They are selling a parasocial relationship, not porn. The lewd content contributes to the feeling of personal connection, especially behind a paywall as it makes it feel more personal.
This is the natural result of feminism and capitalism(but I repeat myself) as it is a monetization of young disaffected males who have been excluded from relationships. On it's own, it is a civilization destroying phenomenon, which is only amplified by every other degenerate aspect of our decaying society.
You said it yourself: it's about feeling like you're being in a relationship with someone. People aren't stupid. They know prostitutes exists. They know where to find them. But the simple fact is that the current generation of men feel unloved and you can thank the advent of online dating services for heavily tipping the scales in favour of women.
It's also the reason why I don't ascribe to "earn that bag" faggotry and think thots like Bella should be hung from a tree for her actions. Taking advantage of people who are emotionally vulnerable because of a society that you helped create should not be excused or celebrated.
Onlyfans is legal, escorts are not. The amount of bullshit hoops you have to jump through to get an escort in the United States is insane. 99% of escorts require a reference, so you have to find one that will accept "newbies" aka fuck a chick that's probably way past her prime and fat. You have to give this random woman all your personal information, where you work, ect. Then once you have a reference, you have to keep going to escorts so you can keep your references up to date. If a girl you went to quits, then you are back to being a newbie with no references.
Sure you could pick up a street walker, but they are only available in major cities, are dirty, diseased and your chance of getting busted by police is very high. Nothing like your whole town seeing the news that you got busted for trying to pay for pussy.
Also the cost of a hour with an average escort is like the same price as a year worth of OF subscription. It's best to just refrain from everything sexual.
No, I was I agreeing with you that men are fucked in this society, most feel lonely and unloved. I was just explaining why I think Onlyfans exploded in popularity when prostitution has always been available. Onlyfans gives the parasocial fake love relationship without any of the risk. That's why it's so dangerous for the mental health of men.
at least everyone understands what the nature of that relationship is.
Debatable.
But even then, I be there are more johns who somehow managed turned their favorite whore into a wife than there are simps who who even managed to get laid.
Yep. OnlyFans leans into it worse, but the distinction between it and other porn isn't drastic. Shit, there have been cam girls who would chat with people for many years now. These people kvetching about OnlyFans but also defend porn in general make no damn sense.
It is, and it's not limited just to OF. Lot of twitch streamers (even the non titty-streamers) do the same thing with their subscribers, acting as though they're friends. It's weird and a bit sad.
Porn takes advantage of the natural urge of sexual desire.
OnlyFans & Co. take advantage of the manufactured urge in young men that The One and Only reason for Life is to be in a relationship with a girl. That your entire self-worth is based on this fact, and any other achievements in your life are meaningless if you are still single as a male.
it underscores tradcons braindead aversion to sexual content.
What do you mean here? Tradcons have had a knee jerk reaction to, I think perceiving their society being attacked but not understand why or where it was coming from, but I don't think their anti-porn stance is wrong.
Capitalism loves feminism. There's nothing better for it than a fresh labor pool and a bunch of anti-natalists with nothing to spend their money on other than consumer products.
A) Women already spend the majority of money, even when they weren't working
B) Capitalism doesn't need "fresh labor". Labor, like everything else, just has whatever it's price is. It is Corporatism and Syndicalism that needs to keep wages low, so that uniform garbage can be produced using economies of scale.
That doesn't matter because there is a difference between simply spending money and having your whole identity revolve around consumption.
This is just another Consoomer. Those people come in both wealthy and poor types. It doesn't actually have anything to do with promoting a free market.
Actually hording money is normally stupid and unprofitable in a free market. This is what most businesses would call: zero cash flow, or "death". It's why Socialists like Maynard Keynes helped create a system where the money would always be spent, rather than held for a later date.
The reason you have money is to do something with it, not sit on it Scrooge McDuck style, and even then, no one who you would call a Capitalist would actually do that. Only stupid, useless, rich Hollywood actors, or BLM activists do that.
Capitalists love cheap labor. It's strange to even question that idea.
It's because you're using the Socialist definition of the word, while I'm referring to someone who basically just wants people not to fuck up the market with state intervention. Cheap labor isn't necessarily a good thing, because the quality of your labor might also be dropping.
It's only good for the Corporatists who insists on using massive structures and enormous economies of scale to make profits off of infinitely small margins.
Yes, exactly. Feminists make excellent consoomers because they have nothing else. Even the "furbabies" become commodified.
It's because you're using the Socialist definition of the word
I'm using the word correctly, capitalists accumulate capital by way of owning and investing in things. That's capitalism. It has nothing to do with free market astrology.
Markets have never been free and conflict between the state and private sector is mostly imaginary or driven by conflicts between competing business interests. The "market" has long since worked hand-in-hand with the state, from the Enclosure Acts, to the United Fruit Company, to the Federal Reserve, and up today, to Google and Amazon.
You're fucking retarded if you think women are gonna be swayed by things like data, statistics or reality. Anything short of a return of physical violence visited upon whores is likely to be insufficient stimulus to correct their behavioral patterns.
Earlier this year there was a news story about a university offering freshmen women bodies-with-front-holes classes on how to safely get into OnlyFans.
It's not that much of a stretch to see them putting together "entrepreneur" funds that will loan gift money to strong, brave, and independent young female entrepreneurs to assist in buying a nice 4K camera and some studio lights for their business endeavour. All written off as a corporate responsibility tax break.
I'm surprised the alphabet people haven't been more vocal in demanding fair representation in porn though. The existing audience won't want to watch it. So the obvious solution is that the government (i.e., the taxpayer) should subsidise the companies on the condition they hire them (i.e. pay them to hire ugly danger hairs).
Hell, there was drama the past week or two about a "Family Sex Show" in the UK, that was basically just child grooming in a "we are kind and caring leftists" disguise, and that was funded by the tax payer.
Gee, I wonder how many new subs she’ll get after headlining an article in a major online newspaper. Certainly no money changed hands when the writer was deciding on the subject for this story.
Ukrianain women are physically hot but their personalities are trash. One of the worse of the worst for women. Somehow Slavs seemed to have got all the cold psychotic traits of Asian women with the unruly egos of white women. Literally the worst combination in the world.
We live in such a twisted hypocritical society...on the one hand the leftist western nu-puritans are banning anything even close to an attractive female figure in a video game, and on the other hand e-thotting is encouraged by the same society and same people trying to remove anything even remotely sexy or flirtatious in video games.
What a time to be alive, circling the drain of the best civilization man had ever built.
Come back to me in a decade and see if you're still supporting your parents. Best be putting all that money you're making to one side, because at the moment your main qualification appears to be that you are 19 and that shit doesn't last...
Im a pervy nerd. I mod sexy outfits and boob jiggles into games.
But i never, ever watch girl streamers or youtubers... let alone pay any money to them to see avg nudes. Where do all these simps and betas come from with all this money lol. Plenty of hentai and blender r34 stuff out there.
There are certainly some who do as you suggest here. The sad fact is that, the loneliness that fuels this economy of whores is a side-effect of life. It's always been with is. So has been the inevitable and violently destructive backlash.
If Apple ran the schools and everyone came out as a mindless iDrone buying all their bullshit, everyone's ire would be directed at Apple for brainwashing the kids.
Apple and your favorite company, Microsoft, actually have gotten their hooks into a lot of schools and gotten them to waste tons of money on computers and shit for the students. Not many people noticed or cared about that, either. I guess they're too busy playing with their phones.
Are you saying women have constructed a conspiracy to train boys to buy OnlyFans when they grow up? You've also condemned the "attack" on pornhub as a wamen plot. So wamen are behind promoting and attacking porn?
OnlyFans is porn. Just because the woman talks "to you" while spreading eagle doesn't make it not porn. OnlyFans is a subset of porn. To attack porn is to attack OnlyFans. Learn Set Theory, bro.
So what? I reiterate, you can't attack porn without including OnlyFans. It's porn. To criticize porn is to criticize it. You are focusing on a non-porn aspect of OnlyFans to dodge the contradiction in your narrative.
They are selling a parasocial relationship, not porn. The lewd content contributes to the feeling of personal connection, especially behind a paywall as it makes it feel more personal.
This is the natural result of feminism and capitalism(but I repeat myself) as it is a monetization of young disaffected males who have been excluded from relationships. On it's own, it is a civilization destroying phenomenon, which is only amplified by every other degenerate aspect of our decaying society.
This is somehow worse in my opinion.
It is worse. These men would be better served by actual hookers, at least everyone understands what the nature of that relationship is.
Spez: Hookers are healthier than porn too, which rewires the brain like a drug and necessarily escalates to more degenerate subjects.
You said it yourself: it's about feeling like you're being in a relationship with someone. People aren't stupid. They know prostitutes exists. They know where to find them. But the simple fact is that the current generation of men feel unloved and you can thank the advent of online dating services for heavily tipping the scales in favour of women.
It's also the reason why I don't ascribe to "earn that bag" faggotry and think thots like Bella should be hung from a tree for her actions. Taking advantage of people who are emotionally vulnerable because of a society that you helped create should not be excused or celebrated.
Onlyfans is legal, escorts are not. The amount of bullshit hoops you have to jump through to get an escort in the United States is insane. 99% of escorts require a reference, so you have to find one that will accept "newbies" aka fuck a chick that's probably way past her prime and fat. You have to give this random woman all your personal information, where you work, ect. Then once you have a reference, you have to keep going to escorts so you can keep your references up to date. If a girl you went to quits, then you are back to being a newbie with no references.
Sure you could pick up a street walker, but they are only available in major cities, are dirty, diseased and your chance of getting busted by police is very high. Nothing like your whole town seeing the news that you got busted for trying to pay for pussy.
Also the cost of a hour with an average escort is like the same price as a year worth of OF subscription. It's best to just refrain from everything sexual.
Wow, imagine making a reply this long that completely misses the entire fucking point of my comment.
No, I was I agreeing with you that men are fucked in this society, most feel lonely and unloved. I was just explaining why I think Onlyfans exploded in popularity when prostitution has always been available. Onlyfans gives the parasocial fake love relationship without any of the risk. That's why it's so dangerous for the mental health of men.
Debatable.
But even then, I be there are more johns who somehow managed turned their favorite whore into a wife than there are simps who who even managed to get laid.
Porn is actually a para-social relationship in and of itself already, which is why its so dangerous and addictive.
Yep. OnlyFans leans into it worse, but the distinction between it and other porn isn't drastic. Shit, there have been cam girls who would chat with people for many years now. These people kvetching about OnlyFans but also defend porn in general make no damn sense.
It is, and it's not limited just to OF. Lot of twitch streamers (even the non titty-streamers) do the same thing with their subscribers, acting as though they're friends. It's weird and a bit sad.
It's significantly worse, IMHO.
Porn takes advantage of the natural urge of sexual desire.
OnlyFans & Co. take advantage of the manufactured urge in young men that The One and Only reason for Life is to be in a relationship with a girl. That your entire self-worth is based on this fact, and any other achievements in your life are meaningless if you are still single as a male.
What do you mean here? Tradcons have had a knee jerk reaction to, I think perceiving their society being attacked but not understand why or where it was coming from, but I don't think their anti-porn stance is wrong.
hey hey hey HEY.
I won't tolerate you besmirching the name of Capitalism with Feminism. Sex based National Socialism is not Capitalist.
Everything else is right.
Capitalism loves feminism. There's nothing better for it than a fresh labor pool and a bunch of anti-natalists with nothing to spend their money on other than consumer products.
A) Women already spend the majority of money, even when they weren't working
B) Capitalism doesn't need "fresh labor". Labor, like everything else, just has whatever it's price is. It is Corporatism and Syndicalism that needs to keep wages low, so that uniform garbage can be produced using economies of scale.
That doesn't matter because there is a difference between simply spending money and having your whole identity revolve around consumption.
Capitalists love cheap labor. It's strange to even question that idea.
This is just another Consoomer. Those people come in both wealthy and poor types. It doesn't actually have anything to do with promoting a free market.
Actually hording money is normally stupid and unprofitable in a free market. This is what most businesses would call: zero cash flow, or "death". It's why Socialists like Maynard Keynes helped create a system where the money would always be spent, rather than held for a later date.
The reason you have money is to do something with it, not sit on it Scrooge McDuck style, and even then, no one who you would call a Capitalist would actually do that. Only stupid, useless, rich Hollywood actors, or BLM activists do that.
It's because you're using the Socialist definition of the word, while I'm referring to someone who basically just wants people not to fuck up the market with state intervention. Cheap labor isn't necessarily a good thing, because the quality of your labor might also be dropping.
It's only good for the Corporatists who insists on using massive structures and enormous economies of scale to make profits off of infinitely small margins.
Yes, exactly. Feminists make excellent consoomers because they have nothing else. Even the "furbabies" become commodified.
I'm using the word correctly, capitalists accumulate capital by way of owning and investing in things. That's capitalism. It has nothing to do with free market astrology.
Markets have never been free and conflict between the state and private sector is mostly imaginary or driven by conflicts between competing business interests. The "market" has long since worked hand-in-hand with the state, from the Enclosure Acts, to the United Fruit Company, to the Federal Reserve, and up today, to Google and Amazon.
How many simps plowed their stimmy checks straight into some e-girl thot’s bank account?
You're fucking retarded if you think women are gonna be swayed by things like data, statistics or reality. Anything short of a return of physical violence visited upon whores is likely to be insufficient stimulus to correct their behavioral patterns.
-TheImpossible1
Some people will never know that there may have never been such an honest, true, and heartfelt comment ever posted on the internet.
I still think he'd have sex with dudes to avoid fucking women.
Impy is best, based, closeted homosexual.
It wouldn't surprise me if the government somehow funnels money into porn and prostitution apps under the guise of women's empowerment or something
It's not that far off TBH.
Earlier this year there was a news story about a university offering freshmen
womenbodies-with-front-holes classes on how to safely get into OnlyFans.It's not that much of a stretch to see them putting together "entrepreneur" funds that will
loangift money to strong, brave, and independent young female entrepreneurs to assist in buying a nice 4K camera and some studio lights for their business endeavour. All written off as a corporate responsibility tax break.I'm surprised the alphabet people haven't been more vocal in demanding fair representation in porn though. The existing audience won't want to watch it. So the obvious solution is that the government (i.e., the taxpayer) should subsidise the companies on the condition they hire them (i.e. pay them to hire ugly danger hairs).
Hell, there was drama the past week or two about a "Family Sex Show" in the UK, that was basically just child grooming in a "we are kind and caring leftists" disguise, and that was funded by the tax payer.
"Women most affected."
There's a clue as to how they ended up raising a whore daughter.
Gee, I wonder how many new subs she’ll get after headlining an article in a major online newspaper. Certainly no money changed hands when the writer was deciding on the subject for this story.
No money and certainly not some other currency.
Definitely not the currency I'm letting hot female Ukrainian refugees pay me in for a place to stay since they're low on cash.
Ukrianain women are physically hot but their personalities are trash. One of the worse of the worst for women. Somehow Slavs seemed to have got all the cold psychotic traits of Asian women with the unruly egos of white women. Literally the worst combination in the world.
"You're making how much money now? --All is forgiven, lovely daughter!"
We live in such a twisted hypocritical society...on the one hand the leftist western nu-puritans are banning anything even close to an attractive female figure in a video game, and on the other hand e-thotting is encouraged by the same society and same people trying to remove anything even remotely sexy or flirtatious in video games.
What a time to be alive, circling the drain of the best civilization man had ever built.
Their ability to hold in their minds multiple contradictory beliefs simultaneously, truly is truly astounding.
Come back to me in a decade and see if you're still supporting your parents. Best be putting all that money you're making to one side, because at the moment your main qualification appears to be that you are 19 and that shit doesn't last...
Hence the burning her money.
What a waste. No one is going to want a burned out e-thot.
This is a college whore. She likes that shit-tier game.
Not sarcastic response: She was in college, became a whore, you guess what her minor was.
Bitch doesn't realize she's going to turn 30 at some point and have nothing but a bunch of fucking dirty rags.
No wonder she became a whore.
Her parents are deadbeats.
Thots gonna thot. They are worth as much as simps make them.
Im a pervy nerd. I mod sexy outfits and boob jiggles into games.
But i never, ever watch girl streamers or youtubers... let alone pay any money to them to see avg nudes. Where do all these simps and betas come from with all this money lol. Plenty of hentai and blender r34 stuff out there.
Desperate losers will do anything for a girl. It's a tale as old as time.
There are certainly some who do as you suggest here. The sad fact is that, the loneliness that fuels this economy of whores is a side-effect of life. It's always been with is. So has been the inevitable and violently destructive backlash.
Apple and your favorite company, Microsoft, actually have gotten their hooks into a lot of schools and gotten them to waste tons of money on computers and shit for the students. Not many people noticed or cared about that, either. I guess they're too busy playing with their phones.
Are you saying women have constructed a conspiracy to train boys to buy OnlyFans when they grow up? You've also condemned the "attack" on pornhub as a wamen plot. So wamen are behind promoting and attacking porn?
OnlyFans is porn. Just because the woman talks "to you" while spreading eagle doesn't make it not porn. OnlyFans is a subset of porn. To attack porn is to attack OnlyFans. Learn Set Theory, bro.
So what? I reiterate, you can't attack porn without including OnlyFans. It's porn. To criticize porn is to criticize it. You are focusing on a non-porn aspect of OnlyFans to dodge the contradiction in your narrative.