Whatever helps them sleep at night. The thing is these women aren't actually avoiding men altogether. They're just letting the Chads cycle through them, and since those Chads are so desirable the women don't give a shit about whether they "hate women". It's Billy Nice Guy who can't get his dick wet regardless of how he feels about women and feminism. These men aren't alone because they hate women. The stereotypical sexist pig gets plenty of pussy. They're alone because like the vast majority of men they don't have the genetics to be in the Chad Zone and women are constantly being told that being in a relationship with a man outside that zone is a fate worse than death, regardless of how realistic getting a Chad into a relationship would be for a given woman. Women in their 20's and 30's might enjoy being Strong Independent Women riding the cock carousel right now but in 20 years they'll be wondering where all the good men went, just as post wall thots are right now.
I feel for the lonely men, but I wish they'd realize how much better off they are alone than dealing with the modern woman. The modern woman doesn't cook, she doesn't clean, and unless she's with a Chad she doesn't put out on anything other than a transactional basis. She's fat, bitchy, entitled, and probably a single mother. Where's the upside? You can hire someone to cook, clean, and fuck you, so why throw money down the toilet to keep someone around who doesn't do those things? That's probably the biggest advantage men have over women. We can hire someone to do the things we'd normally expect from a woman. A woman can't hire a man to financially support her fat ass while she cucks him. Men should start making use of that advantage.
if most guys were raised like me then they can already do all of those things, perks of a second wave feminist mom is I learned all the family recipes, and had all the responsibilities while my older sister's greatest life accomplishment was becoming a trophy wife and alcoholic. I was raised with the "just be yourself" line and didn't even really bother chasing girls until I was 21, and by then it was obvious how useless modern women are, so the idea of romance or dating was never on the table. I think I've met 2? women who I would actually date in my entire life.
Yeah for sure. The thing is it's nice to have a housewife do that stuff, even though we can do it on our own. I don't think they realize how happy men are to be alone rather than be in a feminist relationship. Look at all the bullshit around dividing up the housework there is in feminist circles. It's clear that they don't know and don't care how insulting it is to tell a man that he needs to do his fair share of the housework after busting his ass for 50 or 60 hours a week at a real job because she has some bullshit job to show how Strong and Independent she is. I'm single and I have to do all my housework after busting my ass at work. I'm sure as shit not going to financially support someone and still have to do that. If I'm giving someone a free place to live the least she can do is keep it clean. Since the modern woman won't even do that and I can hire a professional to fuck me I'm out of the dating clown show.
I don't think they realize how happy men are to be alone rather than be in a feminist relationship
I would rather remain single for the rest of my life than ever be in a relationship with one of these harpies.
It's clear that they don't know and don't care how insulting it is to tell a man that he needs to do his fair share of the housework after busting his ass for 50 or 60 hours a week at a real job
I work in a warehouse loading trucks. I barely have energy to do anything most of the time because I burn so many calories lifting 60lb boxes for hours on end.
The last thing I would want when coming home from lifting air conditioners and pianos is to be told that I'm not doing enough work by some shrill harlot who can't even lift with both arms the things I have to be able to with one.
It's never the people with the really difficult or shitty jobs that bitch about stuff like this.
You're very wrong on one point. They aren't even happy now. They are super unhappy which is why even at 25 they are on 8 different psych meds and cry all the time.
That was a short quick road from "Not the victory any feminist intended or hoped for" to "loneliness is proof of misogyny."
Since she doesn't want to convince any man to accept her ideology, she's on a great path since she's now equated any and all pain a man will experience with evidence of his being her sworn enemy and discarded his concern in full.
Men, look at this. This is a serious take from a frank and earnest feminist who wades into a discussion on a social problem affecting males and pivots that into a hateful rant that claims all men deserve pain categorically. These creatures want nothing from you but absolute servility. You are not to be their partners; you are to be their dogs.
Recognize their all-encompassing hate for you and pity them if you choose to think about them at all, because they are well beneath your contempt. They don't deserve the personhood you'd grant to them by hating them back. They are, in-fact, sub-human trash.
Odd how feminists have tried proving they aren't useless without men by 1. not building their own society, 2. not creating their own businesses, and 3. not actually doing anything without men. Then again I'm sure that feminist utopia is on its way ladies, it's call Islam.
The only reason they're pulling this shit is because they know there's a never ending supply of simps willing to pay for their bad decisions without expecting anything in return. The problem is that thanks to movements like MGTOW and TRP the simp supply is drying up and there aren't enough to go around anymore. That comment is one big cope, and it's glorious watching men wake up to the clown show.
Yes, and its far more pathetic. Its just harder to notice because they still get laid and seemingly have a social circle. But mentally they are busted down to a point of little return, and their easy sex is only making it worse.
I don't feel pity for them, because they had a far easier start and better chance to not end up like they are. But unfortunately, they are still women and their short term feefees were all that mattered. And it led them to their own little depressing hells.
And while that's the obvious example everyone can think of and has met one, there are many more lesser versions that aren't as noticeable to those not in the orbit.
There is. The single ones in their late 30s / early 40s really open up & cling to you if you show even the slightest interest in them. Doesn’t matter if you’re married or not. If you ever press them as to what they hell they were doing from 18-35 they either were career building with no interest in dating or riding the cock carousel.
Most of this is delusion, rationalization, and projection.
Feminism has never, at any point, believed in the concept of gender equality. They have always, even since the 1st Wave, demanded superiority. It was founded under the idea that a society should be judged on how it treats it's women. Not "does it treat women equally", just "how good does it treat it's women". It was 1st Wave Feminists who demanded women be removed from coal mines and replaced with children and animals. Men, children, and animals got to stay in the mines under identical conditions, because in "women most effected" by working in hard conditions in a mine. It was 2nd wave feminists that then declared that their own efforts to remove women from mines through gender segregation was sexist discrimination by the patriarchy. If you've ever learned the lessons of the people who built the Duluth Model (I read through one of their Text Books), they actually identified that they had to stop letting mothers with children into "battered women's shelters" because the children were getting physically and sexually abused by the mothers in the shelters. They never assumed that women could harm their own children, or that the fathers would try to save their children, until they had to hide the abuse from the cops. The Model asserts that men are the cause of all family dysfunction. The Model provides legal aid only to women. The family court system itself is built upon Feminist ideology, and it's why Family Court judges give themselves unlimited power and scope when making rulings. Feminism stems from a Marxist interpretation of sex as a class struggle, and sees men as the bourgeoisie: Men are not equals, they are the enemy, and deserve to be exterminated.
Where this cunt is right is that Feminists do argue that women should be financially independent of men. The problem is, women can't be both financially independent of men and have everything in the world that they would ever want. Wherefore, women have to be supported by the state. This suits the Marxist roots of Feminism just fine as it destroys the family, and most Feminists still see the family as an inherently patriarchal institution anyway. Make women subjugated to the state is always superior to women having an amicable relationship with any man.
For God's sake, the primary lesson taught to young men about relationships and dating was: "women don't want to talk to you." Literally, for decades that was the message, at least 25 years. There are no appropriate times or places to approach a woman. Not in a bar. Not in a school. Not at work. Not on the street. Not in the store. If men listened to authority, let alone Feminists, they wouldn't know how to approach women, because they would never do it. Why would they? There's literally no time it's acceptable, and there never will be. Feminism is where the idea of: "it's only sexual harassment if you're ugly" comes from. Trump was right: if you're wealthy, powerful, attractive, or some combination thereof, they really will let you grab them by the pussy. If you aren't any of those, you'd better believe you're gonna get shot or stabbed. It's because women will use their sexual attractiveness to allure men they prefer, and any man they don't prefer needs to be kept at extreme distance. And because what has been institutionalized is the desires of 40 year old eggless, professional, white women by Feminism; it means that only men like Brad Pitt matter, and no one else. The 18 year old young man who works at Taco Bell can kill himself. The 25 year old man who works HVAC can kill himself. The 35 year old professional who makes under $65,000 a year can settle for being a cuck and being cheated on.
These are really what she thinks "shitcans" are: "men who don't make me wet."
Feminism hit its mark: women are now willing and able to make choices that further their own happiness and goals rather than settle for a misogynist shitcan
Women are more unhappy than ever. This is because most of them probably would have been perfectly happy marrying one of those men I just mentioned, and being his inspiration in life. Those women could have been completely content, helping that 18 year old Taco Bell employee work to provide her with the life she wanted because he loves her. Instead, they told him to eat shit and die because he didn't already have that money. She doesn't want to put one second of "emotional labor" into the relationship, so if he can't write the check, then he doesn't to join her in bed (she'll just find someone who can). That's what creates they hypergamous society in the first place. Because she is a normal woman, she ends up competing with dozens or hundreds of other women over the same few men that are the perfect catch, and so she refuses to settle until it's well too late.
She could have had that perfect man if she had invested in him at a younger age. So now, she gets nothing. Now she gets men who've never been inspired by women, and only who've been either rejected or betrayed by them, and wonders why they are so jaded.
Not only are women not happy, men aren't either. Feminism wins so long as everyone loses.
I'm constantly observing on reddit is that misogynist men believe they are the primary audience for feminism.
Let's be clear that when she says misogynist men, she doesn't mean that, she only means men as a class. There are no non-misogynist men to her. So, what she's saying is that men think that they should be persuaded by Feminism.
Normies think that Feminist arguments should, at some point, be persuasive if they were valid.
It's a good start, but the truth is that men who know anything about Feminism aren't looking to be persuaded, we want you to get the hell out of everyone's lives. We don't need you castrating our sons, cutting off the breasts of our daughters, telling our wives to cheat on us, and telling us to kill ourselves. It's as if you're a fucking poison on society and you deserve to be treated with intolerance and contempt because you're so evil.
What she's probably thinking of are the successful men she wants to hate-fuck for being wealthy, successful, attractive, capitalists. It's those men who won't fuck her that are telling her, "listen, you're a bit of a feminist harpy, and it's a real turn off."
Where she supposedly found successful men on Reddit, I'll never know. Probably someone shitposting from 4chan.
For generations, feminism has done the work to explain to men what the baseline is: understanding that women are human beings just like they are.
No, Feminism has taught that women are human beings, and that men are not.
As I read it, it's basically "Yes, I'm some spinster cat lady who will die alone and childless, my corpse feeding my cats for a couple of weeks, but at least I got to be mindlessly spiteful to men for a few years!"
This ought to be called "The Future is Feminist: Lesbianism or Peanut Butter." Because honestly, if it wasn't for welfare and corporate mandated diversity hiring, the whore house industry would be back in full swing.
Feminists have been advocating for laws and processes that treat women fairly at work and in public spaces...
Well, that's sounding pretty damn nice, I suppose I agree. Women absolutely deserve to be treated fairly. We have to start treating women fairly in the workplace, and the like.
Can you imagine the unholy shrieking from women, if women started getting treated fairly? Holy shit.
Whatever helps them sleep at night. The thing is these women aren't actually avoiding men altogether. They're just letting the Chads cycle through them, and since those Chads are so desirable the women don't give a shit about whether they "hate women". It's Billy Nice Guy who can't get his dick wet regardless of how he feels about women and feminism. These men aren't alone because they hate women. The stereotypical sexist pig gets plenty of pussy. They're alone because like the vast majority of men they don't have the genetics to be in the Chad Zone and women are constantly being told that being in a relationship with a man outside that zone is a fate worse than death, regardless of how realistic getting a Chad into a relationship would be for a given woman. Women in their 20's and 30's might enjoy being Strong Independent Women riding the cock carousel right now but in 20 years they'll be wondering where all the good men went, just as post wall thots are right now.
I feel for the lonely men, but I wish they'd realize how much better off they are alone than dealing with the modern woman. The modern woman doesn't cook, she doesn't clean, and unless she's with a Chad she doesn't put out on anything other than a transactional basis. She's fat, bitchy, entitled, and probably a single mother. Where's the upside? You can hire someone to cook, clean, and fuck you, so why throw money down the toilet to keep someone around who doesn't do those things? That's probably the biggest advantage men have over women. We can hire someone to do the things we'd normally expect from a woman. A woman can't hire a man to financially support her fat ass while she cucks him. Men should start making use of that advantage.
if most guys were raised like me then they can already do all of those things, perks of a second wave feminist mom is I learned all the family recipes, and had all the responsibilities while my older sister's greatest life accomplishment was becoming a trophy wife and alcoholic. I was raised with the "just be yourself" line and didn't even really bother chasing girls until I was 21, and by then it was obvious how useless modern women are, so the idea of romance or dating was never on the table. I think I've met 2? women who I would actually date in my entire life.
Yeah for sure. The thing is it's nice to have a housewife do that stuff, even though we can do it on our own. I don't think they realize how happy men are to be alone rather than be in a feminist relationship. Look at all the bullshit around dividing up the housework there is in feminist circles. It's clear that they don't know and don't care how insulting it is to tell a man that he needs to do his fair share of the housework after busting his ass for 50 or 60 hours a week at a real job because she has some bullshit job to show how Strong and Independent she is. I'm single and I have to do all my housework after busting my ass at work. I'm sure as shit not going to financially support someone and still have to do that. If I'm giving someone a free place to live the least she can do is keep it clean. Since the modern woman won't even do that and I can hire a professional to fuck me I'm out of the dating clown show.
I would rather remain single for the rest of my life than ever be in a relationship with one of these harpies.
I work in a warehouse loading trucks. I barely have energy to do anything most of the time because I burn so many calories lifting 60lb boxes for hours on end.
The last thing I would want when coming home from lifting air conditioners and pianos is to be told that I'm not doing enough work by some shrill harlot who can't even lift with both arms the things I have to be able to with one.
It's never the people with the really difficult or shitty jobs that bitch about stuff like this.
Hire a cleaner. They cost like 100$ a week and then you can sit on your ass more or go running or whatever you want
You're very wrong on one point. They aren't even happy now. They are super unhappy which is why even at 25 they are on 8 different psych meds and cry all the time.
That was a short quick road from "Not the victory any feminist intended or hoped for" to "loneliness is proof of misogyny."
Since she doesn't want to convince any man to accept her ideology, she's on a great path since she's now equated any and all pain a man will experience with evidence of his being her sworn enemy and discarded his concern in full.
Men, look at this. This is a serious take from a frank and earnest feminist who wades into a discussion on a social problem affecting males and pivots that into a hateful rant that claims all men deserve pain categorically. These creatures want nothing from you but absolute servility. You are not to be their partners; you are to be their dogs.
Recognize their all-encompassing hate for you and pity them if you choose to think about them at all, because they are well beneath your contempt. They don't deserve the personhood you'd grant to them by hating them back. They are, in-fact, sub-human trash.
Odd how feminists have tried proving they aren't useless without men by 1. not building their own society, 2. not creating their own businesses, and 3. not actually doing anything without men. Then again I'm sure that feminist utopia is on its way ladies, it's call Islam.
The only reason they're pulling this shit is because they know there's a never ending supply of simps willing to pay for their bad decisions without expecting anything in return. The problem is that thanks to movements like MGTOW and TRP the simp supply is drying up and there aren't enough to go around anymore. That comment is one big cope, and it's glorious watching men wake up to the clown show.
That's a lot of copium in word form. These aren't women men want so they try to reframe the picture where it doesn't show how undesirable they are.
You mean the 36 year old whose really “proud” of her corporate career while she downs a bottle of wine every night is lying about how happy she is?
Unrealistic, we all know it's a box.
"Delta Airlines thinks I'm cool!"
Yes, and its far more pathetic. Its just harder to notice because they still get laid and seemingly have a social circle. But mentally they are busted down to a point of little return, and their easy sex is only making it worse.
I don't feel pity for them, because they had a far easier start and better chance to not end up like they are. But unfortunately, they are still women and their short term feefees were all that mattered. And it led them to their own little depressing hells.
And while that's the obvious example everyone can think of and has met one, there are many more lesser versions that aren't as noticeable to those not in the orbit.
There is. The single ones in their late 30s / early 40s really open up & cling to you if you show even the slightest interest in them. Doesn’t matter if you’re married or not. If you ever press them as to what they hell they were doing from 18-35 they either were career building with no interest in dating or riding the cock carousel.
Most of this is delusion, rationalization, and projection.
Feminism has never, at any point, believed in the concept of gender equality. They have always, even since the 1st Wave, demanded superiority. It was founded under the idea that a society should be judged on how it treats it's women. Not "does it treat women equally", just "how good does it treat it's women". It was 1st Wave Feminists who demanded women be removed from coal mines and replaced with children and animals. Men, children, and animals got to stay in the mines under identical conditions, because in "women most effected" by working in hard conditions in a mine. It was 2nd wave feminists that then declared that their own efforts to remove women from mines through gender segregation was sexist discrimination by the patriarchy. If you've ever learned the lessons of the people who built the Duluth Model (I read through one of their Text Books), they actually identified that they had to stop letting mothers with children into "battered women's shelters" because the children were getting physically and sexually abused by the mothers in the shelters. They never assumed that women could harm their own children, or that the fathers would try to save their children, until they had to hide the abuse from the cops. The Model asserts that men are the cause of all family dysfunction. The Model provides legal aid only to women. The family court system itself is built upon Feminist ideology, and it's why Family Court judges give themselves unlimited power and scope when making rulings. Feminism stems from a Marxist interpretation of sex as a class struggle, and sees men as the bourgeoisie: Men are not equals, they are the enemy, and deserve to be exterminated.
Where this cunt is right is that Feminists do argue that women should be financially independent of men. The problem is, women can't be both financially independent of men and have everything in the world that they would ever want. Wherefore, women have to be supported by the state. This suits the Marxist roots of Feminism just fine as it destroys the family, and most Feminists still see the family as an inherently patriarchal institution anyway. Make women subjugated to the state is always superior to women having an amicable relationship with any man.
For God's sake, the primary lesson taught to young men about relationships and dating was: "women don't want to talk to you." Literally, for decades that was the message, at least 25 years. There are no appropriate times or places to approach a woman. Not in a bar. Not in a school. Not at work. Not on the street. Not in the store. If men listened to authority, let alone Feminists, they wouldn't know how to approach women, because they would never do it. Why would they? There's literally no time it's acceptable, and there never will be. Feminism is where the idea of: "it's only sexual harassment if you're ugly" comes from. Trump was right: if you're wealthy, powerful, attractive, or some combination thereof, they really will let you grab them by the pussy. If you aren't any of those, you'd better believe you're gonna get shot or stabbed. It's because women will use their sexual attractiveness to allure men they prefer, and any man they don't prefer needs to be kept at extreme distance. And because what has been institutionalized is the desires of 40 year old eggless, professional, white women by Feminism; it means that only men like Brad Pitt matter, and no one else. The 18 year old young man who works at Taco Bell can kill himself. The 25 year old man who works HVAC can kill himself. The 35 year old professional who makes under $65,000 a year can settle for being a cuck and being cheated on.
These are really what she thinks "shitcans" are: "men who don't make me wet."
Women are more unhappy than ever. This is because most of them probably would have been perfectly happy marrying one of those men I just mentioned, and being his inspiration in life. Those women could have been completely content, helping that 18 year old Taco Bell employee work to provide her with the life she wanted because he loves her. Instead, they told him to eat shit and die because he didn't already have that money. She doesn't want to put one second of "emotional labor" into the relationship, so if he can't write the check, then he doesn't to join her in bed (she'll just find someone who can). That's what creates they hypergamous society in the first place. Because she is a normal woman, she ends up competing with dozens or hundreds of other women over the same few men that are the perfect catch, and so she refuses to settle until it's well too late.
She could have had that perfect man if she had invested in him at a younger age. So now, she gets nothing. Now she gets men who've never been inspired by women, and only who've been either rejected or betrayed by them, and wonders why they are so jaded.
Not only are women not happy, men aren't either. Feminism wins so long as everyone loses.
Let's be clear that when she says misogynist men, she doesn't mean that, she only means men as a class. There are no non-misogynist men to her. So, what she's saying is that men think that they should be persuaded by Feminism.
Normies think that Feminist arguments should, at some point, be persuasive if they were valid.
It's a good start, but the truth is that men who know anything about Feminism aren't looking to be persuaded, we want you to get the hell out of everyone's lives. We don't need you castrating our sons, cutting off the breasts of our daughters, telling our wives to cheat on us, and telling us to kill ourselves. It's as if you're a fucking poison on society and you deserve to be treated with intolerance and contempt because you're so evil.
What she's probably thinking of are the successful men she wants to hate-fuck for being wealthy, successful, attractive, capitalists. It's those men who won't fuck her that are telling her, "listen, you're a bit of a feminist harpy, and it's a real turn off."
Where she supposedly found successful men on Reddit, I'll never know. Probably someone shitposting from 4chan.
No, Feminism has taught that women are human beings, and that men are not.
Remember when you put out this advertisement and thought it was a great idea? Don't pretend you think we're human.
As I read it, it's basically "Yes, I'm some spinster cat lady who will die alone and childless, my corpse feeding my cats for a couple of weeks, but at least I got to be mindlessly spiteful to men for a few years!"
They are resentment mongers.
Holy shit that ad is bad.
I aint reading all that chief
For real. I'll read long comments if they are quality, but I don't need to read a novel written by someone who is mentally ill.
“Men being lonely is good because we as women don’t need them.”
There.
Yea, I figured it'd be bullshit
tl;dr
"We made TheImpossible1, and that's a good thing."
I choked on my lonely men soup for one while reading your comment.
The worst part is that I ain't even fucking wrong, that's basically what it says.
I took one look at that wall of text and noped out. You are doing God's work and must have the patience of a saint.
That's what happens when you argue with Feminists for 10 years.
Bitch, you're not going to be forgiven for your Title IX Tribunals. I ain't gonna let that go.
Ironic considering women are still having about as much sex.
They just get pumped and dumped by a narrower sample of men with higher sexual value who won't comit to them.
Watch what happens when things get hard.
This ought to be called "The Future is Feminist: Lesbianism or Peanut Butter." Because honestly, if it wasn't for welfare and corporate mandated diversity hiring, the whore house industry would be back in full swing.
Women post stuff like that then claim there are no good guys and wonder, WONDER why they’re alone.
With blackjack and hookers
I'm Ok with them cat-ladying on to dotage. I'm sure the kitties will finally enjoy the meat... roast beef and all.
I could say the same about you, but I suspect you wouldn't take that kindly.
WALL OF TEXT
Why the fuck do you screech at us so much then
womens' "rights" starts a doomsday countdown on civilization and ours will run out relatively soon
Well, that's sounding pretty damn nice, I suppose I agree. Women absolutely deserve to be treated fairly. We have to start treating women fairly in the workplace, and the like.
Can you imagine the unholy shrieking from women, if women started getting treated fairly? Holy shit.
Kek!
The greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing women they weren't retarded.