They are selling a parasocial relationship, not porn. The lewd content contributes to the feeling of personal connection, especially behind a paywall as it makes it feel more personal.
This is the natural result of feminism and capitalism(but I repeat myself) as it is a monetization of young disaffected males who have been excluded from relationships. On it's own, it is a civilization destroying phenomenon, which is only amplified by every other degenerate aspect of our decaying society.
You said it yourself: it's about feeling like you're being in a relationship with someone. People aren't stupid. They know prostitutes exists. They know where to find them. But the simple fact is that the current generation of men feel unloved and you can thank the advent of online dating services for heavily tipping the scales in favour of women.
It's also the reason why I don't ascribe to "earn that bag" faggotry and think thots like Bella should be hung from a tree for her actions. Taking advantage of people who are emotionally vulnerable because of a society that you helped create should not be excused or celebrated.
Onlyfans is legal, escorts are not. The amount of bullshit hoops you have to jump through to get an escort in the United States is insane. 99% of escorts require a reference, so you have to find one that will accept "newbies" aka fuck a chick that's probably way past her prime and fat. You have to give this random woman all your personal information, where you work, ect. Then once you have a reference, you have to keep going to escorts so you can keep your references up to date. If a girl you went to quits, then you are back to being a newbie with no references.
Sure you could pick up a street walker, but they are only available in major cities, are dirty, diseased and your chance of getting busted by police is very high. Nothing like your whole town seeing the news that you got busted for trying to pay for pussy.
Also the cost of a hour with an average escort is like the same price as a year worth of OF subscription. It's best to just refrain from everything sexual.
at least everyone understands what the nature of that relationship is.
Debatable.
But even then, I be there are more johns who somehow managed turned their favorite whore into a wife than there are simps who who even managed to get laid.
Yep. OnlyFans leans into it worse, but the distinction between it and other porn isn't drastic. Shit, there have been cam girls who would chat with people for many years now. These people kvetching about OnlyFans but also defend porn in general make no damn sense.
It is, and it's not limited just to OF. Lot of twitch streamers (even the non titty-streamers) do the same thing with their subscribers, acting as though they're friends. It's weird and a bit sad.
Porn takes advantage of the natural urge of sexual desire.
OnlyFans & Co. take advantage of the manufactured urge in young men that The One and Only reason for Life is to be in a relationship with a girl. That your entire self-worth is based on this fact, and any other achievements in your life are meaningless if you are still single as a male.
it underscores tradcons braindead aversion to sexual content.
What do you mean here? Tradcons have had a knee jerk reaction to, I think perceiving their society being attacked but not understand why or where it was coming from, but I don't think their anti-porn stance is wrong.
Capitalism loves feminism. There's nothing better for it than a fresh labor pool and a bunch of anti-natalists with nothing to spend their money on other than consumer products.
A) Women already spend the majority of money, even when they weren't working
B) Capitalism doesn't need "fresh labor". Labor, like everything else, just has whatever it's price is. It is Corporatism and Syndicalism that needs to keep wages low, so that uniform garbage can be produced using economies of scale.
They are selling a parasocial relationship, not porn. The lewd content contributes to the feeling of personal connection, especially behind a paywall as it makes it feel more personal.
This is the natural result of feminism and capitalism(but I repeat myself) as it is a monetization of young disaffected males who have been excluded from relationships. On it's own, it is a civilization destroying phenomenon, which is only amplified by every other degenerate aspect of our decaying society.
This is somehow worse in my opinion.
It is worse. These men would be better served by actual hookers, at least everyone understands what the nature of that relationship is.
Spez: Hookers are healthier than porn too, which rewires the brain like a drug and necessarily escalates to more degenerate subjects.
You said it yourself: it's about feeling like you're being in a relationship with someone. People aren't stupid. They know prostitutes exists. They know where to find them. But the simple fact is that the current generation of men feel unloved and you can thank the advent of online dating services for heavily tipping the scales in favour of women.
It's also the reason why I don't ascribe to "earn that bag" faggotry and think thots like Bella should be hung from a tree for her actions. Taking advantage of people who are emotionally vulnerable because of a society that you helped create should not be excused or celebrated.
Onlyfans is legal, escorts are not. The amount of bullshit hoops you have to jump through to get an escort in the United States is insane. 99% of escorts require a reference, so you have to find one that will accept "newbies" aka fuck a chick that's probably way past her prime and fat. You have to give this random woman all your personal information, where you work, ect. Then once you have a reference, you have to keep going to escorts so you can keep your references up to date. If a girl you went to quits, then you are back to being a newbie with no references.
Sure you could pick up a street walker, but they are only available in major cities, are dirty, diseased and your chance of getting busted by police is very high. Nothing like your whole town seeing the news that you got busted for trying to pay for pussy.
Also the cost of a hour with an average escort is like the same price as a year worth of OF subscription. It's best to just refrain from everything sexual.
Debatable.
But even then, I be there are more johns who somehow managed turned their favorite whore into a wife than there are simps who who even managed to get laid.
Porn is actually a para-social relationship in and of itself already, which is why its so dangerous and addictive.
Yep. OnlyFans leans into it worse, but the distinction between it and other porn isn't drastic. Shit, there have been cam girls who would chat with people for many years now. These people kvetching about OnlyFans but also defend porn in general make no damn sense.
It is, and it's not limited just to OF. Lot of twitch streamers (even the non titty-streamers) do the same thing with their subscribers, acting as though they're friends. It's weird and a bit sad.
It's significantly worse, IMHO.
Porn takes advantage of the natural urge of sexual desire.
OnlyFans & Co. take advantage of the manufactured urge in young men that The One and Only reason for Life is to be in a relationship with a girl. That your entire self-worth is based on this fact, and any other achievements in your life are meaningless if you are still single as a male.
What do you mean here? Tradcons have had a knee jerk reaction to, I think perceiving their society being attacked but not understand why or where it was coming from, but I don't think their anti-porn stance is wrong.
hey hey hey HEY.
I won't tolerate you besmirching the name of Capitalism with Feminism. Sex based National Socialism is not Capitalist.
Everything else is right.
Capitalism loves feminism. There's nothing better for it than a fresh labor pool and a bunch of anti-natalists with nothing to spend their money on other than consumer products.
A) Women already spend the majority of money, even when they weren't working
B) Capitalism doesn't need "fresh labor". Labor, like everything else, just has whatever it's price is. It is Corporatism and Syndicalism that needs to keep wages low, so that uniform garbage can be produced using economies of scale.
That doesn't matter because there is a difference between simply spending money and having your whole identity revolve around consumption.
Capitalists love cheap labor. It's strange to even question that idea.
We said the same thing, at nearly the same time. That's pretty funny.