It's funny how you, Antonio, and a few others pretend to be tolerant of speech but as soon as it comes to actual far-right ideology the narrative shifts.
No matter how many arguments you lose you're right back to the same thing the day after.
Only reason I say this is, as I said before, you're doing yourself no favors. The far-right is growing whether you like it or not and we are aligned by ideology simply because we are not leftist Bolsheviks. Maligning potential allies because you have a personal grudge with the image of said group given by the media is rather foolish, no?
Don't worry though. The far-right waits with open arms. The pendulum is just about at the apex into far-left nonsense.
The Nazis weren't "far-right". The only "left" and "right" involved was a split within their own ranks, but even the "right" faction wouldn't ever shut up about how socialist they were.
leftist Bolsheviks
People like Goebbels adored them. To him, Lenin was "the greatest man, second only to Hitler".
Today Nazism is considered a far-right position. Ironically almost entirely because of the Nationalism part.
People like Goebbels adored them. To him, "Lenin was the greatest man, second only to Hitler".
Can you source this? Goebbels was a propagandist heart and soul and said different things to different people depending on what he wanted the outcome to be.
Calling them "far-right" was a trick by their leftist rivals against the actual right to associate them with something so widely despised. The German "far-right" were the monarchists (not very popular since the monarchy had been discredited by the conduct of the last Kaiser, who just fled before the war that he had started did even end, and then never returned).
So why can't you guys find anything else to associate with than a disastrously failed and long defunct socialist movement from, as you say, a century ago?
Even Mussolini was inspired by something that lasted way way longer than Hitler's "1,000-year Reich" of 12 years. And even after it did crash and burn even the people who did the burning (the Germans) would come to regret it, and so they would wear the Roman skinsuit to self-identify as the "Holy Roman Empire" (aka the Reich). You're wearing a Nazi skinsuit now, but they were a failure.
Nah the Nazi stuff is more like a badge on a Nascar-style sticker suit.
I like many of the ideas, but it's not all that encompasses my thoughts nor close to the majority.
Hitler's "1,000-year Reich" of 12 years. And even after it did crash and burn
Again, that's pretty disingenuous.
The NSDAP led Germany would probably have lasted many a year longer if they didn't draw the ire of international finance.
Even had Hitler not invaded Poland war would have been inevitable.
So why can't you guys find anything else to associate with than a disastrously failed and long defunct socialist movement from, as you say, a century ago?
As said above, I can and I do.
I just always find it so fascinating how everything about Nazism must under common social contention become a discussion of how bad it was without ever really discussing WHAT it was.
In my eyes there's no negative association whatsoever. Aspersions are cast blindly without any real appeal. Muh hoilocaust pulls a nice big blanket over the whole affair.
Personally, I blame the attacks on Nazism for the fall of Nationalism as a political concept. That is why I push for it to be discussed so much. Once that taboo is broken it becomes much more likely to have Nationalism rekindled.
The NSDAP led Germany would probably have lasted many a year longer if they didn't draw the ire of international finance.
Also if it didn't go around invading its neighbors. Or even if it had stopped doing that in 1939, and probably even 1940.
Even had Hitler not invaded Poland war would have been inevitable.
That is a counterfactual that you can't prove and no one can disprove. Maybe, maybe not.
Personally, I blame the attacks on Nazism for the fall of Nationalism as a political concept. That is why I push for it to be discussed so much. Once that taboo is broken it becomes much more likely to have Nationalism rekindled.
I'm sure nationalism will be much more successful once you associate it with the Nazis.
Before Poland the international community repeatedly did everything they could to avoid the war by just giving Hitler whatever he wanted. Including letting him occupy 2 entire countries.
As for "international finance", Poland that Hitler decided to destroy at all cost was discriminating against Jews even on the small business scale, and had outlandish ideas like sending the Jews away as colonists to Madagascar after aquiring it as an overseas colony (much more realistically, Poland was covertly helping the right-wing Zionists to achieve independence for Palestine from Britain so the Jews would go there - which was also the original Nazi plan before "the resettlement to the east").
The German "far-right" were the monarchists (not very popular since the monarchy had been discredited by the conduct of the last Kaiser, who just fled before the war that he had started didn't even end, and then never returned).
Plenty of black-supremacists and women-supremacists on the left, a lot more then white-supremacists so is clear that a "supremacist" movement does not need to be on the right, in fact it rarely is.
You're conflating groups and individuals pretty heavily there.
As for what I myself say, what's it matter if you have issues? No one will ever agree completely. On many core issues we are aligned. Why should we be enemies when a common, and much more brutal, enemy stands before us?
Sounds like you are. National socialist. And pro second amendment? I guess if you ignore banning whoever the party claimed was the enemy of the state. Only places you can find arguments that the nazis were pro gun are left leaning sites like salon
Strong traditional family life like Lebensborn. Where they were encouraging young women to have children outside of marriage and if the children were “racially pure” they would then be handed over to the ss to care for and not their parents. Or encourage women of occupied countries to sleep with German officers just to have their children taken from them. Or the 100k-200k children who were kidnapped from Poland. Those deemed pure got stuck with foster parents in Germany and those not were executed.
“Nazi Traditional family life” is shit and anyone who supports it is shit. I’m not interested in fighting against one shitty ideology to replace it with an equally shitty one. Fuck off
I like how I have no idea what a tradcon is, not really interested in any far-right buzz wards.
You've not given a solution. Should kia2 just move again? Return to reddit? I know a lot still visit both reddit and kia2.win but I've closed my account entirely and not planning to create a new one.
We do not have the power to close a .win site and even if we did, censorship would greatly taint the freedom of speech thing the .win is trying out.
On the other-hand the far-right, actual far-right, are unsavory, dangerous and it can potentially bring a lot more attention to .win then we would like. I would not be surprised that it is now on some FBI monitoring list.
There is also the scenario where the site can be used as a stage for an internet censorship bill, "fbi nazis" set up some fake threat and then use that as an excuse to harm everyone by leftist censorship.
I honestly have no solution here, would be nice to not have actual far-right people all together but is anyone surprised that the real far-right is getting popular? There is a reason why the white-supremacists wanted Biden to win. When the left paints anyone opposing immigration as a white-supremacist then at what point will some of them just say fuck it I guess we are white-supremacists now.
You can obviously see a few who are obvious far-right, I've been seeing more of them for the past few days, but other then observing what exactly can we do?
Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
Bakunin pointed this out too:
commercial or banking agents, writers, politicians, correspondents for newspapers of all shades, with one foot in the bank, the other in the socialist movement, and with their behinds sitting on the German daily press — they have taken possession of all the newspapers — and you can imagine what kind of sickening literature they produce... the world today stands for the most part at the disposal of Marx and at the same time at the disposal of Rothschild. I am certain that Rothschild for his part greatly values the merits of Marx, and that Marx for his part feels instinctive attraction and great respect for Rothschild.
This may seem strange. What can there be in common between Communism and the large banks? Oh! The Communism of Marx seeks enormous centralization in the state, and where such exists, there must inevitably be a central state bank, and where such a bank exists, the parasites which speculate on the work of the people, will always find a way to prevail.
Question if all -isms are suggested by the same parasitic few towards the ignorant many who are being deceived into choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law?
the banks (plural) are still technically separate entities
Banks that hold the suggested currency (money); while the many ignore the real current aka flow (inception towards death) for the responding form (life) in-between.
Ask yourself why the parasitic few suggest currency; liquidity; (river)banks; floating loans; freezing assets etc. (water allegories)?
It is consent to any suggestion (-ism) that causes the offense. Any suggestion towards your choice tempts "want or not want" consent. If you chose either; you find yourself within the want versus not want conflict (reason). Whatever side you chose will then tempt you to defend yourself against the other side.
That is called division (reason) by suggestion (-ism). Meanwhile in reality...choice represents the response to balance (need/want); which is what the many ignore when falling for the temptation (want over need) of suggestion (want or not want).
Communism; fascism; capitalism; socialism; idealism; feminism; veganism; scientism; metamorphism; individualism and every other suggested -ism are all representing the same foundation of choice...want or not want; hence want over need (temptation of ignorance). Tricking the many into this represents choice (suggesting) to choice (consenting) contract law; which is ignorance of balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
The mass industrialization of the aforementioned contract law (choice to choice) is called RELIGION, noun [Latin religio, to bind anew; re and ligo, to bind.] and the main tool to suggest represents spell-craft aka suggesting idolized meaning (words) over perceived meaning (sound).
Using a 103kb jpg to distribute a virus over a public image hoster...classic cyber-warfare. I could post the big dipper as ASCII art; but spending some quality moments outside under the big swastika in the sky could improve your "well being". If that doesn't suit you; I could teach you a lot about the "Hakenkreuz"; because my hook & cross are said to leave a lasting impact...
I would have the upper hand by resisting the temptation of consenting to suggested fights. You fight for outcomes (beating others), hence consenting to self destruction while doing so; I utilize martial arts for self sustenance; hence within momentum (balance); while resisting temptation (imbalance).
I guess the stormfags bitched and created enough fake accounts that they finally got their own sub. Like XfaggotX is fooling anyone with all his recent handshake sockpuppets. Trying to drum up upvotes with the frequent posts here and elsewhere to make them look legitimate. I am so tired of the admins being fools.
Only if you accept the redefinition by the left. Controlling the narrative (with all these just openly Marxist journalists and political science professors) to turn "right wing" into a bogey man.
What's wrong with soyboys being scared of us? It's not like we'll ever convince them anyway. The nonstop assault on our dignity in juxtaposition to our actual character and actions only serves to wake up the normies and bring independents over to the right.
This is a specious or at best meaningless argument. What is "far-right ideology"? Your argument below makes it clear that this is a subjective term. Everyone to the "right" of Mao is considered to by far-right by mainstream media today.
Most likely what we're seeing is just a concentration effect. As "far-right" types are banned by big tech sites, they are forced to move to free speech sites. This collects a bunch of deplorables under the same banner that wouldn't normally be in agreement except they aren't Maoists. It also makes the more extreme ideologues appear more numerous (in those communities) than they actually are.
If you're unironically a national socialist in 2022 then I'm not in alignment with you on most issues. I don't pretend to know the numbers, but I guess a lot of people here are like me and don't care what lefties think. We think "guilt by association" is bullshit. Doesn't mean we consider ourselves party to YOUR ideology either, even if we tolerate or participate in dialogue with you.
Not particularly charming, but as long as they don't start calling for the gassing of Jews and what not, it should pose no risk to the site as a whole. The problem is that these types cannot be trusted to keep it in their pants.
Are we sure it is not an attempt to take down all the win sites? I know there must be actual nazis somewhere but has anyone ever seen one in real life?
If the guys running that are real nazis then this is why we can't have nice things. I never go outside kia2.win and it would be a bummer to see it closed.
Who poses this risk to the site as a whole? It's as legal to display a swastika as a hammer and sickle, in the US. And the people who would shut down a site for a swastika would shut it down faster for Donald Trump.
That's the janny excuse, that somehow if their sacred cows aren't bowed to then the site will be shut down somehow, by someone that is never actually elaborated.
Basically they still want reddit rules to apply here.
It is not really about legal or illegal. There is plenty of stuff that is legal, but which poses a severe risk. E.g. the Daily Stormer did nothing illegal, but registrars and hosters did a number on it.
The Daily Stormer is wishing me a Happy Eliot Rodger Day. They still seem to be around. If you start yielding before any pressure at all is applied, you're definitely going to lose.
don't want to be associated with genocide, while being nazis
What if those who suggest genocide by vaccine, and those who suggest that resisting it makes you a nazi; as well as those that claim genocide and those who suggested the brand nazi...were so called ashkenazi?
Suggested his-story by the few; which aims to explain "understanding" aka standing under suggested information by others; while ignoring to grow comprehension within self by adaptation to perceived inspiration.
Question if "forming within mind" (conceive) is done by choice, and then question if choice represents the response to balance...instead of to the suggested choices by others.
Shakespeare
"to be or not to be"? My ass...."to be" implies "out of"; hence as choice in response to balance. As for William...indeed; WILL I AM.
Seems like purposeful troll brigade. Deliberately create all sorts of unsavory boards to force an emotional reaction and shutdown from whatever authority is available
We already have conpro yes. Which is why I'm certain they weren't done by any genuine member. Anyone familiar with the site would know its redundant and frankly, it be called 'tribe' or something a bit more specific if you catch my drift
First I was a ConPro poster, now I am a woman? Sounds paranoid. Maybe I am just sick of you shitting up the board with your irrelevant posts and retarded comments turning this community into TheImpossible1IncelBlog.win. Seems like a lot of people are. You "flood the platform with the most borderline, unappealing content, in an effort to push away new users."
I dont give a shit about the Jews, Mr Strawman. Your low quality content would make the average Indian embarrassed. As long as you keep incel spamming every day, this community will never grow because you make it worse than reddit.
You were just bragging about having a site of your own to call for the culling of women
Did he? As far as I know, he only claims that women are plotting to 'cull' men, which is of course absurd, but not quite the same as holding the converse position.
It's funny how you, Antonio, and a few others pretend to be tolerant of speech but as soon as it comes to actual far-right ideology the narrative shifts.
No matter how many arguments you lose you're right back to the same thing the day after.
Only reason I say this is, as I said before, you're doing yourself no favors. The far-right is growing whether you like it or not and we are aligned by ideology simply because we are not leftist Bolsheviks. Maligning potential allies because you have a personal grudge with the image of said group given by the media is rather foolish, no?
Don't worry though. The far-right waits with open arms. The pendulum is just about at the apex into far-left nonsense.
The Nazis weren't "far-right". The only "left" and "right" involved was a split within their own ranks, but even the "right" faction wouldn't ever shut up about how socialist they were.
People like Goebbels adored them. To him, Lenin was "the greatest man, second only to Hitler".
I'm talking about now, not then.
Today Nazism is considered a far-right position. Ironically almost entirely because of the Nationalism part.
Can you source this? Goebbels was a propagandist heart and soul and said different things to different people depending on what he wanted the outcome to be.
Calling them "far-right" was a trick by their leftist rivals against the actual right to associate them with something so widely despised. The German "far-right" were the monarchists (not very popular since the monarchy had been discredited by the conduct of the last Kaiser, who just fled before the war that he had started did even end, and then never returned).
You're still doing it.
I'm talking about TODAY.
Nazism is a "right-side" ideology TODAY.
Stop with the word games.
So why can't you guys find anything else to associate with than a disastrously failed and long defunct socialist movement from, as you say, a century ago?
Even Mussolini was inspired by something that lasted way way longer than Hitler's "1,000-year Reich" of 12 years. And even after it did crash and burn even the people who did the burning (the Germans) would come to regret it, and so they would wear the Roman skinsuit to self-identify as the "Holy Roman Empire" (aka the Reich). You're wearing a Nazi skinsuit now, but they were a failure.
Nah the Nazi stuff is more like a badge on a Nascar-style sticker suit.
I like many of the ideas, but it's not all that encompasses my thoughts nor close to the majority.
Again, that's pretty disingenuous.
The NSDAP led Germany would probably have lasted many a year longer if they didn't draw the ire of international finance.
Even had Hitler not invaded Poland war would have been inevitable.
As said above, I can and I do.
I just always find it so fascinating how everything about Nazism must under common social contention become a discussion of how bad it was without ever really discussing WHAT it was.
In my eyes there's no negative association whatsoever. Aspersions are cast blindly without any real appeal. Muh hoilocaust pulls a nice big blanket over the whole affair.
Personally, I blame the attacks on Nazism for the fall of Nationalism as a political concept. That is why I push for it to be discussed so much. Once that taboo is broken it becomes much more likely to have Nationalism rekindled.
Also if it didn't go around invading its neighbors. Or even if it had stopped doing that in 1939, and probably even 1940.
That is a counterfactual that you can't prove and no one can disprove. Maybe, maybe not.
I'm sure nationalism will be much more successful once you associate it with the Nazis.
Before Poland the international community repeatedly did everything they could to avoid the war by just giving Hitler whatever he wanted. Including letting him occupy 2 entire countries.
As for "international finance", Poland that Hitler decided to destroy at all cost was discriminating against Jews even on the small business scale, and had outlandish ideas like sending the Jews away as colonists to Madagascar after aquiring it as an overseas colony (much more realistically, Poland was covertly helping the right-wing Zionists to achieve independence for Palestine from Britain so the Jews would go there - which was also the original Nazi plan before "the resettlement to the east").
Wasn't Hindenburg a monarchist?
Hindenburg was only elected by running against Hitler.
What about the first time when he wasn't bothered by that Bohemian corporal?
Link please for this attempt to slander Goebbels.
I never said that that was a bad thing.
Plenty of black-supremacists and women-supremacists on the left, a lot more then white-supremacists so is clear that a "supremacist" movement does not need to be on the right, in fact it rarely is.
I have issues with what you say, not with what the media says about you.
You're conflating groups and individuals pretty heavily there.
As for what I myself say, what's it matter if you have issues? No one will ever agree completely. On many core issues we are aligned. Why should we be enemies when a common, and much more brutal, enemy stands before us?
That's fine, but let's then focus on defeating the common enemy rather than say, bash the Jews.
Nazis aren’t right wing just another shit flavor of Marxism
Nationalist, anti-LGBTQ, pro second amendment...
Marxist?
Are you fucking retarded?
Sounds like you are. National socialist. And pro second amendment? I guess if you ignore banning whoever the party claimed was the enemy of the state. Only places you can find arguments that the nazis were pro gun are left leaning sites like salon
The NatSocs had less in common with Marxism than does the current-day USA.
Natsocs
Marxism and current-day globohomo USA
Strong traditional family life like Lebensborn. Where they were encouraging young women to have children outside of marriage and if the children were “racially pure” they would then be handed over to the ss to care for and not their parents. Or encourage women of occupied countries to sleep with German officers just to have their children taken from them. Or the 100k-200k children who were kidnapped from Poland. Those deemed pure got stuck with foster parents in Germany and those not were executed.
“Nazi Traditional family life” is shit and anyone who supports it is shit. I’m not interested in fighting against one shitty ideology to replace it with an equally shitty one. Fuck off
We are.
No need to be shy about it.
Firing squad innawoods, not fanciful Rube Goldberg machine. No need to waste bullets either, industrial cattle skull rods are reusable.
But no.
The ultimate victory would be a quick rout of the Bolsheviks and then a slow and methodical movement of culture over a few generations.
There's no reason to execute thought criminals. That has been shown to be wholly ineffective and counterproductive.
Why would we do that?
We pretty much agree on the role of women in society.
Also not a big fan of taxes.
"The Bureaucracy expands to meet the needs of the expanding Bureaucracy."
?
That is pretty unrelated to my post.
When did I ever talk about "women's honor?"
I'm fine with Stormfags as long as they are useful.
So you like yourself, and no one else.
Sounds like a winning coalition.
I like how I have no idea what a tradcon is, not really interested in any far-right buzz wards. You've not given a solution. Should kia2 just move again? Return to reddit? I know a lot still visit both reddit and kia2.win but I've closed my account entirely and not planning to create a new one.
We do not have the power to close a .win site and even if we did, censorship would greatly taint the freedom of speech thing the .win is trying out.
On the other-hand the far-right, actual far-right, are unsavory, dangerous and it can potentially bring a lot more attention to .win then we would like. I would not be surprised that it is now on some FBI monitoring list.
I honestly have no solution here, would be nice to not have actual far-right people all together but is anyone surprised that the real far-right is getting popular? There is a reason why the white-supremacists wanted Biden to win. When the left paints anyone opposing immigration as a white-supremacist then at what point will some of them just say fuck it I guess we are white-supremacists now.
You can obviously see a few who are obvious far-right, I've been seeing more of them for the past few days, but other then observing what exactly can we do?
Did you also complain about TheDonald representing a communist sub? What do you call bailing out banks but communism?
If that offends you; then this is gonna be awkward... https://pic8.co/sh/bA2aBG.jpg
Yes, like Lenin said: "first thing we do, is give capitalist pig in bank trillions of ruble."
Measure 5 of the communist manifesto:
Bakunin pointed this out too:
That is more akin to fascism than communism. Because the banks (plural) are still technically separate entities
Question if all -isms are suggested by the same parasitic few towards the ignorant many who are being deceived into choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law?
Banks that hold the suggested currency (money); while the many ignore the real current aka flow (inception towards death) for the responding form (life) in-between.
Ask yourself why the parasitic few suggest currency; liquidity; (river)banks; floating loans; freezing assets etc. (water allegories)?
If you think me saying that it was more akin to fascism than communism was somehow a defense of either, you are sorely mistaken
It is consent to any suggestion (-ism) that causes the offense. Any suggestion towards your choice tempts "want or not want" consent. If you chose either; you find yourself within the want versus not want conflict (reason). Whatever side you chose will then tempt you to defend yourself against the other side.
That is called division (reason) by suggestion (-ism). Meanwhile in reality...choice represents the response to balance (need/want); which is what the many ignore when falling for the temptation (want over need) of suggestion (want or not want).
Communism; fascism; capitalism; socialism; idealism; feminism; veganism; scientism; metamorphism; individualism and every other suggested -ism are all representing the same foundation of choice...want or not want; hence want over need (temptation of ignorance). Tricking the many into this represents choice (suggesting) to choice (consenting) contract law; which is ignorance of balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
The mass industrialization of the aforementioned contract law (choice to choice) is called RELIGION, noun [Latin religio, to bind anew; re and ligo, to bind.] and the main tool to suggest represents spell-craft aka suggesting idolized meaning (words) over perceived meaning (sound).
Using a 103kb jpg to distribute a virus over a public image hoster...classic cyber-warfare. I could post the big dipper as ASCII art; but spending some quality moments outside under the big swastika in the sky could improve your "well being". If that doesn't suit you; I could teach you a lot about the "Hakenkreuz"; because my hook & cross are said to leave a lasting impact...
I would have the upper hand by resisting the temptation of consenting to suggested fights. You fight for outcomes (beating others), hence consenting to self destruction while doing so; I utilize martial arts for self sustenance; hence within momentum (balance); while resisting temptation (imbalance).
I'm always ready for sparring tho.
I don’t venture out of here anyway, but I think I’ll give it a pass and let the feds talk to each other.
Fuck off, commie.
And I suppose you're impossible? Fuck off commie.
I guess the stormfags bitched and created enough fake accounts that they finally got their own sub. Like XfaggotX is fooling anyone with all his recent handshake sockpuppets. Trying to drum up upvotes with the frequent posts here and elsewhere to make them look legitimate. I am so tired of the admins being fools.
Have you ever considered the idea that maybe far-right ideology is simply becoming more popular?
It's not even moderate right, it's just leftist. Revolutionary leftist. Or "third positionist", in another way they described themselves.
You can't just mix and match political labels and attributions across an almost century-wide gap.
That's incredibly disingenuous.
I'll continue to trust the people who actually invented the swastika as a political symbol.
"Third position" was technically Fascism, an entirely different system but similar, no wonder as it was invented by a former Marxist journalist.
Then you've gone past being disingenuous and are just simply lying.
Equating the political terms of a hundred years ago 1:1 to today, on purpose and understanding the difference, is an act of deceit.
What is "left" and "right" today is not the same as what was "left" or "right" even twenty years ago.
We have to look at the policies, ideals, and actions in regards to modern thought.
Saying that Nazism is today a leftist ideology is a factually untrue statement.
Only if you accept the redefinition by the left. Controlling the narrative (with all these just openly Marxist journalists and political science professors) to turn "right wing" into a bogey man.
I'm fine with "right-wing" being a boogie man.
What's wrong with soyboys being scared of us? It's not like we'll ever convince them anyway. The nonstop assault on our dignity in juxtaposition to our actual character and actions only serves to wake up the normies and bring independents over to the right.
For them (and the Hindus generally) it's a religious symbol. And not just to them, it was so around the world.
This is a specious or at best meaningless argument. What is "far-right ideology"? Your argument below makes it clear that this is a subjective term. Everyone to the "right" of Mao is considered to by far-right by mainstream media today.
Most likely what we're seeing is just a concentration effect. As "far-right" types are banned by big tech sites, they are forced to move to free speech sites. This collects a bunch of deplorables under the same banner that wouldn't normally be in agreement except they aren't Maoists. It also makes the more extreme ideologues appear more numerous (in those communities) than they actually are. If you're unironically a national socialist in 2022 then I'm not in alignment with you on most issues. I don't pretend to know the numbers, but I guess a lot of people here are like me and don't care what lefties think. We think "guilt by association" is bullshit. Doesn't mean we consider ourselves party to YOUR ideology either, even if we tolerate or participate in dialogue with you.
Giving yourself eight hand jobs with a puppet is still just masturbation.
Not particularly charming, but as long as they don't start calling for the gassing of Jews and what not, it should pose no risk to the site as a whole. The problem is that these types cannot be trusted to keep it in their pants.
Are we sure it is not an attempt to take down all the win sites? I know there must be actual nazis somewhere but has anyone ever seen one in real life?
If the guys running that are real nazis then this is why we can't have nice things. I never go outside kia2.win and it would be a bummer to see it closed.
You can never be sure. I'm just commenting on the likelihood of success as long as they behave themselves minimally.
Who poses this risk to the site as a whole? It's as legal to display a swastika as a hammer and sickle, in the US. And the people who would shut down a site for a swastika would shut it down faster for Donald Trump.
That's the janny excuse, that somehow if their sacred cows aren't bowed to then the site will be shut down somehow, by someone that is never actually elaborated.
Basically they still want reddit rules to apply here.
It is not really about legal or illegal. There is plenty of stuff that is legal, but which poses a severe risk. E.g. the Daily Stormer did nothing illegal, but registrars and hosters did a number on it.
The Daily Stormer is wishing me a Happy Eliot Rodger Day. They still seem to be around. If you start yielding before any pressure at all is applied, you're definitely going to lose.
What is the implication of questioning the gas chamber narrative; while "calling for the gassing of jews"?
You should ask the people who do exactly that.
What if using suggested contradictions keeps both sides in conflict with each other?
I am not sure. I assume the people who do 'question' it do so because they don't want to be associated with genocide, while being Nazis.
What if those who suggest genocide by vaccine, and those who suggest that resisting it makes you a nazi; as well as those that claim genocide and those who suggested the brand nazi...were so called ashkenazi?
I cannot conceive you.
You don't have to...my mum already did.
Someone's not familiar with King Lear.
Suggested his-story by the few; which aims to explain "understanding" aka standing under suggested information by others; while ignoring to grow comprehension within self by adaptation to perceived inspiration.
Question if "forming within mind" (conceive) is done by choice, and then question if choice represents the response to balance...instead of to the suggested choices by others.
"to be or not to be"? My ass...."to be" implies "out of"; hence as choice in response to balance. As for William...indeed; WILL I AM.
Before clicking this thread I saw a ratio that was "0 points, almost 100 replies [96]" and just knew this would be a shitshow of a thread.
🍿
What are you talking about...? What sub?
Seems like purposeful troll brigade. Deliberately create all sorts of unsavory boards to force an emotional reaction and shutdown from whatever authority is available
We already have conpro yes. Which is why I'm certain they weren't done by any genuine member. Anyone familiar with the site would know its redundant and frankly, it be called 'tribe' or something a bit more specific if you catch my drift
This is disgusting. We should boycott the entire Scored/Win platform and not make any more posts or comments until they remove the sub.
First I was a ConPro poster, now I am a woman? Sounds paranoid. Maybe I am just sick of you shitting up the board with your irrelevant posts and retarded comments turning this community into TheImpossible1IncelBlog.win. Seems like a lot of people are. You "flood the platform with the most borderline, unappealing content, in an effort to push away new users."
I dont give a shit about the Jews, Mr Strawman. Your low quality content would make the average Indian embarrassed. As long as you keep incel spamming every day, this community will never grow because you make it worse than reddit.
[citation needed]
Are the ConPro users in the room with you now?
Did he? As far as I know, he only claims that women are plotting to 'cull' men, which is of course absurd, but not quite the same as holding the converse position.
Really? I thought he was one of the reasonable users here.