TL;DR - The rapist isn't mentioned and they don't say who "denied" the abortion, thus making the results very sketchy.
"A 10-year-old rape victim in Ohio was denied an abortion...Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an obstetrician-gynecologist in Indianapolis, received a call last Monday, three days after the Court's ruling, from a child abuse doctor in Ohio .."
The "child abuse doctor" is unnamed.
The rapist or case is also completely glossed over.
"..who had a 10-year-old girl in their office who was six weeks and three days pregnant, and therefore ineligible to receive an abortion in the state, according to a report from The Indianapolis Star."
Notice that it doesn't say anyone actually denied the abortion or what actually happened to the alleged rape victim. All it says it an anonymous child abuse doctor (?) called a doctor in Indianapolis about an alleged rape victim. There are no more details than that which makes this really sketchy.
Also Ohio is often a battleground state and this came just days after the SCOTUS ruling. Something is definitely off here.
Let's look at the story closely:
TL;DR - The rapist isn't mentioned and they don't say who "denied" the abortion, thus making the results very sketchy.
"A 10-year-old rape victim in Ohio was denied an abortion...Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an obstetrician-gynecologist in Indianapolis, received a call last Monday, three days after the Court's ruling, from a child abuse doctor in Ohio .."
"..who had a 10-year-old girl in their office who was six weeks and three days pregnant, and therefore ineligible to receive an abortion in the state, according to a report from The Indianapolis Star."
Also Ohio is often a battleground state and this came just days after the SCOTUS ruling. Something is definitely off here.