It technically is, but it shares nothing in common with regular porn except containing sexual content.
When you pay for OF, you aren't really paying for porn. You're paying for that woman to interact with you, to pretend to be part of a community with her.
It's like the difference between a TV show and a YouTube video. Both are entertainment, but one is built to be more personal in nature, to feign a bond between the viewer and the creator.
So what? I reiterate, you can't attack porn without including OnlyFans. It's porn. To criticize porn is to criticize it. You are focusing on a non-porn aspect of OnlyFans to dodge the contradiction in your narrative.
That's targeting specific sites, and other sites can get around it by requiring a credit card as well. I reiterate, you can't attack porn, as a concept, without attacking OnlyFans.
It technically is, but it shares nothing in common with regular porn except containing sexual content.
When you pay for OF, you aren't really paying for porn. You're paying for that woman to interact with you, to pretend to be part of a community with her.
It's like the difference between a TV show and a YouTube video. Both are entertainment, but one is built to be more personal in nature, to feign a bond between the viewer and the creator.
So what? I reiterate, you can't attack porn without including OnlyFans. It's porn. To criticize porn is to criticize it. You are focusing on a non-porn aspect of OnlyFans to dodge the contradiction in your narrative.
Yes you can. You just target the streaming sites and say OF is okay because you need a credit card and that proves your age.
That's what the UK is doing. I even posted about it forever ago.
That's targeting specific sites, and other sites can get around it by requiring a credit card as well. I reiterate, you can't attack porn, as a concept, without attacking OnlyFans.