Did they ever contact the girl at all? Or even the doctor? Afaik, this was a tale told by a doctor to a MSM outlet about something ANOTHER doctor told her
Which is why there seems to be a LOT of details missing because at best, this is a 3rd hand account , at worse, yet another medical professional is lying through their teeth to advance their shit ideology like the last 2 years
Very convenient when it means you dont even have to bother to investigate if this story is true. They didn't even bother to go find the doctor that supposedly told the other doctor this story
Assuming the kid even exists. No one has ever spoken to the kid, no one has EVEN spoken to the doctor directly treating the kid. Instead, this is a story that a doctor SAID she heard from another doctor IN ANOTHER fucking state.
Seriously, the interview was given in Indiana. The girl and the original doctor are supposedly from Ohio. Yet the 2nd doctor gave this story in an interview in indiana
I would point out this should be VERY easy to find out because the 2nd doctor claimed the first doctor was someone who specialised in child abuse. And this would be logged as a statutory rape case at the very least. Just narrowing down the time range, it should be easy to find out if ANYONE in Ohio saw a 10 year old pregnant kid at all
Yet even now, there are still no details on any of the other 2 figures in this story
Did they ever contact the girl at all? Or even the doctor? Afaik, this was a tale told by a doctor to a MSM outlet about something ANOTHER doctor told her
Which is why there seems to be a LOT of details missing because at best, this is a 3rd hand account , at worse, yet another medical professional is lying through their teeth to advance their shit ideology like the last 2 years
Minors are protected from the press I believe.
Very convenient when it means you dont even have to bother to investigate if this story is true. They didn't even bother to go find the doctor that supposedly told the other doctor this story
The press shouldn't be allowed anywhere near the kid, she's gone through trauma and you think letting the media parasites near her will help that?
It's on the police to investigate and release a name, then it's on the public to pressure the police into getting results.
Besides, big L for thinking that the media actually investigate anything anymore. Especially when there's a chance the perp is a protected class.
Assuming the kid even exists. No one has ever spoken to the kid, no one has EVEN spoken to the doctor directly treating the kid. Instead, this is a story that a doctor SAID she heard from another doctor IN ANOTHER fucking state.
Seriously, the interview was given in Indiana. The girl and the original doctor are supposedly from Ohio. Yet the 2nd doctor gave this story in an interview in indiana
I would point out this should be VERY easy to find out because the 2nd doctor claimed the first doctor was someone who specialised in child abuse. And this would be logged as a statutory rape case at the very least. Just narrowing down the time range, it should be easy to find out if ANYONE in Ohio saw a 10 year old pregnant kid at all
Yet even now, there are still no details on any of the other 2 figures in this story
But people charged with rape aren't. You would think the rapist would be identified, especially if it's someone raping children.
That's a really good point.