Logic of a lunatic
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
Comments (34)
sorted by:
murder of the one that did the property damage but not property damage against innocent people as response to a murder - sounds normal to me
Neither of the things they're bitching about is almost ever actually murder in the first place.
The first one is usually self defence by someone inside the property being attacked.
And the second is usually just some criminal overdosing in the vicinity of a white guy.
It's like saying "you think you should be able to defend your life but get angry when a gang pulls off a bunch of random retaliatory murders???? hypocrite much????". It's such a terrible comparison I can't even emulate the sheer brain fuckery required to think it makes any sense at all.
The most charitable explanation I can think of is that if you strip the words of all meaning, it almost sounds poetic. Like singing lyrics in a language you don't understand. Maybe that's what's going on here
it wasn't murder. Murder is killing an innocent person, they aren't innocent
libtards are here to to convince you that accidental death while restraining a violent criminal is murder, and wanton rioting & destruction is appropriate any time a violent criminal black dies accidentally.
Didn't it come out that the scumbag in question bit the dust at a hospital, several hours after being restrained?
Pronounced dead officially. But shooting victims can be pronounced dead hours later at the hospital too, doesn't mean the bullet didn't kill them, sometimes they just have to wait and see if resuscitation might save their life before they call it.
So that alone doesn't prove anything. You need to point out the other possible causes of death. Like, say, consuming a whole bunch of drugs that morning.
Let's see if they actually release a toxicology report. They might, since they didn't lose anything when they did it with Fentanyl Floyd.
Yes. Both Floyd and Michael Jackson Jr.
When the dumbest people alive scream “I love science” but don’t understand that under the theory of relativity shows that your property is the acclimation of your life’s work. There is no difference between someone stabbing you or stealing from you, they both have direct costs to your life and that variance is what we use to determine when lethal force as a preventative is necessary.
It essentially boils down to "but, I did have breakfast!"
The other issue is that you can't know their intentions. If you knew they'd only steal your TV remote, obviously you wouldn't go to the trouble of fighting back. But for all anyone knows, they plan to tie you up and do unspeakable things to you and your family.
Set his car on fire as a response for the millions of people leftoids brutally murdered throughout history.
Leftist logic:
Left wing violence is speech, right wing speech is violence.
Did you forget the "silence is violence" BS they cooked up? It'd be more accurate to say "Anything less than complete loyalty and obedience to the party line is violence!", but it's not like leftoids can even be honest with themselves.
If someone shows up and starts destroying my shit, I'm going to assume they're about to attack me and use whatever force is necessary to repel such an attack. As for the case this is referring to, the real crime is that the animal that the marine stopped wasn't put down long ago.
I wonder how much weed this dude had to smoke before he thought his little observation was "deep".
Leftists are here to convince you that 155 consecutive days of Black National Socialist & White Communist race rioting is "property damage", and that defending yourself from a Molotov-Ribbentrop Lynchmob is "murder".
It is a self-contained and wholly logical statement of excellent illogical contradiction..
By itself.
Context matter, and their definitions of the words used are not logical to that endpoint. Murder is "with malice aforethough", Manslaughter is not. And it is legal to defend yourself and your property. Property damage is not okay in either case, and especially not against something unrelated, and while on a supposedly peaceful riot. The second murder also isn't.. A murder. It's again manslaughter (tenuously at best), and by a police defending the public and the dead person from said OD'd person, in the execution of his duty to uphold the law. A law which the convenience-robbing fentanyl-addicted crackhead broke before said event.
He also got the antecedent and subsequent actions flipped. In both scenarios it's only prior to the act that we justify using violence to defend property or life. Nobody says you can go around murdering people or destroying property after the fact as punishment for past injustices. Oh wait, leftists do. Very logical indeed.
More simple than that. They simply have too much money to appreciate material value unlike those who do not have it.
It's like Bikecuck comic or some san fran dude who got his car mugged a dozen time that have been mentioned here.
why are you damaging some random guy's property over a beef between two other people?
Tendency towards violence, low impulse control, low intelligence, poor decision making skills...I could go on, but none of them matter because racisms for even stating facts.
Am I supposed to pretend like this leftist has any principles that are independent of race and politics? We all know that this guy would be cool with a white conservative being killed if he damaged a black guy’s property.
So they're asking to be murdered by that reasoning
Basically
Conservatives are here to tell you to "OBEY THE LAW ASSHOLE"
Yes, and left-wing conservatives are here to convince you that men are not and cannot be women, but women can do anything men can do.