Capitalism loves feminism. There's nothing better for it than a fresh labor pool and a bunch of anti-natalists with nothing to spend their money on other than consumer products.
A) Women already spend the majority of money, even when they weren't working
B) Capitalism doesn't need "fresh labor". Labor, like everything else, just has whatever it's price is. It is Corporatism and Syndicalism that needs to keep wages low, so that uniform garbage can be produced using economies of scale.
That doesn't matter because there is a difference between simply spending money and having your whole identity revolve around consumption.
This is just another Consoomer. Those people come in both wealthy and poor types. It doesn't actually have anything to do with promoting a free market.
Actually hording money is normally stupid and unprofitable in a free market. This is what most businesses would call: zero cash flow, or "death". It's why Socialists like Maynard Keynes helped create a system where the money would always be spent, rather than held for a later date.
The reason you have money is to do something with it, not sit on it Scrooge McDuck style, and even then, no one who you would call a Capitalist would actually do that. Only stupid, useless, rich Hollywood actors, or BLM activists do that.
Capitalists love cheap labor. It's strange to even question that idea.
It's because you're using the Socialist definition of the word, while I'm referring to someone who basically just wants people not to fuck up the market with state intervention. Cheap labor isn't necessarily a good thing, because the quality of your labor might also be dropping.
It's only good for the Corporatists who insists on using massive structures and enormous economies of scale to make profits off of infinitely small margins.
Yes, exactly. Feminists make excellent consoomers because they have nothing else. Even the "furbabies" become commodified.
It's because you're using the Socialist definition of the word
I'm using the word correctly, capitalists accumulate capital by way of owning and investing in things. That's capitalism. It has nothing to do with free market astrology.
Markets have never been free and conflict between the state and private sector is mostly imaginary or driven by conflicts between competing business interests. The "market" has long since worked hand-in-hand with the state, from the Enclosure Acts, to the United Fruit Company, to the Federal Reserve, and up today, to Google and Amazon.
Capitalism loves feminism. There's nothing better for it than a fresh labor pool and a bunch of anti-natalists with nothing to spend their money on other than consumer products.
A) Women already spend the majority of money, even when they weren't working
B) Capitalism doesn't need "fresh labor". Labor, like everything else, just has whatever it's price is. It is Corporatism and Syndicalism that needs to keep wages low, so that uniform garbage can be produced using economies of scale.
That doesn't matter because there is a difference between simply spending money and having your whole identity revolve around consumption.
Capitalists love cheap labor. It's strange to even question that idea.
This is just another Consoomer. Those people come in both wealthy and poor types. It doesn't actually have anything to do with promoting a free market.
Actually hording money is normally stupid and unprofitable in a free market. This is what most businesses would call: zero cash flow, or "death". It's why Socialists like Maynard Keynes helped create a system where the money would always be spent, rather than held for a later date.
The reason you have money is to do something with it, not sit on it Scrooge McDuck style, and even then, no one who you would call a Capitalist would actually do that. Only stupid, useless, rich Hollywood actors, or BLM activists do that.
It's because you're using the Socialist definition of the word, while I'm referring to someone who basically just wants people not to fuck up the market with state intervention. Cheap labor isn't necessarily a good thing, because the quality of your labor might also be dropping.
It's only good for the Corporatists who insists on using massive structures and enormous economies of scale to make profits off of infinitely small margins.
Yes, exactly. Feminists make excellent consoomers because they have nothing else. Even the "furbabies" become commodified.
I'm using the word correctly, capitalists accumulate capital by way of owning and investing in things. That's capitalism. It has nothing to do with free market astrology.
Markets have never been free and conflict between the state and private sector is mostly imaginary or driven by conflicts between competing business interests. The "market" has long since worked hand-in-hand with the state, from the Enclosure Acts, to the United Fruit Company, to the Federal Reserve, and up today, to Google and Amazon.