This is basically like being being customer support for a company, the women don’t actually want to interact with the pathetic customers they have so they pawn off the job for some other person to pretend flirt and sell content. These customer support agents are who keep whales on the hook and usually also do the social media management for the “content creator”. It’s really not far removed from how celebrities “interact” with fans on social media.
Even if the women wanted to interact with needy customers that message them all day long asking about the colour of their panties, as soon as they reach 1.000 subscribers it is impossible for the models to interact with subscribers and fulfil the expectation that she will remember their names. Anybody subscribed to an OnlyFans with over 1.000 subscribers must be getting replies from somebody else because the model doesn´t have enough time to deal with it even if she wanted to.
It doesn´t matter whether they are whores or not, I understand the logic of these girls/whores, they do it for the money so that they don´t have to work at some shitty place that could spoil their nail polish, and they are going to milk their simp customers as much as they can, what I don´t understand is why would anybody pay for a fake "relationship" and convince themselves that the girl gives a shit about them.
What's amazing isn't that any of this happens it's the way the articles that write about this shit frequently gush about OnlyFans and lie to women about what it really is. I would go so far as to accuse journalists of aiding people trafficking given the age of girls who sometimes try and make OnlyFans accounts. Though legally that might be a bit debatable since they're managing to brainwash girls into thinking this is normal. They're also as everyone has long suspected manipulating obviously lonely guys.
Though legally that might be a bit debatable since they're managing to brainwash girls into thinking this is normal
That's the whole intent -- it's the next phase of the sexual liberation era, turned up to 11. Convince women to be promiscuous and vain, and it automatically makes them ineligible for long-term relationship fidelity.
They pump the minds of impressionable women with the idea that they can catch themselves a Chad/Tyrone for marriage after they get done being ran-through between 18 and 35 years of age. Chad/Tyrone will never settle down, however. And these OnlyFools models have been told by modern feminists that any guy who isn't Chad/Tyrone isn't worth marrying (which automatically precludes all of their simp-tier subscribers).
There's now an entire generation of women who are no longer worthy (nor fit) for marriage and family, and a generation of men who have been coached into simping for women they will never be able physically engage with, much less marry.
Men have nothing to do with it, that's such a bad take and the way people keep going back to this is pretty ridiculous. No, I know exactly how women have formed these opinions and it starts off with university professors and schools feeding them women's empowerment bullshit making it out that being a total slut is sexual liberation and encouraging them to identify as whatever bollocks they like. Men have actually been completely removed from the equation precisely because they knew men would object to this.
This is something I get ticked off with a lot of right wingers on and why I think they're no better than TERFs because at the end of the day they blame men for everything and treat women as the victims. Might explain why they fanboi over TERFs so much these days. I swear, women could do something entirely by themselves and declare it as such and there will be a segment of a population that will find a way to cast men as the villains.
I noticed people were mentioning simps a lot and yes but I also think it's important to make the distinction between simps and men because simps may as well be their own category of people at this point.
Go back 15 years. Could you have had OnlyFans? No, because porn was still relegated to the dirty corners of the internet. Yeah it was out there any anyone could find it if they were looking but it was shameful.
Now, porn is pretty socially acceptable. If you are caught with it at work or school you might get in trouble but for the most part, it's a none issue.
Now, we are in a situation where if porn is OK, why not producing porn? And be proud of the fact that you don't contribute anything to society beside images of your naked, young body.
You kind of debunked yourself there and made my point, again, men are not part of this equation. Men always sexualise the female body because it's in our nature, that's a natural side effect of having a healthy sex drive.
What's been unnatural is like you're pointing out women are being told that it's completely normal to put themselves on display to an extreme degree to the literal highest bidder for as many men as possible which ironically also reduces their value. This is a result of the education system and articles brainwashing young women. It's nothing to do with men themselves and I squarely put the blame on the marxist glowies preaching that this is women's liberation. They've neglected to tell women that men find exclusivity with them attractive.
By the way this attitude about exclusivity also explains why a lot of the smarter psychopath women doing this know not to say they have a boyfriend or are married when they do this shit. They're obviously coaching each other or have picked up on this behaviour with regards to making money from OnlyFans and the fake girlfriend experience.
I do actually know quite a lot about this because the psychology is fascinating. You dig through and find articles on dating advice and shit like that and how women talk to each other online and you realise they are being fed some utter horseshit. Aside from mentally ill lonely men who think they can simp to be a boyfriend, when it comes to the simps that do this, many of them are just consuming what's there, it's an unfortunate side effect of the free market principle, supply and demand.
The AI bots will be the models, too. Why would you ever simp over a real girl, with real flaws, whom you can never touch, when you can have the same non-relationship with literal virtual perfection?
This reminds me of that Ai company that wants the vtubers to sign up for their Ai program so the Ai can create contents and interact with viewers when the steamers are offline
Whores are already throwing a fit over anyone using a filter modeling a hot woman over them on camera, or full-blown AI bot farming desperate men's dollars.
Sorry e-whores, turns-out a computer program can do it too. Lean to coal ( no, not that coal, get away from the nigs you morron ).
Disregard WoW ERP, obtain Final Fantasy 14 ERP in the Quicksands on Balmung with a free trial account. You wouldn't believe the kinds of things you can see with mods. GTA's Hot Coffee ain't got shit on FFXIV.
It's quite funny sad how they larp as super manly traditional men even though they were basically e-whores who sucked e-cocks of creepy simps every single day.
I'm a bit smaller/weaker than Tates but I have jiujitsu/wrestling background, I probably have a decent chance at murdering them with bare hands, especially the one with hair transplants.
rofl, from the website of one of these 'management companies'.
Your OnlyFans Is A Business, We’re Here To Help You Develop It.
Do you think CEOs sit replying to customer enquiries for hours a day? No, they hire people.
Why treat your OnlyFans differently?
You're not just a prostitute. You're a CEO. :')
From the FAQ section:
An OnlyFans chatter is a dedicated sales person responsible for engaging with fans, building a relationship, and selling a creators PPV content. OnlyFans chatters help boost sales whilst giving a creators fans a more intimate experience, by being constantly available 24/7 for chat support. Having OnlyFans chatters on an account almost guarantees that a creator will make more money than without. A subscriber who receives a fast reply when they're is more likely to spend their money and more likely to stay subscribed.
Gay men in particular are highly sought after for the job, and they are happy to do it. Know several of the big only fans models and can say it's the norm not just there, but on insta and other "normal" social media.
It's all a racket. If you can't spot the sucker on the platform, it's you.
It's dishonest to sell this service as a one-to-one chat with the model herself. I suspect they do this because they know that no-one will dare challenge this with the likes of the FTC/trading standards in that country out of public shaming, embarrassment and condemnation that will come their way if they dare speak out. Nor do they have the backbone and moral conviction to challenge the system that exploits their loneliness and desire for social connection.
It is fraud but most models are not based in the US anyway, the FTC can´t touch them, and OnlyFans is registered in the United Kingdom, they can claim they know nothing about it, and like you can gather from comments, many people are going to say the men deserve it for being simps.
This is basically like being being customer support for a company, the women don’t actually want to interact with the pathetic customers they have so they pawn off the job for some other person to pretend flirt and sell content. These customer support agents are who keep whales on the hook and usually also do the social media management for the “content creator”. It’s really not far removed from how celebrities “interact” with fans on social media.
Even if the women wanted to interact with needy customers that message them all day long asking about the colour of their panties, as soon as they reach 1.000 subscribers it is impossible for the models to interact with subscribers and fulfil the expectation that she will remember their names. Anybody subscribed to an OnlyFans with over 1.000 subscribers must be getting replies from somebody else because the model doesn´t have enough time to deal with it even if she wanted to.
Model? I think you mean whore?
It doesn´t matter whether they are whores or not, I understand the logic of these girls/whores, they do it for the money so that they don´t have to work at some shitty place that could spoil their nail polish, and they are going to milk their simp customers as much as they can, what I don´t understand is why would anybody pay for a fake "relationship" and convince themselves that the girl gives a shit about them.
It's because they believe it's better than nothing.
Reminds me of phone sex where they advertise with pics of beautiful women, but the ones who answer the phone are smoky hags.
lol I thought the same
At least you could be reasonably certain those were women. If only because AFAIK they only hired women to do it.
It's unfortunate that this article isn't going to reach the guys who need it the most.
Even if they manage to read it, they'll believe "sure, Suzy Showmybutt hires help, but when I talk to her, it's really her."
Simps never let reality get in the way of their delusions. They're very much like women in that regard.
What's amazing isn't that any of this happens it's the way the articles that write about this shit frequently gush about OnlyFans and lie to women about what it really is. I would go so far as to accuse journalists of aiding people trafficking given the age of girls who sometimes try and make OnlyFans accounts. Though legally that might be a bit debatable since they're managing to brainwash girls into thinking this is normal. They're also as everyone has long suspected manipulating obviously lonely guys.
That's the whole intent -- it's the next phase of the sexual liberation era, turned up to 11. Convince women to be promiscuous and vain, and it automatically makes them ineligible for long-term relationship fidelity.
They pump the minds of impressionable women with the idea that they can catch themselves a Chad/Tyrone for marriage after they get done being ran-through between 18 and 35 years of age. Chad/Tyrone will never settle down, however. And these OnlyFools models have been told by modern feminists that any guy who isn't Chad/Tyrone isn't worth marrying (which automatically precludes all of their simp-tier subscribers).
There's now an entire generation of women who are no longer worthy (nor fit) for marriage and family, and a generation of men who have been coached into simping for women they will never be able physically engage with, much less marry.
That's the crazy part. Imagine going back 10 years and trying to convince people that prostitution would be as widespread and accepted as it is today.
The first step was convincing men that porn is something normal and natural.
Men have nothing to do with it, that's such a bad take and the way people keep going back to this is pretty ridiculous. No, I know exactly how women have formed these opinions and it starts off with university professors and schools feeding them women's empowerment bullshit making it out that being a total slut is sexual liberation and encouraging them to identify as whatever bollocks they like. Men have actually been completely removed from the equation precisely because they knew men would object to this.
This is something I get ticked off with a lot of right wingers on and why I think they're no better than TERFs because at the end of the day they blame men for everything and treat women as the victims. Might explain why they fanboi over TERFs so much these days. I swear, women could do something entirely by themselves and declare it as such and there will be a segment of a population that will find a way to cast men as the villains.
I noticed people were mentioning simps a lot and yes but I also think it's important to make the distinction between simps and men because simps may as well be their own category of people at this point.
Go back 15 years. Could you have had OnlyFans? No, because porn was still relegated to the dirty corners of the internet. Yeah it was out there any anyone could find it if they were looking but it was shameful.
Now, porn is pretty socially acceptable. If you are caught with it at work or school you might get in trouble but for the most part, it's a none issue.
Now, we are in a situation where if porn is OK, why not producing porn? And be proud of the fact that you don't contribute anything to society beside images of your naked, young body.
You kind of debunked yourself there and made my point, again, men are not part of this equation. Men always sexualise the female body because it's in our nature, that's a natural side effect of having a healthy sex drive.
What's been unnatural is like you're pointing out women are being told that it's completely normal to put themselves on display to an extreme degree to the literal highest bidder for as many men as possible which ironically also reduces their value. This is a result of the education system and articles brainwashing young women. It's nothing to do with men themselves and I squarely put the blame on the marxist glowies preaching that this is women's liberation. They've neglected to tell women that men find exclusivity with them attractive.
By the way this attitude about exclusivity also explains why a lot of the smarter psychopath women doing this know not to say they have a boyfriend or are married when they do this shit. They're obviously coaching each other or have picked up on this behaviour with regards to making money from OnlyFans and the fake girlfriend experience.
I do actually know quite a lot about this because the psychology is fascinating. You dig through and find articles on dating advice and shit like that and how women talk to each other online and you realise they are being fed some utter horseshit. Aside from mentally ill lonely men who think they can simp to be a boyfriend, when it comes to the simps that do this, many of them are just consuming what's there, it's an unfortunate side effect of the free market principle, supply and demand.
No civilization that allows women to exploit men on this scale deserves to exist.
The AI bots will be the models, too. Why would you ever simp over a real girl, with real flaws, whom you can never touch, when you can have the same non-relationship with literal virtual perfection?
This reminds me of that Ai company that wants the vtubers to sign up for their Ai program so the Ai can create contents and interact with viewers when the steamers are offline
Whores are already throwing a fit over anyone using a filter modeling a hot woman over them on camera, or full-blown AI bot farming desperate men's dollars.
Sorry e-whores, turns-out a computer program can do it too. Lean to coal ( no, not that coal, get away from the nigs you morron ).
Absolutely NO sympathy for simps who fall for this shit. Could have a better time ERP-ing in wow, lmao. Might also be cheaper.
Disregard WoW ERP, obtain Final Fantasy 14 ERP in the Quicksands on Balmung with a free trial account. You wouldn't believe the kinds of things you can see with mods. GTA's Hot Coffee ain't got shit on FFXIV.
Also works, yes. Anything but giving thots money to have fake conversations. Heck, AI also works for that, no?
Kek and this is the main thing the simps subscribe for too.
This isn't new. The Tate Brother described this years ago.
It's quite funny sad how they larp as super manly traditional men even though they were basically e-whores who sucked e-cocks of creepy simps every single day.
tell me how they hurt you.
I'm a bit smaller/weaker than Tates but I have jiujitsu/wrestling background, I probably have a decent chance at murdering them with bare hands, especially the one with hair transplants.
We need to close the onlyfans wage gap
https://youtu.be/4Te4SFrok4g
rofl, from the website of one of these 'management companies'.
You're not just a prostitute. You're a CEO. :')
From the FAQ section:
Apparently, The Verge did a story on this in 2021.
Gay men in particular are highly sought after for the job, and they are happy to do it. Know several of the big only fans models and can say it's the norm not just there, but on insta and other "normal" social media.
It's all a racket. If you can't spot the sucker on the platform, it's you.
It's dishonest to sell this service as a one-to-one chat with the model herself. I suspect they do this because they know that no-one will dare challenge this with the likes of the FTC/trading standards in that country out of public shaming, embarrassment and condemnation that will come their way if they dare speak out. Nor do they have the backbone and moral conviction to challenge the system that exploits their loneliness and desire for social connection.
It is fraud but most models are not based in the US anyway, the FTC can´t touch them, and OnlyFans is registered in the United Kingdom, they can claim they know nothing about it, and like you can gather from comments, many people are going to say the men deserve it for being simps.
Once home LLMs get a little better these guys will definitely get cut out of the process.