Anyways, I have eyes of which to see, and ears of which to hear.
I see the use of off-shore software development, and it's mostly because a lot of companies can't get large, cheap, software development teams.
If your issue is progressive identitarian nationalism, stop tolerating progressivism. It's not going to be a surprise that the DIE cultists of the Wakanda Forever crowd are going to hire rabid nationalists. Both agree with each other.
Liberals like you will continue making no progress whatsoever in getting Indians to shed their in-group bias, just like you have done with blacks and Asians, while insisting that white people sit by and "trust the plan" while we get increasingly dispossessed and disenfranchised.
stop tolerating progressivism
We can't control Indians' in-group bias or any of their other politics. The solution is to exclude them.
I disagree with even calling it "progressive." Having an in-group bias is normal and was correctly seen as such until the 1960s when MLK's Jewish communist speech writer convinced the short-sighted and gullible that it was bad, and the ruling class moved to coerce and destroy people who saw through the bullshit.
Liberals like me would have to succeed and not be undercut by active racialism of the progressive movement.
We can't control Indians' in-group bias or any of their other politics. The solution is to exclude them.
Weird, because it seems like white Leftists were propagandized into being voluntary sonderkommandos. All you have to do is lay out the values of the American nation, and demand people accept that. If they can't, they can go.
I disagree with even calling it "progressive." Having an in-group bias is normal and was correctly seen as such until the 1960s
It's not 'in-group preference' it's racialism. It's an in-group preference when you want to marry someone from your ethnic group. Purging an entire ethnic group is not that, and you need to stop confusing the two.
Beyond that, it was absolutely progressive, and was founded under the progressive nationalist movements going all the way back to the mid 19th century. The progressives changed position on it only when it became unpopular. First it was the height of Progressiveism in order to destroy the Hapsburg Order for Europe under monarchical or imperial control, then it became un-progressive in the west because they decided to adopt internationalism. Meanwhile in eastern Europe, nationalism was not only progressive, but was declared to be explicitly communist. Internationalists in the West even went to Africa and pushed nationalism there to destroy the remnants of European empires, leading to the introduction of nationalist socialism all throughout the Arab and African world through Pan Arabism and Pan Africanism, leading to dozens of wars, including the bloodiest conflict in African history in the 2nd Congolese War, all while claiming Progresivism and Nationalism were incompatible in just Western Europe. Then again today, we are seeing Supra-Nationalism for the EU, and Ukrainian Nationalism embraced as noble Progressive causes, while the US gets attacked with "New Nationalism" from the Democrats, as it appears that nationalism is being re-defined as necessary for the most current Progressive talking point.
Liberals like me would have to succeed and not be undercut by active racialism of the progressive movement.
"We would have succeeded if no one opposed us!" - The absolute state of liberals
All you have to do is lay out the values of the American nation, and demand people accept that. If they can't, they can go.
That sounds like supporters of the racialist state of Israel need to get expelled from the country. I'm sure liberals are putting some real energy behind such a political project and are going to succeed in the very near future.
Quora:"Is there any bias among Indians of hiring other Indian workers in the IT industry? They're like termites" Full of normies showing examples on how brahmin indians are taking over american companies with their blatantly racist caste-based hiring system.
Oh, well, Quora, I'm convinced.
Anyways, I have eyes of which to see, and ears of which to hear.
I see the use of off-shore software development, and it's mostly because a lot of companies can't get large, cheap, software development teams.
If your issue is progressive identitarian nationalism, stop tolerating progressivism. It's not going to be a surprise that the DIE cultists of the Wakanda Forever crowd are going to hire rabid nationalists. Both agree with each other.
Liberals like you will continue making no progress whatsoever in getting Indians to shed their in-group bias, just like you have done with blacks and Asians, while insisting that white people sit by and "trust the plan" while we get increasingly dispossessed and disenfranchised.
We can't control Indians' in-group bias or any of their other politics. The solution is to exclude them.
I disagree with even calling it "progressive." Having an in-group bias is normal and was correctly seen as such until the 1960s when MLK's Jewish communist speech writer convinced the short-sighted and gullible that it was bad, and the ruling class moved to coerce and destroy people who saw through the bullshit.
Liberals like me would have to succeed and not be undercut by active racialism of the progressive movement.
Weird, because it seems like white Leftists were propagandized into being voluntary sonderkommandos. All you have to do is lay out the values of the American nation, and demand people accept that. If they can't, they can go.
It's not 'in-group preference' it's racialism. It's an in-group preference when you want to marry someone from your ethnic group. Purging an entire ethnic group is not that, and you need to stop confusing the two.
Beyond that, it was absolutely progressive, and was founded under the progressive nationalist movements going all the way back to the mid 19th century. The progressives changed position on it only when it became unpopular. First it was the height of Progressiveism in order to destroy the Hapsburg Order for Europe under monarchical or imperial control, then it became un-progressive in the west because they decided to adopt internationalism. Meanwhile in eastern Europe, nationalism was not only progressive, but was declared to be explicitly communist. Internationalists in the West even went to Africa and pushed nationalism there to destroy the remnants of European empires, leading to the introduction of nationalist socialism all throughout the Arab and African world through Pan Arabism and Pan Africanism, leading to dozens of wars, including the bloodiest conflict in African history in the 2nd Congolese War, all while claiming Progresivism and Nationalism were incompatible in just Western Europe. Then again today, we are seeing Supra-Nationalism for the EU, and Ukrainian Nationalism embraced as noble Progressive causes, while the US gets attacked with "New Nationalism" from the Democrats, as it appears that nationalism is being re-defined as necessary for the most current Progressive talking point.
"We would have succeeded if no one opposed us!" - The absolute state of liberals
That sounds like supporters of the racialist state of Israel need to get expelled from the country. I'm sure liberals are putting some real energy behind such a political project and are going to succeed in the very near future.