pop singers
(media.communities.win)
Comments (36)
sorted by:
The difference is that the pixels aren't child stars that were groomed, manipulated and often abused into becoming slutty pop stars to dance and twerk around because their mind has been wrecked by the experience
...I'm not even being sarcastic, DON'T ever let your kids work in the entertainment industry, Youtube is fucking safer than any studio!
You're surely exaggerating the situation. Only like 95% of child stars grow up to be weird freaks with clear mental issues.
Remember, some of them overdose as children.
Oh river phoenix, we hardly knew ye
I knew a guy who was into kiddie porn and he claimed his entire collection was celebrities.
I would definitely agree, especially knowing how abusive the Kpop industry is too. I don't know if you were explicitly saying that them being involved in a youtube channel is less likely to hurt them, with my knowledge of the number of disastrous ""family"" channels like DaddyOFive, the Royalty Family and 8passengers
YouTube tends to be less harmful, you have more Internet sleuths will uncover shit quickly to burn them compared to Hollywood's 'pedo ring bubbles'
Good point, actually - and I think all 3 of the channels my other post mentioned have come under scrutiny (and even legal action in some cases) that might not have happened had they had careers in more industrialized entertainment.
👏 The 👏 pixels 👏 didn't 👏 consent 👏 bigot.👏👏
It’s fucking terrifying that this is actually their argument. They care more about the rights (and I don’t mean the intellectual property kind) of fictional characters than, say, a fetus.
It speaks to their inability to separate fiction from reality. They can't comprehend someone doing anything in an imaginary context without actually wanting to do that thing for real.
Do you think this has anything to do with how they were raised, or is it because they're so wrapped up in their BS that it's affected their judgement?
I remember when as little as a decade ago, gamers all united to shut down the arguments of MSM pundits and self-serving politicians with that simple argument.
That what's happening on a screen is fictional and doesn't represent reality.
What happened to this mindset and when did some "gamers" forget this important distinction?
That's a good argument against fictional CP : Leftists, which are full of pedos, conflate fiction with reality and argue fiction makes people ( well, them ) do the actions IRL.
That's not an argument against it, its just accepting them at their word and letting them make excuses. Unless you think the porn makes them into pedos entirely on its own and its not an excuse.
I think it's legit they're buttmad because the virtual character allows nerds to access women (in a fashion) that would be out of their league irl.
You know, reading your comment I think it comes down to:
and
Video game women satisfy neither. The booth babes of yore satisfy condition 1 but not 2 because both the male and female parties are getting equal value in that situation.
In the IG/OF world of today, some women are getting immense value out of softcore porn and their male patrons are getting addicted and bilked out of money, shredded by society for paying the money, and in some cases personally destroyed for even patronizing the service ("he knows me IRL and subbed to my OF, gross!"). So both conditions are passed with flying colors.
Listen, if we can't have hot vidya girls then they can't have access to the internet for infinite validation. Once they're gone from the internet they won't know about vidya girls anymore so we can have them again. Problem solved.
I can see a blue haired weirdo saying that
I didn't make it up myself.
GayStation cover art can only feature trannies now. The future is faux female.
fauxmale?
eh...we can workshop it a bit
Fee-fee-male?
Nu-fem?
Ironic since that was the console that Meryl Silverburgh, Jill Valentine, and of course Lara Croft herself came from.
I like how the bikini armor actually covers more than the underwear worn in the top picture.
They support OnlyFans because even though it is made for straight simps, the bitch is the one getting richer. It's all about the money, simps hate when men use the female body to get rich, but they love it when women use their bodies to get richer.
Who is "they" ? Do people like Sarkeesian support OF? That doesn't seem like her.
That's actually brilliant.
only thing wrong is that its a playstation cover, they censor more than nintendo even during the ps4 era
Bleh.. elves...
Trolls better
You want axe?
Top isn't Lizzo.
Oh I thought that was a stripper.
In 2023 you can't really tell