Are you saying women have constructed a conspiracy to train boys to buy OnlyFans when they grow up? You've also condemned the "attack" on pornhub as a wamen plot. So wamen are behind promoting and attacking porn?
OnlyFans isn't porn. You can't talk to...I don't know any porn stars that are active. Fuck. What was that one right wing grifter one. Brandi something?
Anyway, you can't talk to the porn stars in a porn video, you can talk to an OnlyThot. That's the difference. There's an illusion that she actually cares about you - same thing that props up women on Twitch.
What I think is that the psychological attacks on boys in school are deliberately producing broken men with a need for female validation that can easily be exploited.
OnlyFans is porn. Just because the woman talks "to you" while spreading eagle doesn't make it not porn. OnlyFans is a subset of porn. To attack porn is to attack OnlyFans. Learn Set Theory, bro.
It technically is, but it shares nothing in common with regular porn except containing sexual content.
When you pay for OF, you aren't really paying for porn. You're paying for that woman to interact with you, to pretend to be part of a community with her.
It's like the difference between a TV show and a YouTube video. Both are entertainment, but one is built to be more personal in nature, to feign a bond between the viewer and the creator.
So what? I reiterate, you can't attack porn without including OnlyFans. It's porn. To criticize porn is to criticize it. You are focusing on a non-porn aspect of OnlyFans to dodge the contradiction in your narrative.
Are you saying women have constructed a conspiracy to train boys to buy OnlyFans when they grow up? You've also condemned the "attack" on pornhub as a wamen plot. So wamen are behind promoting and attacking porn?
Not just OnlyFans. OF just made it obvious.
OnlyFans isn't porn. You can't talk to...I don't know any porn stars that are active. Fuck. What was that one right wing grifter one. Brandi something?
Anyway, you can't talk to the porn stars in a porn video, you can talk to an OnlyThot. That's the difference. There's an illusion that she actually cares about you - same thing that props up women on Twitch.
What I think is that the psychological attacks on boys in school are deliberately producing broken men with a need for female validation that can easily be exploited.
OnlyFans is porn. Just because the woman talks "to you" while spreading eagle doesn't make it not porn. OnlyFans is a subset of porn. To attack porn is to attack OnlyFans. Learn Set Theory, bro.
It technically is, but it shares nothing in common with regular porn except containing sexual content.
When you pay for OF, you aren't really paying for porn. You're paying for that woman to interact with you, to pretend to be part of a community with her.
It's like the difference between a TV show and a YouTube video. Both are entertainment, but one is built to be more personal in nature, to feign a bond between the viewer and the creator.
So what? I reiterate, you can't attack porn without including OnlyFans. It's porn. To criticize porn is to criticize it. You are focusing on a non-porn aspect of OnlyFans to dodge the contradiction in your narrative.