Most of this is delusion, rationalization, and projection.
Feminism has never, at any point, believed in the concept of gender equality. They have always, even since the 1st Wave, demanded superiority. It was founded under the idea that a society should be judged on how it treats it's women. Not "does it treat women equally", just "how good does it treat it's women". It was 1st Wave Feminists who demanded women be removed from coal mines and replaced with children and animals. Men, children, and animals got to stay in the mines under identical conditions, because in "women most effected" by working in hard conditions in a mine. It was 2nd wave feminists that then declared that their own efforts to remove women from mines through gender segregation was sexist discrimination by the patriarchy. If you've ever learned the lessons of the people who built the Duluth Model (I read through one of their Text Books), they actually identified that they had to stop letting mothers with children into "battered women's shelters" because the children were getting physically and sexually abused by the mothers in the shelters. They never assumed that women could harm their own children, or that the fathers would try to save their children, until they had to hide the abuse from the cops. The Model asserts that men are the cause of all family dysfunction. The Model provides legal aid only to women. The family court system itself is built upon Feminist ideology, and it's why Family Court judges give themselves unlimited power and scope when making rulings. Feminism stems from a Marxist interpretation of sex as a class struggle, and sees men as the bourgeoisie: Men are not equals, they are the enemy, and deserve to be exterminated.
Where this cunt is right is that Feminists do argue that women should be financially independent of men. The problem is, women can't be both financially independent of men and have everything in the world that they would ever want. Wherefore, women have to be supported by the state. This suits the Marxist roots of Feminism just fine as it destroys the family, and most Feminists still see the family as an inherently patriarchal institution anyway. Make women subjugated to the state is always superior to women having an amicable relationship with any man.
For God's sake, the primary lesson taught to young men about relationships and dating was: "women don't want to talk to you." Literally, for decades that was the message, at least 25 years. There are no appropriate times or places to approach a woman. Not in a bar. Not in a school. Not at work. Not on the street. Not in the store. If men listened to authority, let alone Feminists, they wouldn't know how to approach women, because they would never do it. Why would they? There's literally no time it's acceptable, and there never will be. Feminism is where the idea of: "it's only sexual harassment if you're ugly" comes from. Trump was right: if you're wealthy, powerful, attractive, or some combination thereof, they really will let you grab them by the pussy. If you aren't any of those, you'd better believe you're gonna get shot or stabbed. It's because women will use their sexual attractiveness to allure men they prefer, and any man they don't prefer needs to be kept at extreme distance. And because what has been institutionalized is the desires of 40 year old eggless, professional, white women by Feminism; it means that only men like Brad Pitt matter, and no one else. The 18 year old young man who works at Taco Bell can kill himself. The 25 year old man who works HVAC can kill himself. The 35 year old professional who makes under $65,000 a year can settle for being a cuck and being cheated on.
These are really what she thinks "shitcans" are: "men who don't make me wet."
Feminism hit its mark: women are now willing and able to make choices that further their own happiness and goals rather than settle for a misogynist shitcan
Women are more unhappy than ever. This is because most of them probably would have been perfectly happy marrying one of those men I just mentioned, and being his inspiration in life. Those women could have been completely content, helping that 18 year old Taco Bell employee work to provide her with the life she wanted because he loves her. Instead, they told him to eat shit and die because he didn't already have that money. She doesn't want to put one second of "emotional labor" into the relationship, so if he can't write the check, then he doesn't to join her in bed (she'll just find someone who can). That's what creates they hypergamous society in the first place. Because she is a normal woman, she ends up competing with dozens or hundreds of other women over the same few men that are the perfect catch, and so she refuses to settle until it's well too late.
She could have had that perfect man if she had invested in him at a younger age. So now, she gets nothing. Now she gets men who've never been inspired by women, and only who've been either rejected or betrayed by them, and wonders why they are so jaded.
Not only are women not happy, men aren't either. Feminism wins so long as everyone loses.
I'm constantly observing on reddit is that misogynist men believe they are the primary audience for feminism.
Let's be clear that when she says misogynist men, she doesn't mean that, she only means men as a class. There are no non-misogynist men to her. So, what she's saying is that men think that they should be persuaded by Feminism.
Normies think that Feminist arguments should, at some point, be persuasive if they were valid.
It's a good start, but the truth is that men who know anything about Feminism aren't looking to be persuaded, we want you to get the hell out of everyone's lives. We don't need you castrating our sons, cutting off the breasts of our daughters, telling our wives to cheat on us, and telling us to kill ourselves. It's as if you're a fucking poison on society and you deserve to be treated with intolerance and contempt because you're so evil.
What she's probably thinking of are the successful men she wants to hate-fuck for being wealthy, successful, attractive, capitalists. It's those men who won't fuck her that are telling her, "listen, you're a bit of a feminist harpy, and it's a real turn off."
Where she supposedly found successful men on Reddit, I'll never know. Probably someone shitposting from 4chan.
For generations, feminism has done the work to explain to men what the baseline is: understanding that women are human beings just like they are.
No, Feminism has taught that women are human beings, and that men are not.
As I read it, it's basically "Yes, I'm some spinster cat lady who will die alone and childless, my corpse feeding my cats for a couple of weeks, but at least I got to be mindlessly spiteful to men for a few years!"
Most of this is delusion, rationalization, and projection.
Feminism has never, at any point, believed in the concept of gender equality. They have always, even since the 1st Wave, demanded superiority. It was founded under the idea that a society should be judged on how it treats it's women. Not "does it treat women equally", just "how good does it treat it's women". It was 1st Wave Feminists who demanded women be removed from coal mines and replaced with children and animals. Men, children, and animals got to stay in the mines under identical conditions, because in "women most effected" by working in hard conditions in a mine. It was 2nd wave feminists that then declared that their own efforts to remove women from mines through gender segregation was sexist discrimination by the patriarchy. If you've ever learned the lessons of the people who built the Duluth Model (I read through one of their Text Books), they actually identified that they had to stop letting mothers with children into "battered women's shelters" because the children were getting physically and sexually abused by the mothers in the shelters. They never assumed that women could harm their own children, or that the fathers would try to save their children, until they had to hide the abuse from the cops. The Model asserts that men are the cause of all family dysfunction. The Model provides legal aid only to women. The family court system itself is built upon Feminist ideology, and it's why Family Court judges give themselves unlimited power and scope when making rulings. Feminism stems from a Marxist interpretation of sex as a class struggle, and sees men as the bourgeoisie: Men are not equals, they are the enemy, and deserve to be exterminated.
Where this cunt is right is that Feminists do argue that women should be financially independent of men. The problem is, women can't be both financially independent of men and have everything in the world that they would ever want. Wherefore, women have to be supported by the state. This suits the Marxist roots of Feminism just fine as it destroys the family, and most Feminists still see the family as an inherently patriarchal institution anyway. Make women subjugated to the state is always superior to women having an amicable relationship with any man.
For God's sake, the primary lesson taught to young men about relationships and dating was: "women don't want to talk to you." Literally, for decades that was the message, at least 25 years. There are no appropriate times or places to approach a woman. Not in a bar. Not in a school. Not at work. Not on the street. Not in the store. If men listened to authority, let alone Feminists, they wouldn't know how to approach women, because they would never do it. Why would they? There's literally no time it's acceptable, and there never will be. Feminism is where the idea of: "it's only sexual harassment if you're ugly" comes from. Trump was right: if you're wealthy, powerful, attractive, or some combination thereof, they really will let you grab them by the pussy. If you aren't any of those, you'd better believe you're gonna get shot or stabbed. It's because women will use their sexual attractiveness to allure men they prefer, and any man they don't prefer needs to be kept at extreme distance. And because what has been institutionalized is the desires of 40 year old eggless, professional, white women by Feminism; it means that only men like Brad Pitt matter, and no one else. The 18 year old young man who works at Taco Bell can kill himself. The 25 year old man who works HVAC can kill himself. The 35 year old professional who makes under $65,000 a year can settle for being a cuck and being cheated on.
These are really what she thinks "shitcans" are: "men who don't make me wet."
Women are more unhappy than ever. This is because most of them probably would have been perfectly happy marrying one of those men I just mentioned, and being his inspiration in life. Those women could have been completely content, helping that 18 year old Taco Bell employee work to provide her with the life she wanted because he loves her. Instead, they told him to eat shit and die because he didn't already have that money. She doesn't want to put one second of "emotional labor" into the relationship, so if he can't write the check, then he doesn't to join her in bed (she'll just find someone who can). That's what creates they hypergamous society in the first place. Because she is a normal woman, she ends up competing with dozens or hundreds of other women over the same few men that are the perfect catch, and so she refuses to settle until it's well too late.
She could have had that perfect man if she had invested in him at a younger age. So now, she gets nothing. Now she gets men who've never been inspired by women, and only who've been either rejected or betrayed by them, and wonders why they are so jaded.
Not only are women not happy, men aren't either. Feminism wins so long as everyone loses.
Let's be clear that when she says misogynist men, she doesn't mean that, she only means men as a class. There are no non-misogynist men to her. So, what she's saying is that men think that they should be persuaded by Feminism.
Normies think that Feminist arguments should, at some point, be persuasive if they were valid.
It's a good start, but the truth is that men who know anything about Feminism aren't looking to be persuaded, we want you to get the hell out of everyone's lives. We don't need you castrating our sons, cutting off the breasts of our daughters, telling our wives to cheat on us, and telling us to kill ourselves. It's as if you're a fucking poison on society and you deserve to be treated with intolerance and contempt because you're so evil.
What she's probably thinking of are the successful men she wants to hate-fuck for being wealthy, successful, attractive, capitalists. It's those men who won't fuck her that are telling her, "listen, you're a bit of a feminist harpy, and it's a real turn off."
Where she supposedly found successful men on Reddit, I'll never know. Probably someone shitposting from 4chan.
No, Feminism has taught that women are human beings, and that men are not.
Remember when you put out this advertisement and thought it was a great idea? Don't pretend you think we're human.
As I read it, it's basically "Yes, I'm some spinster cat lady who will die alone and childless, my corpse feeding my cats for a couple of weeks, but at least I got to be mindlessly spiteful to men for a few years!"
They are resentment mongers.
Holy shit that ad is bad.