I wonder if there is anything to do with the caste system that causes it too. Maybe some Brahmins come over here, expecting to be treated as the highborn they are. Then they discover that we dont do that here, and they get treated just like every other caste. And worse, they are even expected to work with them! Or use the same facilities as them! eewwww And so they start lashing out because this mistreatment is unbearable.
This is something that I've started to really turn towards. Meritocracy is always less than integrity. Otherwise, you're just hiring a mercenary. You shouldn't even be hiring someone who can't handle understanding that their social place is determined by their work, their social relationship with co-workers, and their trust by the rest of the company.
If they can't handle a dynamic social environment, then they need to get out. They will cause more problems than they can solve.
Oh, you will get no complaint from me on that regard. It was just a theory, like how there is evidence that a lot of the hardcore Black Nationalist types came from the tribes that were going around enslaving the other Africans (which may be why they think they are superior).
I'm sure there are Brahmins that won't adapt, but we're supposed to select against that. I get the feeling that we're seeing something different in progressive companies because Brahmin racists probably fit the agenda of progressive racism.
Anyways, I have eyes of which to see, and ears of which to hear.
I see the use of off-shore software development, and it's mostly because a lot of companies can't get large, cheap, software development teams.
If your issue is progressive identitarian nationalism, stop tolerating progressivism. It's not going to be a surprise that the DIE cultists of the Wakanda Forever crowd are going to hire rabid nationalists. Both agree with each other.
Liberals like you will continue making no progress whatsoever in getting Indians to shed their in-group bias, just like you have done with blacks and Asians, while insisting that white people sit by and "trust the plan" while we get increasingly dispossessed and disenfranchised.
stop tolerating progressivism
We can't control Indians' in-group bias or any of their other politics. The solution is to exclude them.
I disagree with even calling it "progressive." Having an in-group bias is normal and was correctly seen as such until the 1960s when MLK's Jewish communist speech writer convinced the short-sighted and gullible that it was bad, and the ruling class moved to coerce and destroy people who saw through the bullshit.
Liberals like me would have to succeed and not be undercut by active racialism of the progressive movement.
We can't control Indians' in-group bias or any of their other politics. The solution is to exclude them.
Weird, because it seems like white Leftists were propagandized into being voluntary sonderkommandos. All you have to do is lay out the values of the American nation, and demand people accept that. If they can't, they can go.
I disagree with even calling it "progressive." Having an in-group bias is normal and was correctly seen as such until the 1960s
It's not 'in-group preference' it's racialism. It's an in-group preference when you want to marry someone from your ethnic group. Purging an entire ethnic group is not that, and you need to stop confusing the two.
Beyond that, it was absolutely progressive, and was founded under the progressive nationalist movements going all the way back to the mid 19th century. The progressives changed position on it only when it became unpopular. First it was the height of Progressiveism in order to destroy the Hapsburg Order for Europe under monarchical or imperial control, then it became un-progressive in the west because they decided to adopt internationalism. Meanwhile in eastern Europe, nationalism was not only progressive, but was declared to be explicitly communist. Internationalists in the West even went to Africa and pushed nationalism there to destroy the remnants of European empires, leading to the introduction of nationalist socialism all throughout the Arab and African world through Pan Arabism and Pan Africanism, leading to dozens of wars, including the bloodiest conflict in African history in the 2nd Congolese War, all while claiming Progresivism and Nationalism were incompatible in just Western Europe. Then again today, we are seeing Supra-Nationalism for the EU, and Ukrainian Nationalism embraced as noble Progressive causes, while the US gets attacked with "New Nationalism" from the Democrats, as it appears that nationalism is being re-defined as necessary for the most current Progressive talking point.
I don't see this among Indians. Like normal, most don't give a shit.
What you're looking at here is the intellectual class of progressive, identitarian, racist, midwits.
I wonder if there is anything to do with the caste system that causes it too. Maybe some Brahmins come over here, expecting to be treated as the highborn they are. Then they discover that we dont do that here, and they get treated just like every other caste. And worse, they are even expected to work with them! Or use the same facilities as them! eewwww And so they start lashing out because this mistreatment is unbearable.
Good. Fire them.
This is something that I've started to really turn towards. Meritocracy is always less than integrity. Otherwise, you're just hiring a mercenary. You shouldn't even be hiring someone who can't handle understanding that their social place is determined by their work, their social relationship with co-workers, and their trust by the rest of the company.
If they can't handle a dynamic social environment, then they need to get out. They will cause more problems than they can solve.
Oh, you will get no complaint from me on that regard. It was just a theory, like how there is evidence that a lot of the hardcore Black Nationalist types came from the tribes that were going around enslaving the other Africans (which may be why they think they are superior).
I'm sure there are Brahmins that won't adapt, but we're supposed to select against that. I get the feeling that we're seeing something different in progressive companies because Brahmin racists probably fit the agenda of progressive racism.
Quora:"Is there any bias among Indians of hiring other Indian workers in the IT industry? They're like termites" Full of normies showing examples on how brahmin indians are taking over american companies with their blatantly racist caste-based hiring system.
Oh, well, Quora, I'm convinced.
Anyways, I have eyes of which to see, and ears of which to hear.
I see the use of off-shore software development, and it's mostly because a lot of companies can't get large, cheap, software development teams.
If your issue is progressive identitarian nationalism, stop tolerating progressivism. It's not going to be a surprise that the DIE cultists of the Wakanda Forever crowd are going to hire rabid nationalists. Both agree with each other.
Liberals like you will continue making no progress whatsoever in getting Indians to shed their in-group bias, just like you have done with blacks and Asians, while insisting that white people sit by and "trust the plan" while we get increasingly dispossessed and disenfranchised.
We can't control Indians' in-group bias or any of their other politics. The solution is to exclude them.
I disagree with even calling it "progressive." Having an in-group bias is normal and was correctly seen as such until the 1960s when MLK's Jewish communist speech writer convinced the short-sighted and gullible that it was bad, and the ruling class moved to coerce and destroy people who saw through the bullshit.
Liberals like me would have to succeed and not be undercut by active racialism of the progressive movement.
Weird, because it seems like white Leftists were propagandized into being voluntary sonderkommandos. All you have to do is lay out the values of the American nation, and demand people accept that. If they can't, they can go.
It's not 'in-group preference' it's racialism. It's an in-group preference when you want to marry someone from your ethnic group. Purging an entire ethnic group is not that, and you need to stop confusing the two.
Beyond that, it was absolutely progressive, and was founded under the progressive nationalist movements going all the way back to the mid 19th century. The progressives changed position on it only when it became unpopular. First it was the height of Progressiveism in order to destroy the Hapsburg Order for Europe under monarchical or imperial control, then it became un-progressive in the west because they decided to adopt internationalism. Meanwhile in eastern Europe, nationalism was not only progressive, but was declared to be explicitly communist. Internationalists in the West even went to Africa and pushed nationalism there to destroy the remnants of European empires, leading to the introduction of nationalist socialism all throughout the Arab and African world through Pan Arabism and Pan Africanism, leading to dozens of wars, including the bloodiest conflict in African history in the 2nd Congolese War, all while claiming Progresivism and Nationalism were incompatible in just Western Europe. Then again today, we are seeing Supra-Nationalism for the EU, and Ukrainian Nationalism embraced as noble Progressive causes, while the US gets attacked with "New Nationalism" from the Democrats, as it appears that nationalism is being re-defined as necessary for the most current Progressive talking point.