They are selling a parasocial relationship, not porn. The lewd content contributes to the feeling of personal connection, especially behind a paywall as it makes it feel more personal.
This is the natural result of feminism and capitalism(but I repeat myself) as it is a monetization of young disaffected males who have been excluded from relationships. On it's own, it is a civilization destroying phenomenon, which is only amplified by every other degenerate aspect of our decaying society.
You said it yourself: it's about feeling like you're being in a relationship with someone. People aren't stupid. They know prostitutes exists. They know where to find them. But the simple fact is that the current generation of men feel unloved and you can thank the advent of online dating services for heavily tipping the scales in favour of women.
It's also the reason why I don't ascribe to "earn that bag" faggotry and think thots like Bella should be hung from a tree for her actions. Taking advantage of people who are emotionally vulnerable because of a society that you helped create should not be excused or celebrated.
at least everyone understands what the nature of that relationship is.
Debatable.
But even then, I be there are more johns who somehow managed turned their favorite whore into a wife than there are simps who who even managed to get laid.
Yep. OnlyFans leans into it worse, but the distinction between it and other porn isn't drastic. Shit, there have been cam girls who would chat with people for many years now. These people kvetching about OnlyFans but also defend porn in general make no damn sense.
It is, and it's not limited just to OF. Lot of twitch streamers (even the non titty-streamers) do the same thing with their subscribers, acting as though they're friends. It's weird and a bit sad.
Porn takes advantage of the natural urge of sexual desire.
OnlyFans & Co. take advantage of the manufactured urge in young men that The One and Only reason for Life is to be in a relationship with a girl. That your entire self-worth is based on this fact, and any other achievements in your life are meaningless if you are still single as a male.
it underscores tradcons braindead aversion to sexual content.
What do you mean here? Tradcons have had a knee jerk reaction to, I think perceiving their society being attacked but not understand why or where it was coming from, but I don't think their anti-porn stance is wrong.
Capitalism loves feminism. There's nothing better for it than a fresh labor pool and a bunch of anti-natalists with nothing to spend their money on other than consumer products.
A) Women already spend the majority of money, even when they weren't working
B) Capitalism doesn't need "fresh labor". Labor, like everything else, just has whatever it's price is. It is Corporatism and Syndicalism that needs to keep wages low, so that uniform garbage can be produced using economies of scale.
Feminist-led education system produces broken men desperate for female validation.
Women take advantage by providing faux relationships through the internet.
If a hundred broken men (which is barely 4 classrooms full out of the thousands run by feminists) give this whore $5 a week, she already has $1k in a fortnight.
I don't think people realize how insidious this all is. It's not as simple as "people just buying porn".
Earlier this year there was a news story about a university offering freshmen women bodies-with-front-holes classes on how to safely get into OnlyFans.
It's not that much of a stretch to see them putting together "entrepreneur" funds that will loan gift money to strong, brave, and independent young female entrepreneurs to assist in buying a nice 4K camera and some studio lights for their business endeavour. All written off as a corporate responsibility tax break.
I'm surprised the alphabet people haven't been more vocal in demanding fair representation in porn though. The existing audience won't want to watch it. So the obvious solution is that the government (i.e., the taxpayer) should subsidise the companies on the condition they hire them (i.e. pay them to hire ugly danger hairs).
Hell, there was drama the past week or two about a "Family Sex Show" in the UK, that was basically just child grooming in a "we are kind and caring leftists" disguise, and that was funded by the tax payer.
imagine how many thousands of women will be turned away from liberalism once the consensus swings back to desire for trad wifes and data starts getting slung around about how miserable liberal women are.
What a massive shill you are. Back to ConPro.
You will never have a tradwife. It's a carrot your handlers dangle in front of your eyes.
You're fucking retarded if you think women are gonna be swayed by things like data, statistics or reality. Anything short of a return of physical violence visited upon whores is likely to be insufficient stimulus to correct their behavioral patterns.
They are selling a parasocial relationship, not porn. The lewd content contributes to the feeling of personal connection, especially behind a paywall as it makes it feel more personal.
This is the natural result of feminism and capitalism(but I repeat myself) as it is a monetization of young disaffected males who have been excluded from relationships. On it's own, it is a civilization destroying phenomenon, which is only amplified by every other degenerate aspect of our decaying society.
This is somehow worse in my opinion.
It is worse. These men would be better served by actual hookers, at least everyone understands what the nature of that relationship is.
Spez: Hookers are healthier than porn too, which rewires the brain like a drug and necessarily escalates to more degenerate subjects.
You said it yourself: it's about feeling like you're being in a relationship with someone. People aren't stupid. They know prostitutes exists. They know where to find them. But the simple fact is that the current generation of men feel unloved and you can thank the advent of online dating services for heavily tipping the scales in favour of women.
It's also the reason why I don't ascribe to "earn that bag" faggotry and think thots like Bella should be hung from a tree for her actions. Taking advantage of people who are emotionally vulnerable because of a society that you helped create should not be excused or celebrated.
Debatable.
But even then, I be there are more johns who somehow managed turned their favorite whore into a wife than there are simps who who even managed to get laid.
Porn is actually a para-social relationship in and of itself already, which is why its so dangerous and addictive.
Yep. OnlyFans leans into it worse, but the distinction between it and other porn isn't drastic. Shit, there have been cam girls who would chat with people for many years now. These people kvetching about OnlyFans but also defend porn in general make no damn sense.
It is, and it's not limited just to OF. Lot of twitch streamers (even the non titty-streamers) do the same thing with their subscribers, acting as though they're friends. It's weird and a bit sad.
It's significantly worse, IMHO.
Porn takes advantage of the natural urge of sexual desire.
OnlyFans & Co. take advantage of the manufactured urge in young men that The One and Only reason for Life is to be in a relationship with a girl. That your entire self-worth is based on this fact, and any other achievements in your life are meaningless if you are still single as a male.
What do you mean here? Tradcons have had a knee jerk reaction to, I think perceiving their society being attacked but not understand why or where it was coming from, but I don't think their anti-porn stance is wrong.
hey hey hey HEY.
I won't tolerate you besmirching the name of Capitalism with Feminism. Sex based National Socialism is not Capitalist.
Everything else is right.
Capitalism loves feminism. There's nothing better for it than a fresh labor pool and a bunch of anti-natalists with nothing to spend their money on other than consumer products.
A) Women already spend the majority of money, even when they weren't working
B) Capitalism doesn't need "fresh labor". Labor, like everything else, just has whatever it's price is. It is Corporatism and Syndicalism that needs to keep wages low, so that uniform garbage can be produced using economies of scale.
We said the same thing, at nearly the same time. That's pretty funny.
Feminist-led education system produces broken men desperate for female validation.
Women take advantage by providing faux relationships through the internet.
If a hundred broken men (which is barely 4 classrooms full out of the thousands run by feminists) give this whore $5 a week, she already has $1k in a fortnight.
I don't think people realize how insidious this all is. It's not as simple as "people just buying porn".
"Women most affected."
If it was proven true and everyone started hating women, I think the media would unironically try it.
"Why women are the true victims of the unproven right-wing conspiracy that feminists were brainwashing boys to worship women."
How many simps plowed their stimmy checks straight into some e-girl thot’s bank account?
It wouldn't surprise me if the government somehow funnels money into porn and prostitution apps under the guise of women's empowerment or something
It's not that far off TBH.
Earlier this year there was a news story about a university offering freshmen
womenbodies-with-front-holes classes on how to safely get into OnlyFans.It's not that much of a stretch to see them putting together "entrepreneur" funds that will
loangift money to strong, brave, and independent young female entrepreneurs to assist in buying a nice 4K camera and some studio lights for their business endeavour. All written off as a corporate responsibility tax break.I'm surprised the alphabet people haven't been more vocal in demanding fair representation in porn though. The existing audience won't want to watch it. So the obvious solution is that the government (i.e., the taxpayer) should subsidise the companies on the condition they hire them (i.e. pay them to hire ugly danger hairs).
Hell, there was drama the past week or two about a "Family Sex Show" in the UK, that was basically just child grooming in a "we are kind and caring leftists" disguise, and that was funded by the tax payer.
What a massive shill you are. Back to ConPro.
You will never have a tradwife. It's a carrot your handlers dangle in front of your eyes.
You're fucking retarded if you think women are gonna be swayed by things like data, statistics or reality. Anything short of a return of physical violence visited upon whores is likely to be insufficient stimulus to correct their behavioral patterns.
I wouldn't want to be a fucking woman.
I'm not a leftist, you're a feminist sympathizer. Forgiveness for them is not on the table, shill.