Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
NoNewNormal
MillionDollarExtreme
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
Win uses cookies, which are essential for the site to function. We don't want your data, nor do we share it with anyone. I accept.
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

46
()
posted 3 days ago by Wizard08 3 days ago by Wizard08 +46 / -0
39 comments share
39 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (39)
sorted by:
▲ 43 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 43 points 3 days ago +43 / -0

A budget of $100,000,000

BWHAHAHAHA, what did they spend it on, yoga classes? Feelings seminars on how life is for an urban black woman?

It didn't go into art or design I tell you that much!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 34 ▼
– deleted 34 points 3 days ago +34 / -0
▲ 20 ▼
– Lurker404 20 points 3 days ago +20 / -0

They need whole departments to make characters as ugly as possible

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– kinezumi 7 points 3 days ago +7 / -0

So that's how it's done? I often wondered how it's possible that they somehow don't even accidentally design a pretty female character. Now it makes sense.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 21 ▼
– send_it 21 points 3 days ago +21 / -0

it's a money laundering scheme.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 16 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 16 points 3 days ago +16 / -0

I mean I would CLAIM that rather than gross incompetence and mismanagement. But there's a lot of evidence for the latter just from the status of the game engine used.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– AlfredicEnglishRules 6 points 3 days ago +6 / -0

Why not both?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– LinkR 1 point 3 days ago +1 / -0

I feel like there are easier avenues you could go down for that, but I'm too ignorant in this to rule it out.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– lapalapa 1 point 3 days ago +1 / -0

How can it be money laundering if they're spending the money and not making a profit?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– Decrixxx 10 points 3 days ago +10 / -0

entertainment industry sinecures are the globohomo equivalent of commie working for the state.

you must be woke, adhere to the ideology, be ready to bribe and taking bribes, be morally bankrupt and be friend of friends. skills aren't needed.

the goal is to turn "everything is political" up to a point the state will have to subside it as they propaganda will become indispensable.

too bad convincing people to voluntarily seek propaganda is very difficult otherwise no dictatorship would have to force it on their citizens.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 24 ▼
– Kaarous 24 points 3 days ago +25 / -1

There is no way that at least half of that wasn't embezzled.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– dagthegnome 17 points 3 days ago +17 / -0

Are we sure that isn't yen?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– LauriThorne 8 points 3 days ago +8 / -0

That's still 758 thousand dollars

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– ailurus 14 points 3 days ago +15 / -1

Honestly, 758k is tiny for a game these days, even if you ignore the marketing budgets. That would get you 4 programmers for about 2 years, maybe less.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– dagthegnome 7 points 3 days ago +7 / -0

That's about what it looks like they spent on this game.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 15 ▼
– BetterNameUnfound 15 points 3 days ago +15 / -0

Money laundering.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– lapalapa 0 points 3 days ago +1 / -1

How? The money was spent and they're not making a profit.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Smith1980 14 points 3 days ago +14 / -0

And this game had the backing of all the media shills

permalink save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– ArchRespawnsAgain 12 points 3 days ago +12 / -0

They probably spent half the money buying off shills.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Smith1980 2 points 3 days ago +2 / -0

True

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Daucus9 5 points 3 days ago +5 / -0

I had a laugh at Movie Bob who yelled that the reason why Forpsoken was getting dunked on was because it had a black woman for a protagonist. He made a video whining about how people people liked quirky quipping writing in Deadpool back in 2016 but after 7 years of oversaturation for SOME reason we don't like it in Forspoken.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Smith1980 4 points 3 days ago +4 / -0

Back in 2000 there was a cool cop game called Urban Chaos 2. You played as a black female detective. I don’t remember any issues and you can point to plenty of female or minority characters in the past but when you hammer me over the head and constantly tell me I have to like something because it has the right diversity it gets annoying. And you are spot on about the over saturation of quirkiness.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Adamrises 5 points 3 days ago +5 / -0

I honestly saw very little shilling for it. It seemed more like they wanted to sweep it under the rug and not acknowledge it because it would damage their future blackqween games.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– GimmeFuelGimmeFire 7 points 3 days ago +7 / -0

Shill early, then memory hole when the DARVO tactics fail as people realize the game is dogshit for more reasons than Shaniqua twerking with her mind

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Adamrises 5 points 3 days ago +5 / -0

I mean, from the moment Forspoken was even mentioned to exist it was being dunked on hard. It had a negative hype train for years that didn't change at all with more info or release.

If it was shilled, it had to have been a while ago.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– Smith1980 4 points 3 days ago +4 / -0

I saw some of the usual overhype due to a black female being the protagonist but I didn’t go too deep.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– Galean 12 points 3 days ago +12 / -0

I doubt it, there is no way that this game had this budget. It makes no sense, it was obvious a test run game for "modern audiences", you do not throw such a huge budget on an experiment.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– evilplushie 9 points 3 days ago +9 / -0

Its already on like 30% discount on steam

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Lurker404 8 points 3 days ago +8 / -0

Imagine putting on your resume that you had any responsibility in a project that literally killed your last company.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– Erithal 8 points 3 days ago +8 / -0

Squeenix is no stranger to boondoggles.

Forespoken is just FF XIV 1.0 all over again.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– Mpetey123 6 points 3 days ago +6 / -0

Good lord that's a lot of money, how about you play pong and I'll tell you the ball is the white patriarchy!!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– bloodguard 6 points 3 days ago +6 / -0

If we had a real Department of Justice instead of the partisan mess we have now they'd be sending forensic accountants down to see how much of this money was laundered. I'm betting just like Hollywood studios drug cartels are now using "game" companies to launder their Fentanyl money.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– blyat56 6 points 3 days ago +6 / -0

Hundred million dollar game that I haven't heard a peep of genuine interest or discussion about, except for a few Youtubers who played it for the lulz and thought it was junk.

Get woke, go broke.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– barwhack 5 points 3 days ago +6 / -1

Trannies don't reproduce. Evidently, they don't produce either.

DEI, O flightless bird, and rise no more. ◼️

permalink save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– JiggsawCalrissian 3 points 3 days ago +3 / -0

Is that end to end? I recall someone saying the dev time on this distilled cringe was something like 10 years in total

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– kinezumi 2 points 3 days ago +2 / -0

Is it possible a substantial proportion of that was spent developing the game engine itself? I remember reading this started out as a tech demo or something.

Surely even Squeenix would shitcan a game running into this level of budget overrun; especially on a new IP.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– GimmeFuelGimmeFire 2 points 3 days ago +2 / -0

Please tell me that's 100 million yen and not USD

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– dekachin 1 point 3 days ago +3 / -2

Not surprising at all. All these huge companies are giant money pits. The developer subsidiary grift their parent company and pay top dollar salaries for dumb shit. The incentive structure is fucked because the parent company does not adequately supervise and impose discipline on spending.

So now an expensive lesson is learned and Square will demand more supervision next time.

permalink save report block reply
▲ -2 ▼
– TheImpossible1 -2 points 3 days ago +4 / -6

Did that include everyone's termination fee when it was over?

permalink save report block reply

The below rules are just a summary of the rules which can be found in the Welcome Ashore post.

.

ONE: Do not post Illegal Activity, or criminal manifestos.

.

TWO: Do not engage in speech that promotes, advocates, glorifies, or endorses violence.

.

THREE: Do not threaten, harass, defame, or bully users.

.

FOUR: Do not post involuntary Salacious Material.

.

FIVE: Do not post Porn

.

SIX: NSFW content must be flaired NSFW.

.

SEVEN: Do not post Facebook accounts or twitter accounts with less than 500 followers, and personal information.

.

EIGHT: Do not intentionally deceive others by impersonating another.

.

NINE: Do not solicit or engage in transactions that are federally regulated by the US govt.

.

TEN: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

ELEVEN: Do not post spam.

.

TWELVE: Do not post intentional falsehoods or hoaxes.

.

THIRTEEN: No reposts

.

FOURTEEN: Do not post more than 5 posts a day to this sub.

.

FIFTEEN: Do not direct particularly egregious identity based slurs at users.

.

SIXTEEN: Do not attack entire identity groups as inferior or conspiring.


Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • ClockworkFool
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2023.11.02 - 58d57 (status)

Copyright © 2023.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy