twilight fanfiction.
They would argue that men only see the sexual aspects of the characters, as if you can't think a woman is hot and like her character at the same time. Honestly it's not even that the new model isn't sexy, it just looks so shit lol how can anyone defend that
This wave of feminism is the result of deep-seathed insecurity. During the 90's and early 2000's fictional women were everything feminists claimed they want: Smart, beautiful, proactive and charismatic. Instead of feeling uplifted by this aspirational characters the feminists tried to bring them down, they declared them a conceptual betrayal. They realized they couldn't live to such expectations, so they bitterly added them to the pile of "male fantasies" and "unrealistic expectations". When men watch capeshit we want to be Batman, Thor, Iron man. When women watch capeshit they want She-Hulk to be a emotional mess like them, they want Harley to be strong and independant but also for her to keep her bpd personality and basically making the same mistakes, they want validation.
Ironically they are the ones taking the most superficial traits from those characters. Whenever a female character becomes popular you'll get a crowd of thots and uggos wearing sexualized costumes all the same: "I'm totally not a vapid cunt, I'm as likable as your favorite character", they claim
They've got the new Mega-Cred bottles and they aren't afraid to show them off to everyone else who is a fake Cred drinker not allowed in their affinity group :p
Since its the Arkham canon, Harleen was a boring mid quality therapist who was so lonely she accidentally took Joker's "confession" to finding his purpose and love in life after meeting Batman to be about her, and then obsessively followed him since due to a crippling codepence to a point where she would fuck even a wrinkled old man who had some of his blood in him.
Which is also probably a story they should think about.
Now you're thinking!
I swear do these people even know what objectification even is? When I think of that word, I think of shit like bondage porn when a woman is quite literally reduced to a object with no human traits, like serial killer type shit. Since when does liking fictional sexy women mean you view real women as pure objects? And how does a female character just looking feminine mean men see women as pure non human sex objects?
Objectification doesn't exist.
It's not, it was a term coined by two marxist sociologists: Barbara Fredrickson and Tomi-Ann Roberts.
But even then it's more retarded in this context since Harley Quinn is a fictional character...
Objectification certainly does exist: In Vietnam, when leading generals were discussing strategies that involved gassing their own troops, acceptable losses and whatnot, that was reducing the men involved into merely active objects.
Objectification of women, though, not nearly so common. For they are viewed as so inherently valuable, that an active effort to reduce that perception is still giving special consideration.
Just like gaslighting.
Women want to be objects. That's why when they photograph something they always have to put their face in there too
Her face is just... busted.
They tried making her black. It shows immediately, that’s a fat black woman face.
"I'm going to throw buzzwords at this because I can't say objectively that they're wrong. That'll show them"
That's what women are the best at
Words are magic spells.
And she'll demand we pay off her school loans since she brings SO much value to the world with her big gaslighty words.
So from would to would take to the gym, it's just trying to lower the expectations of men because they can't even meet the simple ask of be healthy.
But if they're denied their husbandos it's a fucking War Crime...
For any of you non-weebs (who did you get here?) and anyone who hasn't seen One Piece (ain't nobody got time for that!): https://www.animecharactersdatabase.com/allchars.php?id=1447
Note the outfits, particularly for the characters who have "FILTERED" as a thumbnail.
How do people watch that? The art is hideous. It's like anime Big Mouth.
Not a clue.
I hate Harley Quinn as a character, so killing it off works for me.
Kinda based actually. If women were truly just sex objects in media, characters like Harley Quinn wouldn't be as capable as they are. She would just be a cock sucking slave for the joker, whose ONLY purpose is to have her tits out for the male audience, and not a criminal mastermind to be scared of.
The right one looks like a soccer mom right after having given birth to her fifth. That would also explain her perturbed facial expression and her hemorrhoidic 'Should I scratch it or not?' pose.
lmao, that game is going to be hot garbage.
Guess it's a matter of taste but I prefer the model on the right. Well, if you don't consider the face, which is an abomination, like wtf those eyes?? Left looks too muscular in the waist / across the shoulders and has quite unrealistic leg / torso length. I get that some people like the super long leg thing, but it's extremely rare in real women and it doesn't scream 'fertile' to me. And I especially hate a six pack on a woman, ugh. Right has a fantastic pair of hips and good/realistic waist and thigh proportions, overall a very feminine and fertile body style. If she didn't have such mannish arms she'd be hot indeed.
If modern games gave us female models like the right rather than hip-less, waist-less, mannish lesbian looking creatures they're pumping out I'd be pretty pretty satisfied.
The image looks horizontally stretched.
Anime profile pic = Troon.
You can bet the house on this complainer being a hideous tranny.
The image on the right has been stretched horizontally by about 20%
The original source can be found here at around 0:06
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaTax7Bz79U
More importantly, bug-eyed black woman is front and center, which I have added to my Ugly on Purpose article
You need Triss Merigold in there, with regards to the Netflix casting.
Also I don't mind Aloy. She's kind of homely-looking and detailing the facial fuzz is a funny choice, but I dunno, it kinda fit the illiterate tribal motif they had going on.
Like how you're crying right now slag?