Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

48
"10-year-old girl denied abortion in Ohio" Why are we not looking for the criminal child rapist?? He should be on the FBI's Most Wanted list. (archive.ph)
posted 3 years ago by xleb2 3 years ago by xleb2 +48 / -0
38 comments share
38 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (38)
sorted by:
▲ 34 ▼
– BulbasaurusThe7th 34 points 3 years ago +34 / -0

This is the thing, the left doesn't want to solve the core issue, because theat would mean they have to be honest about it.
No, just cover it up for now, she will be traumatised enough to later on become the ideal leftist puppet: either gender confused, a promiscuous woman/actual prostitute or even both! Sprinkle in some things like drug use and we have the perfect purpe haired leftoid broad.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Adamrises 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

What's funny is almost all the teen moms I've ever met are the most redneck, white trash conservatives around. They don't live up to any values but they espouse them hard.

They need her traumatized and babyless because otherwise the cold harshness of reality will keep her out of the Left's hands.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

You sure? Aren't single mothers one of the most reliable leftist voter blocks? I can't imagine how much more that would be the case if it's a single mother who got impregnated by rape and then prevented from getting rid of it by laws passed by conservatives.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Adamrises 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I said teen moms, not single mothers in general. The kind who were forced to go through public education while raising a baby, thereby dragging them kicking and screaming into some level of reality. Unlike after highschool where they can abuse the plenty of options available to them, including just not working, they are government mandated to keep schooling and their parents have far less ability to collect any form of welfare on them.

Now, near none of them are good parents, nor are any of them "conservative" in any way but superficial, but they scream about libtards all the same.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 23 ▼
– evilplushie 23 points 3 years ago +23 / -0

I question if this story is even real

permalink save report block reply
▲ 13 ▼
– deleted 13 points 3 years ago +13 / -0
▲ 17 ▼
– evilplushie 17 points 3 years ago +17 / -0

Did they ever contact the girl at all? Or even the doctor? Afaik, this was a tale told by a doctor to a MSM outlet about something ANOTHER doctor told her

Which is why there seems to be a LOT of details missing because at best, this is a 3rd hand account , at worse, yet another medical professional is lying through their teeth to advance their shit ideology like the last 2 years

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– BrainJuice 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

Minors are protected from the press I believe.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– evilplushie 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

Very convenient when it means you dont even have to bother to investigate if this story is true. They didn't even bother to go find the doctor that supposedly told the other doctor this story

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Robotinic 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

The press shouldn't be allowed anywhere near the kid, she's gone through trauma and you think letting the media parasites near her will help that?

It's on the police to investigate and release a name, then it's on the public to pressure the police into getting results.

Besides, big L for thinking that the media actually investigate anything anymore. Especially when there's a chance the perp is a protected class.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– evilplushie 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

Assuming the kid even exists. No one has ever spoken to the kid, no one has EVEN spoken to the doctor directly treating the kid. Instead, this is a story that a doctor SAID she heard from another doctor IN ANOTHER fucking state.

Seriously, the interview was given in Indiana. The girl and the original doctor are supposedly from Ohio. Yet the 2nd doctor gave this story in an interview in indiana

I would point out this should be VERY easy to find out because the 2nd doctor claimed the first doctor was someone who specialised in child abuse. And this would be logged as a statutory rape case at the very least. Just narrowing down the time range, it should be easy to find out if ANYONE in Ohio saw a 10 year old pregnant kid at all

Yet even now, there are still no details on any of the other 2 figures in this story

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 6 ▼
– tensigh 6 points 3 years ago +6 / -0

But people charged with rape aren't. You would think the rapist would be identified, especially if it's someone raping children.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 3 ▼
– BrainJuice 3 points 3 years ago +3 / -0

That's a really good point.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– altmehere 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

I think it could be, in the very loosest sense of "real".

If the story is at all real, I'm guessing the family never even sought an exception in Ohio and simply elected to travel to Indiana, and then realized they could use the case to push their political position (which regressive media will gladly eat up).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– evilplushie 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Except its not the family bringing this up. Its a pro abortion doctor who heard it from another doctor and who told it to the msm. No one has even contacted the family or the doctor thats supposedly directly treating the little girl

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– FlartKnife 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

There no way it’s real. It’s pure bullshit meant to further enrage and divide.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 22 ▼
– GeneralBoobs 22 points 3 years ago +22 / -0

Shut up and listen only to the part they want you to pay attention to. Less than 1% is all that matters!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 10 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 10 points 3 years ago +10 / -0

They'll focus on such cases for as long as they can - for as long as they are illegal.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– GeneralBoobs 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Those 1% are legal in several states and these ragging cunts still bitched about being prosecuted for murdering their babies after being born in Cali.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

If that 1% is not legal everywhere, 99% of attention will be paid to them - to the detriment of both conservatives and pro-lifers.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– GeneralBoobs 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

You overestimate the the spite of those who have been harassed by the pro-abortion nutters and the desire to allow pro-choice. As long as it is legal in some states, I guarantee most people won't give a fuck.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Yeah, I think you're very wrong in that you're thinking that everyone else shares your rather idiosyncratic views.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– GeneralBoobs 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

I know people don't agree with me on abortions. You will find that the common ground, however is not your standard either. The U.S. is far more conservative on things like reproductive rights than we care to admit. People still shame those who need IVF.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 20 ▼
– AntonioOfVenice 20 points 3 years ago +20 / -0

What makes you think groomers have any problem with child rapists?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– poherf 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Yeah, it tells you a lot that all the stories about this are only talking about the fact that she couldn’t get an abortion. They don’t care that she was raped, but it is very important for them that the kids they groom can kill the baby.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 17 ▼
– cartoonericroberts 17 points 3 years ago +17 / -0

Rather, doctors can detect a flutter in the region where the heart will eventually form.

I know it isn't the point of the story, but this is splitting a hair so fine you'd need a scanning electron microscope to see it. "It's not a heartbeat; it's a flutter of cardiac tissue."

permalink save report block reply
▲ 4 ▼
– deleted 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0
▲ 14 ▼
– Kaarous 14 points 3 years ago +14 / -0

Because it's a propaganda op, and an obvious one too If any part of that story is true I'd be surprised.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– dekachin 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an obstetrician-gynecologist in Indianapolis, received a call last Monday, three days after the Court's ruling, from a child abuse doctor in Ohio who had a 10-year-old girl in their office who was six weeks and three days pregnant, and therefore ineligible to receive an abortion in the state, according to a report from The Indianapolis Star.

Fake story, just like all the lies and fake stories about people supposedly killing themselves with "horse paste" or whatever. It's all based on hearsay.

Dr. Caitlin Bernard made up a fake story of the perfect "edge case": a 10 year old (the lowest age she could plausibly claim pregnancy would even be possible, using the lowest age of early puberty) who just so happened to be 3 days over the legal limit.

You know it's fake because it's too perfect. It's too "and then everyone clapped" and these shitlibs know that the lib media will never fact check the story or insist on corroboration (which would be easy: name the doctor who told you and let us call him and verify that this is true - you'll note that this didn't happen).

You don't need to dox the 10 year old - if she even exists which I don't believe she does - to corroborate the story. You just need the media to verify that she exists, is pregnant, and is 10, and is 6 weeks +3 days, and they don't need to publish her name.

But they won't do that.

Because the child does not exist.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– FlartKnife 2 points 3 years ago +2 / -0

They won’t even give a city in Ohio. Not to mention that much of Ohio is within easy driving distance of Indianapolis. So even if this story is true, which it isn’t, but are we supposed to be outraged that a family had to drive two hours round trip?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– Steampunk_Moustache 12 points 3 years ago +12 / -0

This is of course an exceptional circumstance that lawmakers weren't thinking of when they put pen to paper, because functional people can't always think what the worst of the worst degenerates will manage to do.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 11 ▼
– tensigh 11 points 3 years ago +11 / -0

Let's look at the story closely:

TL;DR - The rapist isn't mentioned and they don't say who "denied" the abortion, thus making the results very sketchy.

"A 10-year-old rape victim in Ohio was denied an abortion...Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an obstetrician-gynecologist in Indianapolis, received a call last Monday, three days after the Court's ruling, from a child abuse doctor in Ohio .."

  • The "child abuse doctor" is unnamed.
  • The rapist or case is also completely glossed over.

"..who had a 10-year-old girl in their office who was six weeks and three days pregnant, and therefore ineligible to receive an abortion in the state, according to a report from The Indianapolis Star."

  • Notice that it doesn't say anyone actually denied the abortion or what actually happened to the alleged rape victim. All it says it an anonymous child abuse doctor (?) called a doctor in Indianapolis about an alleged rape victim. There are no more details than that which makes this really sketchy.

Also Ohio is often a battleground state and this came just days after the SCOTUS ruling. Something is definitely off here.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– MegoThor 9 points 3 years ago +9 / -0

Was she in the White House recently?

permalink save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– FutaCumDiet 8 points 3 years ago +8 / -0

"Here's a dubious story about a child getting pregnant from rape! I should be allowed to have on demand abortions in Ohio paid for by people in Texas."

Suck my dick.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– user20461 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

Why are we not looking for the criminal child rapist??

Because pedos are part of the faggot alphabet group

permalink save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– tensigh 7 points 3 years ago +7 / -0

I think this story is highly dubious.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– bloodguard 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

He should be on the FBI's Most Wanted list.

Not a chance. The FBI is all about protecting pedos these days.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– NewNameIguess 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

The issue is if it's someone her own age neither of them will receive any repercussions at all.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– Knife-TotingRat 5 points 3 years ago +5 / -0

Maybe the rapist is some actual retard. Things get covered up pretty quickly when they're the ones responsible for criminal shit, no matter how violent. Lord knows, Ohio just loves retards.

permalink save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - w2qgj (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy