We are onto something big, white women are the least racist group if you look at actual racism. I don't know many Indians, but if I had to guess they are very racist like other Asians.
He's always looking for an angle to divide white people and present fake & gay "anti-idpol" as a viable alternative. If you want to have fun with him, just ask him how well his efforts to dismantle Zionism are going (spoiler: the efforts don't exist because he and the rest of the "anti-idpol" crowd are full of shit).
White women are much more politically similar to white men than anyone else, contrary to this gayop that liberals are promoting.
I don't know where you're going with this, other than wittingly or unwittingly playing along with a subversive, philo-semitic liberal's attempt at safeguarding Jewish power by blaming its negative consequences on white women.
"overwhelmingly", probably still the lowest racial in-group sexual preference of all demographics considering how many are also having a low species in-group sexual preference.
Ah yes, the ole' "white women fuck dogs" trope, make it more obvious that you just hate white people please. This same guy constantly loses his shit if you discuss Jewish power, though.
probably still the lowest racial in-group sexual preference of all demographics
You have no clue what you are talking about. Asian women actually prefer white men over Asian men. I believe they have the worse in group preference. The dirty secret of these liberal white women that say anti-white things is that they seldom date minorities. Even they overwhelmingly prefer white men.
Ah yes, the ole' "white women fuck dogs" trope, make it more obvious that you just hate white people please.
Dude, it's not my fault that the emasculation of men has caused some degenerate white women to go towards dogs. You want to help white women, then you need to be a strong white man that can obviously out compete a dog (and also not let your daughters fuck dogs).
Don't try to turn this around as if stereotypes you like are evidence of racial inferiority, but stereotypes you don't like are just slander. If a stereotype has something behind it, the problem needs to be identified and dealt with. And yeah, white women have problems. Lots of problems.
There is a reason there are so many white women involved in cucking, inter-racial porn obsession, rape fantasies, and bestiality. A lot of it has to do with the emasculation of men, particularly white men, mixed with the rampant sexual degeneracy of white women. It's not a surprise that it's also Leftist white women specifically.
You have no clue what you are talking about. Asian women actually prefer white men over Asian men.
No. In-group preference is the majority for all demographics. As I said before, white women just have some of the lowest numbers (in-group still being the plurality). Asians are far more preferences towards in-groups than whites. There are many asian parents that are okay with kids marrying whites because they see it as a sign of potential success and status in predominantly white countries.
There is a reason there are so many white women involved in cucking, inter-racial porn obsession, rape fantasies, and bestiality.
You haven't even established the premise that there are an unusual amount of white women involved in any of that crap. What do you think of the actual, documented over-representation of Jews in (lying, degenerate) media and in promoting degenerate agendas like the trans one?
As I said before, white women just have some of the lowest numbers (in-group still being the plurality).
Again, you have nothing to back this up. We have data from online dating that proves my assertions and disproves yours. Again, white women are most similar to white men politically and socially. You are just doing the usual "anti-idpol" canard of actually practicing idpol against white women because your whole thing is a huge fraud.
You haven't even established the premise that there are an unusual amount of white women involved in any of that crap.
The fact that cuckoldry, inter-racial porn, rape porn, and bestiality seem to be more prevalent, and mostly among white women, tells me otherwise. I'm sure there's not going to be a massive documented study, though there are a few regarding rape and interacial porn specifically. Hell, I don't think most people could have told you what cuckoldry was back in 2010. The fact that it's entered the vernacular at all is rather astonishing.
Leftism has increased sexual degeneracy to levels no one has ever seen. White women are also some of the victims of that.
Stop trying to do this nonsense "defend the honor of white women" bullshit and recognize the problem in front of you. You're acting like a BLM supporter excusing a fiery, but mostly peaceful, looting of a 7/11. It's not a condemnation of a race, it's the recognition of a serious social failure.
Again, white women are most similar to white men politically and socially.
You're not even actually disputing what I said with statements like this. That's a completely unrelated claim.
Not really. Majority of inter-racial couples are entirely non-white. The majority or plurality of every demographic is an in-group sexual preference. None of that's ever really a surprise given that most of your primary relationship issues and determinants are going to be cultural.
In totality? Yes, the minority of black men prefer white women. The majority of black men prefer black women. The same is true of every race and demographic that I'm aware of.
Again. White women seem to just have a larger minority of white women that are averse to white men.
This. I think I've posted here before about a friend I used to have that worked at Microsoft around 20 years ago. They hired Indians to save money, and once they got to management positions, that was it- the whole company turned pajeet.
When you go to the malls in Bellevue, where Microsoft has its HQ, you would think it's another country- easily 80% is Indian or Chinese. It's super jarring because that ethnic breakdown doesn't appear at the other malls in the area. Its like they don't leave the city.
Well, they're not outsourcing the work to India, they're bringing them over on tech worker visas.
Assuming equal skills, it makes sense: You have to pay an American $X in this job market, but foreigners are poor, so you can get away with paying them $X-Y, and they'll be happy because you also got them a ticket to the States.
There's a couple issues though: first, those guest worker visas were intended to help fill career fields that didn't have enough Americans working in them, not to help major corporations save money on salaries. The unintended consequence is that it depresses wages for the tech sector, because the American workers are forced to accept lower pay to compete with the foreigners taking their jobs.
Second, it changes the entire character of the company. In group preference is a real thing, as these imported workers rise to the ranks, they will hire more and more of their countrymen rather than similarly qualified Americans.
And, as you and others have pointed out, you get what you pay for with these employees, and it just lowers the quality of work all around as they become entrenched in the industry.
People are fungible. You can't help fill jobs that "don't have enough" Americans working in them without reducing wages. That said, I do believe there are fewer programmers in America than America needs. You'd rather some foreigners be doing the work here than foreigners doing it somewhere else. You really would. A sensible immigration system would help fill these roles. If you want white people, Eastern Europe is full of them. So you can be competitive without turning into another culture.
By the time it's even possible to look at the results, management has been talking about it so long in positive terms anyone pointing out what's really going in is committing corporate-politics-suicide by publicly talking about it.
She does. She's also seems to be of the opinion that "anti-racism" is required for a decent society - any stance short engagement with and advocacy for the extremely discriminatory "anti-racism" stance is racism as far as she is concerned. She's not quite advocated for a race war against the whites yet, but then, she doesn't really need to yet, does she?
That's what Colorblindness was: "white" disculturation, and its attendant inculcation of self-hate, to make colonization of "whiteness" easier. Indians are generally racist; but so is every other cultural isolate. Except effected "white people".
I wonder if there is anything to do with the caste system that causes it too. Maybe some Brahmins come over here, expecting to be treated as the highborn they are. Then they discover that we dont do that here, and they get treated just like every other caste. And worse, they are even expected to work with them! Or use the same facilities as them! eewwww And so they start lashing out because this mistreatment is unbearable.
This is something that I've started to really turn towards. Meritocracy is always less than integrity. Otherwise, you're just hiring a mercenary. You shouldn't even be hiring someone who can't handle understanding that their social place is determined by their work, their social relationship with co-workers, and their trust by the rest of the company.
If they can't handle a dynamic social environment, then they need to get out. They will cause more problems than they can solve.
Oh, you will get no complaint from me on that regard. It was just a theory, like how there is evidence that a lot of the hardcore Black Nationalist types came from the tribes that were going around enslaving the other Africans (which may be why they think they are superior).
I'm sure there are Brahmins that won't adapt, but we're supposed to select against that. I get the feeling that we're seeing something different in progressive companies because Brahmin racists probably fit the agenda of progressive racism.
Anyways, I have eyes of which to see, and ears of which to hear.
I see the use of off-shore software development, and it's mostly because a lot of companies can't get large, cheap, software development teams.
If your issue is progressive identitarian nationalism, stop tolerating progressivism. It's not going to be a surprise that the DIE cultists of the Wakanda Forever crowd are going to hire rabid nationalists. Both agree with each other.
Liberals like you will continue making no progress whatsoever in getting Indians to shed their in-group bias, just like you have done with blacks and Asians, while insisting that white people sit by and "trust the plan" while we get increasingly dispossessed and disenfranchised.
stop tolerating progressivism
We can't control Indians' in-group bias or any of their other politics. The solution is to exclude them.
I disagree with even calling it "progressive." Having an in-group bias is normal and was correctly seen as such until the 1960s when MLK's Jewish communist speech writer convinced the short-sighted and gullible that it was bad, and the ruling class moved to coerce and destroy people who saw through the bullshit.
Liberals like me would have to succeed and not be undercut by active racialism of the progressive movement.
We can't control Indians' in-group bias or any of their other politics. The solution is to exclude them.
Weird, because it seems like white Leftists were propagandized into being voluntary sonderkommandos. All you have to do is lay out the values of the American nation, and demand people accept that. If they can't, they can go.
I disagree with even calling it "progressive." Having an in-group bias is normal and was correctly seen as such until the 1960s
It's not 'in-group preference' it's racialism. It's an in-group preference when you want to marry someone from your ethnic group. Purging an entire ethnic group is not that, and you need to stop confusing the two.
Beyond that, it was absolutely progressive, and was founded under the progressive nationalist movements going all the way back to the mid 19th century. The progressives changed position on it only when it became unpopular. First it was the height of Progressiveism in order to destroy the Hapsburg Order for Europe under monarchical or imperial control, then it became un-progressive in the west because they decided to adopt internationalism. Meanwhile in eastern Europe, nationalism was not only progressive, but was declared to be explicitly communist. Internationalists in the West even went to Africa and pushed nationalism there to destroy the remnants of European empires, leading to the introduction of nationalist socialism all throughout the Arab and African world through Pan Arabism and Pan Africanism, leading to dozens of wars, including the bloodiest conflict in African history in the 2nd Congolese War, all while claiming Progresivism and Nationalism were incompatible in just Western Europe. Then again today, we are seeing Supra-Nationalism for the EU, and Ukrainian Nationalism embraced as noble Progressive causes, while the US gets attacked with "New Nationalism" from the Democrats, as it appears that nationalism is being re-defined as necessary for the most current Progressive talking point.
Liberals like me would have to succeed and not be undercut by active racialism of the progressive movement.
"We would have succeeded if no one opposed us!" - The absolute state of liberals
All you have to do is lay out the values of the American nation, and demand people accept that. If they can't, they can go.
That sounds like supporters of the racialist state of Israel need to get expelled from the country. I'm sure liberals are putting some real energy behind such a political project and are going to succeed in the very near future.
You were presenting "American values" as an alternative to political ethnocentrism. Zionists are the most powerful politically ethnocentrists so surely they are first on your list of people needing expulsion from America. Then again, maybe you're just being full of shit, as is tradition.
I don’t get how these people see the stats of successful Asians and still insist white supremacy is everywhere. As for this moronic tweet I’m so sick of these idiots who keep talking about how white people don’t want to acknowledge their racism.
Now if only she can look in the mirror and admit her own racism. Women in general can't admit the truth. I admit I'm a little racist it saves time. But I also strive to be better unlike this bitch.
We are onto something big, white women are the least racist group if you look at actual racism. I don't know many Indians, but if I had to guess they are very racist like other Asians.
Not so sure about white women being least racist. I feel like white women hate white people at a rather alarming rate.
Using the leftist definition of 'racist' as 'total lack of in-group preference' or possibly 'out-group preference'.
Almost as if it's by design.
So, you're saying culture can be more powerful than genetic influence.
Don't you start with me you fucking subversive.
He's always looking for an angle to divide white people and present fake & gay "anti-idpol" as a viable alternative. If you want to have fun with him, just ask him how well his efforts to dismantle Zionism are going (spoiler: the efforts don't exist because he and the rest of the "anti-idpol" crowd are full of shit).
You came to me!
White women overwhelmingly prefer to date white men so not really.
Politically they hate white people.
Politically, they are the second most pro-white people behind white men.
Out of 4 options, the other two of which are nonwhite, yeah. Black women aren't the second most pro-black group outside of black men.
White women are much more politically similar to white men than anyone else, contrary to this gayop that liberals are promoting.
I don't know where you're going with this, other than wittingly or unwittingly playing along with a subversive, philo-semitic liberal's attempt at safeguarding Jewish power by blaming its negative consequences on white women.
The only place I would go with it is I don't think that women should be able to vote.
"overwhelmingly", probably still the lowest racial in-group sexual preference of all demographics considering how many are also having a low species in-group sexual preference.
Ah yes, the ole' "white women fuck dogs" trope, make it more obvious that you just hate white people please. This same guy constantly loses his shit if you discuss Jewish power, though.
You have no clue what you are talking about. Asian women actually prefer white men over Asian men. I believe they have the worse in group preference. The dirty secret of these liberal white women that say anti-white things is that they seldom date minorities. Even they overwhelmingly prefer white men.
Dude, it's not my fault that the emasculation of men has caused some degenerate white women to go towards dogs. You want to help white women, then you need to be a strong white man that can obviously out compete a dog (and also not let your daughters fuck dogs).
Don't try to turn this around as if stereotypes you like are evidence of racial inferiority, but stereotypes you don't like are just slander. If a stereotype has something behind it, the problem needs to be identified and dealt with. And yeah, white women have problems. Lots of problems.
There is a reason there are so many white women involved in cucking, inter-racial porn obsession, rape fantasies, and bestiality. A lot of it has to do with the emasculation of men, particularly white men, mixed with the rampant sexual degeneracy of white women. It's not a surprise that it's also Leftist white women specifically.
No. In-group preference is the majority for all demographics. As I said before, white women just have some of the lowest numbers (in-group still being the plurality). Asians are far more preferences towards in-groups than whites. There are many asian parents that are okay with kids marrying whites because they see it as a sign of potential success and status in predominantly white countries.
You haven't even established the premise that there are an unusual amount of white women involved in any of that crap. What do you think of the actual, documented over-representation of Jews in (lying, degenerate) media and in promoting degenerate agendas like the trans one?
Again, you have nothing to back this up. We have data from online dating that proves my assertions and disproves yours. Again, white women are most similar to white men politically and socially. You are just doing the usual "anti-idpol" canard of actually practicing idpol against white women because your whole thing is a huge fraud.
The fact that cuckoldry, inter-racial porn, rape porn, and bestiality seem to be more prevalent, and mostly among white women, tells me otherwise. I'm sure there's not going to be a massive documented study, though there are a few regarding rape and interacial porn specifically. Hell, I don't think most people could have told you what cuckoldry was back in 2010. The fact that it's entered the vernacular at all is rather astonishing.
Leftism has increased sexual degeneracy to levels no one has ever seen. White women are also some of the victims of that.
Stop trying to do this nonsense "defend the honor of white women" bullshit and recognize the problem in front of you. You're acting like a BLM supporter excusing a fiery, but mostly peaceful, looting of a 7/11. It's not a condemnation of a race, it's the recognition of a serious social failure.
You're not even actually disputing what I said with statements like this. That's a completely unrelated claim.
Well I mean other groups have a preference for white women. Probably impacts that.
Not really. Majority of inter-racial couples are entirely non-white. The majority or plurality of every demographic is an in-group sexual preference. None of that's ever really a surprise given that most of your primary relationship issues and determinants are going to be cultural.
You're denying that black men prefer white women?
In totality? Yes, the minority of black men prefer white women. The majority of black men prefer black women. The same is true of every race and demographic that I'm aware of.
Again. White women seem to just have a larger minority of white women that are averse to white men.
Quora:"Is there any bias among Indians of hiring other Indian workers in the IT industry? They're like termites" Full of normies showing examples on how brahmin indians are taking over american companies with their blatantly racist caste-based hiring system.
This. I think I've posted here before about a friend I used to have that worked at Microsoft around 20 years ago. They hired Indians to save money, and once they got to management positions, that was it- the whole company turned pajeet.
When you go to the malls in Bellevue, where Microsoft has its HQ, you would think it's another country- easily 80% is Indian or Chinese. It's super jarring because that ethnic breakdown doesn't appear at the other malls in the area. Its like they don't leave the city.
Well, they're not outsourcing the work to India, they're bringing them over on tech worker visas.
Assuming equal skills, it makes sense: You have to pay an American $X in this job market, but foreigners are poor, so you can get away with paying them $X-Y, and they'll be happy because you also got them a ticket to the States.
There's a couple issues though: first, those guest worker visas were intended to help fill career fields that didn't have enough Americans working in them, not to help major corporations save money on salaries. The unintended consequence is that it depresses wages for the tech sector, because the American workers are forced to accept lower pay to compete with the foreigners taking their jobs.
Second, it changes the entire character of the company. In group preference is a real thing, as these imported workers rise to the ranks, they will hire more and more of their countrymen rather than similarly qualified Americans.
And, as you and others have pointed out, you get what you pay for with these employees, and it just lowers the quality of work all around as they become entrenched in the industry.
People are fungible. You can't help fill jobs that "don't have enough" Americans working in them without reducing wages. That said, I do believe there are fewer programmers in America than America needs. You'd rather some foreigners be doing the work here than foreigners doing it somewhere else. You really would. A sensible immigration system would help fill these roles. If you want white people, Eastern Europe is full of them. So you can be competitive without turning into another culture.
It's all about some executive getting a promotion for saving money and being long gone before the chickens come home to roost.
By the time it's even possible to look at the results, management has been talking about it so long in positive terms anyone pointing out what's really going in is committing corporate-politics-suicide by publicly talking about it.
According to OK cupid data - Indian women are by far the most racist demographic (when it comes to dating at least) in the US :
https://www.gwern.net/docs/psychology/okcupid/howyourraceaffectsthemessagesyouget.html
She does. She's also seems to be of the opinion that "anti-racism" is required for a decent society - any stance short engagement with and advocacy for the extremely discriminatory "anti-racism" stance is racism as far as she is concerned. She's not quite advocated for a race war against the whites yet, but then, she doesn't really need to yet, does she?
A good percentage of the Indians over here are high caste and used to feeling superior
Identity politics tells Indians they are superior
there is no tradition of noblesse oblige in India so the high castes mercilessly abuse their inferiors (you)
That's what Colorblindness was: "white" disculturation, and its attendant inculcation of self-hate, to make colonization of "whiteness" easier. Indians are generally racist; but so is every other cultural isolate. Except effected "white people".
Yep. You can't have this
without first having this
There is much irony, right. In fact, irony is really all that's left...
"Violent backlash" = Disagreeing.
Fuck you curry breath. Go worship a stone-age idol.
I'm sick of this shit. I am now a White Supremacist!
All races tolerate other races at best, but are usually racist. Every single group hates at least another group.
I don't see this among Indians. Like normal, most don't give a shit.
What you're looking at here is the intellectual class of progressive, identitarian, racist, midwits.
I wonder if there is anything to do with the caste system that causes it too. Maybe some Brahmins come over here, expecting to be treated as the highborn they are. Then they discover that we dont do that here, and they get treated just like every other caste. And worse, they are even expected to work with them! Or use the same facilities as them! eewwww And so they start lashing out because this mistreatment is unbearable.
Good. Fire them.
This is something that I've started to really turn towards. Meritocracy is always less than integrity. Otherwise, you're just hiring a mercenary. You shouldn't even be hiring someone who can't handle understanding that their social place is determined by their work, their social relationship with co-workers, and their trust by the rest of the company.
If they can't handle a dynamic social environment, then they need to get out. They will cause more problems than they can solve.
Oh, you will get no complaint from me on that regard. It was just a theory, like how there is evidence that a lot of the hardcore Black Nationalist types came from the tribes that were going around enslaving the other Africans (which may be why they think they are superior).
I'm sure there are Brahmins that won't adapt, but we're supposed to select against that. I get the feeling that we're seeing something different in progressive companies because Brahmin racists probably fit the agenda of progressive racism.
Quora:"Is there any bias among Indians of hiring other Indian workers in the IT industry? They're like termites" Full of normies showing examples on how brahmin indians are taking over american companies with their blatantly racist caste-based hiring system.
Oh, well, Quora, I'm convinced.
Anyways, I have eyes of which to see, and ears of which to hear.
I see the use of off-shore software development, and it's mostly because a lot of companies can't get large, cheap, software development teams.
If your issue is progressive identitarian nationalism, stop tolerating progressivism. It's not going to be a surprise that the DIE cultists of the Wakanda Forever crowd are going to hire rabid nationalists. Both agree with each other.
Liberals like you will continue making no progress whatsoever in getting Indians to shed their in-group bias, just like you have done with blacks and Asians, while insisting that white people sit by and "trust the plan" while we get increasingly dispossessed and disenfranchised.
We can't control Indians' in-group bias or any of their other politics. The solution is to exclude them.
I disagree with even calling it "progressive." Having an in-group bias is normal and was correctly seen as such until the 1960s when MLK's Jewish communist speech writer convinced the short-sighted and gullible that it was bad, and the ruling class moved to coerce and destroy people who saw through the bullshit.
Liberals like me would have to succeed and not be undercut by active racialism of the progressive movement.
Weird, because it seems like white Leftists were propagandized into being voluntary sonderkommandos. All you have to do is lay out the values of the American nation, and demand people accept that. If they can't, they can go.
It's not 'in-group preference' it's racialism. It's an in-group preference when you want to marry someone from your ethnic group. Purging an entire ethnic group is not that, and you need to stop confusing the two.
Beyond that, it was absolutely progressive, and was founded under the progressive nationalist movements going all the way back to the mid 19th century. The progressives changed position on it only when it became unpopular. First it was the height of Progressiveism in order to destroy the Hapsburg Order for Europe under monarchical or imperial control, then it became un-progressive in the west because they decided to adopt internationalism. Meanwhile in eastern Europe, nationalism was not only progressive, but was declared to be explicitly communist. Internationalists in the West even went to Africa and pushed nationalism there to destroy the remnants of European empires, leading to the introduction of nationalist socialism all throughout the Arab and African world through Pan Arabism and Pan Africanism, leading to dozens of wars, including the bloodiest conflict in African history in the 2nd Congolese War, all while claiming Progresivism and Nationalism were incompatible in just Western Europe. Then again today, we are seeing Supra-Nationalism for the EU, and Ukrainian Nationalism embraced as noble Progressive causes, while the US gets attacked with "New Nationalism" from the Democrats, as it appears that nationalism is being re-defined as necessary for the most current Progressive talking point.
"We would have succeeded if no one opposed us!" - The absolute state of liberals
That sounds like supporters of the racialist state of Israel need to get expelled from the country. I'm sure liberals are putting some real energy behind such a political project and are going to succeed in the very near future.
Getting shot in the back by Leftists who pretend to be Liberals is an unfortunate trend in Liberalism.
I said American nation. Israel's not my problem.
You were presenting "American values" as an alternative to political ethnocentrism. Zionists are the most powerful politically ethnocentrists so surely they are first on your list of people needing expulsion from America. Then again, maybe you're just being full of shit, as is tradition.
And this seems to be unavoidable, everywhere humans exist.
I'm tired of being involved in an experiment that we already know the results of, and being blamed for all of the past results.
I'd love to live in a liberal society. I just don't think they can exist in any sort of stable state for longer than a few decades at best.
"White Media"
Perhaps they should take a quick waltz through the ethnicity section of almost every media member and their spouse.
I don’t get how these people see the stats of successful Asians and still insist white supremacy is everywhere. As for this moronic tweet I’m so sick of these idiots who keep talking about how white people don’t want to acknowledge their racism.
you deserve the violence you're trying to create.
Now if only she can look in the mirror and admit her own racism. Women in general can't admit the truth. I admit I'm a little racist it saves time. But I also strive to be better unlike this bitch.